2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

So we need some force strong enough to turn the phone into shrapnel but I'm not convinced it has to be an implanted bomb. I'm wondering though, just like I wonder some weirdness about the towers kinda turning into dust. Nothing would suprise me anymore and I think there is usually some weirdness afoot and whatever everyone's talking about, I wanna look at other possibilities, crazy as they may seem. Truth is stranger than fiction, in my opinion.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not entirely sure. I'm wondering about the chemicals in the batteries and somehow directing frequencies tuned to make it blow up. Sounds wild, if true.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even more cool, this makes me wish I could talk to this really cool chemistry teacher I had in HS, he ended up retiring soon after, I think, ahahaha not my fault, I was a fantastic student and I'm not being facetious! (That's an inside joke between me and my brain about that teacher always using that word, great guy)

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you have a link to what he's saying? I can look later if not edit: got it

https://tass.com/world/1844493

Just to be clear, he may be cool but I don't trust him either.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is interesting and could very well be true Edit: the fact that most people are agreeing it's bombs makes me want to investigate because I just don't believe anyone.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have you never seen a magic trick? If they say look here, something is probably going on somewhere else, distraction, illusion, whatever it's called.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

No but I understand it pretty alright, I think

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

It could be staged but I doubt it because where we live there's a whole lotta people that see no value in human life.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey man, the brain damage is a side issue

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure it was a comment you made that got me thinking, cheers.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not trying to do anything but find out if this is possible. I really didn't think it would be upsetting

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it can be done, I would wager it could be directed.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm trying to find out what's going on. I don't know if it's a simple as planted bombs, but it could be.

I'm trying to look at articles of what they've already figured out to see if it could be twisted to this purpose of the OP.

I don't know anything but I'm extremely curious.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

So your alternative is to sell electronivs with bombs inside? Seems like too mank moving parts, to me. I do appreciate your perspective and evil lurks in all places.

Perhaps I get hyper on the possibilities of technology I don't fully understand. I'm still gonna keep looking.

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they don't want you to think it's possible, but yes my theory is anything with a radio signal can be 'bombed' and I'm even wondering if having a battery could be hijacked but I no engineer and I'm not all that smart but I can't get rid of the thought and it's worth looking into on the off chance to bring the darkness to light.

Thanks for your encouragement!

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://archive.fo/2024.09.19-153926/https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/sci-tech/electromagnetic-waves-used-to-detonate-landmines/29525168

the team discovered that despite the wide range of deadly makeshift bombs, they all had similar frequency ranges, explained Mora. “So we developed a system that concentrates on those, and thus loses less energy,” he added.

They successfully tested their system in Colombia last November and again in January 2011 using improvised mines provided by a team of professional bomb disposal experts. The devices were remotely set off at an average distance of 20 metres.

Also see AI and RF:

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/371438/why-dont-radio-waves-ruin-electronics

Curious about this comment:

If the radio waves are strong enough, they can easily destroy electronics devices. But they need to be very, very strong and able to penetrate the case of the device to do so.

The electromagnetic whiplash (called electromagnetic pulse or EMP) of an atomic or nuclear explosion is sudden enough and strong enough to induce very large currents in metal objects tens to hundreds of km away from the blast. Those currents are sufficient to blow up high-voltage power line switchgear and fry the semiconductor junctions inside all sorts of solid-state electronic devices. To survive, military electronics as used in the battlefield and in aircraft must be carefully "hardened" against EMP with special shielding techniques.

In the case of light: If the box enclosing the electronics is colored plastic or metal, sunlight will not make it inside. Even if it could, the wavelength of the light is far, far shorter than the dimensions of the circuit board with the electronics on it, and so electric currents will not be induced in the board by having sunlight fall on it.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-ai-is-starting-to-influence-wireless-communications (2019)

https://scored.co/p/19952xBa7T
I posted this yesterday and it doesn't explain this incident per se but it does give an overview of their ambitions and current capabilities.

https://archive.fo/2024.09.19-160419/https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/whats-the-frequency-an-ai-algorithm-can-help-with-that

https://archive.fo/2024.09.19-161622/https://lieber.westpoint.edu/gospel-lavender-law-armed-conflict/

5
Thisisnotanexit 5 points ago +5 / -0

That sounds like a lot of effort. I think it's possible to detonate electronics remotely using frequency. I'm archiving an article that did this with IEDs in Columbia 2011, stay tuned.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speaker: Karen Haigh, PhD consultant in Cognitive EW and embedded AI

Abstract:
This presentation will highlight how artificial intelligence (AI) can be used in electronic warfare (EW). AI enables EW systems to respond more quickly and effectively to battlefield conditions with complex and novel emitters. The presentation will touch on AI techniques for electronic support (ES), electronic protect (EP), electronic attack (EA), and electronic battle management (EBM). It will describe how to handle real-time in-mission learning, motivate why this capability is crucial, and present ideas on how to evaluate a system that learns during a mission. The presentation is based on the book “Cognitive Electronic Warfare: An Artificial Intelligence Approach.”

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know what you mean, I guess you're insulting me?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›