Genetic modification
You're boring pllbbt
This is the PDF
The last orby thing in the video reminds me of the demons from Howl's Moving Castle. .
I'm exploring edit: PSA: I cannot control the auto play and I apologize for that, I'll figure it out for next time. Edit2: original channel: https://www.bitchute.com/video/0ndFkJyHY7UJ/
Awaked cato
I'm not so sure, last time I think they tried to pull down the heavens.. something about a tower.. either way, babylon will fall. (Edit: they tried to make themselves gods)
Hmmpf, how dare they... (I'll go read it now: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Utopia-by-More)
As profound as philosophy can be, it can also be garbagey
(It matters what it's rooted in, this is funny to me on a few levels)
I wouldn't even say milder. It is absolutely insane how these cults work dude, stuff you'd never think of doing, these people get hijacked man. Satanic ritual abuse.
I'll most likely give this a watch, I'm curious about all cults but this one in particular. There's a movie called 'Going Clear' that was pretty good if you wanna check it out. Edit: also hubbard was friends with jack parsons and he just got a show too, don't watch it, this stuff is being glorified I think.
ABSTRACT
While AI systems are increasingly assuming roles traditionally occupied by human epistemic authorities (EAs), their epistemological status remains unclear. This paper aims to address this lacuna by assessing the potential for AI systems to be recognized as artificial epistemic authorities. In a first step, I examine the arguments against considering AI systems as EAs, in particular the established model of EAs as engaging in intentional belief transfer via testimony to laypeople – a process seemingly inapplicable to intentionless and beliefless AI. Despite this, AI systems exhibit striking epistemic parallels with human EAs, including epistemic asymmetry and opacity that give rise to comparable challenges for both laypeople and AI users. These challenges include the identification problem – how to recognize reliable EAs/AI systems – and the deference problem – determining the appropriate epistemic stance towards EAs/AI systems. Faced with this dilemma, I discuss three possible solutions: 1. reject the concept of artificial EAs, 2. accept that AI can possess beliefs and intentions and thus align with the standard model, or 3. develop an alternative model that encompasses artificial EAs. I argue that while each option has its benefits and costs, a particularly strong case can be made for option 3.
There's that and more to the trans agenda I think.
“TESCREAL bundle,” which includes Transhumanism, Extropianism, Singularitarianism, (modern) Cosmism, Rationalism, Effective Altruism, and Longtermism.
c) Nature doesn't call...it moves hunger and thirst through each being; which forces adaptation by inspiring resistance (need), while tempting ignorance (want).
This is very interesting, thanks!
This is interesting because I do think the silence in battle is the preferrable option, only speaking God's truth will really subdue though, I think. Even if they scream and cry about it haha
edit: also reminds of the song 'Speak Life' by TobyMac
I agree the big bang and evolution are misnomers presented as facts when they are only theories, with not much to back it up, but I'm no scientist.
I think God spoke the world into existence, which is frequency stuff, and I think matter is made up of vibrating strings according to that frequency. I also think evil is always trying to divert this to their own meddling in an unseen war where we are cannon fodder. We don't have to be the ammunition, we can choose differently.
"They're here"
we should have our own round table on these things.
That sounds highly pessimistic and manipulatable. Where does free will (edit: of choice) and choosing good (God) things come in?
Edit: I might be misunderstanding, but I doubt it and unfortunately this book is not high on my priority list. Here's some more quotes: https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/16335152-crome-yellow
Edit2: the end of this chapter reminded me of you: https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/19A1QIRa9m/a-pilgrims-regress-book-two-chap/c
But He designed everything. So my thinking is what have we got that nothing else has..
We agree!
A spirit, with a soul that has a body.
They will pull any and all strings at their disposal, do not comply and do not be deceived.
(I haven't watched it all yet, was busy today, but I'll finish tonight) I wonder about this perversion happening and I'm curious what the future holds since I find everyone in power corrupt and in contempt of the Messiah Jesus. I don't think it's too far fetched to imagine a time (that I think is close) in which His followers are killed, by beheading, with guillotines most likely. I don't really care who does it or where they were born.