▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please, everyone, show this to people who believe everything in the news media. Demonstrate to them that what they are allowed to read and see is carefully created to shape their opinions rather than inform them.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems that criticism of China is reliably met with snide remarks about Jews. Has it occurred to you that you are actually helping the Chinese Communist Party by discrediting negative information about what they do?

▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

He is being erased from Wikipedia as we speak.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RNA_vaccine&type=revision&diff=1028745616&oldid=1028745391

It is ironic that the sockpuppet accounts doing big pharma's ditry work claim that having the names of study authors in this case represent a conflict of interest, self-promotion and a conspiracy theory. Just try--as an individual and not a public relations project--to make and edit and justify it with "fuck off" as they have done here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RandomCanadian

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

My opinion on this topic is primarily informed by Mareck's syndrome. There appear to be forces at work hoping to take advantage of that phenomenon in their genocidal goal of reducing the populations of developing countries--people they colloquially refer to as useless eaters.

But that doesn't sufficiently explain (at least not to me) how the virus emerged to begin with. Either China deliberately released it so it would look like a lab leak with a flimsy food market cover story or it actually was an escaped virus and they panicked (or maybe something else entirely).

In any case, https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE67207_a.html

It is from 2009 and concerns chemical and biological weapons (CBW)--mentioning a lab in Wuhan specifically.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your questions don't address what I wrote, which concerns the world's emergency measures in response to China's biological attack. Your gish gallop is distracting people away from my message. I am not an expert, but I can give you my opinions if you want.

  1. I am guessing buried or cremated mostly. Are you implying that there are hundreds of thousands of phantom death statistics with no bodies to back them up?

  2. Again, I am presuming that the families are holding funerals for their loved ones. Can you show that there are large numbers of deceased on paper that don't have burial plots?

  3. Flu statistics reporting has been suspended due to the pandemic. I suspect it is still there.

  4. HCQ and Ivermectin has been suppressed as it is my understanding that it is illegal in America to administer fast tracked vaccines when there are treatments available, so to keep the shots legal, they pretending that those medications don't work.

  5. The "officials" don't have any idea and are relying upon experts who know quite a bit but not everything and even have conflicting opinions--what is known changes over time and we still don't know it all.

  6. They hope they work a teeny tiny bit to prevent the mask wearer from coughing droplets onto people which could make a significant difference in Rate of spread and number of people needing concurrent hospitalization and resources. They don't think they actually DO work, but they aren't completely sure, so they tell people that's what they should do. There's also a huge public relations aspect to masks.

  7. They are seizing the opportunity to legally tighten their grip on society.

  8. Profit, future "tracking and tracing", access to your medical records, getting symptomless disease carriers to incubate deadlier mutations and travel to places where the shots haven't been rolled out to kill off impoverished people in the developing world.

  9. The China Model: ratchet up the ability to only allow people to see what they want them to see. It's not unconstitutional if the government (deep state) has a third party to do their dirty work for them.

So, now that your questions have been answered, we can go back to discussing this act of war by China, correct?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I've figured it out.

We are under biological attack from China. The shots are our defence. We had to deploy them as quickly as possible and there was no time to test them fully. Chances are it is better to receive one, but there is a chance it will make things worse. So it's better if a significant number of people actually don't get the shots, otherwise it would be like putting all of our eggs in one basket. The way they have chosen to do this is to politicize the issue.

While they're at it, they are using all the new refrigerated trucks to deploy a quantum network. With so many of these trucks going all over the world, it will be impossible for our enemies to know where to disrupt it.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's interesting. I do work at large companies that explicitly require using hand sanitizer in order to reduce production delays due to sick leave. They are very influential. For example, they tell the local government which roads to fix first so as to avoid damaging sensitive equipment during truck transport. It is plausible to me that employers are behind propaganda efforts aimed at workers regardless of the American FDA.

Hand sanitizer is also ubiquitous in hospitals and clinics where I live. Are they really spending money on something that has no basis in science? These healthcare workers are using it to justify washing their hands less frequently.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

They heavily promoted hand sanitizer on local media outlets where I live. They just say what they are told to say.

The reason they did this is because using hand sanitizer can reduce bacterial illness and therefore sick leave from work.

They can say something to the effect of "Protect yourself against Coronavirus. Use hand sanitizer." Do you see how they did not say that hand sanitizer has anything to do with protecting yourself against Coronavirus?

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

The actions of individuals render something unable to be taken seriously. Seriously?

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Five to six times lower than what?

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point. There are also about a million ways that US intelligence can funnel money to them through "advertisers."

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kyle actually made me cringe worse than Milo did.

Here's an actual conspiracy from the linked video at 5:27 https://youtu.be/zg2Z7dTTJjM?t=327

"I think we need to infiltrate it." Just like the Democrats have been infiltrated.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's fine to use the words misinformation and disinformation. The latter implies that the person conveying the message is in on the deception.

Propaganda can be truthful.

▲ 10 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 10 points ago +10 / -0

Research Democrat occupations and sit-ins of the United States Capitol (as well as other capitol buildings) and you will see that this is something they did and supported until their political opposition did it. They did this as recently as 2016 and 2017. Now doing so is an "insurrection."

▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

It has always been a tool to pit the lower class against itself.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is good that scientists and doctors are able to collaborate so well now. It's an achievement. That it happened during the Trump administration is coincidental.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could it treat symptoms?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that what the book calls for? Thanks for the info.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, that's the opposite of what should be done. We need people to copy and paste good information in various places so it's harder to censor. In fact, that's why so many things ARE in picture form. It's done deliberately to make it harder for people like us to find it.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unknown. Mark Zuckerberg was right about that one.

I suspect China may have a "part two" to this virus already developed that will exterminate people who have already been infected and the various mRNA shots are a desperate measure to mitigate that--even if it injures or kills people. We can't tell the public. We can't reveal that we know what they are doing. So we just do our best to save as many people as possible, even without knowing all the details.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like how you think. I just see a lot of thought-terminating cynicism in forums. The issue is about actual cheating currently going on in US elections. We can't allow ourselves to simply accept it because of "conventional wisdom" that it's all just a game among the elites.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›