Worse than Watergate.
This is just manufactured outrage. What percentage of the likely millions of people who saw this in the supermarket were outraged?
There is nothing here to indicate she is a "eunuch," and certainly nothing "Talmudic" going on.
I've thought about that, but I think it would be the entire win platform. I think a smoking gun would be cases in which there are between 0-2 downvotes for something and more than that number come forward to say that they downvoted. That would mean the voting system is wrong.
I am curious how that works.
How is something like this relevant here? This is just the excuse for them to pass laws banning more speech that goes against the new one party in America.
No, it's not better.
From the little I've read, they did things like remotely monitor the DNS lookups. That's different from hidden listening devices and the like.
Wow. Nice find. A few things:
This guy was "Head of Community Development" or some such, not "Global Head Of Facebook".
Can this old looking guy really be only 35?
I'm curious how old the decoy really is.
Here's the full video (renamed):
Facebook Executive caught. He was Talking to a 13 y/o boy! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDbMDy2e44w
EDIT: This is (obviously) not a police sting operation. Also, the conspiracy here could lie in the way this guy is going to get tossed under the bus or coverage is biased or even suppressed. This reminds of me of CNN producer John Griffin. Just know that the (good) conspiracy to snare these people is massive.
Here is what Donald Trump had to say about media coverage of the spying.
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/news-bftrqz2yzp1588
Why isn’t the media asking who gave Crooked Hillary Clinton’s “plumbers” their orders? With Watergate it was the coverup that turned out to be the far bigger crime. With Hillarygate it is the Mainstream Media Coverup that is almost as big of a crime as the act of treasonous espionage itself. It is showing the world why our media is truly the enemy of the people!
I can't believe he's actually right. Did he pay Glenn Greenwald to write it?
We might be able to verify this with tools like youtube-dl and a media analyzer.
What is a conpro?
I think we all get the gist.
People who write good things need their voices amplified, not muffled. Traffic helps. You don't have to support content creators, but I choose to.
This video says nothing about Downdetector.ca being instructed to fake data.
7 hours now
1 post: 627 post score
0 comments: 16 comment score
I don't get the joke.
TIME OUT --> Can we all stop with the fucking Twitter link posting? Not only is it annoying to load but for saving/sharing wise, if it does not have a video, screenshot and upload image. Stop giving Twitter traffic. Stop making us load Twitter traffic.
I will not be doing this. The entire reason big government tech blocks content is to prevent it from going viral. Offering only screenshots has negative side effects:
- It terminates the sharing chain.
- It prevents copying and pasting the text.
- It removes hyperlinks to additional information
- It prevents searching.
- It makes it difficult to determine if the content is real or has been faked.
- Looking at the image will not tell us if a post has been flagged or deleted, nor if an account has been suspended or terminated. We should be aware if things are censored.
- It lowers the number of hits, thereby depriving the creators of recognition, the sense of making a difference and knowing the extent to which their work has reached others.
It is like putting the megaphone of social media on mute. I will share social media links rather than screenshots.
Thank you!
What I was looking for was some context and verification.
Newsweek's lousy title to this article is:
Trump Suggests Clinton Operatives Deserve Death for 'Spying Operation'
What a piece of trash news outlet.
It's more nuanced, but there is now low tolerance for speaking outside the narrative on numerous topics.
This is part of a move toward adopting Chinese-style authoritarianism. They have branded their dictatorship "The China Model."
I was unable to find this on Google. The actual interview starts at 4:30.
Oh, they are antigovernment now. Okay.
I think nukes are real.
Misleading title.