I've thought about that, but I think it would be the entire win platform. I think a smoking gun would be cases in which there are between 0-2 downvotes for something and more than that number come forward to say that they downvoted. That would mean the voting system is wrong.
Did you really just join 4 hours ago already with 496 post score & 14 comment score with no comments?
7 hours now
1 post: 627 post score
0 comments: 16 comment score
Obviously fake points which gets me thinking - how much of conspiracy.win is fake?
I've thought about that, but I think it would be the entire win platform. I think a smoking gun would be cases in which there are between 0-2 downvotes for something and more than that number come forward to say that they downvoted. That would mean the voting system is wrong.
What is your point?
I am curious how that works.
..... Wtf?
I literally checked my bank when that bs was running yesterday. No lag....fake news...panic sell market bs
This video says nothing about Downdetector.ca being instructed to fake data.