If Jesus was a real historical figure how come we don't have any records. First author who mentions Jesus is the Apostle Paul and he's writing in the 50s. Jesus died around the year 30. So, the first time we have Jesus mentioned in any source is about 20 years after his death.
"If something happened 2000 years ago, how come there are no surviving records to our day but the only records we have date back to 1970 years ago?" This is the entirety of your argument.
Why are you trying to interpret what you think I said? you have nothing better to do?
Good job attacking the argument, since it's obvious you have no idea what I said. I think you almost reached a level of coherency resembling a toddler.
If Jesus was a real historical figure how come we don't have any records. First author who mentions Jesus is the Apostle Paul and he's writing in the 50s. Jesus died around the year 30. So, the first time we have Jesus mentioned in any source is about 20 years after his death.
"If something happened 2000 years ago, how come there are no surviving records to our day but the only records we have date back to 1970 years ago?"
This is the entirety of your argument. Do you find it compelling?
Meanwhile Plato's earliest manuscripts date back to 14c after his death but no sane person would dare say Plato didn't exist.
Why are you trying to interpret what you think I said? you have nothing better to do?
I'm attacking your argument and if you think it's a strawman you can demonstrate that. What's the point of framing and doing meta commentary?
This is an open forum, isn't it? Why do you ask stupid question?
Good job attacking the argument, since it's obvious you have no idea what I said. I think you almost reached a level of coherency resembling a toddler.