The MAGAtards are clueless. The social engineers did a great job with Elon. Everyone either loves him or hates him without realizing he's propped up by the agencies to facilitate the NWO agenda.
It's been this way since the 19th c. with Darwin, Freud, Galton, Malthus, T.H. Huxley and later Einstein. It's an institution created by the Royal Society for indoctrination purposes and for revolutionizing society ushering the NWO. It's an ideology steeped in occultism, transhumanism, naturalism and ancient thought and has little to do with the scientific method. Their main goal was to destroy the traditional Christian society and civilization and its notion of absolute truth and morality, and to erect a technocratic utopia based on relativism and scientism and I'd say they succeeded.
Their model has been the subject of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (he was part of it of course). Bertrand Russel wrote about it in his The Impact of Science on Society, H.G. Wells in his Open Conspiracy and The NWO and Julian Huxley in On living in a Revolution to name a few.
"Early life" checks out
All I see is two bald degenerates sporting a goatee. Both serve the same master.
That's correct. Jews love dialectics and sowing discord, lies, ugliness and degeneracy. The Protocols is their playbook and anyone claiming it's a forgery is blind and dumb to the real life evidence that proves it's not made up.
True, it's over a century now.
That's redundant - just say every serving POTUS in the last few decades is a NWO puppet. "The left" and "the right" are both the same thing known as the uniparty. It's the oldest trick in marketing to idiot consoomers "Pepsi or Coca-Cola"? As if there's a meaningful distinction.
Yes, good point. Even if it were a depiction of the same deity, Ecuadorians would definitely use their own style making it and not copy the style of another culture they have zero knowledge of.
-
someone smuggled Babylonian artefacts and dumped them in the cave where Fr. Crespi found them.
-
Fr. Crespi smuggled them and made it all up as a hoax.
-
Ecuadorian Indians really made those objects depicting some kind of a demon/deity who was also known to the Babylonians.
I'd bet on 1 or 2.
What is a Nazi party? Seems like in 2024 everyone I don't like is a nazi...
There were no books "cut from the Bible" because there was no Bible at the Coucnil of Nicaea. The Church compiled the Bible based on its own tradition. It's a liturgical book meant for services within the Church, not a self help book you read in your closet by your own reading all kinds of bs into it.
Btw the gnostic gospels you refer to were written much later than the original 4 and were either forgeries or made up stories by jews, muslims and heretics. Here's more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZpBoNmEy_g
Space is real but white men didn't went to the moon. Indians did though.
Another retarded convo with you. Why do I even bother.
Just so you know - ad hom is when you insult instead of providing an argument. This is what you did. I provided arguments and THEN insulted you. Big difference there.
Your NASA heroes are freemasonic government agents involved in psy ops. The whole "final frontier" sci-fi narrative is ran by your jewish overlords for normiefags like you. The Moon hoax goes back to the 19th c, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Moon_Hoax
I enjoyed Star Wars as a kid too but I had to grow up eventually.
What happened in 1971, dumb fuck?
You tell me.
Fuck off, zero effort paid shill.
The last supposed crewed moon landing was Apollo 17 in 1972. Can you read slowboy?
No one cares about your strawman. We’re ignoring it because you’re beneath contempt.
Ad homs and no counters. You're doing a great job. Don Pettit said all there was to it. Or do you prefer Buzz Lightyear telling you what people saw on their TV's back in 1969 was animated? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trY88y1XmTs
You're hanging by the audacious lies of 33 degree freemasons and CIA agencies like NASA (formerly JPL ran by Jack Parsons who was a degenerate Thelemite) and have the gall calling me a jewsh shill. Don't you wonder why your overlords deem moon landing skepticism as "dangerous misinformation" and going against the "science"?
"Muh government is owned by jews and psychopaths who constantly run psy ops and lie just about everything but they definitely won't lie about landing on the moon, dawg." Talk about reddit mentality. You're grotesque. This is what truther brainrot does to people.
https://time.com/5628572/elon-musk-moon-landing/
Just 2 more years to slow the spread. Yeah, it's not happening.
Here comes the sperg idiot to the rescue.
You don’t have one.
You have poor comprehension skills. I asked why there was no manned mission to the moon since 1972 and deboonked the stupid excuses given by NASA and their normie fanboys which are 1) we've lost the technology and 2) due to financial reasons.
There have been dozens. Fuck off, paid jewish shill.
Really? Where was the last time people went to the moon?
They do. You’re inventing bullshit out of thin air and thinking we can’t take five seconds to prove you wrong.
That's a rhetorical question - I'm pointing out the contradiction in believing we've lost the technology to go there while there are companies like Space X and while Musk initially wanted to go to the moon but was turned down by congress for no apparent reason.
How about we make a pact that you toaster bath when Musk lands on the Moon, whereas I’ll do the same when he doesn’t, okay coward?
Sure. But I want real and verifiable footage and not some CGI or Kubrick shit.
Dude, you're just reinforcing my point - technology has improved drastically in every aspect and everything is a hundred times cheaper and easier to make than back in the 60's and yet there's no mission to the moon. Explain that. I never made the argument the Saturn V tinfoil duct taped junk was the only method to get there so what you're saying makes no sense. What Don Pettit said was they've lost the technology to go to the moon, not the technology to make a Saturn V. Are you telling me Space X doesn't have the technology to go 400 000 km and back when they're preparing for a manned mission to Mars which is 192.87 million km away?
This is a valid argument but you're deflecting because you know there's no good counter to it. The only hole you pointed out is the bottomless pit between your shoulders.
They never went back because as Don Pettit said "we've lost the technology". Even if NASA can't do it due to financial reasons, Musk wanted to go there but congress barred him. Imagine how many people would be willing to pay for a live feed from the moon - it's a great business model. It makes zero sense not to have missions to the moon for the past 50 years but people believe in ridiculous things especially when they are conditioned since they were little kids. Did you go to space camp?
Women didn't want the vote. The suffragettes were a minority of degenerate spinsters backed up by Abby Rockefeller and the jewish cabal. In fact the anti-suffragette movement was very active but it has been memory holed.
This is why women shouldn't vote.
Even Jung is right sometimes. This world is fallen, of course it's not right.
Lots of the jew rap music of the 90's promoted materialism, drugs, sex, objectification of women, gang activity, drug hustling and selling, stealing, stand offs with cops, etc. Probably not all of it. But the stuff the jews liked to promote did.
They did an it was all by design: https://www.hiphopisread.com/2012/04/secret-meeting-that-changed-rap-music.html
Dr. Day talked about it way back in 1969 if you are familiar with the Day tapes.
They may want to throw him under the bus but I think it's more of a Jeffry Epstein thing - he was running a sex op compromising famous people in the industry. A lot of pop stars and media shills will be destroyed if he talks. He's going to get suicided and I'd bet money on it.
There's nothing here supporting the Immaculate conception dogma. Of course we believe Mary was a virgin and was a saint and that's what the Church fathers reiterate. Immaculate conception refers to her being conceived outside of sin but only Christ is free from the sin of Adam by virtue of His miracle conception. The sin of Adam is part of human nature and Mary was human. Christ cannot be subject to the effects of the original sin because He shares both human and divine nature and His divine nature precludes the possibility of any sin.
The older feast of the Conception of Mary (Conception of St. Anne), which originated in the monasteries of Palestine at least as early as the seventh century, and the modern feast of the Immaculate Conception are not identical in their object.
Originally the Church celebrated only the Feast of the Conception of Mary, as she kept the Feast of St. John's conception, not discussing the sinlessness. This feast in the course of centuries became the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, as dogmatical argumentation brought about precise and correct ideas, and as the thesis of the theological schools regarding the preservation of Mary from all stain of original sin gained strength.
It became the feast of the Immaculate conception but was not the same feast initially. Can you read, fren?
Lol research early Church History. The Easterns were always putting the Emperor before the Pope. Easterns considered the Emperor head of the Church, not the Pope.
Research what symphonia is. The head of the Church was always Christ and both Orthodox and Catholics agree.
Easterns put ethnos before Church, which is why all Eastern "Orthodox" Churches are ethno-centric.
Why, because the liturgy is held in different languages? The Orthodox Church acknowledges the differences of different people and affirms that what matters is the profession of the true faith in accordance to Church tradition, dogma and sacraments. It's not a centralized structure but is synodal and every patriarch has equal authority over their diocese. This is how the Early Church was structured and not after the supreme authority of Rome which is a later development in the west.
You have no Emperor now. You have no unity. You have no universalism. You have constant schism. The only debatable 2 of the 4 marks of the Church you have are Holy and Apostolic. There is no "One" or "Catholic/universal" marks in your church.
Enjoy your universalist ecumenism - sharing the same God as muslims and hindus. This is what Vatican II says. This is what your pope says. Isn't it bizarre you have popes who embrace Islam straight up contradicting the Catholic Church tradition which used to call crusades against those guys? Even a century back you have a pope who condemned Islam as a satanic heresy and now you have popes praying in mosques, kissing the Quran and teaching Islam is as valid as Christianity.
Again, the problems you have with heretical popes collapse the whole system because according to your dogma the Roman pontiff cannot be a heretic and apostatize. This is not the case in Orthodoxy as I pointed out with Athanasius so even if both Kirill and Bartholomew are heretics that doesn't render Orthodoxy false. You can't reconcile that and if you think you can I'd love to see you go on Jay Dyer's debate streams on jewtube and try.
Strawman. Space is real. What's fake is space travel and the NASA sci-fi stories.