What's wrong with the horizon?
Everyone is free to do whatever they like but they will suffer the consequences eventually. Libtards are like kids not understanding that simple concept.
He's been diagnosed with aphasia and that was announced in 2022. I never saw anything about it before that. Guess what aphasia is commonly caused by? A stroke. Guess what caused strokes en masse starting 2021? The clot shot. I personally know a couple of people who got strokes and heart attacks shortly after the shot and thousands such cases have been reported but also there's a surge in neurodegenerative diseases. Could be other reasons in Willis' case but Occam's razor tells me it was the shot. Yes, I do think celebrities got it because they are divorced from reality and basically normies.
It's the jibby-jab.
I've wasted time too but generally I spend it much more productively, yes. I played games too and still get the urge and download some old game but if it starts sucking me in for more than a few hours I just uninstall it. It's not just games but TV, social media, pron or anything designed to waste your time, pacify you and make you apathetic to real life. It's not worth it.
The benefit of living a healthy productive life and not spending thousands of hours in fantasy land/metaverse. Men who are addicted to fantasies and waste too much time in recreational activities cannot be trusted to follow their duties in society. They are weak and everyone suffers, including themselves.
What did Farage say?
Yes, I believe we're in the same boat. I'm not afraid to admit I am wrong and bear the consequences. We're all playing 4D chess at this point exploring uncharted territories with these technologies. I'm very much against AI and have never used it outside of checking it out. You're smart to hedge some BTC even if you don't believe in it and I'm pretty much in the same situation because I hold more gold than BTC and look for real estate too. People who are not smart about investment will be enslaved by the NWO - the rest may still have a chance and build sustainable communities. Good talk.
A transfer from one anonymous wallet to another is anonymous regardless of it staying on the ledger forever. BTC is not any more speculative than other assets like gold or the dollar which are entirely controlled by the central bankers and that's not just speculation like in the case with BTC. Its value is the technology itself and it being the biggest p2p network in existence. There are already countries that recognize BTC like El Salvador. Volatility will come down with time but it's going to the moon. It already achieved the 100k milestone that critics thought was impossible because the bubble would burst "any time now".
At the end you present a false dichotomy as if there are no other choices. There are already crypto that are more privacy focused and less network intensive than Bitcoin. We could also attempt to avoid a world digital currency altogether, though that's unlikely to happen because tptb love their control
I already acknowledged BTC is not the best currency-wise because it's a store of value like gold. There's a reason people don't trade using gold ingots and coins anymore. More practical cryptos can be tethered to BTC. If it's a false dichotomy you should be able to present the alternatives that have all the strengths and less weaknesses than BTC. Currently BTC is a safeguard against government overreach and I'd rather have money there than in my bank account. If that changes and BTC turns becomes a tool of the technocratic elite, I'll admit I was wrong.
We're not going back to the good ol' pirate days even though I'd like that because I love gold and stack it - the future is digital whether we like it or not. I don't even use a smartphone, I plan to live in the country and I'm against digital payment but reality is reality.
Dude, I've been barking at BTC for 10 years, I know all the talking points and criticisms.
It is absolutely relevant that the NSA released SHA256 and would not do so without being able to break it, but more than that, if you think so highly of the technology you should be able to explain how it works and why it succeeds in the ways you claim it succeeds.
Guess where all the technology you're using, including the internet and modern cryptography comes from? Ultimately, you're always putting your trust in the system that creates and maintains the technology. It's inevitable unless you build and maintain it yourself.
You don't buy and sell cash, you are buying and selling bitcoin because it's being used as a speculative asset and not a currency.
Yes, BTC is mostly used as a store of value like gold. And just like gold, you can tether currency to facilitate transactions of said value.
Also you claim full anonymity but it's not fully anonymous, because everything is tied to a wallet and I'd be surprised if there's no way for a motivated person to trace your wallet to you (how are you paying for this Bitcoin, for instance?).
Depends on how serious you are on staying anonymous. There is a way to open a wallet that's not tied in any way to your ID. But even if I grant some hacker still can trace you that applies to any transaction you make, including cash.
It's either BTC which is a decentralized blockchain money with limited supply or Fed ran CBDC programable social credit monopoly money. That's the future and it shouldn't be a tough choice. If you have an alternative I'll hear it out.
I was against BTC thinking it's a scam and then coping that it's not "real money" until last year when I finally took the L and bought in. Why would I have to explain how the encryption works (btw I have an idea because I was a web developer and handled streams that are encrypted that way)? I guess you're alluding that some entity behind the technology may have the key to decrypt the transaction hash? There are no 100% guarantees in cryptography and any system has vulnerabilities.
As I said, unless you have evidence BTC (not CBDC or some shitcoin that uses the blockchain technology) is used by tptb for nefarious purposes like tracking and tracing every transaction and destroying anonymity through digital id there's nothing more to talk about. Right now I can own, buy and sell BTC in full anonymity just like with cash.
And you will never convince anyone who thoughtlessly made money on Bitcoin that it's bad
You will, once it is used in the manner you suggest. It won't be though. Meanwhile you're just dissing an alternative to fiat money and the central banking system and coping for not buying BTC by pretending you took the high ground. Come back when you have the receipts.
Was he dancing though?
All post-WWII USSR Communists, including leadership was extreme internationalists so highliting one etnicity over another was a no go. Simple as that.
That doesn't make sense. The West has been ruled by fanatical internationalists since WWII also and that didn't stop them. J.D. Rockefeller calls himself "a proud internationalist" in his autobiography.
Meanwhile, any buptized Orthodox Christian will be penanced by church for visiting sinagogue according to canonical rules
Most won't care. What percentage of children even go to Church?
RUSSIA is a former Soviet Republic. The people in the Soviet Union were provided with the official Soviet view of the Nazis as, above all, enemies of communism and with the war as less about the Holocaust and more about the heroism of the Russian people.
According to Russian Holocaust scholar Ilya Altman, “from the mid-1940s until the late 1980s, the Holocaust was omitted from school and university textbooks, encyclopedias, and monographs for exclusively political reasons. The ideological mechanisms of forgetting the memory assumed different forms: omitting it in silence, distorting historical facts, and direct falsification.” Holocaust education in RUSSIA, then, really began in the early 1990s, following the formal disintegration of the Soviet Union. read more
https://www.salzburgglobal.org/multi-year-series/hegp/pageId/4958
Seems like you were right there. But still things changed after the fall of the regime. I didn't know how the Holocaust was presented in the USSR but I knew the Red Army helped get the narrative going. I remember reading that they came up with the insane initial figures of the victims in Auschwitz but looks like they exported their propaganda to the west.
They relish in ugliness, lies, desecration and brutality.
This is not the case in Russia and never was in USSR.
Come on, no one demonized the Germans quite as the Soviets and they sure as hell didn't miss the golden opportunity to blame them for "the greatest genocide in history". There is tons of evidence of Soviet propaganda on the Holocaust starting right after the war - no one shilled for the jews harder than the commies (at least up until the 60's). And that makes sense, because it was the Red Army that "liberated" those camps. I will bring the receipts if you insist that's not true.
Look, Russians are such Holocaust deniers that they erected a memorial synagouge-museum in their capital city. https://cja.huji.ac.il/hmm/browser.php?mode=set&id=21925
Anyways I admit there is nuance to the problem and the party policy may have changed throughout time.
Exactly. The whole "muh constitutional rights" is a thing of the past. You may have rights on paper but de facto you are a slave to the zionist NWO and WILL be punished for wrongthink.
You're right, I didn't have to surrender the mott at all. I could easily disprove your claim and say that your constitution will be made void on demand because it already has been multiple times after 9/11 and during the coof. You have rights until you don't have them because tptb have taken them by force and they don't care about made up rights on a paper - they keep the illusion so that normies and magatards don't get fidgety. Actions speak louder than words.
Strange - you readily attack krypto but not fiat? You've been sitting on the Fed's cock for so long that you've forgotten it's all up your ass.
CERN and NASA
Also, vaccines and green energy.
It may not be outright illegal but you'd be labeled a far right dangerous extremist and you will be denied services because of poor social credit score. You may even get imprisoned for being blacklisted as a domestic terrorist and attending a rally like the poor bastards at J6. As we saw during the coof, people who didn't comply with the narrative suffered the consequences in their social and professional life. Have you forgotten how the constitution got suspended with an executive order because of a "crisis"? Bill Cooper warned about this even before 9/11.
Praising WWII enemies and denial of their war crimes on the territory of USSR is criminalised in Russia. Holocaust denial is in no way fall into any of this categories.
According to mainstream history, the most notorious of the Nazi war crimes is the purported Holocaust. How can it not fall into this category?
In fact it was precisely the USSR regime that concocted the biggest lies and propagandized the hoax. The communist regime was primarily jewish and propped up by foreign jewish financing and logistics even after Stalin's purge. It was the first country to criminalize antisemitism and ban the Protocols. Jews were only kept at bay during the Imperial days but they managed to kill the Tzar and topple the empire just like they always do. Let's not forget parts of Russia are the former Khazarian khaganate which is where 90% of todays jews come from and where Chabad-Lubavitch was founded.
Russia is the most important country for the jews along with Israel, Switzerland and the US.
It's an old PR trick - make one candidate outright insane so that the other could always look good by comparison.
It doesn't matter if they were puritans and pious, the seed was there and it blossomed into what the US is today. Protestantism always runs counter to conservatism because it's a progressive theological stance that rejects historical tradition of Christianity. It's also always revolutionary, because it rejects Church authority and makes every person into "their own pope", so it's based on relativism and individualism.
Communism is an escalation of the Reformation but it's within the same revolutionary ethos and surprise, it's the jews again behind it. International jewry loves their revolutions especially when royal heads roll and newly democratic puppet governments fall in their hands. This is what happened in England in 1640, in France in 1790, in Russia in 1917 and Germany and the rest of the free world during the world wars.
This is not an excuse of RC because the Western Church started falling away centuries before Huss, Luther and Calvin. In a very big way, Rome started the process when they started adopting new heterodox doctrines and made a single man a head of the Church, when historically the Early Church was synodal.
Simp detected.