I agree but anyone who has red Machiavelli and knows how jews operate can reach to the same conclusion. I stumbled on this "paper" because I was looking into Machiavelli's early life. There was a reason I wanted to perform the check.
b) Reality cannot be moral...a being within reality can choose to respond moral or immoral to one another aka start a fictitious conflict of reason, while ignoring reality.
If reality is not fundamentally moral then there's no objective standard for morality which renders the concept of morality meaningless. In such a universe, a being cannot choose to "be moral or immoral" but only to follow his subjective preferences or adhere to an arbitrary socially constructed law.
How are hunger and thirst moral or immoral?
They aren't, because morality requires a free will agent acting in the world. Morality is an attribute of a person. It's either a choice to move towards the good (God) or away from it.
The Protocols were very popular before WWII. They were discussed in mainstream media and in high level circles. They were first banned by the bolsheviks and then after WWII were declared forgery and any other even slightly nuanced position was deemed antisemitic and wiped from public discourse.
Recently, NWO propagandist Umberto Eco was tasked with writing the Prague Cemetery as a psy op to present a modern day reference on the forgery claims and to anticipate the inevitable wave of people noticing patterns and getting to know about the Protocols through their research after 9/11 and with the advance of the internet.
I don't think they are trapped in moralism because ultimate reality is indeed moral. The problem is they don't acknowledge that their rulers don't adhere to such a framework, but that they are beyond good and evil. The masses are deceived because they mostly play by the rules and can't comprehend how it could be otherwise. But jews never play by the rules - they want to define the rules, they want to be God.
Then why are you here, dumbass? If the board is stupid why do you participate? There are two options: you're either a shill or a troll. If you're a shill at least you're getting paid. If you're a troll that's sad because you're just wasting your time or maybe you're too desperate for attention.
Are you a lone wolf type of guy? A sigma? You're like the edgy rebel kid saying everything is stupid. Can't wait to hear what your beliefs are besides thrashing Christianity which is very edgy indeed - all the cool people at reddit are doing it.
I'm pretty sure I do. Do you believe the universe is something like what I described? Are you a materialist/physicalist? Do you believe in objective truth and free will?
Ad homs are not an argument. Hit me back when you have one, coper.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Wait, Unz is jewish?
Arthur Koestler - not a self-hating jew by any means, but his book The Thirteenth Tribe popularized the theory about the Khazarian origin of Ashkenazi jews. He later tried to backtrack it.
Maybe because people who strive towards truth eventually find the ultimate Truth who is the person of Jesus Christ. Nothing makes sense otherwise and it's just coping with the inevitable nihilism. What's the point of exposing anything if everything is meaningless and we're just insignificant mortal specks arbitrary thrown in the vast emptiness of space and time by some random explosion out of nothing?
The US constitution is a made up social construct. It only has objective grounding in reality as far as it is based on Christian morals. Secularism is inevitably relativistic and arbitrary (because it lacks an objective standard for morals and truth which in Christianity is God). But the Christian worldview is objectively true and not a human construct, regardless if people accept or reject it and everyone will be judged accordingly, meaning that there is ultimate justice and consequences of one's action.
I believe we are as much body as we are soul and mind and that the soul is immortal. So the soul isn't controlling you because the soul is you, it is the free will agent while the mind is the knowing and rational agent. The body is the physical agent that allows you to interact with the world, the vehicle for the mind and the soul.
What else would be the "I"? It surely is not just the body because you can loose parts of your body and still retain your identity. So it has to be something metaphysical like the mind and the soul.
They sure are ahead of times. X was the start of the rolling back of the agenda. It all stinks to the heavens.
Yes, that's retarded.
He's not. It's a facade many people in those circles put on. He's anticipating the critique of his position which is that society should be based on technocratic and scientific terms. It's the same with Aldous Huxley who acts all worried about the possibility of a Brave New World emerging while advocating for mass-drugging of society, eugenics and technocracy.
They are all liars and say things like that for plausible deniability as if they don't work towards the thing they warn against.
Space trilogy. The gaylien narrative is demonology for brainwashed soyence spergs. Everyone knows so called aliens are demons.
Parasites are fascinating and I've thought about ivermectin and the whole knee-jerk reaction to it and something is very fishy there. But I'd say spiritual and demonic influence in particular is not due to physical causes but it's metaphysical in nature so the entry point is the mind and the soul rather than the body. https://www.bitchute.com/video/McgVGZ3Fl8ZG
Obviously not. It's a figure of speech, spergboy.
Have you read Lewis' Space Trilogy? The last book That Hideous Strength is literally about the NWO demons and how they managed to establish a One world technocratic government on Earth and how the protagonist (who's based on Tolkien) saves humanity. He emphasizes the spiritual nature of the war and reveals the technocrats are taking orders from demon-like beings, basically Satan.
They are all sick. The worst part is they knew how destructive and enslaving their ideology was and still advocated for it. This is what evil looks like.
It's the Scientific Outlook, p.198
He wrote that one back in 1931. Later he wrote The Impact of science on society which is equally deranged. He knew what the plan was because he was one of the main figures behind it along with fellow RS members H.G. Wells and the Huxleys.
Tolkien and C.S. Lewis also knew those guys and opposed them. The evil powers in their books are based on the NWO RS gang (Wells literally wrote a books called The New World Order and The Open Conspiracy). Orwell was part of that circle too but got disillusioned and exposed the plan in his 1984.
Complaining that reddit is ran over by deranged libtards and fedbots peddling narratives is like complaining that water is wet.
Yes, but still Ford sang praises of nationalism, industrialism of the white man and the superiority of the anglo-saxon people. I bet that if you give normies an excerpt from his book they will immediately think they were reading Mein Kampf. Hitler didn't contribute much on the jewish problem because it was all laid out before he started writing. Normies believe the guy was some kind of an evil genius who's deranged mind dreamed up the whole thing.