Maybe. She's a freemason too. But that's not a kabbalistic string. In my country there are people who wear a red string as an old-time superstition for good luck. Now that's definitely kabbalistic even though they don't know it. I make sure to tell people what the red string represents really.
They wear a red string. The way more likely explanation here is red for Republican.
Do people go to Heaven, though?
People live in the afterlife either in God's Kingdom and bask in eternal bliss and the uncreated light of God or outside of it - in darkness, misery and desperation. It depends on their life, free will to choose God and their soul's disposition. People can experience both heaven and hell even here on Earth. A person who rejects God is in hell even if he doesn't realize it but as long as he lives he can repent. Saints experience immense bliss by reaching theosis (becoming like God, restoring the likeness which we lost due to the fall of Adam).
Our fate is sealed on the day of judgment which will happen when the world ends.
What about the death toll from (XYZ+), what's up with those events?
What about it? Death is the result of the fall. Our world is fallen and the only path to salvation is through Christ. There is no utopia here on Earth. God allows for these things to happen because it's all part of His providence. We cannot know why He allows it because we don't have the full picture. But He does - Him being all-knowing means He knows everything - future, present and past. All suffering is the result of our own free will and us choosing sin and death over the truth and the life - over God.
And how do you know WHAT the 1K years of the devil being imprisoned were? Or even that it was in the past??? There is nothing in the Bible referring to that specifically.
This is the Church's teaching that is based on interpretation of Scripture. The Bible itself is a divinely inspired liturgical text of the Church tradition. I understand you grapple with this because you've been taught all your life the protestant doctrines of Sola Scriptura, but the truth is that the Bible is the product of the Church and the Bible canon (the books that go in the Bible) were decided very late (about 7thc) by the ecumenical councils. Yet the teachings and structure of the apostolic Church remained unchanged since Christ established it even before the Bible was compiled. And they remain unchanged to this day. God has promised us that the Holy Spirit will guide the Church and the gates of hell won't prevail over it.
Thx for info.
Glad to share my knowledge.
God has already brought His Kingdom down to Earth - it's His Church. There are no 1000 years after Christ's second advent - nobody believed in this before the Reformation. The Church teaches that Christ will dethrone the antichrist, the dead will be resurrected and everyone will be judged and then the world will end. This is the correct eschatological teaching.
The 1000 years of Satan being imprisoned refers to the first millennium of the Church when the Christianized Roman Empire, aka Byzantium, ruled the world keeping Satan at bay. This period ended with the apostasy of the Western Church which subsequently led to the protestant Reformation, the freemasonic Enlightenment and its revolutions, the nihilist XXc and whatever satanic clown world we live in today.
That's dumb. The US is not in a conflict where one would take sides currently and "I stand with Israel" is a PR phrase approved by the social engineers.
You can sell BTC for cash anonymously with another person who has a wallet. So it's the same as gold. But unlike gold, you can trade anonymously virtually, whereas with gold you have to make physical contact with the other party.
If gold was more secure and anonymous, criminals would prefer it over BTC but that's not the case. This should be proof enough.
As soon as someone corrupts the blockchain, hacks it, or inserts some sort of malware then the thing falls apart.
It's not hosted centrally. There are thousands of instances (nodes) of the blockchain globally. If one node is corrupted it would have no effect on the rest. You'd have to simultaneously infect all nodes that run the blockchain.
Why aren't central banks buying up bitcoin instead of gold? Because bitcoin isn't a tier one asset according to the BASEL III rules banks comply with?
Blackrock and other financial corporations sure think otherwise. I predict that BTC is about to go on a bull run and will break 200k by the end of the year. The more one knows what BTC is the more one becomes more confident about its future. There's a good book The Bitcoin Standard - it's basically a short history of banking and where BTC fits in the big picture.
Yes, I get the reasoning, fiat is going down and I agree gold will appreciate in time compared to it. I have a good enough stack and I will only be glad if it doubles. But I believe BTC will vastly outperform it like it did for the past decade.
Seems to expensive rn. I don't want to buy at double the price I paid a few year back. I'll wait for BTC to come down a bit and invest in it instead.
It goes against their core belief in the revolutionary ethos which is propagated by jews (using fronts like freemasonry and jesuits) for the sole reason to do away with Christianity because they're of Satan and hate everything that is good and true because it's the stamp of the Creator. They hate humanity and all of creation and want to destroy it (that's why they love to depop and murder).
For our civilization, monarchy is rooted in Christianity and it's an expression of the divine hierarchy with God being the ultimate monarch at the top. This chain of command goes all the way down to each man being both the monarch and the priest of his household.
Leftists (jews) want to do away with this order which they deem as inherently oppressive. They rebel against the natural order of the world just like their master Satan/Lucifer did - he too felt oppressed by God's monarchy because he was envious, prideful and didn't want to serve anyone but himself (sound familiar? We all tend to be like that because we're fallen ourselves). They ultimately want to replace God and become gods themselves. This is the common trait shared by everyone who's opposed to Christianity - be it new age, atheists, transhumanists, satanists.
It's an internal critique of Roman Catholicism. He's not saying the Bible says so. Catholics quote the keys given to Peter as the justification for papal supremacy over the rest of the bishops. But this doesn't hold to scrutiny.
During the first millennium the Roman pontiff was considered first among equals but that was an honorary title. Rome didn't have primacy and Peter himself presided over Alexandria and Antioch so there's no reason to put Rome first. The doctrine of papal supremacy and the establishment of the Western Church as a geopolitical worldly power with standing armies and banks was a later development which occurred after the great schism of 1054. Basically, RC is the first protestant sect with the Pope as their leader.
The Catholic Orthodox Church had a synodal structure - the same structure we see in today's Eastern Orthodox. It was never ruled in a centralized manner by one infallible guy.
It's not as if the US is a Christian country. Makes sense that jews, freemasons and pagans call the shots there.
Some may have knowledge of Scripture but they don't know enough about Church history and their papal teachings, canon and dogma. Which makes no sense because that's what makes them catholic and not protestant. If they only read the Bible and interpret it as they like (i.e. being their own pope), then they're not catholic.
It was irony. I thought the "dangerous for our democracy" msm mantra gave it away. Of course I agree with everything you said.
Are you against strong independent women? Look how much we have progressed since women got their equality. Society is totally thriving right now. Your antisemitism and misogyny are dangerous for our democracy. It's FEMA for you, boyo.
Why would she be mad? The Vatican's position on judaism is that jews shouldn't be converted because there is a dual covenant in place. This is a form of dispensationalism. Her Pope is a judaizer basically, and she must submit to his teachings with docility.
It's laughable how Catholics don't know their own faith.
That's cope. We live in a gynocentric society and women have never had that much attention at any point, nor has there been as many low T thirsty simps to go around. Men will always want women and they will settle for feminists (basically every woman in the west) because they have no other choice. Many of the men have also been indoctrinated into holding feminist ideas about gender equality, anti-traditionalism and gender roles being a social construct, so they don't mind being with like minded women.
In conclusion - women have more power than ever but they are still miserable because today's society goes against God's natural order. We all feel the negative effects while the jews celebrate their success.
But that was the goal from the beginning when the Nazi Rockafeller family created this psyop to separate man and woman to destabilize society. Now they are trying to manipulate men to dress like women but luckily not so many men are falling for it.
Goes way before Rockefeller, who is a jewish pawn himself. It's safe to say they started advancing their agenda with the revolutionary movements of the 18c. in the US and France. They had to get rid of the Church and of monarchy - the old patriarchal world order first, in favor of enlightenment secularism (freemasonry/illuminism), liberalism and republicanism/democracy. Once you get rid of the institutions that ground the Christian moral and way of life, marriage, family, identity and relations between the sexes are easy to subvert.
Or maybe Patel is a weird pagan.
It's always the same - people who lack basic understanding of something are the most vocal in their opposition to it. It's something to do with Dunning-Kruger.
But Savannah wrote an online article about it so it must be true I guess. Savannah?Never take financial advice from strippers btw.
But the "raised as an evangelical and this thing got drilled into his head" is quite at the heart of the necessary paradigm change. That applies to everyone in the human race. It's where they get their worldview and morality: from the "authorities".
About 80% are stuck there. Their worldview and morality will change only if the authorities they accept tell them so, or if those who they perceive as the authorities are changed.
It's only bad if the authority is corrupted. God is the ultimate authority and His true historic Church is the authority here on Earth. The Church's teaching about the jews is unchanged for 2000 years and those who were raised within it and submitted to its authority, don't face the delusions of those outside of it (like evangelicals or unbelievers).
Yes, we need to put the correct authorities where they belong but that won't happen until people are willing to change themselves and repent first. I don't see this happening in our post-enlightenment freemasonic degenerate society. Society is too far gone, too prideful and spiritually deluded. It's all about getting to individual people who have an open heart to the truth.
Yes, G stands for the Grand Architect of the masonic luciferian religion. It's never used by Christians.
True. But just because the left-right dialectic is fake and gay, that doesn't mean there is no real struggle between the forces of good and evil here on Earth.
You're too harsh on him. He was raised as an evangelical and this thing got drilled into his head. But he was beginning to question it in the past few months it seems. A lot of people testify to this. I believe he was on the path to truth and that he was decent. Explains why he got gunned down like that.
We're indigo children, brah. Source: the clockwork elves told me so.
But yes, vaccines are obviously satanic and aimed at enslaving you to the system, transhumanism and mass depop.