Lol, that's what happens when you let people go wild with the interpretation of liturgical texts, quote mining without paying attention to context and shoving their preconceived notions in the text: "It's me and muh Bible - now I will uncover all the secret knowledge encoded within and find my meaning in it". Guttenberg did us all a disservice.
Can you enlighten us with the secret gnostic meaning behind this verse? Meanwhile I will share the actual meaning of the quote: https://myocn.net/sermon-on-the-sunday-before-the-exaltation-of-the-cross-john-3-13-17/
No, I meant the Amish.
Mormonism is hardly Christianity. If someone wants to subvert the truth it's makes sense they will try to compromise it from within. That's why we have hundreds of churches and cults when the truth is only one.
Those are good arguments. I may have to research more to see if I can steelman my hypothesis. I've always wondered how they got so famous when most of their comedy is pretty cringe even for Brit standards.
I agree with most of what you say but I'm Eastern Orthodox and while we too have problems in the church, I believe this to be the one true apostolic church of Christ that will not be overcome till the end of times. Our Church fathers have spoken against jewry extensively, probably more than any other church.
The greatest Orthodox empire, Byzantium banned jews from all public offices, as well as from education. They knew they were trouble. It was a Russian monk who made the Protocols of the Elders of Zion public. and managed to warn the world about the impending doom of the jewish NWO, first attempted through the Bolshevik revolution influenced by jewish satanic ideology (80% of the party were jews).
Zionism in Christianity is a completely astro turfed concept which Rockefeller promoted mostly using the evangelist protestants. That's why boomer Americans love Israel - it was a PR campaign using the church.
It seems to be a categorization error. I wouldn't consider most of those people Christian. Real Christians know and follow (or at least make an effort to) the teachings of Christ and His Church. It's not enough to say "I'm a Christian, Jesus is God" (grace alone people are idiot reductionist heretics - the Bible implies one's fate will inevitably influence one's way of life which is what both the Orthodox and Catholic Church teaches). It's a way of thinking and living in the world.
Beside the obvious contradiction of Genesis, the main selling point of contraception is sexual liberation and promiscuity which runs against the Christian doctrine of sexuality and the family.
I wonder (((who))) owns the biggest pron platforms like pornhub and onlyfans?
That's a performative contradiction. Being a Christian implies worshipping Jesus as God and following His teachings. What you have met are people who larp being Christian but are in fact pagans.
Christians usually don't take the pill. This is for the psy op'd "liberated" secularists who's worldview on sexuality is entirely perverted.
That's the high IQ post here. Christians SHOULD NOT import views on sex from pagan practices and religions.
Btw, I think that's Gandalf.
That's demonic. I'll stick with what the Church teaches.
Is doing it with your wife considered wasting?
In seed oils? The excess amount of omega-6 which should be balanced with omega-3 fatty acids otherwise it can promote inflammation and lead to conditions like heart disease, stroke, arthritis, diabetes. The processing removes antioxidants from the oils too.
I prefer we do it here publicly.
Does it matter? People don't care how the actual war looks like. TPTB only care if the war can be sold to the public or not. I'm sure they can sell an all-drone long range war if they wanted to (they did it with the war on terror where the enemy was everywhere and invisible).
It's been demonstrated they promote inflammation. They are subject to a complex industrial processing including chemicals and high temperatures that alter the structure of the molecules. That's why cold-pressed sunflower oil (the method used before 1900) is fine. Who would have thought highly processed unnatural food would be bad for the health?
I don't get your line of questioning. There are thousands of studies on the detrimental effects of those substances - some are more researched than others, but I'm sure it's hardly news for you that there are toxic pathogenetic compounds in our environment.
The contradiction is they got the same results without inputting a supposed virus sample. Which means it's not the variable they call "virus" that's causing the effects observed but something else used in the culturing - the monkey kidney cell line, the bovine fetal serum, the antibiotics, the enzyme trypsin.
The info is all out there. If you wanted to learn, you would have. You don't even want to engage with the arguments.
Yes it does. The only problem is that they managed to observe 1) the same pathology, 2) the same particles under a microscope and 3) got the same RNA sequence of the sars, AIDS and flu viruses WITHOUT USING AN ACTUAL SAMPLE OF INFECTED TISSUE. They used yeast RNA instead, which is neutral and doesn't cause pathology. That's why I called it a falsification of the virus theory - this should not be possible if the theory was correct.
That's a cool slogan. Can you back it up with any arguments? Do you know what are the actual arguments made by the "virus deniers"?
If you can get the rubes to think "viruses don't exist" then everything people like Geert are saying is null and void. No viruses = no covid = no bioweapons = no shedding = NO CRIMINALS RESPONSIBLE FOR IT ALL. Gee... why would the perpetrators of all want to push out a narrative like that...
That does not follow. No viruses doesn't mean there's no covid disease caused by other mechanisms, neither does it mean there are no bioweapons - on the contrary, it completely demolishes the possibility of covid being of natural origin or an accidental leak. The shots are bioweapons, we can all agree on that.
So in your head, the sars virus not existing leads to zero accountability for the people who made it up and convinced everyone it was a deadly threat, locked down and force vaccinated the whole world causing millions to die? Make that make sense.
That's why conspiracy theorizing ain't for everyone.
Correct but I was asking about the methodology. As shown here (the falsification of the "isolation" of the virus): https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8?t=5666
Only if people cared about science instead of scientism.
That's a non-sequiter. Sounds like "I was a big believer in God, but then I saw a bunch of monkeys and realized we were just like them, only slightly evolved". You're presupposing the thing you "caught" is a transmissible disease caused by a virus. How does getting sick negate terrain theory? Does terrain theory deny the existence of flu-like diseases?
How would one prove that a given particle is the cause of the disease, that it's self-replicating and it is able to infect other hosts?
Just post the links here dude. I don't need a struggle session 1 on 1.
Give it 10 more years and this would be normalized. Spain if pretty woke and satanic as is. Overton window keeps shifting.