-
The video shows a cellphone gun at 2 minutes.
-
The video shows recoil shortly after the 7 minute mark.
-
The weapon features a silencer, the crowd is very loud.
-
We audibly hear the discharge.
-
It's known to take 2 rounds to figure out where a shot has been fired from.
-
What are you even doing here?
If you want to post this. Go ahead.
They had 3000+ people in attendance, yet no cameramen on the roof, or drones in the air. And nobody inside those offices with windows overlooking the roof on a Wednesday. Sure, why not?
They're not moving to the right. They are sowing malcontent.
Halfway through, and the video turn to pure climate change propaganda, putting words in the mouth of the dead, and ignoring more current theories such as mud floods.
This is fairly compelling evidence of a two round hidden gun. Gun type, after 2 minute mark, gun discharge, Strange hand position and movements, past the 3 minute mark, during the fatal shot.
So you touched a nerve, and they reacted poorly. That is no surprise. What I do find surprising is how you posted your theory there, and not here. Then afterwords you came to this theory forum to gloat about the poor reaction you received there? Why? None of what you have done makes any sense.
And to top it off. Your title sucks.
"Kirk was shot by AI. Keep your eyes open "
My Take:
-
You are seeing the bottom of the mic, not the ring.
-
The F is behind the fold, caused by his under armor, the "O" Doesn't turn into a "D", As those letters are similarly shaped already.
-
The blood is falling forward past the shirt and is too thick to instantly saturate cotton, or synthetic blends. As we are looking at a slow motion image and these are fractions of seconds.
You, I like. Him, not so much.
Actually, I believe Dick Cheney was in control of the operation. Who he was under the control of, was neither asked, nor stated.
You asked for memes. I can't help but feel you don't know what that word means.
OH yah. I'm personally running 8,227 of those accounts. And I'm just two beavers and a platypus in a man suite baby!
ã ¤ ã ¤ ã ¤ ã ¤ ã ¤ ã ¤ đ¸đđđđ đļđđ đđ¸đ đđģ đđđđ đ đđđ đžđ đđ¸đŊđžđđđ đŊđđđđžđ¸ đļđđš đ¸đđđģđđļđđđš. ã ¤ đŧ đđđ¸đđđđđđš đđļđđžđđ đļ đšđđđˇđđ đšđđđ đđģ đ¸đđš đđžđđđ đđžđ đģđđ đļđ đđđļđđ đļ đđđļđ.
-ÎÎŧĪΚĪβΡĪÎŽĪΚÎŧÎŋĪ |ĖĖ âĄ.ĖĖĖ
Or, it could have simply been pointing to the fact that this was a professional hit, and that the shooter had an escape route planned. Which is the current talking point out of the FBI.
Edit: I derived my above statement from your title and partial Quote. And then I clicked on your .png file. It seems I am backwards engineering plane text statements from your whole cloth conjecture.
My take on it, is that the USD stays the same, but is taken over on the back end. I also have a theory that the 1 dollar bill, that all the other notes are based on, will receive change in appearance, losing all of it's old world symbology, when this change over takes place. But, this is all just speculation on my part.
Or inversely, simply do a couple million computer controlled trades, and you have a few trillion dollars. And not just from Americans but from all over the world, while simultaneously inflating the values of coins of your choice. (under the control of the constitutional government, AKA: The US military)
Maybe. But since all that debt is fraudulent, This could also be a quick and dirty way of undoing such fraud without admitting guilt. Similar to the way that we have several foreign countries willing to invest upwards of 17 trillion dollars in America, with little benefit to themselves.
Get the fuck out of my thread you piece of shit.
Of course. As always, you are correct.
Being real selective on our translations in order to use word policy. Do us a favor, and tell us which version of the bible you follow. As the man of God you claim to be. None of this pick and choose your own adventure crap.
Correct. Misquotes are a common tactic in propaganda from the mainstream media.
Correct. Not just a name change. Though I do not recognize your authority when you use a broken redacted Quote to speak for "We".
I'm assuming you didn't watch the video, and that you have no actual opinions of your own.
No, shit, which is why I brought up follow up points that you are actively ignoring.
What do you think I meant? I assumed that your post history in this sub reflected your overall post history. Which would have matched the profile of shills and bots that are not allowed to submit posts.