3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know, I've thought along those lines but I've never been able to make a rigorous connection between the longheads and the Nephilim. Consider their typical characteristics:

Longheads: long skulls (obv) and tall but otherwise normal human bodies. Infrequently, the skulls have hair and it appears reddish. Apparently lived freely in community with humans.

Nephilim: giants, six fingers, six toes, double rows of teeth, red hair, often violent and cannibalistic, sometimes lived with humans but more often in separate and often hostile communities.

Not much overlap except for the red hair, which is very intriguing but far from conclusive. In years I've never stumbled across evidence as to what their real relationship might have been.

Also, there's the issue of beauty and it's standards. The Nephilim may have been big and powerful, but I don't think I've ever heard them described as beautiful.

Saul is described as "tov" and "bachur". Translations vary, but in any case I think he is being described as attractive. Well, today as in all times, beauty standards are set by the elites in society. Longheads burials have often indicated they were the elites of the day, so you see how it ties together that Saul had "movie star good looks".

In my view, we still have a mystery on our hands.

9
Primate98 9 points ago +9 / -0

King Saul was one of these "longheads".

They try to disguise it with mistranslations as being "head and shoulders taller", but in earlier translations and tracing back to the original Hebrew we find in 1 Sam 9:

From his shoulders upward, he was taller than all the people.

Unless he had a real long neck, he must have had a real long head.

One can further infer that longheads were not exceptional at the time, since the Bible doesn't specifically note that. By analogy, one might note that a woman has real big boobs, but would not specifically note that she is a person with boobs since that is taken as literally unremarkable.

I hope I didn't offend anyone by talking about the Bible and boobs in the same comment.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Followup story: "ISIS invades Guatemala--sources say they 'hate their freedoms'"

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

As you say, indeed much is hidden from us, but in my analysis the end game is for all the marbles. That is, there's no running away, "safe" countries, parallel economies, opting out, etc, etc. We either win, or every single thing that could possibly be considered our own is taken from us, right down to our identities and our consciousness.

The alarming part is that it's all speeding up, as if a hidden clock is ticking down. I mean, it hasn't been going that well for TPTB lately, and a sensible strategy would be to pull back then let everyone cool off and go back to sleep, thinking they had "won".

But nope, it just keeps ratcheting up higher to a level I would have never believed if I told it to myself 5 years ago.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

We don't need any more proof, but if you want to see how the mainstream shapes the news by sanding off the "rough edges", read the milquetoast paragraphs way down the page that Politico writes about the dissent, then compare that to this scorcher:

‘Blatantly Unconstitutional’: Justice Alito Writes Blistering Dissent In Biden Admin Censorship Case (Daily Caller via MSN 6/26/2024)

Justice Samuel Alito excoriated the Supreme Court majority for “shirk[ing]” its duty to restrain the government’s coercive censorship efforts in “one of the most important free speech cases” to reach the high court in years.

“Facebook’s responses resembled that of a subservient entity determined to stay in the good graces of a powerful taskmaster,” Alito wrote. “When criticized, Facebook representatives whimpered that they ‘thought we were doing a better job’ but promised to do more going forward…And when denounced as ‘killing people,’ Facebook responded by expressing a desire to ‘work together collaboratively’ with its accuser.”

Frankly, I never knew Sammy was so Fiery before. Doesn't look like it, does he?

BTW, didn't Mussolini have some term for state and corporate power working together collaboratively?

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

The October 7th is a subtle one. I don't look around a whole lot, but as far as I can tell no one has analyzed it succinctly and correctly. We're in real 5th-generation warfare territory so all reports have to be deconstructed and put in their proper context.

First, the background is important. In October 2012, Kissinger said that in ten years there would be no more Israel. Say what you want about him but he was sharp and well-informed. I'm not certain what he was basing that on, but apparently the path of the Zionist entity led to a cliff, and here we are.

Then there was a real crisis going on. The maniac criminal Netanyahu was barely dodging prison, and it was pretty clear that as soon as he left office that's where he would go. The backlash against the 2023 judicial reforms were causing civil disturbances bordering on insurrection. Civil war was in the air.

Clearly, any resistance group is just going to let them shake themselves apart. They know well that the death of the Zionist entity will not come in the form of a military victory and seizure of the central government, but when people call bullshit on the Zionist entity and are no longer interested in supporting it. More and more people were doing just that.

Then a war breaks out. How convenient, eh? But that context tells us how to pull apart the rest of the events.

Hamas is a hybrid organization and a 5GW weapon. It was supported by the Israeli government, so most of the leadership would have been agents, but the vast majority of the rank and file would be authentic resistance fighters.

"Operation Al Aqsa Flood" appears to have been a legitimate operational plan, but that's not all that went down that day and not even the important part. Netanyahu & Co., through control of elements of Hamas and elements of the IDF, bolted a big psyop on top and arranged for the LIHOP elements.

Authentic Hamas fighters running around doing legitimate resistance things according to the op just ended up being cover and concealment for the other operations going on that day: the nonsense music festival attack, non-existent paraglider troopers, kidnappings of old ladies and hot chicks, the list goes on.

There was a flurry of events that really happened, but then we're lied to about who and why. Suppose a family of 6 Jews got smoked in the own home due to "terrorism". Real resistance fighters have nothing to gain, obviously, so maybe it was 5GW Hamas moles or IDF dressed up as Hamas. Or maybe they admit it was the IDF but operating under the "Hannibal Directive". Again, all reports have to be carefully deconstructed.

And then everything is buried under an avalanche of black propaganda: civilians executed, babies beheaded and burned, mass rapes, etc. I have to inject here that there is a certain peculiarly Judaic mindset in dreaming this shit up that is sickening.

All along, the IDF and the militias are getting smoked and anyone sensible would have shut it all down long before now. But if you wrap back to the context, they have got to keep this thing going. They don't give a rat's ass about the hostages (assuming there are actually any real ones left) or a ceasefire. They want to attack Lebanon, and Hezbollah secretly wishes they would. They're going to draft the ultra-Orthodox, which is a ginormous red line. Also, if Trump gets into office, he's going to pull the plug. That's a long ways away but the clock is ticking.

It's just more chaotic by the day, and when you have chaos it's impossible to see how it's all going to shake out.

Well, that was pretty long! I feel like I just got something off my chest... lol

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

The vast majority of people will never believe they could set off nukes in Manhattan and lie about it for two and a half decades

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole shill thing is really coming off the chain lately, especially over on r/conspiracy.

Someone will post some fairly innocuous conspiracy, not spicy at all, and then there's a straight flood of a dozen "users" saying how dumb and crazy it is. Whatever subtlety there ever was is totally gone and now it's all about flooding the zone.

On the flip side, I notice that the shill narrative posts almost always get downvoted right to zero, so there are still a good number of people awake and aware.

8
Primate98 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think "Loose Change" is taken to be the standard documentary. There are several versions on YouTube.

I've never watched it but I doubt they tell you the buildings were turned into dust by nukes. So the film can be considered--ultimately--disinformation, and that's precisely why they allow it on YouTube.

The vast majority of people will never believe they could set off nukes in Manhattan and lie about it for two and a half decades, so they're free to watch "Loose Change" while never getting to the ultimate truth.

All that being said, I would recommend it anyway because they have to give you enough actual truth that will at least get someone with an open mind to the point, "Okay, clearly the government was involved, and the official narrative of Muslims and boxcutters is bullshit."

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

You missed the other shill that posted the source here: https://conspiracies.win/p/17tLFgCNuh/idiots-claiming-assange-is-dead-/c/

That's okay, though. I'll copypasta it for everyone's convenience:

https://x.com/Stella_Assange/status/1805573781303308326?t=Ghjaip3LL7cH1a671xu3IA

Julian’s travel to freedom comes at a massive cost: Julian will owe USD 520,000 which he is obligated to pay back to the Australian government for charter Flight VJ199. He was not permitted to fly commercial airlines or routes to Saipan and onward to Australia. Any contribution big or small is much appreciated.

Which is an even more ridiculous claim: that America's Southern Bitch fronts America's Enemy of the State #1 half a mill, while not permitting him to fly commercial. Why not just tell Australia not to do what they've never done for anyone else? How does this make sense to anyone? It doesn't, but no one is actually looking and trying to make sense.

I didn't even know "Stella" had tweeted this until I saw it in the other post. You shills need to coordinate better. Oh, and be less obvious. Now everyone reading this sees! Oh no!

hahahahahahaha

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is another act in the psychodrama, as phony as the original "event". The dumb plotline makes no sense.

A court would never force you to sell your assets, they would be seized. If you were forced to sell, you could just sell to a friend for $1 and buy back after bankruptcy for $1. For that matter, you could sell to a different enemy for $1 with no expectation of buyback just to give a middle finger to the court and the plaintiffs.

If anyone is thinking, "Yeah, well, the court could just force you to sell for a reasonable market price," think again. You could do that with a 99.99% commission to your friend, the broker. "Well then the court could....", ad infinitum.

That's why plaintiffs file a judgment lien and then courts seize assets for auction.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's out and anyone can see him. I call him Julian "Gotta Get In Shape Now That I'm Out of the Joint" Assange.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, sad to see. It still looks active but a ton of the posts (I'd say 30-40%) are from a certain new type of astroturf account.

It's very thinly disguised post after post from the same handful of users with "Israel sucks... just like Trump", and "Hillary sucks... just like Trump", and "The WEF sucks... just like Trump". Not quite that bad but not much more sophisticated. Half of it we all know already so it does no more damage, and half is what we're supposed to swallow along with the bait.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are they not?

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

In what I think is a strange twist, I think r/conspiracy is now reporting accurate numbers. That is, 2.1M members and <500 online at any given time. I think that may be real.

There were times in the recent past when in the middle of the night for the US, it would report 70K active users. I never thought that was real, but neither did I think it was bots upvoting and downvoting according to the Establishment. Then and now, a highly upvoted post will only get 2K or so.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know not a lot of people read these, so sometimes I do indeed feel like I'm just blindly instantiating posts for the Akashic Record, or our lame and horrible version of it, The Internet.

But thanks very much for being one of the readers!

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Regrettably, the Internet and all it's insanity will still be there when you wake up. Nighty-night!

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

You did get it was snide humor, right? Oh, NOPE.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yet we got this four months ago:

Assange ‘too ill’ to attend last chance UK appeal against US extradition: Washington wants the WikiLeaks publisher on its soil where he could face a prison sentence of up to 175 years (RT 2/20/2024)

Assange, 52, has been held largely in solitary confinement in the Belmarsh maximum security prison in England since 2019, when Ecuador revoked his asylum at American insistence. The Australian-born publisher had requested to appear in court personally, but was unable to do so due to poor health, according to his lawyers.

What has he been doing for 5 years in solitary, eating Doritos? No wonder he's "too ill" to attend court. Maybe they if they'd held court in a private jet he could have sprung right up the stairs.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interesting turn of events. I've long maintained that Assange is dead, having been black-bagged from the embassy in October 2016, then probably executed. I maintain that he's still dead.

For whatever reason, they are now drawing the curtain on their psychodrama. Maybe someone got some power that could spring him, and they didn't want to everyone to realize there was no one to spring. Who knows?

So we get a text-only tweet from the assuredly compromised WikiLeaks, no pics or vids of this historic event. Has anyone else ever been sprung from prison this fast, no announcement? Who picked him up? Who paid for his plane ticket? No one in the airport says, "Hey that's Julian Fucking Assange!" and snaps a pic?How could he possibly have a valid passport? Can I see his passport photo?

I feel it's just another demonstration of how easily people are deceived.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Twitter: @ammoland Instagram: @ammoland Facebook: www.facebook.com/ammoland Telegram: t.me/ammolandnews Email: [email protected]

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know it's hard to keep up, but this was from 5 years ago:

Tulsi is Terrible but Redeemable on the Second Amendment (Ammoland 4/24/2019)

Furthermore, her openness to reach across the aisle means she may listen to the facts. If Second Amendment supporters can convince the Tulsi Gabbards in our personal lives – and across the country – to re-think Second Amendment issues, we could decisively shift the landscape in our favor.

The world be far better off if people had the sense to stay home and out of the way--on all matters--when they don't know what the fuck they're talking about.

Come to think of it, that actually highlights a far bigger problem than Tulsi Gabbard's views on the Second Amendment.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do shills ever get embarrassed about what they write, no matter how retarded it is? Is there anyone "inside there" to feel shame? Hello?

Actually, nevermind. No ones cares.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Trump picks her as VP (which I have been hoping for since the first go-round), it's going to blow the roof off this joint. And I hope I did not just jinx it.

If nothing else, in their fervor to demonize her we'll get to see how much the Democrats truly despise actual females, actual feminists, veterans, people of color, former Democrats, followers of any faith (that isn't Reform Zionist Judaism) and those who think it's their right to speak their mind.

I suspect they'll eventually claim that because she was born in Samoa, she's "basically not an American" and can't run for VP.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›