Did you know that this spyware package actually has a built-in desktop operating system? Strange but true!

Biden's not a biologist. C'mon, man! But let me tell you the story of when Biden was the Chairunit of the Senate Biology Committee 150 years ago. So there was this dead dog....

He should have asked her if she considered Dred Scott's violent gangsta rap to be harmful.

Wait'll you get a load of the unsubstantiated things about Ukraine they're saying over on Reddit. You've got your work cut out for you.

I'm not the type to traffic in rumors, but the rumor is vengeful father.

Yes, the Reagan attempt was real. John Hinckley SENIOR was a political supporter of George H.W. Bush and a fellow Texas oilman. JUNIOR was just a distraction, and his bullets had virtually no chance of hitting Reagan. He was shot from a balcony right above the building's exit.

Bizarrely, this was reported by eyewitness Judy Woodruff. Normally, you'd think this meant it absolutely did not happen, but the critical factors are she was a nobody NBC correspondent at the time and they never discuss it any more:

Judy Woodruff was at the scene said a shot came from the balcony. In an official White House photo taken at the time of the shooting, you can see a man in a sport coat with his arm protruding from a room window on the balcony in what looks like a firing position in line with the shot hitting the limo that in turn wounded Reagan.

Here's the full article where WaPo tells you you're dumb if you believe it:

Rawhide Down: Del Wilber on the near assassination of Ronald Reagan

Yes, they show you the Babushka Lady film. Close up look!

I don't think there's any institutionalized learning facility that would have me 5 minutes longer than it took to find out what I was trying to tell people.

I'll say this straight out: what I've been able to decipher about this incident differs from any conventional teaching in any church in the land. So how do I personally come to grips with that? Well, if there's anything I take as an article of faith, it's that God wants us to know the truth. I think I've found it, and to reject it is to reject God. But everyone's different, right? So if you want to proceed....

You may be ready for a very troublesome truth about the Bible, which would alter the context of many of the questions you ask (which are all very good, btw). The word translated as "God" in the Old Testament is "elohim".

You can research this word yourself, and I did and you should, but in short there's a huge problem with it. The "-im" suffix in Hebrew indicates plural. That is, it can't possibly be "God" but is at best "gods". At this point I should interject that even "gods" is not a good translation. Just leave "elohim" as "elohim" until you get a handle on exactly who these Elohim were. (I use biblehub.com and on certain screens if you hover over a word it shows you the original language.)

Conventional Biblical scholars wave their hands around and come up with all manner of rationalizations but I don't buy any of it for a second. If you're into conspiracy, then maybe you would agree with me (and others) that this is a deliberate mistranslation, propagated across many centuries.

I've given you a lot to take in, but I have found that almost all people reject the truth because they are uncomfortable with its implications, they find it too disturbing to their worldview. That's their right and is yours as well. I'll tell you anything you want to know, but you have to decide whether you really want to know it.

HMU when and if you're ready for more. Good luck!

So instead of informing us with your knowledge of actual history you decided to shitpost. Great job, thanks for contributing.

Ha, didn't take long! Here's the shill post with all the shill comments to push Corbett:

For the newish subscriber base who either don't know of or have forgotten about The Corbett Report...

Their psyop game is getting so lame it's getting less fun to dunk on them.

We're going to need a time machine because written history is FUBAR (literally). There are mountains of obviously phony BS laying around the mainstream, and regrettably I have 100% given up on any "real historian" ever noticing a bit of it.

Want to see a fun one? So, Jesse James was real person and a stone cold killer, right? Everybody knows that. Search for images of "jesse james outlaw" and look at the pic with the hat.

WTF? Is that a masculine woman, an effeminate cross-dressing man, or a tranny of some kind? A scoop neck sweater, baby soft hand, and a novelty hat from the party store? He doesn't look like any of his other pictures, but what does it matter anyway because on close inspection, they're all fake.

But the real takeaway is, how can this be the first you're hearing about this, from some rando in the innerwebz, instead of a historian of any stripe?

As I mentioned, I believe the story is 50K years old, so we we must be as precise as possible when reading it if we hope to extract what actually happened so very long ago.

Note that they didn't eat the fruit of the "tree of knowledge" (as in facts and figures or what have you), they ate of the fruit of the "tree of the knowledge of good and evil". Big difference, yes?

And what is "the knowledge of good and evil"? Well, a clue is that animals and children under a certain age are not generally expected to know the difference between good and evil. Only older children and adults are held responsible for knowing the difference and acting accordingly. So what do they have that animals and small children do not?

As you bring up, the other clue is nakedness. But is that precisely the issue? The story is probably slightly metaphorical or distorted here. Is this a way of saying that Adam and Eve first felt shame or guilt, where they did not before? Can one feel shame or guilt without a moral sense?

Also important in deciphering this event is that God expressed apprehension that, "their eyes will be opened and they will become as the gods". What happens right before you first open your eyes in the morning?

A couple of final but crucial points, virtually always missed. God never says knowledge (of anything) is bad. Rather, he forbids them to eat the fruit and tells them they will die if they do so. Do they die? And does the nachash tempt Eve, or does he simply tell her that she will not die? Was that a lie?

As I hope you can see, the story is nearly universally misread, and I would point to that as the reason for so much controversy and misunderstanding.

I was going to post on Corbett after his last podcast "exposing" Putin. I let it go after he went buckwild on Trump last year as a random case of TDS, but this last podcast made it obvious he was always a controlled opposition mole. And I've listened to the entire run of his podcast, so it pains me to say all this.

Without dissecting every bit of it, his Putin podcast was at the level of Reddit shill talking points. In an hour, he never once mentions Donbass or neo-Nazis. Do you really think such a careful researcher could be ignorant of such things? Me neither.

If TPTB are burning their deep-cover assets of many, many years like this, I believe They are getting desperate indeed.

Uhhh... uhhh... iT's AlL pArT oF tHe PlAn!

wow, it's getting rough for the shills tasked with pushing the "Putin is a WEF puppet" narrative, isn't it?

YoU'rR dUmB iF yOu DoN't GeT iT!

Seems like quite compelling evidence. For the Phantom Time Hypothesis and New Chronology of Anatoly Fomenko, that is. But then again, Joseph Justus Scaliger was a Christian, so I guess all Christians really are to blame.

But what am I saying? Fomenko is Russian! Down with all chronologies everywhere!

Here's an interpretation I bet you didn't see coming: the story of the Garden of Eden Incident is basically true, but is about 50,000 years old and was poorly understood at the time. Thus, it has become a bit distorted and somewhat metaphorical. "God" and the "serpent" in the story are actually aliens, and the story involves a couple of humans gaining consciousness.

Of course, all that sounds like a lot of malarkey, but I'll give you a couple of points to research to indicate the story is not just some fairy tale someone made up one day.

First, do you know where the name "Eden" comes from? In Sumerian, "e" means "house, home, or temple", and "din" means "pure or bright". When referring to a person, "din" is often translated as "righteous". The Sumerians called their deities "dingir". So "e-din" would be "the home of the righteous" or even "the home of the gods".

Second, were you aware there were two stages of "modern humans"? There were "anatomically modern humans" that, with a shave and a haircut and a 3-piece suit would pass unnoticed on the subway. They were around for 200,000 years but they acted basically just like animals (no culture, monkey-level tools, etc.). Then suddenly and for no apparent reason about 50,000 years ago, they became "behaviorally modern". They started developing very quickly with all kinds of tools and tech. Quite curious, no?

The point is, IMHO there's quite a bit to understand clearly about the story until you get to some of the finer points.

See where it says "unprecendented"? It's not, and it shows how fast BS flies right past our faces.

Back in the wake of the 1917 Spanish Flu, the US military conducted two studies on "transmission of the flu virus". Spoiler alert: they could not infect anybody through any means.

But that was already known in the 1500's by the Italians. They had epidemics too, and studied their possible mechanisms. Of all the possible causative factors they looked at, they could find only one correlation: the activity level of the Sun. So they called it "influenza delle stelle", or "the influence of the stars".

Kevin Boyle has short videos with very cogent presentations of these facts.

I haven't seen the movie, but it caught my attention that part of it was set in Ancient Babylon. I have a certain particular interest in that city, and I've noticed over the years that it comes up very, very often in many different contexts. On the one hand you have this movie, and way on the other end you have Bill Cooper with a whole series of shows called "Mystery Babylon".

For all the mention of it, I've noticed that basically no one cares to research why that one ancient place might have such outsized modern cultural import.

My favorite part of the staging was the airliner landing gear jammed in between two buildings, with the rope they used to lower it down still attached. Or, you know, maybe that was just where local residents kept their bicycles and their landing gear.

Haha, no, it was the guy that was running MTV at the time and hired Adam Curry and all the other VJs as part of a total revamp of MTV. Before that it was literally just music videos.

He went on to run NPR for a few years. Most people would think, "Who cares?", but at the time he was doing it I looked at the ratings. Limbaugh and Hannity had audiences of about 20M, but "Fresh Air" and "All Things Considered" each had audiences of about 30M.

I actually tried emailing AC about this years back, but my emails were, ahem, compromised.

I think the Orthodox are the least worrisome of the group. I've seen videos of them getting their asses kicked in a very anti-Semitic way by cops in the streets of Tel Aviv, mostly because they refuse to submit to military conscription. Gotta give them props for not joining "the world's most moral army"

They also refused to get vaxxed in NY, but that was kept real hush-hush, lest the goyim get any ideas in their own heads.

Thanks for the link! I'd heard the name before but never looked into it. As frightening as Dead Internet Theory is, and I'm sure there's more truth to it than we guess, I think there's much truth to the opposite and it's terrifying.

That is, many real people behave at no higher a level than bots, and NPCs are way more prevalent than is comfortable to think about.

I was recently DMing with someone from Reddit and asked him 4 yes or no questions in a row, the last one being, "Do you understand what a yes or no question is?" I got zero answers of yes or no. Would anyone write such a malfunctioning bot? I don't think so.

But do some human brains actually work more poorly than malfunctioning bots? I fear so.

Well, if you had to go by the metric of what the highest number of people did, I would say they got 0% of the way through. That is, they saw the length and thought, "There's no possible payoff worth that" and their eyes slid right off. I'm sure it's all taking place at a subconscious level.

When you start paying very close attention to people's interactions, you can see how very little actual engagement there is. The vast majority of conversations are simply intersecting monologues.

The more closely I study what people actually do, the less surprised I am that the world is the way it is. Still an optimist, though!

Regrettably, I've concluded that this is one manifestation of the "MTV attention span" cultural generations. Ever since the rise of music videos, you've got to have a cut every two seconds to hold their attention. They've been immersed in that since early childhood and have no awareness of any other condition.

We lost most people at the third word above, when they subconsciously thought, "booooorrrrrrrinnnnngggggg" and moved on. If you made it this far, congratulations.

SECRET BONUS: For only the diligent readers that will see this, back in the 80's the guy that made MTV into what we it as today is a crypto-Nazi billionaire living under an assumed identity. No kidding! But in fairness, you probably could have guessed that.