This is precisely why I think Mike Lindell is a plant to blackwash the real fraud evidence with this fake spreadsheet. No info on who this Mary fanning is, how she could possibly have access to this data, how the systems were set up, how the hacks were verified or not, etc etc
Thing is, we don't even need this spreadsheet to know the election was fraudulent. There is plenty of data already out there that shows this to be the case.
We're already leaving the solar mimimum, any disease related therefor will decrease over the next year and be mostly gone by next year. "official source" - https://www.weather.gov/news/201509-solar-cycle
"conspiracy source" related - http://milesmathis.com/solmin.pdf
The classic inversion of truth. If Trump was such a fascist, why didnt he use the military to assert his election win? Why did he go through all the legal channels (courts, legislature) to try and overturn the election results?
I didn't know fascists use legal constitutional means to assert their authority. I didn't know fascists abdicate after their legal term has ended. I didn't know fascist dictators would sacrifice half their lifetime fortune to serve as a democratically elected official without abusing their position for accruing more money and power.
I am 100% confident there was fraud and the election was stolenm (you just have to look at the classic graphs of the biden vote dumps to see that), but this "proof" shown was given without any context of how they got it, no explanation of why it wasnt shown sooner, who this mary fanning person is, etc etc. It just seems like they could have made up a bunch of stuff and passed it off as proof so that shills could swoop in once it gains traction to "deboonk" it and memory hole the actual proof. I'd be curious if anyone knows more information about this beyond what Mike Lindell showed.
What I thought was weird about this is he spends only about 10 minutes on the most important new evidence which is all the forensic data on the hacking from foreign nations, and he doesnt bother saying how it was obtained, who set up the systems, etc. He just mentions the woman who is presenting it's name and she doesnt seem to work for the government in an official capacity, so it makes me wonder if this dude is controlled oppo. Also I find it oddly coincidental that the Time article came out the same day as this video. My guess is that they are playing both sides of the issue and will have "debunkers" for this video soon enough. The debunking will be legit because this video has fake evidence in it, and that will be used to memory hole all the real evidence (ie mail in ballot fraud).
edit: I'm specifically referring to Mary Fanning's testimony around 1:36:00, I looked her up and it looks like she doesnt work for the gov so I have no idea how she would have that info esp since there weren't any forensic audits of the voting machines. If more details were given it would be more believable but it looks like they just presented the info and added a cool animation of lines going to different parts on the globe to make it look "official".
Just as a side note, I've seen estimates that VAERS is vastly underestimating the true side effects simply because doctors and hospitals are reluctant to blame the vaccine. And with covid I think alot of times they use the "they got covid" excuse. So difficult to gauge based on VAERS alone. However, you can get a relative gauge by seeing how many reports it has compared to other vaccines.
She is very likely dead, there was a video that came out not long after the incident showing how you could look up her death certificate on find a grave or one of these sites. I tried to verify it myself and got 404'd every time i searched her name. Any other name worked fine though. They scrubbed the death record from the internet, so its pretty obvious what that implies...
You mean the quarantines that are already unenforceable?