Kinda pisses me off when academics use this roundabout language - "strange desire" .. Just come out and say it, they are doing it for power and control, stop beating around the bush. If scientists and academics weren't such pussies we never would have had this "pandemic"
Hm I've seen "excess mortality" stats for the different states and NY definitely has a big spike around March-April of last year. Although those stats could be faked for sure. I guess the reason I believe that there were alot of deaths then was there were several whistleblower nurses speaking out against all the protocol violations and bad practices that were being performed at those emergency hospitals during the "height of hte pandemic" that makes me believe its legit. Of course, these psyops tend to have fakes on both sides of hte issue so its possible that they were full of **** too. (Here is an example of what i am talking about https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12526320/new-york-nurse-coronavirus-book-investigation-elmhurst-hospital/ )
Did you check out https://gigablast.com/
This whole "covid is fake or cuomo killed a bunch of nursing home residents" false dichotomy is annoying me. Clearly some shareblue talking point to discredit the fact that the virus is a lie. Yes, putting sick people into nursing homes while you are broadcasting on every form of media that there is a deadly virus going around that specifically targets the elderly is going to scare the **** out of the people already there. Just put yourself in those shoes. Yes, fear and anxiety can cause illness and even death in people who are already on the last leg of their life. The people placed in the nursing home could be sick with anything (of course they probably had a cold, the flu, pneumonia or whatever), the point is that psychologically it doesn't matter what they have because the nonsick people in that nursing home are going to think that a deadly plague was just brought into their home. No covid-19 required.
Also it goes well beyond just the nursing home debacles. That is almost a distraction from the real killing field, which were the emergency hospitals that went up in NY where they were having people sign do not resuscitate orders (these old peole who didnt have advocates for them probably didnt even read what they were signing). There are a number of nurses who blew the whistle on this. If you look at the nursing home deaths as a percentage of total deaths "due to covid" in new york you will see new york has one of the lowest percentages in the US. This is because of the actual mass killing that occurred in NYC was not in the nursing homes, it was in the emergency hospital setups. Edit: forgot to add, this was back when they were putting everyone on ventilators, people who clearly didnt need them but it was done because that was the "covid protocol" at the time. We will probably never know how many people that killed.
If you want to use a search engine that isn't from a big company (ie yahoo, bing, google) and doesnt just aggregate results from said companies (like searx) then you can use https://gigablast.com/
This is precisely why I think Mike Lindell is a plant to blackwash the real fraud evidence with this fake spreadsheet. No info on who this Mary fanning is, how she could possibly have access to this data, how the systems were set up, how the hacks were verified or not, etc etc
Thing is, we don't even need this spreadsheet to know the election was fraudulent. There is plenty of data already out there that shows this to be the case.
We're already leaving the solar mimimum, any disease related therefor will decrease over the next year and be mostly gone by next year. "official source" - https://www.weather.gov/news/201509-solar-cycle
"conspiracy source" related - http://milesmathis.com/solmin.pdf
The classic inversion of truth. If Trump was such a fascist, why didnt he use the military to assert his election win? Why did he go through all the legal channels (courts, legislature) to try and overturn the election results?
I didn't know fascists use legal constitutional means to assert their authority. I didn't know fascists abdicate after their legal term has ended. I didn't know fascist dictators would sacrifice half their lifetime fortune to serve as a democratically elected official without abusing their position for accruing more money and power.
I am 100% confident there was fraud and the election was stolenm (you just have to look at the classic graphs of the biden vote dumps to see that), but this "proof" shown was given without any context of how they got it, no explanation of why it wasnt shown sooner, who this mary fanning person is, etc etc. It just seems like they could have made up a bunch of stuff and passed it off as proof so that shills could swoop in once it gains traction to "deboonk" it and memory hole the actual proof. I'd be curious if anyone knows more information about this beyond what Mike Lindell showed.
What I thought was weird about this is he spends only about 10 minutes on the most important new evidence which is all the forensic data on the hacking from foreign nations, and he doesnt bother saying how it was obtained, who set up the systems, etc. He just mentions the woman who is presenting it's name and she doesnt seem to work for the government in an official capacity, so it makes me wonder if this dude is controlled oppo. Also I find it oddly coincidental that the Time article came out the same day as this video. My guess is that they are playing both sides of the issue and will have "debunkers" for this video soon enough. The debunking will be legit because this video has fake evidence in it, and that will be used to memory hole all the real evidence (ie mail in ballot fraud).
edit: I'm specifically referring to Mary Fanning's testimony around 1:36:00, I looked her up and it looks like she doesnt work for the gov so I have no idea how she would have that info esp since there weren't any forensic audits of the voting machines. If more details were given it would be more believable but it looks like they just presented the info and added a cool animation of lines going to different parts on the globe to make it look "official".
Just as a side note, I've seen estimates that VAERS is vastly underestimating the true side effects simply because doctors and hospitals are reluctant to blame the vaccine. And with covid I think alot of times they use the "they got covid" excuse. So difficult to gauge based on VAERS alone. However, you can get a relative gauge by seeing how many reports it has compared to other vaccines.
She is very likely dead, there was a video that came out not long after the incident showing how you could look up her death certificate on find a grave or one of these sites. I tried to verify it myself and got 404'd every time i searched her name. Any other name worked fine though. They scrubbed the death record from the internet, so its pretty obvious what that implies...
How often do you get random internet conspiracy theorists to do your homework for you?