People at the time claimed this footage exists. CNN reported that this footage exists. The reason I can't show it to you is because the government confiscated it. They did this because they thought it might have the claimed footage. Unlike you, I have evidence to support my claims. You merely insist it is impossible, despite the he fact that we already have this very improbable footage. You are wrong and you are rude. Also, you, like all shills, cannot stand to not have the last word and resort to attack words and profanity. It's classic, but sad. Critical thinking is important. Try it!
Gee, I wonder what the other cameras can see. I wonder if one of them is similarly positioned. If I take your claim at face value, why would I assume there is not a "gate camera" to capture faces at a hotel? You are very rude and you can't prove a negative when there is already a positive counter example. Saying that the one and only example of footage that we have, that disproves your hypothesis, simply doesn't count because you already commented on it is childish and I think you are the dumb one. :)
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pentagon_Security_Camera_2.ogv
Notice how the single piece of released footage includes a bunch of sky thereby proving your hypothesis that, in 2001, there were no security cameras positioned to see the sky completely false by its very existence as a single counter example is sufficient to disprove a negative claim.
Think critically. Also, you are rude and arrogant while being wrong, never a good look. Be better!
You are telling me to think critically; I am giving you food for such thought but you either didn't read it or can't think critically about it. It literally says there is footage of impact from a hotel that has not been released. It does not say that every camera was pointed at the sky or that every camera caught footage of anything, but to claim the opposite without any basis in evidence is pretty sloppy critical thinking. I will quote some of the article for your edification:
"According to a CNN FOIA request however, the nearby hotel's video DID capture the impact. The following exchange is from a CNN transcript of a report on the 2002 release of the original four frames of Pentagon footage:
MCINTYRE (on camera): These pictures are the first to be made public, but they are not the only images of the plane hitting the Pentagon. Sources tell CNN that the FBI on September 11th confiscated a nearby hotel's security camera videotape, which also captured the attack. So far, the Justice Department has refused to release that videotape. Aaron.
BROWN: Why? Do we have any idea why they won't release it?
MCINTYRE: Well, the claim - we have filed a freedom of information request for it. They claim that it might provide some intelligence to somebody else who might want to do harm to the United States. But officials I talked to here at the Pentagon say they don't see any national security or criminal value to that tape. The FBI tends to hold on to things. But the government may eventually release that tape, and if they do, we'll bring it to you.
BROWN: Jamie, thanks. I must have missed something in how, where the intelligence possibilities are there, but that happens with me sometimes. Thank you for your work today, nice job."
Judicial Watch has repeatedly asked for the footage back but they have never gotten it. Even the people who own the cameras have never seen the footage because the FBI was there within MINUTES to take their property never to return it. You are sadly misinformed and it colors every statement you make.
http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=6082
Within this article are statements and indeed court documents from people who had their cameras pointed at the sky and want to see (insert whatever the fuck you think it was), and the government won't give the video back. It used to be very easy to find this sort of information but it is being systematically removed from the internet and shills keep trying to pretend it was never there. But we remember.
They took the camera footage because they don't want people to see what is on them. If there was no reason to take it because they were not pointing in the correct directions and at the right time, they wouldn't have taken it. They didn't take security tapes from New Jersey gas stations pointing toward Canada. They didn't take tapes from every business in DC that had a camera, either. And they have never given the owners of the tapes their property back, because "National Security." Who are you trying to fool here? Me or yourself? If you're trying to shill, you need to do way better than that.
OP is just confused about what money is, like practically everyone else. Pretend that he said "currency". Fractional reserves and currency replacing actual money is one of the root causes of this madness, and it is not an accident. Nor is it accidental that noone understands the difference between currency and money.
The below lawsuit is the best chance I have seen in decades to hold these bastards' feet to the fire, legally speaking. I'm sure you could reach out to them for advice in your suit. Good luck and Godspeed. Edited to ask if you are already affiliated with them?
http://fluoridealert.org/issues/tsca-fluoride-trial/fact-sheet/
http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/government-reports/timeline-the-tsca-law-suit-against-u-s-epa/
Some of the best people from Google left to form Neeva which is now in public beta. The founders of Neeva are some of the Really Good People from the Old Days when Google was not Evil. It has no ads and is purely a paid service. Disclosure I worked for Google and recognize the names of the Neeva people and have met a few of them, but have no skin in their game. Check them out, so far I am pleased.
Also, by the way, I read a book once that talked about labour as currency. It was science fiction pulp but I really remember being struck by the currency in the book and wondering if such an economy could work.
https://stainlesssteelrat.fandom.com/wiki/Chojecki
Edited to say that you do seem to be talking about this vaguely remembered philosophy from the books of my youth. Individual Mutualism. I will read about it. Thanks!
You might be interested in this video I stumbled across while looking up Feder:
It details some of the ways that the market was deformed by Hitler's socialism. Things like buying whole trucks, keeping the rubber and scrapping the rest. Market inefficiency is practically synonymous with socialism.
I am not, I'm sorry. I did a quick search and he seems to be the premier economists of the German Nazi party. At a glance, it seems Von Mises did not approve of his ideas, although I can certainly agree with him that usury is a major problem in our world today, as it was in his back then. The book Omnipotent Government by Ludwig Von Mises appears to be explicitly concerned with the German economic phenomenon. His conclusion was something like:
"Our civilization is based on the international division of labor. It can not survive under autarky. Protectionism and autarky will lead to disintegration and pasteurization. Such conditions expedite aggression of totalitarian states."
I haven't read the book but in general agree with him and the Austrian school on economic questions. Socialism is bad, managed currencies are bad, managed economies are bad and essentially impossible in the long run. Sorry I can't offer more.
The Constitution specifies the Government should maintain a sound currency and a system of weights and measures to facilitate trade. Von Mises believed that another role of Government is to enforce contracts and to prosecute fraud. I'm not sure if I totally agree with the Austrian economists, but I think they at least make more sense than the Modem Monetary Theorists and Keynesians. Every market intervention has unintended and usually bad consequences.
Capitalism is just Free Exchange. You are mistaking Corporatism for Capitalism. Psychopathic corporations abusing the rule of law for exclusive privileges to increase shareholder value at the expense of all else is not Capitalism. It is Cronyism. It is Fascism. I would take a real Free Market over whatever it is we have now any day. Limited liability is a creation of Government,not Capitalism. What we have now, usurious Fascism, should never have been allowed to develop. It used to be illegal.
As I have started to trade stocks more, I have started to really appreciate the blockchain's rapid settlement of transactions. Banking and brokerage account transactions take days to settle, and if you move money at the wrong time you get a "Good Faith Violation", which is basically just legalese for "double-spend protection", and it happens much more quickly and efficiently with a blockchain. You can't pretend that there is no utility in the distributed ledger technology, because there obviously is.
https://www.conspiracyarchive.com/2015/01/10/albert-pike-to-mazzini-august-15-1871-three-world-wars/
Albert Pike to Mazzini, August 15, 1871: Three World Wars?
(Or, how Michael Haupt said, that William Guy Carr said, that Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez of Santiago, Chile said, that The Cause of World Unrest said, that the confessed hoaxer Gabriel Jogand-Pagès aka Dr. Bataille aka Leo Taxil said about Albert Pike and Giuseppe Mazzini in Le diable au XIXe siècle, v. II, 1892-1894, p. 605 (but actually pp. 594-606). Got it?)
There are FOIAs that were denied for this footage. People at the time claiming it exists and contemporary reporting confirms this. These things are called evidence. The 3 stills we have showing, however improbably, SKY, is actually PROOF that the improbable is possible.