You are telling me to think critically; I am giving you food for such thought but you either didn't read it or can't think critically about it. It literally says there is footage of impact from a hotel that has not been released. It does not say that every camera was pointed at the sky or that every camera caught footage of anything, but to claim the opposite without any basis in evidence is pretty sloppy critical thinking. I will quote some of the article for your edification:
"According to a CNN FOIA request however, the nearby hotel's video DID capture the impact. The following exchange is from a CNN transcript of a report on the 2002 release of the original four frames of Pentagon footage:
MCINTYRE (on camera): These pictures are the first to be made public, but they are not the only images of the plane hitting the Pentagon. Sources tell CNN that the FBI on September 11th confiscated a nearby hotel's security camera videotape, which also captured the attack. So far, the Justice Department has refused to release that videotape. Aaron.
BROWN: Why? Do we have any idea why they won't release it?
MCINTYRE: Well, the claim - we have filed a freedom of information request for it. They claim that it might provide some intelligence to somebody else who might want to do harm to the United States. But officials I talked to here at the Pentagon say they don't see any national security or criminal value to that tape. The FBI tends to hold on to things. But the government may eventually release that tape, and if they do, we'll bring it to you.
BROWN: Jamie, thanks. I must have missed something in how, where the intelligence possibilities are there, but that happens with me sometimes. Thank you for your work today, nice job."
sorry i just don't see how they would be pointing a shitty 2001 security camera at the pentagon from a hotel... what reason? why would you even waste the security camera to point it not at the things you are securing?
that makes zero sense and i don't believe a word of whoever you just quoted.
Notice how the single piece of released footage includes a bunch of sky thereby proving your hypothesis that, in 2001, there were no security cameras positioned to see the sky completely false by its very existence as a single counter example is sufficient to disprove a negative claim.
Think critically. Also, you are rude and arrogant while being wrong, never a good look. Be better!
You are telling me to think critically; I am giving you food for such thought but you either didn't read it or can't think critically about it. It literally says there is footage of impact from a hotel that has not been released. It does not say that every camera was pointed at the sky or that every camera caught footage of anything, but to claim the opposite without any basis in evidence is pretty sloppy critical thinking. I will quote some of the article for your edification:
"According to a CNN FOIA request however, the nearby hotel's video DID capture the impact. The following exchange is from a CNN transcript of a report on the 2002 release of the original four frames of Pentagon footage:
MCINTYRE (on camera): These pictures are the first to be made public, but they are not the only images of the plane hitting the Pentagon. Sources tell CNN that the FBI on September 11th confiscated a nearby hotel's security camera videotape, which also captured the attack. So far, the Justice Department has refused to release that videotape. Aaron.
BROWN: Why? Do we have any idea why they won't release it?
MCINTYRE: Well, the claim - we have filed a freedom of information request for it. They claim that it might provide some intelligence to somebody else who might want to do harm to the United States. But officials I talked to here at the Pentagon say they don't see any national security or criminal value to that tape. The FBI tends to hold on to things. But the government may eventually release that tape, and if they do, we'll bring it to you.
BROWN: Jamie, thanks. I must have missed something in how, where the intelligence possibilities are there, but that happens with me sometimes. Thank you for your work today, nice job."
i don't believe that claim for one second.
sorry i just don't see how they would be pointing a shitty 2001 security camera at the pentagon from a hotel... what reason? why would you even waste the security camera to point it not at the things you are securing?
that makes zero sense and i don't believe a word of whoever you just quoted.
https://lmgtfy.app/?q=security+camera+footage+of+sky
2001
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pentagon_Security_Camera_2.ogv
Notice how the single piece of released footage includes a bunch of sky thereby proving your hypothesis that, in 2001, there were no security cameras positioned to see the sky completely false by its very existence as a single counter example is sufficient to disprove a negative claim.
Think critically. Also, you are rude and arrogant while being wrong, never a good look. Be better!