People at the time claimed this footage exists. CNN reported that this footage exists. The reason I can't show it to you is because the government confiscated it. They did this because they thought it might have the claimed footage. Unlike you, I have evidence to support my claims. You merely insist it is impossible, despite the he fact that we already have this very improbable footage. You are wrong and you are rude. Also, you, like all shills, cannot stand to not have the last word and resort to attack words and profanity. It's classic, but sad. Critical thinking is important. Try it!
your only evidence that all businesses mount cameras pointed at the sky to record birds... is a gate keypad's security camera on that property that took 3 stills.
you really cracked the case, bravo columbo, bravo.
There are FOIAs that were denied for this footage. People at the time claiming it exists and contemporary reporting confirms this. These things are called evidence. The 3 stills we have showing, however improbably, SKY, is actually PROOF that the improbable is possible.
You dismissed the part where they claim the footage exists and shows the impact and that is why they want it back, as reported by CNN. You simply say you don't believe it as if that settles it. Clue: it doesn't settle anything.
People at the time claimed this footage exists. CNN reported that this footage exists. The reason I can't show it to you is because the government confiscated it. They did this because they thought it might have the claimed footage. Unlike you, I have evidence to support my claims. You merely insist it is impossible, despite the he fact that we already have this very improbable footage. You are wrong and you are rude. Also, you, like all shills, cannot stand to not have the last word and resort to attack words and profanity. It's classic, but sad. Critical thinking is important. Try it!
your only evidence that all businesses mount cameras pointed at the sky to record birds... is a gate keypad's security camera on that property that took 3 stills.
you really cracked the case, bravo columbo, bravo.
There are FOIAs that were denied for this footage. People at the time claiming it exists and contemporary reporting confirms this. These things are called evidence. The 3 stills we have showing, however improbably, SKY, is actually PROOF that the improbable is possible.
"i want my camera footage back"
doesn't mean "there is evidence on that camera footage"
again... a keypad security gate still camera doesn't prove that the hotel down the block had a camera pointed at the sky.
...just stop.
You dismissed the part where they claim the footage exists and shows the impact and that is why they want it back, as reported by CNN. You simply say you don't believe it as if that settles it. Clue: it doesn't settle anything.