Notice how the single piece of released footage includes a bunch of sky thereby proving your hypothesis that, in 2001, there were no security cameras positioned to see the sky completely false by its very existence as a single counter example is sufficient to disprove a negative claim.
Think critically. Also, you are rude and arrogant while being wrong, never a good look. Be better!
thats the camera on the numberpad i was talking about.
i said "the only reason we even got the crappy footage we did get was because of the numberpad camera that takes stills of people's faces as they enter their gate code from their cars."
and your response was "YeAh buT wHat ABoUt ThE gaTe CaMEra, CheCKMAte ShillZ"
Gee, I wonder what the other cameras can see. I wonder if one of them is similarly positioned. If I take your claim at face value, why would I assume there is not a "gate camera" to capture faces at a hotel? You are very rude and you can't prove a negative when there is already a positive counter example. Saying that the one and only example of footage that we have, that disproves your hypothesis, simply doesn't count because you already commented on it is childish and I think you are the dumb one. :)
https://lmgtfy.app/?q=security+camera+footage+of+sky
2001
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pentagon_Security_Camera_2.ogv
Notice how the single piece of released footage includes a bunch of sky thereby proving your hypothesis that, in 2001, there were no security cameras positioned to see the sky completely false by its very existence as a single counter example is sufficient to disprove a negative claim.
Think critically. Also, you are rude and arrogant while being wrong, never a good look. Be better!
holy shit you're dumb
thats the camera on the numberpad i was talking about.
i said "the only reason we even got the crappy footage we did get was because of the numberpad camera that takes stills of people's faces as they enter their gate code from their cars."
and your response was "YeAh buT wHat ABoUt ThE gaTe CaMEra, CheCKMAte ShillZ"
Gee, I wonder what the other cameras can see. I wonder if one of them is similarly positioned. If I take your claim at face value, why would I assume there is not a "gate camera" to capture faces at a hotel? You are very rude and you can't prove a negative when there is already a positive counter example. Saying that the one and only example of footage that we have, that disproves your hypothesis, simply doesn't count because you already commented on it is childish and I think you are the dumb one. :)