They took the camera footage because they don't want people to see what is on them. If there was no reason to take it because they were not pointing in the correct directions and at the right time, they wouldn't have taken it. They didn't take security tapes from New Jersey gas stations pointing toward Canada. They didn't take tapes from every business in DC that had a camera, either. And they have never given the owners of the tapes their property back, because "National Security." Who are you trying to fool here? Me or yourself? If you're trying to shill, you need to do way better than that.
they took the camera footage because it was the largest attack on american soil... it's called gathering evidence.
just because they didn't share the intimate details of the forensic audit of every single second of area security camera footage... doesn't mean they are hiding a multi camera shoot of DB cooper flying patriot missiles into giant barrels of thermite paint.
they always take the footage hoping something is on there.
they even take ATM cameras.
also... who in the fuck is asking for the camera footage back? unless they had a camera pointed at the sky, AND WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD THEY, there is not a god damned thing on them.
you show me the interview or even the claim from a credible witness that says "i have a security camera pointed at the sky that captured the video of the (insert whatever the fuck you think it was) and the government won't give it back".
i'll wait.
USE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS... what in the fuck is a more likely scenario here?
the fact that you won't even entertain the most simple and basic explanation for the whole thing should be a fucking alarm clock blaring into your ears that something is very very wrong with your theory.
seriously... what is more likely...
cameras are never pointed at the sky to record nothing 99.99999999999 % of the time.
or...
whatever the fuck you have convinced yourself into believing.
Judicial Watch has repeatedly asked for the footage back but they have never gotten it. Even the people who own the cameras have never seen the footage because the FBI was there within MINUTES to take their property never to return it. You are sadly misinformed and it colors every statement you make.
Within this article are statements and indeed court documents from people who had their cameras pointed at the sky and want to see (insert whatever the fuck you think it was), and the government won't give the video back. It used to be very easy to find this sort of information but it is being systematically removed from the internet and shills keep trying to pretend it was never there. But we remember.
i said show me someone claiming they have footage of the sky
your response is "people are asking where the footage is"
no shit...
now show me someone saying they had cameras pointed in such a way that would capture video of a plane flying in the sky.
just because nobody got the tapes back doesn't mean they had anything on them, it just means nobody gives a fuck enough to give them back because its fucking stupid.
what part of a gas stations security camera keeping an eye on the beer cooler is going to show you the plane that hit the pentagon?
none of those people had cameras pointed at the sky, thats total bullshit and you know it.
why in the fuck would they?
what fucking purpose would it have served?
catching blurry images of birds flying by faster than shitty 2001 cameras could resolve?
You are telling me to think critically; I am giving you food for such thought but you either didn't read it or can't think critically about it. It literally says there is footage of impact from a hotel that has not been released. It does not say that every camera was pointed at the sky or that every camera caught footage of anything, but to claim the opposite without any basis in evidence is pretty sloppy critical thinking. I will quote some of the article for your edification:
"According to a CNN FOIA request however, the nearby hotel's video DID capture the impact. The following exchange is from a CNN transcript of a report on the 2002 release of the original four frames of Pentagon footage:
MCINTYRE (on camera): These pictures are the first to be made public, but they are not the only images of the plane hitting the Pentagon. Sources tell CNN that the FBI on September 11th confiscated a nearby hotel's security camera videotape, which also captured the attack. So far, the Justice Department has refused to release that videotape. Aaron.
BROWN: Why? Do we have any idea why they won't release it?
MCINTYRE: Well, the claim - we have filed a freedom of information request for it. They claim that it might provide some intelligence to somebody else who might want to do harm to the United States. But officials I talked to here at the Pentagon say they don't see any national security or criminal value to that tape. The FBI tends to hold on to things. But the government may eventually release that tape, and if they do, we'll bring it to you.
BROWN: Jamie, thanks. I must have missed something in how, where the intelligence possibilities are there, but that happens with me sometimes. Thank you for your work today, nice job."
They took the camera footage because they don't want people to see what is on them. If there was no reason to take it because they were not pointing in the correct directions and at the right time, they wouldn't have taken it. They didn't take security tapes from New Jersey gas stations pointing toward Canada. They didn't take tapes from every business in DC that had a camera, either. And they have never given the owners of the tapes their property back, because "National Security." Who are you trying to fool here? Me or yourself? If you're trying to shill, you need to do way better than that.
thats ridiculous bullshit.
they took the camera footage because it was the largest attack on american soil... it's called gathering evidence.
just because they didn't share the intimate details of the forensic audit of every single second of area security camera footage... doesn't mean they are hiding a multi camera shoot of DB cooper flying patriot missiles into giant barrels of thermite paint.
they always take the footage hoping something is on there.
they even take ATM cameras.
also... who in the fuck is asking for the camera footage back? unless they had a camera pointed at the sky, AND WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD THEY, there is not a god damned thing on them.
you show me the interview or even the claim from a credible witness that says "i have a security camera pointed at the sky that captured the video of the (insert whatever the fuck you think it was) and the government won't give it back".
i'll wait.
USE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS... what in the fuck is a more likely scenario here?
the fact that you won't even entertain the most simple and basic explanation for the whole thing should be a fucking alarm clock blaring into your ears that something is very very wrong with your theory.
seriously... what is more likely...
cameras are never pointed at the sky to record nothing 99.99999999999 % of the time.
or...
whatever the fuck you have convinced yourself into believing.
Judicial Watch has repeatedly asked for the footage back but they have never gotten it. Even the people who own the cameras have never seen the footage because the FBI was there within MINUTES to take their property never to return it. You are sadly misinformed and it colors every statement you make.
http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=6082
Within this article are statements and indeed court documents from people who had their cameras pointed at the sky and want to see (insert whatever the fuck you think it was), and the government won't give the video back. It used to be very easy to find this sort of information but it is being systematically removed from the internet and shills keep trying to pretend it was never there. But we remember.
i said show me someone claiming they have footage of the sky
your response is "people are asking where the footage is"
no shit...
now show me someone saying they had cameras pointed in such a way that would capture video of a plane flying in the sky.
just because nobody got the tapes back doesn't mean they had anything on them, it just means nobody gives a fuck enough to give them back because its fucking stupid.
what part of a gas stations security camera keeping an eye on the beer cooler is going to show you the plane that hit the pentagon?
none of those people had cameras pointed at the sky, thats total bullshit and you know it.
why in the fuck would they?
what fucking purpose would it have served?
catching blurry images of birds flying by faster than shitty 2001 cameras could resolve?
critical thinking is important.
You are telling me to think critically; I am giving you food for such thought but you either didn't read it or can't think critically about it. It literally says there is footage of impact from a hotel that has not been released. It does not say that every camera was pointed at the sky or that every camera caught footage of anything, but to claim the opposite without any basis in evidence is pretty sloppy critical thinking. I will quote some of the article for your edification:
"According to a CNN FOIA request however, the nearby hotel's video DID capture the impact. The following exchange is from a CNN transcript of a report on the 2002 release of the original four frames of Pentagon footage:
MCINTYRE (on camera): These pictures are the first to be made public, but they are not the only images of the plane hitting the Pentagon. Sources tell CNN that the FBI on September 11th confiscated a nearby hotel's security camera videotape, which also captured the attack. So far, the Justice Department has refused to release that videotape. Aaron.
BROWN: Why? Do we have any idea why they won't release it?
MCINTYRE: Well, the claim - we have filed a freedom of information request for it. They claim that it might provide some intelligence to somebody else who might want to do harm to the United States. But officials I talked to here at the Pentagon say they don't see any national security or criminal value to that tape. The FBI tends to hold on to things. But the government may eventually release that tape, and if they do, we'll bring it to you.
BROWN: Jamie, thanks. I must have missed something in how, where the intelligence possibilities are there, but that happens with me sometimes. Thank you for your work today, nice job."