Also, the glowing vaxxed vein videos were fake.
Your main focus is to make people look the other way. I just add you in my shill folder and never bother to reply again.
always make sure to block anyone who ever has a different view! then you’ll be safe in your echo chamber, and are sure to learn nothing!
If you don't like it, you have every right to keep it to yourself.
don’t like what? i made two statements :
-
the glowing vein videos were fake.
-
luminescent graphene isn’t luciferase by definition, and shouldn’t be mistaken for it.
i didn’t comment because i “didn’t like” what you said. i commented to try and help you correct your mistakes! alternatively, i commented so that you could clarify and edify my views. we are not adversaries, and this is not an argument nor a flimsy pretext to get people to ignore your post.
earnestly, if you have any evidence/reasoning that supports that i am wrong - i would very much like to know it and i wouldn’t be offended or rush to block you for providing it!
You are blocked.
:(
That’s easy, but doesn’t have anything to do with the op.
If you are interested in further discussing your topic, and/or greater subject, please join us on flatearthresearch!
2 reasons.
1: It’s a conditioned response to protect their dogmas. you see it in most all organized religions/cults. it is to prevent any possible rational discussion, challenge, criticism, and/or dissent. scientism is the secular religion they practice, largely unwittingly/unknowingly. one of the first, and false, things many students are taught is how our “primitive” ancestors once believed that the world was flat and we enlightened moderns would never fall for that again. this biases young minds against ever seriously considering the idea, and outlines the punishment for doing so (becoming “primitive”, thought stupid/foolish; banishment from “intellectual modern society”)
2: The heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop encourages this false enmity (and false dichotomy) between “flattards” and “globetards” in order to further disable, prevent, and suppress any collaboration or earnest discussion/research on the valuable subject.
Untamed emotion blinds and prevents objective study or earnest discussion. There truly is no rational or intellectual reason to respond in such a way to an ostensibly silly claim like “the earth is flat” or any other.
To anyone with an interest, including critical, in the subject; please join us on flatearthresearch to further explore and exchange views!
Luminescence is already used in medicine
No one said it wasn’t! I just said that the videos showing glowing veins were faked. Do you have any evidence/observations which contradict that?
#Facts
Exactly! There is no agenda - i’m talking about semantics/definitions/facts.
It is incorrect to say that luminescent graphene is luciferase, unless the graphene is converted into an oxidative enzyme (meaning it isn’t graphene anymore).
Those videos of people's veins lighting up under UV light were not fake after all
They were completely fake, afaiaa. UV light can’t penetrate into the veins, and even if it somehow could and caused the (luminescent graphene/luciferase) in the blood to luminesce - it couldn’t get back out again for the same reason - too much opaque stuff in the way.
luminescent graphene wouldn’t be an “oxidative enzyme” in any case, and wouldn’t fit the current definition of luciferase anyway. not everything that luminesces is automatically luciferase, although it does seem to have a somewhat loose definition.
No, it does not.
sounds like you haven’t read it closely.
Article vii sub 5
5. Each Contracting Party shall, at the time when the present Treaty enters into force for it, inform the other Contracting Parties, and thereafter shall give them notice in advance, of a. all expeditions to and within Antarctica, on the part of its ships or nationals, and all expeditions to Antarctica organized in or proceeding from its territory; b. all stations in Antarctica occupied by its nationals; and c. any military personnel or equipment intended to be introduced by it into Antarctica subject to the conditions prescribed in paragraph 2 of Article I of the present Treaty.
article x
Each of the Contracting Parties undertakes to exert appropriate efforts, consistent with the Charter of the United Nations, to the end that no one engages in any activity in Antarctica contrary to the principles or purposes of the present Treaty.
all expeditions must be approved by the host nations, and then given to the other member nations in advance of them for subsequent approval.
Lots of Flat Earthers claim it as a fact.
flat earthers are, largely, not real. they are agents and or products of a psyop. they repeat that “fact” because it was presented to them as such, like most all other claims of fact one might encounter.
earnest flat earth researchers may, of course, claim it as fact and have evidence to support their claim (a fact is merely one type of claim, after all). however, wether that fact is true or false doesn’t change the shape of the world - nor does the shape of the world depend on it being true (wether flat, round, or any other shape).
as i said, it’s all red herring to discussion/determination of the shape of the world anyhow.
I’m not sure about the 60deg latitude claim, but the antarctic treaty unambiguously states that no one can go to antarctica without obtaining explicit permission from one or more of the member nations first.
the whole thing is a red herring in regards to the shape of the world though. no one needs to go there to determine the shape of the world. also the idea that antarctica is not a continent the shape we think it is, and is actually an ice wall that surrounds the known world, is exactly that - an idea.
the shape of the world does not depend on the shape of antarctica; that’s silly, regardless of its shape
to anyone with an interest in the subject, including critical, please join us to explore and exchange views on flatearthresearch!
When your views are weak and can’t stand against the alternative/dissenting views of others - always block them out! That way you’ll always be protected from learning (especially learning when you’re wrong)!
Just stick your fingers in your ears and scream like a child! That’s what all the smart people do...
The moon is not a rock that floats in the sky and never falls, nor is it made of cheese - only a child would believe nonsense like that!
If you would like to learn about and criticize alternative viewpoints, please join us on flatearthresearch. If you want to ever learn new things, don’t reflexively ignore/block the people who say them - try discussing first!
“Flatties” don’t really exist anyway - that is a psyop.
It isn’t transphobic to help someone stop indulging a delusion (all delusion is inherently unhealthy). Nor is matter of factly explaining that boys cannot become girls and vice versa.
Many have tried to find dirt on this guy, and failed. If he was a neo-nazi, he was remarkably pro racial integration (though i have not seen evidence of him encouraging miscegeny)
I know you were just joking, but due to his prominent position shaping young minds for so many years and his prior educational training in developmental child psychology - it is not impossible that he was a propagandist / disinformation agent. I suspect his heart was in the right place, and if it was in any way true - he was likely a patsy / victim of that propaganda himself.
Tl;dr? Troons should have watched mr rogers - it would have helped them.
sadly that rat fucker (his self chosen moniker!) wants a subscription in order to watch the clip :(
here it is - not nearly as sensational as the article makes it out to be, sadly :
right, and i just asked what your best evidence is to support your opinions! do you really not have any? is that why you responded this way instead of simply providing it?
for someone ostensibly interested in sharing their opinions, you seem to have a lot of irrational hostility towards the views of others :( you might want to rethink that.
the claim that the pole “shifts/reverses” is extraordinary - as such, it requires extraordinary evidence to support it. don’t you agree?
this is not really a “conspiracy” question - but there is certainly some overlap in regards to the “food pyramid” etc.
the answer - by the best available data - is high fat. basically the opposite of what the government recommends.
There’s actually quite a bit of archaeology evidence for several pole shifts
Nonsense. However, i have been wrong in the past so ... what is the strongest evidence you know of to support the existence of this thing no one has measured or recorded in history?
They are close to extinction level events each time and everything is destroyed and reset back to the Stone Age basically
Cataclysm, sure - plenty of evidence for that. But no pole shifts.
The reason they are close to extinction level event is that when the pole shifts the crust of the Earth moves in such a way that it is no longer in sync with the weather so the winds continue to go east west and the oceans continue to go that way, much of the world is buried in a mile or two of ocean above sea level, or ripped to shreds by supersonic wins. If you survive that, he better hope your area doesn’t suddenly fall into the arctic zone where you will be flash frozen.
As i said, complete and utter tripe. contrived fiction with no scientific support whatsoever. poorly written apocalyptic fear porn.
I hope all of this is wrong
take heart! people make lousy prophets in every era, and humanity is (historically, and contemporarily) constantly stupid and wrong. the fear porn propaganda has a different purpose, and is a philosophical/mythological bias at the center of the secular religion of scientism.
as for archeology - the most reliable dating method in that “discipline” always was and continues to be pottery (and better than that, coinage with dates stamped in it). The dating methods are largely bunk.
Civilization as we know it will be wiped out within a half day, much of it buried under a mile of mud, and an additional mile of ocean for the next cycle of humans to discover.
i think there is significant evidence for the global flood; none for pole shifts afaiaa. however, that sort of event requires a LOT more water than we have now (even stored in “ice caps”).
but we have some good evidence for periodic cataclysms
To every culture living near an erupting volcano, or experiencing a severe earthquake, or even a severe storm - cataclysms abound.
as for some sort of regular/predictable periodicity - i am extremely skeptical.
in regards to “pole reversal”; that’s just total nonsense.
combined with reasons to think we might be experiencing a slower mass seppuku with radiation, chemicals and related poisons
i see it as warfare, genocide, and slavery not seppuku - but there certainly is a lot of that!
They want us to think that we're doomed, but they might have doomed us with such spirited and convincing methods
“they” wish! we are many, they are few. though granted, willingly accepting mass injection/administration of sterilants could conceivably change that :(
in any case, “the sky is falling” and “the pole reversal is coming” are both silly fear porn.
apocalyptic fear porn nonsense.
there is no scientific support for “pole shifts”.
as long as everything is going to be destroyed anyway - nothing you do matters ... right?!
But perhaps the most alarming aspect of their nonexistence online is that it is also unclear why they were created.
lol, yes - if you are oblivious and/or braindead.
my guess is prop food that has been sprayed with something and is otherwise inedible/poisonous. looks like no one else in the shot is eating either.
pretty common for movie shoots.
thank you for posting the source!
this isn’t quite right, because the datasets are a bit “apples to oranges” - but there is still certainly something going on here.
the ioc report was only looking at 35 and under athletes and the maron study was only looking at american athletes. the total cardiac arrest tally being compared to those numbers from 21-22 is global, without age restriction, and also seems to include people who may or may not be considered “athletes” depending on your criteria.
however, in any case - having the same/similar amount in a single year to ~40 years combined is very disturbing.
The thread you wish to debate is if man has the intelligence to invent rockets that can propel people into low earth orbit
i sincerely have no wish to debate anything, ever. i only seek discussion and the earnest and collaborative pursuit of truth. if i am wrong, i should like to know it and how to demonstrate it; how about yourself?
i do not doubt that man has the intelligence to invent rockets (thousands of years old). i doubt the existence of orbit, writ large, and hence no rocket - no matter how sophisticated or intelligent the inventor - can ever achieve it. it is not coincidence that orbit began, historically, as contrived fiction and today can ONLY be seen on television.
If you do not have such faith, then you are of low intelligence
it's quite the opposite! those of low intelligence and knowledge are the most likely to rely on superstition/belief/faith/mythology/religion. they do this precisely because they lack the knowledge and/or ability to understand (“low intelligence” as you put it). only a fool believes what they ought to know! faith/belief is the enemy of all knowledge and objective study of any kind (it’s called bias).
I don't debate
not a problem; i don’t debate at all! debate is base pageantry for idiots.
i only seek rational discourse and the collaborative pursuit of truth.
You have no evidence that would compel me to believe the earth is flat
i don’t want you to believe in the shape of the earth at all, regardless of what shape it is. if you believe the earth is round, flat, or any other shape - you have faith not fact.
as for compelling evidence, there is plenty of that. why do you so wish there wasn’t?
the voluminous amount of evidence to the contrary
like what? i have been at this a long time. i have evaluated the “voluminous amount of evidence” and found it to not support the premise when scrutinized rationally/critically.
why don’t you start small/simple - what is the best / most compelling (to you!) evidence that supports your view that the world is spherical?
So what's the point?
this is the right question! there are many, but a couple good ones for starters are
- the pursuit of truth
- excising belief where it doesn’t belong and replacing it with knowledge
Debating ... [anyone is] ... 100% waste of time
because debate is a silly game for stupid people. intelligent people prefer rational discourse and the pursuit of truth - not impressing/manipulating judges and the audience for “points”. in any case, i’m not a flat earther - so you don’t have to worry about that!
practice what you preach.
are you truly so afraid of a simple conversation? or are you just incapable of reading and rationally responding to the content of my comments? in either case, the one who needs help is you :(
practice what you preach, brother or sister.
“la, la, la - i can’t hear you” - you
:(
why are you so afraid to engage rationally in a simple conversation? especially if your worldview is correct, you should not need to avoid and discard any alternative views in such a way.
if i am wrong, tell me so! explain how orbit wasn’t first invented as imaginative fiction! if you try to do this, i am certain you will learn something - but perhaps this is what you are afraid of above all else :(
interesting. thanks for sharing!
the cited source, an expert in electron microscopy, doesn’t so much say that viruses don’t exist - but that they have never been established as the causal agent of any sickness/disease.
they argue/suspect that all viruses are endogenous (exist within us naturally already) and are not responsible for any sickness (alone, anyway).
Lifelong antiquities czar - no elections.
Good guy...
He is much more concerned with proving and maintaining the conceited lie that arabs (invaders...) are responsible for all ancient construction and culture in egypt than archeology, egyptology, and history.