Those videos of people's veins lighting up under UV light were not fake after all
They were completely fake, afaiaa. UV light can’t penetrate into the veins, and even if it somehow could and caused the (luminescent graphene/luciferase) in the blood to luminesce - it couldn’t get back out again for the same reason - too much opaque stuff in the way.
luminescent graphene wouldn’t be an “oxidative enzyme” in any case, and wouldn’t fit the current definition of luciferase anyway. not everything that luminesces is automatically luciferase, although it does seem to have a somewhat loose definition.
No one said it wasn’t! I just said that the videos showing glowing veins were faked. Do you have any evidence/observations which contradict that?
#Facts
Exactly! There is no agenda - i’m talking about semantics/definitions/facts.
It is incorrect to say that luminescent graphene is luciferase, unless the graphene is converted into an oxidative enzyme (meaning it isn’t graphene anymore).
I saw all your posts and comment. Your main focus is to make people look the other way. I just add you in my shill folder and never bother to reply again.
If you don't like it, you have every right to keep it to yourself. Or just continue to spam, it makes no difference to me. You are blocked.
Your main focus is to make people look the other way. I just add you in my shill folder and never bother to reply again.
always make sure to block anyone who ever has a different view! then you’ll be safe in your echo chamber, and are sure to learn nothing!
If you don't like it, you have every right to keep it to yourself.
don’t like what? i made two statements :
the glowing vein videos were fake.
luminescent graphene isn’t luciferase by definition, and shouldn’t be mistaken for it.
i didn’t comment because i “didn’t like” what you said. i commented to try and help you correct your mistakes! alternatively, i commented so that you could clarify and edify my views. we are not adversaries, and this is not an argument nor a flimsy pretext to get people to ignore your post.
earnestly, if you have any evidence/reasoning that supports that i am wrong - i would very much like to know it and i wouldn’t be offended or rush to block you for providing it!
They were completely fake, afaiaa. UV light can’t penetrate into the veins, and even if it somehow could and caused the (luminescent graphene/luciferase) in the blood to luminesce - it couldn’t get back out again for the same reason - too much opaque stuff in the way.
luminescent graphene wouldn’t be an “oxidative enzyme” in any case, and wouldn’t fit the current definition of luciferase anyway. not everything that luminesces is automatically luciferase, although it does seem to have a somewhat loose definition.
Found the shill!
#Facts. Luminescence is already used in medicine. Don't try to push your agenda here.
No one said it wasn’t! I just said that the videos showing glowing veins were faked. Do you have any evidence/observations which contradict that?
Exactly! There is no agenda - i’m talking about semantics/definitions/facts.
It is incorrect to say that luminescent graphene is luciferase, unless the graphene is converted into an oxidative enzyme (meaning it isn’t graphene anymore).
I saw all your posts and comment. Your main focus is to make people look the other way. I just add you in my shill folder and never bother to reply again.
If you don't like it, you have every right to keep it to yourself. Or just continue to spam, it makes no difference to me. You are blocked.
always make sure to block anyone who ever has a different view! then you’ll be safe in your echo chamber, and are sure to learn nothing!
don’t like what? i made two statements :
the glowing vein videos were fake.
luminescent graphene isn’t luciferase by definition, and shouldn’t be mistaken for it.
i didn’t comment because i “didn’t like” what you said. i commented to try and help you correct your mistakes! alternatively, i commented so that you could clarify and edify my views. we are not adversaries, and this is not an argument nor a flimsy pretext to get people to ignore your post.
earnestly, if you have any evidence/reasoning that supports that i am wrong - i would very much like to know it and i wouldn’t be offended or rush to block you for providing it!
:(
That would be fluorescent not luminescence.
Don't confuse these morons with facts. They don't want facts. They want their opinions validated.