2
instrumental 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ted Gunderson is very, VERY well known. Search for Conspiracy of Silence documentary.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I agree. I'm also not opposed to the theory that SARS-CoV-2 was completely synthetic all along, and nothing but nanotech.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like (at least) this vid is simply chroma-keyed, which is the exact same process the weather man on the local news and ranom youtubers alike use to remove the background (which could explain any abberations). In this case, I could see how he might insist that his surroundings be removed as to not give away details of his location. And any on-camera interview may have cuts to remove, for example - a cough or a sneeze or throat clearing, editing out complete lines if they felt he was veering off-topic, or if they needed to do another take, for any reason.

I hear what you're saying, but don't really see any reason why this would be faked when people could just say "he's lying" or "the leak is a larp", and brush it off.

2
instrumental 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven't seen him in anything since Signs (2009). But my favorite of course is Conspiracy Theory (1997).

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

You propose it's fake? Seems unlikely to me since the tech is 100% real and has been around for quite a while.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perhaps read the article. It was explained that the tech he worked on was "virus-sized" (for context), not that it dealt with viruses. This particular tech seems to deal with nanowires that can probe inside cells to extract and relay metadata of sorts.

Given the fact that no one can seem to supply a viable sample of the SARS-CoV-2 for testing (which would support the terrain theory), is it not possible that what is said to be a virus is actually nanotech? Is it also not outside the realm of possibility that nanoparticulates might be aerolized and injested in the same way it's claimed that viruses are?

3
instrumental 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hmm, wonder why.

8
instrumental 8 points ago +8 / -0

Y'know, it's pretty crazy - Gibson has done 11 movies since 2020.

3
instrumental 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mr Halley analysed a 1993 report written by Lord Nimmo Smith that looked into the Planet investigation and the events that followed called 'Allegations of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice'.

I think the author accidentally a word there.

Controversially, by modern standards at least, it dismissed the young people involved – many of whom were children in care – as 'rent boys' and said they were not being abused because they were receiving payment.

So bugger a kid, toss him a few quid and judge says it's cool because the kid was paid. That's a mighty fine justice system you got there, Nigel.

2
instrumental 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't read the comments until you mentioned it, but yeah, she slowed down the recording of her narration to make is sound creepier. I don't know if it's more annoying or unsettling, though.

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still waiting on that source.

2
instrumental 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I used to do drugs. I still do...but I used to, too." - Mitch Hedberg

3
instrumental 3 points ago +3 / -0

I actually think the narrator spoke in a regular voice (at normal speed) when it was recorded, but during post-processing, the recording was slowed in order to A) fit the proposed length/imagery B) make it easier understood. I've done a bunch of video editing work, and the narrated voice sounds exactly like it would if it were slowed down by 15% or so. In other words - it doesn't sound natural as though she were just speaking slowly on purpose.

3
instrumental 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure they just slowed the audio voiceover down to 75%-85%, but agree it sounds weird. At least it's not backwards!

2
instrumental 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought for sure it already had been, but that may have been on another forum. Pretty old news to me, from as far back as 9/11 (and before), but maybe I'll post, since maybe others haven't heard of this.

Prior to Israel's infiltration of American modern "big tech", they had been developers of most of the software that controlled communications/telephone systems in the U.S., including the telephone lines/comms channels of govenment intelligence, military, infrastructure, emergency and health services. Essentially, Israel allowed their SIGINT units a backdoor to EVERYTHING all Amricans had discussed, either prior to the NSA doing so itself, or in collusion with the agency.

You may be interested in this classic Fox 4-part series implicating the Israeli communications company AMDOCS (and others) in 9/11:

Israeli spying in the USA: Suppressed four-part Fox News series with Carl Cameron

*edit: posted

2
instrumental 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of all the talk about FBI and CIA influence on big tech, not many seem to acknowledge the scores of "former" Israeli Unit 8200 spies employed across the big tech arena.

REVEALED: THE FORMER ISRAELI SPIES WORKING IN TOP JOBS AT GOOGLE, FACEBOOK AND MICROSOFT

by DrLeaks
1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a feeling they took a quick glance around the office..."Nope, nowhere the be found!"

1
instrumental 1 point ago +1 / -0

it’s a scientific fact that as of today iboga has a higher failure rate than AA/NA/HA.

Source?

view more: Next ›