▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Consider the implications of cleaning yourself within the habitat of others tho...

An interesting addition...

That's because to imagine that which could be; ignores adherence to that which is. I can tell you that my consciousness acts "of the leash", and the more I adapt to inspiration the more it delivers connections I haven't seen before. I try to not even read my own responses anymore; to instead directly adapt to whatever else comes along. Does this help you comprehend? No. You need to adapt to inspiration by yourself.

Beautiful, whether by grace or by glory, you have both made and proven your point without forcing anything on me.

The inversions fall with the beliefs; and the reasoning about the beliefs.

You know how when you’re coming out of a good trip, reality (atleast your comprehension of what we deal with as our “standard” reality) seems to return in waves? Well I’ve thought of myself as not being someone with fixed notions, always “open minded” but reading your comment a wave has washed over me and I’ve come to notice the layers of reality I had thus far taken for granted. I’m going to try to hold on to this mindset and see if it helps any further

Inversions represent fiction; for the natural order of motion cannot be inverted; only ignored.

Wise words in which I see much truth but will struggle to apply to my own perceptions...

We are a growing web of magnetic connections between electric monopoles...

Thanks for the insights friendo

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should man ever divert the flow of water? Or if he wishes to bathe, find a river?

To be in this world would be to only bathe in a river, to be not of it, would be to fill a bath.

I find myself incapable of imagining the life of ONE who has overcome (there I go again) inversion.

Without some inversion, how could we have ever recognized the shadows cast by the chains present in our cave?

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Be in this world, but not of it

Regardless of which metaphysical interpretation is right, they remain metaphysical, while we, for atleast the foreseeable future, remain physical.

That’s how I stay grounded atleast

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

The people who would rather have fans of conspiracy waste their lives on nonsense than exposing their crimes

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve heard that guy was almost like an epstein or a dutreaux, but it got cleaned up to point to just him... fucking filth

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

And to think any fucking retard wants you banned. Great breakdown, it should be stapled onto anyone who visits GAW

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you live in a world of disbelief, you live in a conflicting world of belief as well

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very interesting insight, I’ve never heard it described quite like that but it certainly fits. Do you follow a single practice or a personal amalgam?

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s a literalization of “Gnostic”, but when most people use the word they mean it in the traditional sense of “the esoteric knowledge that ONE is an aspect of ALL”, in which case the phrase “Gnostic atheist” is an oxymoron

▲ 6 ▼
Graphenium 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think that there is something Here, but the available data is miniscule.

https://www.lawofone.info/s/1

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s called an agnostic, and it means someone who hasn’t found the beliefs that make sense to them regarding God. However your life is full of beliefs already. You believe the system hasn’t collapsed, so you pay taxes. You believe your dining room chair hasn’t collapsed, so you sit down. These beliefs make sense to you. Keep seeking and you might find the belief that turns you from an agnostic to a gnostic (lowercase).

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

The breath of life.

Animal = Latin - anima (“a current of air, wind, air, breath, the vital principle, life, soul”), sometimes equivalent to animus (“mind”)

Spirit/Inspiration = Latin - spiritus ("spirit" or "breathing"),

Yoga = Sanskrit - (The Upanisads, Epics, Puranas and Yoga Sutra used the word ‘yoga’ with a meaning of ‘controlling the body, senses, mind and intellect’.)


Breathing, like sleep, is one of the most misunderstood aspects of existence (by everyone, I’m not putting my own limited understanding above others, just sharing what I’ve come to think). Simultaneously obvious yet mystifying. What seem to be prerequisite conditions of existence, taken utterly for granted by almost all of us.

I think they are entwined aspects of each entity’s innate “technology of existence”. Stars inhale Hydrogen and exhale Helium. Plants inhale CO2 and exhale O2. Man (formed from clay) inhales a mixture of O2 and N2 and exhales CO2 and N2. Our body, through literally NO conscious effort, inhales the breath of life, promulgates this motive spirit to every cell in your body, and exhales the byproducts. It also, through likewise NO conscious effort, utilizes the mysterious state of sleep to repair itself, refresh itself, inspire itself through dreams, and revitalize itself for the next day. All of these miracles occurs through NO conscious effort, so what could be accomplished with conscious effort?

As an example, let’s imagine holding our breath as one small aspect of this hidden science/technology. Most people can’t hold their breath for more than a minute or so, but did you know that with a brief amount of practice you can hold your breath for 3,4, even 5 minutes? Did you know that for thousands of years this was common practice among humans living on the coast?. Did you know that some people, like David Blaine, have pushed this to absurd limits beyond 17 minutes?.

Research even indicates that how you breathe can radically affect your health. A disturbing trend of rampant mouth breathing (lol, no not an insult) due to the increased consumption of processed foods has led to a rise in snoring, sleep apnea, asthma, autoimmune disease, and allergies.

What does this return to? The breath, the spirit of life, which is the core of Chang’s Mo Pai, the core of the Tummo Yoga, and the core of Wim Hof’s practice. All three of these are relatively well studied by western science, extremely well documented in terms of tangible effects in respondents, and utterly mind blowing when understanding about them begins to coalesce. These are among the few remaining strands of “user documentation” on the “technology of existence” I referenced above.

As mentioned by another user, hypnagogia, or the thin line that separates sleep from wake, is fundamentally tied to the breath and this hidden science. This is the state wherein you can tap into the same energy source that shapes a fetus from undifferentiated stem cells to a fully formed creature. This state shows up in all manner of weird places when you attempt to understand human existence. In addition to this “source connection” it can be used to induce astral projection, it can be tied to the well documented “flow-state” of certain highly skilled professionals like musicians and athletes. And one may be able to “bootstrap” themselves to versions of this state through certain entheogenic compounds that have coexisted with man since man first woke.

I’d love to say I have things figured out, but the reality is far from that. However I have looked into these practices for a while, and through trial and error have come to some limited conclusions. Among these are:

  1. grounding to the earth, either through direct contact (no insulating materials between the perineum and the ground) , or some method of grounding, such as a buried wire run to your root chakra
  2. A deep, deep state of meditation is the only productive kind. You could sit “meditating” for one hundred hours over the course of a month, but only spend seconds in the relavent state of meditation
  3. Sexual energy, generated by/in/with your root chakra (perineum) and its interaction with your sexual organs, is the fundamental understanding. Like blood, it is not to be spilled lightly.

Unfortunately, due to the miraculous nature of this technology of existence, and its currently unexplained nature, matters are rife with charlatans and lies and deceivers. One must use their own God given gift of free will to discern reality for themselves. I’ve attempted to share some of what I’ve come to understand so far, but I know the only thing I know for sure is how much I don’t know, so please, share anything this inspires you to!

by Blazer
▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

From the wiki page for the Drake Equation:

Criticism related to the Drake equation focuses not on the equation itself, but on the fact that the estimated values for several of its factors are highly conjectural, the combined multiplicative effect being that the uncertainty associated with any derived value is so large that the equation cannot be used to draw firm conclusions.

It is more properly thought of as an approximation than as a serious attempt to determine a precise number.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

by Blazer
▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

But just like the famous Drake equation, all the terms in your equation are unknown. It could be zero species or nearly infinite that meet this criteria, and anywhere in between.

We have zero clue what percent of civilizations that invent computers go extinct, or their travel time/methods, or their ability to communicate at a distance (certain things related to ayylmaos appear superluminal). All we know is that life is possible and our history is full of unexplained “visitations”

by Blazer
▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey you should check out the book “Childhood’s End” I think you’d like it

by Blazer
▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just wondering, but what’s your mathematical reasoning for supposing no alien life?

I feel as though, since we only have knowledge of this one planet, and we observe life here (in other words, a 100% occurrence of life on earth like planets), we could assume life has a chance to arise on similar planets, of which there are billions.

What’s the argument for life being impossibly rare but also based on math?

Edit: reading more into your word choice, I figure you think aliens may exist but the mathematical impossibility is any interaction/overlap between our peoples? If only there were recordings of regular humans meeting godlike beings...

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Super weird, I happened to catch a clip from his show yesterday and he totally seemed to reference hunter biden molesting his niece, found that super out of “character” for Maher

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7I_vVxtVClc

Skip to the end, roughly 4:40 for the entire bit about biden, he mentions not only him going after his brothers widow but also says “they’re both (biden and the queen) open to sex with relatives”

Maybe he really did get a tap on the shoulder, but not from Trump imo

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very interesting link! Going to have to try to find a copy of that first Tome, thank you!

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh sorry, I figured GAW was still obsessed with Trump and “the plan”, if things are changing that’s great

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you can, I think it would be much better for everyone if you could share your knowledge here publicly, I’m certainly interested.

▲ 10 ▼
Graphenium 10 points ago +10 / -0

This has been known for a while dude, I knew this long before Q Anon existed, its hardly a reason to “trust the plan”. If anything you should get those types posting here, where they won’t be silenced by shill mods when they figure out who runs big pharma.

The Proper Symbol of Medicine So which symbol should we use to represent Medicine? That of Asklepios, God of Medicine, or that of Hermes, undertaker, Prince of Thieves, God of Commerce? In these days of malpractice suits, HMO’s, avaricious insurance and pharmaceutical companies, and societal values where cosmetic surgery seems to be more important than health care, the cynic might say that the Caduceus is the more representative symbol of modern medicine. But which symbol would my father choose? Unreservedly, he would feel that no extra snakes are needed in medicine!

From: https://www.premiumcaremd.com/blog/the-battle-of-the-snakes-staff-of-aesculapius-vs-caduceus

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›