Ignoring this post entirely (sorry OP) - what are your thoughts on the Nephilim and their offspring?

Parable/myth/metaphor/etc

Real, either non-physical entities made physical somehow, non-human humanoids (ET), or humanoid ancestors/related species

Ironically (or not?) it’s pretty hard to find information on topics once they’ve been shoved down the Memory Hole. I just thought it might be useful to compile our shared memories to shine some light on what has been shoddily hidden. I’m hoping people can add their own examples, whether the entire subject or just certain perspectives on it have been MH’ed, and what significance they think that information has.

As a couple examples that jump to mind:

Rick Ross (the rapper) usurping the name from Freeway Ricky Ross, a high level gangster who admitted that his source of cocaine (fueling the crack epidemic and helping lay the groundwork for total societal collapse) was in fact the same National Security Establishment who were importing that cocaine into America through (among other locations) the Mena Arkansas Airport, as exposed by journalistic hero (and tragic “suicide by two shotgun blasts” arkancide victim) Gary Webb.

Katy Perry releasing “PRISM” a couple short months after Snowden released his information on the NSA total information surveillance system of the same name. Like the previous example, this muddies the waters for people searching for this information, including gallons of unrelated bullshit to wade through.

Any mass-casualty event which can’t be used to further “The Narrative” gets quickly memory holed. The Vegas shooting (and its associated fuckery) springs to mind, but this actually applies to the majority of these events. Think of every time the bad guy gets stopped by a good guy with a gun, as one common theme which gets Memory Holed.

Any sex-scandal which threatens {their} agents - White House “call boy scandal”, the sex slave who escaped from a Saudi dungeon in california, who actually were epstain’s clients, etc, etc. Many such cases.

Edit) here’s a good one with slightly broader and deeper historical importance - the (first) Book of Enoch, rejected from canon despite being quoted twice in the canonical works, presumed “lost” to the ages (aka Memory Holed), then by divine providence, discovered amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls, the earliest known collection of what would go on to be called The Bible. Of most significance is the perspective shown in this book. It details non-human entities (the fallen angels and their half-human offspring the Nephilim) and how they greatly sullied mankind with their habits and technologies (cosmetics, weapon-making, dark magic, etc) which is what necessitated the Great Flood. Very interesting context to a story we may think we know so well.

Important comment to make, thanks

You don’t need to rewrite history if you can rewrite the search engines.

Just like katy perry releasing “PRISM” right after the NSA revelations, using the phrase “the big lie” to refer to anything drumpf did, or any number of examples.

Should make a wiki of them lol

Yea that guy is literally a shill, responsible for thousands of sockpuppet accounts and tens of thousands of forum sliding/shill posts

https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/141YIjZZTk/consume-sockpuppets/c

https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/141Yg8cAra/vote-manipulation-problem/c

https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/141YbOYqZN/can-the-admins-do-something-abou/c

Her name is B. Censori

Lol

https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x44lrz

What’s your spin on that

Chi, and its associated phenomenon:

https://communities.win/c/HumanPotential/p/141rVOZOu0/perhaps-the-most-important-video/c

Not sure I disagree but also not sure I entirely understand:

Are you rejecting the existence of “right” and “wrong” decisions in general, or just the notion of someone else telling you the “right” or “wrong” course of action?

Or is it that

You actually think of existence as meaningless(nihilism), and thus “right” and “wrong” are equally meaningless concepts/irrelevant?

Or is it something else entirely?

According to the official story, pre-human ancestors used fire too, including homo-erectus ~1,000,000 years ago:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans

I absolutely agree with you, and I’m glad you’re able to see this information and remain positive. It really will all come down to how we react.

The only thing is, i fear many of us have been trained, indoctrinated, and brainwashed into being more likely to make “wrong decisions”. Assuming cyclicality, this means those who are aware of what’s coming can attempt to influence our response, and it just seems strongly to me that this is the case.

https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15JU3BrrFL/this-is-whats-driving-all-the-ac/c

You might be interested in this thread I posted on the “cyclical reset” of civilization. Especially this video which sums up the information quite well imo:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F-d4zfovcog

Many of the greatest masters (especially in the Eastern traditions) spent time in seclusion on mountaintops.

I think the notion of chi is closer to reality than not, and the various schools have a long tradition of associating mountains with concentration of energy to benefit training/healing/etc

And yeah. I’m not sure how much of “the record” to trust, but even going by mainstream numbers, we’ve been “anatomically modern” for 300,000 years, and they also unironically believe that the first time society could have begun was ~6-8,000 BC.... so we were what, identical to modern man, but we spent ~290,000 years jerking off in caves? It’s fucking retarded, but what’s worse is that suggestions otherwise seem “crazy” to most

Yeah it definitely is a rendition of Buddha - I draw similar links to the Chinese zodiacal system as to the Sumerian/Babylonian base-12/base-60 systems.

I’m pretty much convinced of the notion of a “common cultural ancestor” interacting with all of these “totally unrelated” groups. Which explains all the knowledge and building techniques which these groups “shouldn’t have” had. I think astrology is a lot more important than we give it credit for these days, though that’s more a gut feeling than anything.

Cheers man, I’m just an idiot trying to make sense of an insane world.

I appreciate that you actually stepped up for truth. First, trying to be a mod, then later telling the plebs the truths you saw behind the curtain. Not to mention getting gif-posting working lol

👍

It really is a religion unto itself. I’ve tried making a post about this before, tying it to the other modern mental landscape obsessions of “lore” and “canon”, you might find it interesting

https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/12jcci1stN/lore-canon-alternatereality-game/c

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/12jJs7ay5z/canon-lore-the-great-awakening--/c

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-I-zdmg_Dno

Maybe “what do the stars sing for”?

Added a little more in an edit...

How does the metaphysical fit into your conception?

Does anything resembling Platonic Forms exist? Or does the Flow comprise the totality of All?

Yeah, same faggot who wrote the post that axo linked.

Very sus

Usurper - a person who seizes or exercises authority or possession wrongfully.

Truth - that which is in accordance with fact or reality.

Infinite - limitless or endless in space, extent, or size; impossible to measure or calculate.

If you’re wondering the purpose of the post, it is intended as an open-ended prompt regarding the status of Truth in the world and the attempts of {some} to manipulate that status. Examples include:

Postmodernism/relativism which attempts to claim “all truth is relative” == “no truth is absolute”

Sabbatean Frankists who claim “all that is unholy is holy”

Orwellian doublespeakers who claim “freedom is slavery”

Many examples of Usurpers spring to mind

But what do the stars say?

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16ZqiBusID/petition-to-make-cconspiracies-i/c

Check that ban message that their mongoloid top mod sent me for making this post:

https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/16ZqiBuJvl/the-usurper-says-truth-is-infini/c

I had it bookmarked on ZLib until their domains got blasted, haven’t had a chance to hunt for it again yet!

So many open questions, some that come to mind:

1. the “problem” of consciousness (aka the source and mechanism)

2. the observer “problem” of quantum mechanics

3. the “dark matter” “problem”

4. the “dark energy”/“zero-point energy” “problem”

5. hell, going on 100 years now and we still don’t have a scale-invariant theory of the universe (quantum and macro systems don’t reconcile)

(Edit) 6) the finely tuned universe “problem” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe

The fact that people are so confident in their error is the worst part. “Safe and effective” - until their priests educate them otherwise

Excellent response man you touch on a ton of really interesting stuff related to this idea!

In the first place, you’re absolutely right, it’s as if our overconfidence in our own knowledge, or our hubris even, leads us to “ruling out” things which cannot justifiably be ruled out when given an honest accounting.

It seems in regards to the fields of science, this is mostly based on the assumptions or even beliefs of the scientists who make up that field. And if anything has been shown time and time again, it’s that when you assume, one tends to make an ass of everything.

I see this whole subject as echoing Kuhn’s ”Paradigm Shift” perspective, where entrenched beliefs and the paradigms built on these beliefs actively resist the shift towards greater truth, when it threatens their foundational beliefs structure.

Likewise, your point about Gödel’s ”Incompleteness Theorem” is spot-on. Not only did he prove that some logical systems are incomplete, but actually that ALL symbolic logical systems (i.e. “math”/“language”/“code”) are INHERENTLY incomplete. Where “incompleteness” seems quite complicated, but it basically means “no logical system is capable of actually proving itself correct” - which has insane repercussions on things like math in general, which is inherently based on making assumptions (axioms) which mathematicians all regard as “proven”, but which ultimately are totally undermined by Gödel’s work. It’s a mind blowing thing to try and wrap your head around, and directly relavent to this subject, so thanks for raising it!

The video is based on a book, divided into 10 chapters, each dedicated to a question which Sheldrake feels has been neglected by the scientific establishment because of dogmatic beliefs which undergird this “religion of Scientism”.

He provides the “standard” (mainstream, cutting-edge scientific) answer to each. But then to each question, he shows study after study which demonstrate there is effectively no way the “standard” answer is correct, sufficient, or in many cases even pointing in the right direction.

Here are the chapter titles, if any of them pique your interest I recommend finding a copy of the book, you likely won’t be disappointed:

1. Is Nature Mechanical?

2. Is the Total Amount of Matter and Energy Always the Same?

3. Are the Laws of Nature Fixed?

4. Is Matter Unconscious?

5. Is Nature Purposeless?

6. Is All Biological Inheritance Material?

7. Are Memories Stored as Material Traces?

8. Are Minds Confined to Brains?

9. Are Psychic Phenomena Illusory?

10. Is Mechanistic Medicine the Only Kind that Really Works?