A jew comes to Egypt.
Egypt (a gypsy) implies each wandering jew...so does Rome (to roam; wander).
The trick...Egypt and Rome represent theoretical fiction; while "a gypsy + to roam" imply empirical reality. That's how a jew can take down empires within the minds of gentiles, while simultaneously surviving those theoretical falls of empires.
greed
A jew utilizes all given (perceivable) by tempting each one gentile given to (perception) to take (consent) nothing (suggested)...for the price of selling self out.
Gentiles are taking nothing (fiat currency) from a jew, while denying natural current offering everything...wanting more than nature offers implies ones excessively eager desire to possess from another aka greed.
The opposite of greed? Generosity aka all (nature) generating each one (being).
jacob
Aka Ya'aqobh - "a supplanter; one who dispossess aka acquires (a position from someone) by strategy or scheming"...
Suggestion represents the strategic scheme by a jew to tempt gentile consent to willingly dispossess itself from perception, hence ignoring it.
A jew acquires everything a gentile ignores automatically. Why? Because everything (perceivable) is given to each thing (perception) for free will of choice, which is what one ignores when consenting to a chosen ones suggestion.
Consent inverts choice into chance...a gamble aka taking a chance by giving up choice. That's the origin of greed.
odd way
Oddities (life) within even (inception towards death)...that's what sound generates.
you couldn't resist breaking down
Breaking apart resists the temptation of holding together. Why is "sounds alike" such an easy rhetoric to use when drawing comparisons? Could it be a temptation?
GOTTA have more
One (perception) got all (perceivable)...there cannot be more than all, nor can one have all aka take possession of it, while being divided by it (per sonos; by sound) and in it (in-sanus; within sound).
more important
a) IN (inception) PORT/PART (life) EX (death) aka partial within whole coming in and out.
b) Import and export implies linear progression...more vs less implies circular stagnation during linear progression.
As a partial within whole, what could be more important than breaking apart aka sustaining self? Off-spring implies breaking apart...coming into being sounds important.
wtf
Meet the fuckers... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family (The last name was originally spelled "Fucker")
That's the origin of "fuck" aka fuge (masonic joint)...which is what a mason does to ones free will of choice by tempting consent with suggestion.
It's obviously satanic larp but come on, they didn't summon shit.
Summon aka sub (under) monere (to admonish, warn)...does one feel "above" a warning when deriding it? Do you think yourself in an above position in this under-world? If so...what if you're being tricked to think like that?
at the top
One can't be at the top without being under. Where is that which one climbed to the top of situated under?
at the top on the rite
A rite implies a passage from/to...how could one be at the top of a bottom, while being moved from origin towards outcome? Which one came first...from/to or top vs bottom?
Why the "vs" in-between top and bottom? Because climbing to the top turns (versus/verto) one away from bottom. While being (life) moved from origin (inception) towards outcome (death)...can one turn away from the only way one is in?
sounds like
Sound/sanus - "entire; whole"...whole cannot be alike, only partials within whole can be alike one another, when ignoring to be differentiated from one another.
Comparing different...
...equalizing differences makes them alike. What set those differences apart from one another, before one can make comparisons in-between them?
If all is one in energy, then what does one within all compare energy to?
It's ones free will of choice to be in-BE-tween (as above/so below) or under a hierarchy...
nostradamus
Aka nostra (our) damus/dido/deh (to give) which implies singular giving self up to plural. Our implies a possessive, hence only taking in...not giving out.
fiction
Aka fict (to shape) ion (action). Before one can shape action...action (inception towards death) shapes re-actions (life), hence "be-fore" aka forwarding being.
Ones RE-sponse to ALL action implies re-al.
book of revelation
Re (response) vela (velare; veil; cover) tion (action). Action generates reactions by setting each one free from one another, hence enabling each being to react to one another, while acted upon.
A suggested book binds ones free will of choice in-between covers...if consented to.
You so know that King James was a freemason, right?
a) You vs me + was (perceivable) vs is (suggested) + right vs wrong imply conflicts of reason aka a cover a mason tempts ones free will of choice into.
b) King implies rule/reg - "to move in a straight line", hence each one within the king-dom of god being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) aka king (motion) generating DOM (momentum) to set FREE (matter).
c) James/jacob/ya'aqobh - "to supplant; dispossess, acquire (a position from someone) by strategy or scheming" implies a jew speaking (suggestion) in the name of god (perceivable) to disposes gentiles (perception).
d) A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggestion as bricks and consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others.
AT BEST occult
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies linear thinking...turning against others within conflicts of reason (best vs worse) implies circular logic.
Circular logic occults thinking straight...
Christlike ways
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. The separation of all into each one implies christ (to anoint), while ignoring self (singular) for others (plural) equalizes natural differences by artificially making them alike one another.
The foundation for ignoring self for others is based on JESUS (je suis; i am), hence one claiming for self by taking from another, which establishes the YOU (phonetic jew)...the merchant of temptation giving what one wants to take for the price of ones soul/sole (one and only).
1 + 1 = 2
a) All implies equal; each one within implies differentiated from one another.
b) Only within all can one be added (inception), subtracted (death); multiplied (intercourse) and divided (status quo of being one).
c) 1 (a chosen ones suggestion) + 1 (ones consent) = 2 (dualism)...the resulting conflict of reason among consenting ones implies a DUAL/DUEL.
Sounds to me like
a) Sound towards me implies a differentiation of all into one.
b) Me implies one holding onto self, while ignoring that sound differentiates each one from one another.
c) Ignoring all (perceivable) implies for one another (suggested), which makes anyone consenting to a suggestion "alike" one another.
trust
Trust binds; thrust frees... from push (inception towards death) to shove (life), hence being (choice) tempted by pull (want), while being shoved (need).
T(h)RUST...what if the "h" is silent? What if H (phonetic age/aiw - "vital force") implies the sound of silence? If an off-spring screams after birth, then was one still-born before choosing to make noise?
- EL... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_(deity)
- VIS... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vis-a-vis
- PRES... from pre (before), hence impression before expression.
- LEY... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ley
God (el) implies impressing flow; each being within implies expressed form/face/visage (vis). Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) within a-line (align), hence the alignment of natural features.
Did you make these definitions up or what? Source?
a) Few make up definitions (suggested artifice) to trick many to ignore source (perceivable nature).
b) Words are shaped within sound...ignoring sound for any def-inition makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
A jew suggests words like "insane person" to distract gentiles from discerning self as IN SANUS (within sound) + PER SONOS (by sound). This practice of mass deception is called spell-craft.
from dividends
Dividend/dividere - "to force (inception towards death) apart (life)"...nature forces apart the artificial values gentiles hold onto, which where suggested to them by a jew.
onlyfans
A fan implies a devotee aka one who appropriates by or as if by vow aka ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Devote (holding onto) inverts divide (set apart)...
As for only...there can be only one. Whatever one does; affects each other one, hence if one devotes (gentile); another one divides (jew).
home owners association
A home cannot be owned within a moving nature...unless an association (joined company) is established first. To join the artificial company of others implies ones ignorance of nature disjointing each one from one another.
fight back against an association
Fighting implies versus/verto - "to turn" aka turning against one another aka both sides aiming at each other...that's an association.
Nature cannot be fought back...each being struggles to grow life during the natural process of dying.
home
- Home/ham - "dwelling place"; from tkei - "to settle, dwell"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/home
- Settle/setlen - "become set or fixed, stable or permanent; come down"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/settle
- Dwell/dwellan (to lead into error) + dwelana (go astray) + twellen (to hinder; delay) + gedweola (error; heresy; madness) + dwale (deception; trickery)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/dwell
Few suggest "home" to establish settlements (settled minds) among many, which natures motion destroys on behalf of few who depart from settled minds.
Peter; verb - "to diminish gradually and then cease"...few establish hierarchies to grade many, as to distract from nature diminishing (inception towards death) beings (life) when joining hierarchical structures aka when arranging by degrees.
As for level...inception towards death implies the horizontal level (balance) for each irregular life (choice) within.
stringless puppets
A puppet is attached to the theater, hence dolled up to play a part for an audience.
No strings attached implies each ones free will of choice resisting the temptations of one another...a life long struggle.
Edit: Notice them wearing ties, hence being bound...
Elvis aka el (god) vis (visage; face; form) + pres (pressure) ley (alignment of natural and artificial features)
Luciferian cabal doesn't like the whole Jesus thing
a) Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies a partial within whole taking possession of self.
b) Lucifer aka lucis (light) bher (to carry) implies one partial carrying another partial within whole light.
c) Cabal aka cabbala/qibbel - "to receive, admit, accept" implies one partial consenting to the suggestion of another partial, while being carried away within whole.
Why do they do this "borrow" thing?
Because nature moves and cannot be held onto...any attempt to hold onto anything implies borrowing aka "the lending of debt". In nature...any lender pays back the whole of debt accumulated.
Cause who else is the powers in space
Cause empowers effects by separating each one from one another, which allows each one to extent into space/spatior (to wander).
Powers that be implies each empowered (inception towards death) being (life).
will be driven from their course
Being (life) driven (inception towards death), hence course (forward motion)...tempting ones free will of choice to ignore this establishes circular logic, hence tempting each being off-course.
son of man
Aka son (sonos; sound) offering man (person; per sonos; by sound)...
sun and moon
Aka sun/son (sound) + moon/mono (single)...
be driven from their course
Course implies "motion forward", hence being (life) driven forwards (inception towards death)...circular logic tempts one to ignore that.
four corners
Being implies in-between left/right; front/back; up/down, hence within a cube. Ones perspective within a cube implies four corners...circular logic draws an artificial circle within the natural cube, while permitting others to intersect at angles, which is being done by compass and square.
God hates AI
God implies nature moving; holding onto either love or hate shapes an artificial conflict of reason among beings moved apart from one another by nature.
God hates
To hate implies "towards another"...God implies one. Towards implies God moving each one within apart from one another. Choosing to turn against one another (love vs hate) ignores God.
Biden/bide - "to stay, continue, live, remain"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bide
So why use a puppet to depict death in the name of life? Because living implies within the continuous process of dying.
miscegenation and integration
Aka artificially mixing together what nature sets apart.
deceitful deals
Aka ones consent (to buy) to a suggestion (to sell) deceiving ones perception into selling self out.
control over the ruler
Rule/reg aka to move in (life) a straight line (inception towards death)...it's circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others which rolls together (con-trol) many under few.
secret attack
Secret/seco - "to divide"...mixing consent and suggested together implies an attack on all perceivable setting each ones perception apart from one another.
killing many innocents for the actions of one
a) One cannot act...only react.
b) Innocence aka within (in) harm (nocere) aka being (life) within harms way (inception towards death). Ignoring this by consenting to the suggestion of another implies guilt/gieldan - "to pay for, debt".
rationalizing violence
Violence (inception towards death) sets each peace/piece (life) apart from one another...rationalizing aka reasoning implies peaces/pieces at war with one another.
Fiedler. Not fiddler.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/GNaoC2ou.png
the information you attempt to co-opt.
Ones consent co-opts suggested information, which represents the temptation to ignore perceivable inspiration. Free will of choice draws from the ongoing flow of inspiration, while setting temporary information apart.
Holding onto information would contradict "free" will of choice, while inspiration cannot be held onto...
I didn't ask you to quickly peruse
David supplied the preface for the readers quick perusal...and the contradictions in that tell me that David respects those with eyes to see.
information is deeper than any 'words' can describe
Because the one consenting to stand-under (understand) suggested information is burying self as deep as it gets underneath the descriptions by another.
As for scribe/scriba - "teacher of jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe That ain't natural; but artificial.
how/why words were created
First of all to sell gentiles on creationism (creatio ex nihilo; creation out of nothing); thereby tempting each ones discernment into mass de-nial of perceivable for suggestions by a chosen few.
As for how...by modulating natural sound into artificial words, and why..."because" aka tempting being to ignore cause for a "probable cause" aka a general purpose qualifier aka words to describe sound, which is how a jew teaches gentiles "mosaic" law.
The part can't contain the whole
a) Alone aka all(in)one aka "one for all and all for one" aka "there can be only one"
b) If all is one in energy; then each one within all implies energy.
c) The trick...con-tain-ment aka tempting ones mind (ment) to hold (tain) together (con). Nature offers all perceivable towards each ones perception for FREE will of choice. It's holding onto suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration, which establishes containment, while permitting others access through entertainment.
you work backwards
a) Work implies energy (internal/inherent power)...being implies each ones em-ploy-ment within all of energy.
b) Forwards (inception towards death) implies backwards for each being living within. Inception implies flow to form; life implies form within flow; death implies form to flow.
The ongoing process of dying dissolves any being living in it, hence as above/so below.
Raise it up.
There's the IT again...one can only raise self by resisting the temptation of one another. Raising IT tempts others to hold onto it, while dragging it down.
IT implies suggested information, hence the Information Technology... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology
Techno/teks (to weave) + logy (logic/reason/logos) aka weaving together circular logic; turning into conflicts of reason, based on the suggested information others crafted into words to fill ones mind/memory.
That's what a jew does to their gentile goyim/golem... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLFRlsisrBM
You're lowering the conversation into a circular dualism
a) CON (together) VERS (to turn)...there's your circular dualism.
b) Free will of choice reacts to ION (action), which implies a linear progression.
c) There's no conflict between high vs low within action...only within the circular logic of each reaction, when turning against each other (reason), while ignoring action.
De-fine-ing the point
A point implies the end (death) of a sentence (life)...defining implies affixing a point (death); thereby ignoring sentence (life) and corrupting SENTIENCE.
What happens if one makes a point during motion? One draws a line...thereby contradicting the point. Which is how gematria works...tricking one (1) to affix origin (0), while measuring towards outcome (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0). It doesn't matter how many zeros one puts before or behind measurements...it's ones mind which holds onto the measurements.
How does a jew hide numbers? By slapping words upon them, which gentiles mentally affix aka define as DEFINITIONS, hence making themselves into DEAF PHONETICIANS.
Gematria of "energy"? 74 aka 11 aka ONE (partial) within ONEness (whole).
What does ordinal imply? Order within all...for each one within.
Read the thing and understand instead.
Does nature offer anything one needs to read and understand? What does "instead" imply when applied to the one and only nature? Do you really think that putting your mind in-between (book) covers will set you free?
One can hardly 'remain free' if one has never been not-free
Remain aka re-sponding (life) to main (inception towards death)...not implies ones de-nial thereof. Main implies the application of force aka the dominance (action) setting one free (reaction).
Being freed implies lack of effective resistance in the past
a) Being implies resistance (life) freed within velocity (inception towards death).
b) When you say "lack" then you ignore "loss" aka being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...loss offers the foundation for each being to grow within.
c) "In the past" isn't a position one can be in, but represents the denial of ones presence right now for what was (past) or will be (future).
One (life) cannot perceive past (inception) or future (death)...others suggest it to manipulate ones memory, while distracting ones presence.
the same decides
Only ones free will of choice decides, and being one implies differentiated from one another. Meanwhile...different choices can only be formed within the same balanced flow.
Strange that the same decides to become free from 'letting' others who don't resist the knowledge, spell out the letters for them.
Letting another binds one, hence becoming "spell-bound". Knowledge continues to move through one, while ones perception thereof is bound to suggested spells.
Those who try to "spell out" those who are spell-bound are trying to loosen up the bondage by taking apart what other spell-craft together.
begging the question
Both begging and questioning aims forwards, while trying to reach charity and answers in return.
Nature doesn't turn...it causes effects by forcing velocity (inception towards death) through resistance (life).
'Deception' is a perception by one who has been deceived
Before one can be deceived by another, there's de (division) cept (to take) ion (action). Being implies division (perception) within action (perceivable)...taking from another (suggestion) is the issue.
Also; there can be no such thing as a "has been"...unless one ignores being.
to only apply to others when denied in one's own opinion
While applying matter onto matter; one denies motion separating matter from matter. That's the physical issue...mentally, it's opinions held within matter, mentally applied to other matter, while mentally ignoring physical motion, which fucks one up.
Notice opinion/option aka ones free will of choice...not what one chooses to hold onto or apply onto others, but the choice itself.
It's a moot subject to attempt to apply to gematria.
Moot/mod - "to meet; assemble"...that's the wanted temptation one needs to resist. Gematria implies measurements applied to ones mind...
you start from the wrong end
Can life do that, while being moved from inception towards death by nature?
Ideation is what you attempt to bring
ION (action) is what brings reactions into being...ideas/ideal/idols are suggested by other beings to tempt one to ignore reacting to action.
All brings each one...whatever one brings with implies a self imposed burden.
Do I disagree with your summations? About half. Half not.
If one agrees vs disagrees about suggested summation, then one ignores being a fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable).
What is half of energy if all is one in energy?
Notice the upvote vs downvote option next to our comments...those represent the agree vs disagree conflict of reason, and then notice that each one has the free will of choice to resist the temptation of choosing a side within an artificial conflict.
So I haven't downdooted. Yet.
The temptation never lets up...it's ones resistance to it which can be fertilized.
you spank often when needed
90% of comments I get are abusive towards me (seldom about what I wrote tho)...I ain't the one spanking.
The purpose you serve here is to divide
a) Notice that reason implies a conflict against one another, hence versus/verto - "to turn". One can only turn against one another, if one was divided from one another beforehand.
Nature divines/divides beings from one another...
b) Neither do I purpose (put forward), hence only ever commenting after others, nor do I serve division, but resist (life) division (inception towards death).
The issue is that others believe that division is bad, and unification good, hence falling for mosaic law (puzzling the pieces into a whole) aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) etc.
The unwashed MASSES are feeling offended when one (singular) tries to divide them apart from one another. Meanwhile, those masses are governed by each chosen one aka a people apart aka rules for thee, but not for me aka sovereign within commonwealth aka one who erects at center, while circumcising the circumference etc.
Lucifer' is said to go 'to and fro
Lucifer aka bringing forth light, which generates a visible spectrum of light for each ray within. Spectrum implies balance; ray implies choice balancing, hence alternating to and fro.
The issue..."lucifer" doesn't say anything aka doesn't modulate letters together into words...light (motion) separates rays (matter) within a spectrum (momentum).
Ask yourself...who said that lucifer said? Who is shaping suggestions in the name of?
truths of all kinds
Kind/kindred/kin implies relations among different ones within all. Such a relation is established by ones consent to the suggestion of another from either side...truth or false.
All moves...each ones perception ignores that all perceivable moves, when holding onto true or false suggestions.
one is the shadow of the other
Hence ones casting shadows upon other ones, while within all light. If one resists others, then light (discernment) and dark (ignorance) are moving through one....otherwise the shadows of ignorance are spreading, while obfuscating self discernment.
words are shadows of ideation which are seperated 'sephira' of the whole
a) Words become shadows by ones free will of choice "letting" them. Without ones consenting choice...nothing holds the words together.
Sound moves light through...words represent the modulation of sound tempting one to hold onto, hence dimming self with ignorance.
b) Sephira/sophia aka divine (momentum) wis (matter) dom (motion)...one has to wise up to being free will of choice within divine dominance aka free within dom.
ALL needs to be investigated
Notice VEST + GATE...all separates each one from one another in the nude, while passing through.
Gematria is a system to understand the concepts
One doesn't need to measure (matria) generation (ge). One does not need to stand (stem) together (sys). One does not need to stand-under another. One does not need to take (cept) together (con).
Want tempts one to ignore need tho...
it isn't the thing in itself.
Yet IT is held within one thing during the motion of everything.
Gematria implies holding onto numbers; systems are held within one to be applied to another; standing under implies holding ones position, and taking together implies holding together.
Holding onto IT destroys one. It implies anything but male or female. How could there be anything (matter) but male (motion) and fe-male (mo-mentum)? Well; simply by ones ignorance of male and female for IT....whatever others suggest IT may be.
If Godzilla won't come to Tokyo, how will he claim victory?
God + zilla/tsillah from root צֵל (tsel) - "shadow/shade"...it's the conflict within God about victory vs defeat, which casts shadows over each anointed one.
Godzilla represents the monstrous consequences of ignorance, hence monster/moneie/men - "to think"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monster (notice moneie/money).
Get back AFTER not before
Let's do the preface: "This book throws light on some long-overlooked aspects of cosmology and symbolism"...
a) Light throws beings apart from one another...a book binds being to one another, while tempting each ones sight in-between covers.
b) Cosmos aka cosmetic...something applied outwards to cover (make up) what moves from within outwards. Logic implies circular thinking, being implies within linear progression.
c) Symbol implies thrown together aka suggested -ism throwing together consenting -ists.
d) To be able to overlook aspects requires aspects the choose to "stand-under" ones look/lock...
e) David Fideler aka fiddling (playing string instruments aka minds strung together) + david/davit (an oath aka ones consent to the suggestion of another).
f) If I already read H. P. Blavatsky - "The Secret Doctrine", then what else did David Fideler add to the mix?
Semantics divide while attempting to unite.
a) Unite/unit/unus aka one apart from one another...a division.
b) Semantic/sēma - "mark, token; omen, portent; constellation"...a combination.
Breaking semantics apart makes it harder for other ONEs to hold it together.
What happens when someone 'gets' what you attempt to say,
Each one (perception) GOT all (perceivable), while being tempted to GET (suggested) from others. Whatever one gets...will never be enough.
'solve' any question
A question tempts one to wait for an answer by another, while ignoring to be dis (life) solved (inception towards death) aka a division within a solution aka alchemical ingredient within a base.
Nature implies the ongoing solution to any temporary problem within...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
No question can ever be solved; because each beings inception brings up the question again.
point to the spirit
Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" moves through each sentient being, hence while life is being sentenced towards point of death.
what gematria is
Before generation (ge) can be measured (matria)...it was generating each being able to measure.
Hence gematria aka gemara representing the essential secondary part of talmud, while mishnah represents the substantial primary whole.
not the ridiculously simplistic off-the-mark definition you play
a) Like how "not" simply implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything when dividing ones perception with suggestion?
b) Definit (to affix) ion (action)...action acts upon reactions, and cannot be affixed. It's reactions reacting to one another to get a fix, who are ignoring action.
c) Only matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion can be marked...not motion.
for all your semantic pontificating
All forwards each one by division...pons (bridge) + fex (to make) implies artificial combination of natural division.
you don't even know how to 'spell' the words you parse
Crafting spells implies parsing partial letters together...free will of choice needs to resist LETTING others parse LETTERS together, as to remain free.
tl; dr...if gematria is your way to deal with deception, then how about a discussion about 0 and 2...both artificial states within natural singularity aka 1.
If energy implies 1; then what do 0 and 2 imply? Try proving 0 and 2 to another 1 without contradicting 1-self...
What if GE implies the one and only generator, and MATRIA each generated one within having the free will of choice to measure each other? Where is the contradiction in my line of thinking?
Con (together) + scious (ones perception)... a contradiction in terms to test ones mind.
There is none. It doesn’t exist.
What is the significance of nothing?
Everything perceivable moving through each things perception implies linear progression...circular thinking (logic) implies ones de-nial of everything linear aka nial/nihilo/nothing.