a) Meaning implies a measurement taken, while ignoring the all giving God.
b) To look implies "to lock" aka to take into possession, while ignoring process (God) giving potential (Christ).
c) To look at something implies being able to look at something else aka a differentiation...God implies the equality within which differentiation comes into being to be looked at.
That's why each ones perception cannot see all of what God makes perceivable...only one differential; separated; unique; special; particular unit of it aka ones sight.
In simple...one sees the work of God, while being employed within God. Others suggest theory as a mental scheme to trick one into self confinement.
two theories
There can be only one theos (God).
misguided
Nature doesn't guide...it moves any being within from entrance towards outcome, which inspires resistance. Others suggest guidance to tempt one to follow, while ignoring to resist.
The suggestion of guidance represents the carrot on a stick idom.
brainwashed by mainstream
A stream washes away anything within...unless resisted. Others mediate a main stream to tempt one to follow.
regime change
Only within change can a regime be shaped. Few suggest regimes to tempt many into ignoring change.
Wars create
Few suggest creationism to tempt many into a war (new vs old) internally (logic) and externally (reason).
refugee
Aka re (to respond) fuge (masonic joint)...
theory
Aka theo (God) + ory (to orate) aka speaking in the name of God. If one consents to that, then one contradicts "thou shalt have no other gods before me".
reductionist take
a) Only during reduction (inception towards death) can there be an increase (life).
b) Nature gives freely to being...if a being uses free will of choice to take, then one binds self to another.
jewy reductionist
Reduction-ist implies ones consent to suggested reduction-ism aka "taking" from another, while ignoring given. That's how a jew shapes consensus (-ism) among gentiles by tempting consent (-ist) together.
Freud
His field of expertise was neurological psychoanalysis aka using the analytical process of natural animation (psycho; psyche; animating power) to tempt gentiles into neuro (nerve; drawn by strings) logic (circular thinking).
pseudoscience
Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception...any suggestion by another implies pseudoscience if one consents to it.
all of them jews
Only within all can one shape "them" aka a summation of singular into a plural. Each jew does that to gentiles by suggesting pluralism, hence amassing many (commonwealth) under few (sovereign).
boil the human psyche and behavior to base instincts and sex
a) Only within base (inception towards death) can essence (life) come into being...it's the moving base which internally separates essential matter from one another. A jew inverts this by tempting gentiles together.
b) Human psyche inverts psyche (animating power) generating hu (color) of man.
c) Behavior represents a contradiction in terms...being (potential) having (possession). If a being takes into possession, then it corrupts its potential.
Nature represents the process, which sets each potential being free...a jew shapes suggestions to bind gentile potential into a consensus.
d) Instinct aka in (within) stinct (to stick)...the opposite of instinct implies inability aka in (within) able (allowed), hence nature enabling being.
Word analysis aside...instinct was corrupted from inwardly animated (perception) to outwardly prompted (suggestion).
e) Sex/seco - "to divide" aka the distinction between male and female.
They're all running off the naturalistic presupposition
Nature runs being...a jew tempts gentiles to presuppose aka "to hold as a belief or opinion; make a hypothesis, assume as the basis of argument" before adapting to nature.
Presupposition implies fiction (suggestion) shaped within nature (perception)...the former tempts one to hold onto (information); while the latter moves through one and cannot be held onto (inspiration).
not created
Both representing jewish fiction aka nothing/nihilo (nihilism) and creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Nature doesn't create out of nothing, it transforms (transfer of form) everything (cause) into each thing (effect) by internal separation from one another.
in the image of God
God implies moving light; image implies the imagination of those within who ignore moving light for each others shadow-play aka Plato's allegory of the cave. Allegory implies "figurative treatment (suggestion) of an unmentioned subject (perception) under the guise of another similar to it in some way".
bound to struggle
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) wields free will of choice, hence being set free to struggle. It's consenting to any suggestion by another which binds ones free will of choice, while increasing the real struggle with fictitious struggle.
fallen nature
Only while nature falls (inception towards death) can being rise (life)...
to become like God
To become implies coming towards (inception towards death) being (life), hence from all (God) into each one (Christ) aka from same into differential. It's a jew who shapes suggestions to tempt different gentiles into alike consensus, while ignoring the same origin of differentiation.
God cannot be alike...cause there can be only one God. Likeness implies plurality, God implies singularity.
just another animal
Anim-al implies all animation for each one within. Only within animation can one be different from one another aka only within just can one be at odds with one another.
by chance
A chance has to be taken by a given choice. Only within balance can there be choice to take chances from one another, which a jew suggests to gentiles as "gambling".
dumb beast...
...implies BE (being) AST (astute) aka discerning. Ignoring self discernment by consenting to the suggested explanation by another makes one dumber than the other.
Idea
Aka mental ideals and physical idols...both sides of idolatry.
tl;dr: WO(mb)MAN + FE(minine)MALE + S(plit)HE aka one (male) moving through another (female), which allows intercourse in-between one another for off-spring from one another.
Another word to desrcibe hysterical middle aged women...frigid aka cold as ice, which ties to hysteria/hysterikos - "belonging to the womb".
In short..if her oven runs cold; then her emotions run hot.
you really do believe that...?
Setting up a faith based contraction to trick another into suffocating self by consent.
a) Mono (light) > chroma (spectrum) > diversity (ray) aka mono (motion) > chroma (momentum) > diversity (matter)
b) People of color corrupts color of person (per sonos; by sound)...sound/light implies a singular line, within which a spectrum of diverse instruments/rays comes into being.
People (plural) mixes person (singular) together...if a person believes to be part of a people, instead of per sonos (by sound).
justice; justice you shall pursue
Aka the double standard of each jew resisting that which just-is (perceivable), and the jewish justice (suggested) gentiles shall pursue...while ignoring to resist, because "resistance is futile".
solution of collective
Applying a solution to a collective dissolves it...
eradicating our Rights
Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right It's a straight line which introduces (inception) and eradicates (death) each being (life).
Right implies a singular line...not a collective assortment of rights. It's ones ignorance of that which permits another to utilize natural eradication upon fictitious rights.
Lawsuits
Suit/sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/suit Each being needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow natural law. A jew suggests artificial laws to tempt gentiles to follow suit, which afterwards permits each jew to exploit the following lawsuits.
we all
a) We implies a collective of ones within all aka a fictitious plural shaped within natural singularity.
b) We cannot be all, because if we, then they/them aka a circular conflict against another collective...and then there's each chosen ones outside that conflict.
half were prisoners and the other half were prison guards
If half and half equals whole, then why's MILGRIM outside of the experiment? Prison implies the mental "prism" both prison guards and prisoners willingly confine themselves to.
Milgrim, from yiddish Milgroim - "pomegranate"... https://daily.jstor.org/the-pomegranate-in-history-and-myth/
a) https://www.etymonline.com/word/amen (from Hebrew amen "truth")
b) A chosen one implies singular..."them" implies plural. A jew suggests pluralism to tempt each gentiles free will of choice into binding self into a consensus, hence into becoming part of a plurality aka joining a summoning.
c) Nope + nothing... aka doubling down on de-nial.
d) "nothing to do" inverts "everything doing towards each thing within".
say...for
Saying implies uttering artificial noise within natural sound..."saying for" implies sooth-saying aka fortune-telling aka tricking given choice to take a chance. It's gambling.
The bible warns one about fortune-tellers aka taking omens, and yet the jew tricked the gentiles to say OMEN/AMEN...and what does amen represent in Hebrew? Truth...hence gentiles holding onto truth, while being ruled by lies.
strive for
a) Striving for implies towards strife...
b) Striving implies towards outcome...being implies in response to origin.
c) Few suggest strife (estrit) to distract many from vitality (espirit). Strife keeps a hold of vitality, hence few utilizing for example Espirit Holdings... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esprit_Holdings
humanity
The HU in human implies hue/color aka the visible spectrum of light for each ray within. One has to adapt to all light...not seek strife against one another.
what
God; energy; whole; entire; all; motion...what else could bring one into being?
should...
a) ...implies "what ought to be", which tempts one to ignore TOWARDS (inception towards death) BEING (life).
b) Should/shall aka Schuld - "guilt; debt"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/shall
If one asks what should, then one puts self into debt to another, while becoming guilty as charged.
dual...duel
a) Duality implies singularity turned against one another, hence the duel to the death.
b) Singularity divides internally, hence positioning each one within opposition from one another...not turned against one another.
c) Few suggest dualism (logic) to tempt many into a duel (reason) against each other.
citizenship
Ship/skei - "to cut; split"...hence the sea dividing each vessel within from one another. Sea btw implies "to see" as in the HOLY (all perceivable) SEE (each ones perception).
Few corrupted the Holy See into Santa Sede (satan's chair) by calming the sea/see aka by tempting many into a SEDE (phonetic CITY).
City was called "urbs" in Latin, hence now few erecting high-rises in a cities uptown, while cutting many off from downtown, through sub-urbs into the borderlands. Cities are utilized to centralize power, while using citizens as batteries to drain from.
friendship between
a) Ships don't have friends. Binding ships together endangers each vessel in motion.
b) Friend has fiend in it...one can't accept one without the other.
c) Notice the Society of Friends (Quakers) within Christianity, and the jewish suggestion of F.R.I.E.N.D.S (so no one told you life was gonna be this way)
always wrong
Right vs wrong isn't a way, but a circle drawn within the only way (inception towards death) of life.
Edit: notice Dante's description of hell as "nine concentric circles of torment"...
for admitting
Forwards admission implies inception admitting life towards death...notice that life so far hasn't managed to successfully deny death; no matter how many admissions where made to one another.
Here's a simple test...can one deny the admission of spirit by holding ones breath? If not; then a being can only mentally deny forced physical admission.
The word "No" is already a structure
a) Nature structures each thing within everything...nothing implies an infra (below) structure...hence requiring a being to lower itself to nothing within everything.
Sound structures instrument; instrument (mind structured within) has the capacity (memory) to carry infra-structure like nothing aka nihil-ism and de-nial.
b) Already implies all (sound) readying each one within (instrument). Ready/reidh - "to ride"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/ready
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Metallica-ride-the-lightning-lyrics
so you believe you'll become a puppet if...
a) To believe implies puppet stringing self to puppeteer. Before believing...there where no strings attached to ones free will of choice.
b) Become implies coming (inception towards death) into being (life)...
like an actual person
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies a differentiation from one another aka actual (inception towards death) reactivating (life).
Others suggest "likeness" as a fiction to corrupt reactivation aka regeneration.
wrote normally before in the past
Holding onto the past represents a suggested norm, which distracts one from "before" aka being forwarded.
I have free will
a) Have implies taken into possession, which binds free will given.
b) I (i am; jesus) is bound to YOU (you are; judah). If one claims self as I AM, then every other one becomes a YOU ARE aka bound by spell-craft...unless resisted, and guess who resists being called a you/jew?
how do you explain
By expressing (life) within plane (inception towards death), hence being given plain sight.
MY SPECIFIC ACTIONS
a) Specific implies re-action, hence action allowing each reaction within to be specific; special; particular; unique etc.
b) Action implies procession; specific implies potential...my implies possession. The latter contradicts the former.
From the Christian perspective...action (God) > specific (Christ) > my (Jesus nailed to the cross).
convenient
Con (together) + venire (to come)...being implies coming (inception towards death) apart (life) from one another. Few suggest convenient-stores to tempt many to come together.
Aka different herbs to brew different beer at different locals...entrance Reinheitsgebot aka homogenization and hops grown everywhere to destroy any local differences.
Amoritic-Semitic
Amor (to affect) + sem (semblance)...nature differentiates being by causing effects to be apart from one another. A jew suggests artifice to affect semblance among consenting gentiles.
abrahamic
Abh (father) + raham (multitude)...God the father implies singularity.
communism
Com (together) + uni (apart from one another)...a contradiction if put together. Just like father + multitude or affection + semblance.
DIE aka diversity, equity, and inclusion
That's the status quo of being diverse (life) included within equal (inception towards death), hence living within the process of DEI-ing.
The trick...Diversity, equity, and inclusion are organizational frameworks that seek to promote the fair treatment and FULL PARTICIPATION OF ALL PEOPLE.
A partial cannot be full, all or people.
No. No. No...
Notice that de-struc-tion implies a division of structure within action. You tried to add structure within everything by multiplying nothing. You structure doesn't have a foundation...
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Destinys-child-no-no-no-part-1-lyrics
your empty word
Do you think that adding "nothing" to emptiness fills it up?
Now you can no longer analyze words.
Now implies in-between before and after aka as choice within balance. See...using free will of choice to analyze "now" allows one to discern self, which one ignores when trying to curtail others into "no longer" using free will of choice.
Now you'll talk normally
Here's the NORM... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV8cI1U43II aka a running joke to domesticate an audience to follow the norm.
And let's also mention norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm aka the tool used by masons to mark angles/angels...fallen angels.
In real life or...
a) There's no "or" to reality...fiction simply implies ones ignorance of reality.
b) Ones response (re) to all (al) implies instrument responding to natural sound.
No.
Putting a point behind nothing to indicate an end...that's very destructive to a being within everything moving.
Civilize what?
Anyone within civilization aka each ones consent given to a collective consensus.
Your dogs?
If a dog hears and chooses to follow ones command, then that's domestication by faith. The difference...a domesticated dog hearing "wait" gets exited to get relieved from his faith by "go"; while domesticated men exhaust one another by holding onto faith.
The dog knows that everything moves, yet submits to his master temporarily for benefits. The man denies knowledge by holding onto, while allowing to be domesticated into a deficit, hence the continued fall of civilization cycle.
Your word games? What?
What implies an abstract (suggestion) tempting one to ignore actual (perception). Implication solves that issue...if God, then what else?
Asking another "what" implies taking a chance, while ignoring given choice...that's a gamble/game.
Why do you believe Paul destroyed anything?
"So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." ~Romans 10:17
God naturalizes instruments within sound...the articulation of words destroys that, while permitting few to civilize aka domesticate many by speaking in the name of God.
So it doesn't agitate then?
If agitation (inception towards death); then empowerment (life)...it's the N'T which tempts one to ignore what all DOES to each one within.
You are the denier.
De-nial aka the division of nothing (suggested information) within everything (perceivable inspiration).
Free-will-of-choice describes how denial works by analysis...guywholikesDjtof2024 labels another denier, hence a synthesis.
You deny the fakeness of your word games
Real implies ones response to all...fake implies shaped within real, while held onto. Game implies ignoring given by taken a chance...like for example the chance to hold onto any fakery (suggested) shaped within reality (perceivable) like holding onto words within sound.
Reality. That word games are inferior.
Re-al (response to all)...words and games are shaped within all to trick one another to craft spells and play games. Falling for spell-craft tricks one into a gamble/game called reason (inferior vs superior).
Notice that within reason...one side turns against the other side. Reality implies ones sight (life) in-between two sides (inception/death)...one cannot see, hence not two sides but one process giving each one within sight.
I'm not a wordist like you. I mean a desk.
a) "In the beginning was the word; and the word was with God, and the word was God"...that's where one derives meaning from. Meaning implies taking a measurement aka mentally holding onto a word, while ignoring that God aka sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) moves and cannot be held onto.
b) This page features translation of the word "desk" to over 100 other languages... https://www.indifferentlanguages.com/words/desk
Turns out that your meaning has over a hundred different interpretations; meanwhile...sound implies the origin of any internal differentiation aka incantation (enchanting by uttering magical words).
Let's make it simpler...if the word was God, then why are there over a hundred incantations for the word God... https://www.indifferentlanguages.com/words/god
blah blah
Watch this and notice the line (sound) remains the same; no matter what's being shaped (words) within it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0
If you view God as creator, then how could the "blah blah" of anything created not also carry God within it?
ist...ism
Consent...consensus
conflicts of reason...Nope.
Nope vs yep...a conflict of reason. Ignorance always betrays itself.
ignoring sound...How does one do that?
By permitting others to re-do perceivable sound into suggestible words.
they're brown, not fully black.
So why did you call them blacks?
absence of color and not of humanity...
...only if one ignores hu/hue - "color".
Best best best best. Analyze that.
Gibs me dats aka esteeming ever more value aka "I can't get no satisfaction...'cause I tried and I tried and I tried and I tried"
In short...greed.
What are you saying He is doing?
a) God WAS doing before anyone within can suggest what it IS that he does.
b) Do; verb - "bring to pass by procedure" aka "to set, put, place"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/do
God implies the process which brings to pass (inception towards death) each potential (life) within.
Nope...do not work in real life
How does nothing work in real life? Notice that you used it twice (nope; not); while ignoring Gods singularity...
They're your fanfiction.
Does a fan rip apart that which he's a fan of...or is it the holding onto in devotion, which shapes the fiction that destroys anything else within reality?
"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" ~Winston Churchill
Which one can't change his mind...the one holding onto words (synthesis) or the one ripping words apart (analysis)? If one holds onto words, then ones choice subjects self to the chosen one who suggested words.
Inb4 "work blah blah implies blah blah
Thanks for bringing up energy (work)...being within energy implies a reduction of power given the potential to increase. That's why the potential to wield knowledge has to be grown during loss.
Fan fiction implies and means this and that thing."
Fiction implies a synthesis aka putting stuff together...this and that thing implies a separation from one another aka analysis.
No one here is misusing power.
Everything empowers each thing...denying everything for nothing tempts one to miss being empowered.
You're the ignorance chooser.
What does free-will-of-choice choose to ignore...binding self by submitting to words suggested by others?
No it doesn't. You can place things on a desk.
Where does one store the word "desk" to label the "thing" with? If you look at a desk; then where do you see the label "desk"? Without the label "desk" can you not place things upon one another?
What separates things from one another to enable one to put things upon one another?
Buy a flute. You seem to love instruments so much.
a) Buying vs selling aka loving vs hating...conflicts of reason within the mind of one who chooses a side against another.
b) In (within) stru (structure) ment (mind)...all sound puts in (input) each structured mind within (instrument).
It's ignoring sound for words which permits another to blow the flute as a shepherds pipe to herd the sheep aka as the pied piper luring the children away.
a) (((New York City Underground)))
b) A Splinter Group aka "a religious sect or political faction, that has broken away from a parent group".
c) Heroes in a half-shell...like wearing a kippah.
d) They're the world's most fearsome fighting team...frightening others by fear (Latin terrere) implies terror-ism.
e) Teenage (age of a teen) + Mutant (mutare; to change) + Ninja (to conceal a person) + Turtle (tortoise/tortue/torture)
f) Shredder/shred - "to fragment; cut a piece of"...nature fragments being; a jew uses tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together), hence opposing shredding among gentiles by tempting together.
g) Bebop aka fast jazz with complex chords aka jazz (rubbish, unnecessary talk or ornamentation)... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=jazz Fast jazz implies the babbling on (babylon) of suggested information, which tempts ones consent to hold onto, while binding self to complex chords attached to another.
While Bebop is used to attach gentiles to spells from outside; a jew uses Rocksteady to steadily rock the choice within a gentile from one side to another within conflicts of reason.
Example...feeling confused about what free-will-of-choice is writing implies BEBOP, while choosing to upvote vs downvote implies ROCKSTEADY, and for will to be able to freely choose one has to be fragmented from one another aka SHREDDER.
h) Leonardo/leon - "lion" like the lion of judah.
i) Donatello (donat-el aka giving God)..."His David was the first freestanding nude male sculpture since antiquity; like much of his work, it was commissioned by the Medici family. "
j) Raphael from Hebrew Repha'el (healing God)
k) Michelangelo aka Michael from Hebrew Mikha-el (who is like God) + Angelo (angel/angle) whence Michael the Arc-Angel.
l) Foot (foundation) + Clan (offspring)...hence the jewish heroes making the foundation of gentile offspring into the villains.
m) April the shiksa working for Channel 6 News aka channeling the six (pointed star) in-between N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) together with (((Vernon))) and (((Irma))).
Her boss was named Burne Thompson aka to burn thomas/toma - "twin"...working also in New York City btw.
Edit: Forgot Op's picture....Greenbacks taking a slice out of the US economy.