Singer, who financed the never Trump movement is the CEO of hedge fund Elliott Management and Amber Energy. which bought Citgo Petroleum Corp from Venezuela creditors for way below market value.
The winning bid from the Elliott Management affiliate came in at $5.89 billion, lower than the $7 billion bid from another firm called "Gold Reserve Ltd", but a federal judge in Delaware viewed Elliott’s bid as most likely to close, as it included payments to Venezuela’s creditors.
PS singer did flip to support Trump and contributed to his inauguration fund.
"So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." ~Romans 10:17
God naturalizes instruments within sound...the articulation of words destroys that, while permitting few to civilize aka domesticate many by speaking in the name of God.
a) There's no "or" to reality...fiction simply implies ones ignorance of reality.
b) Ones response (re) to all (al) implies instrument responding to natural sound.
No.
Putting a point behind nothing to indicate an end...that's very destructive to a being within everything moving.
Civilize what?
Anyone within civilization aka each ones consent given to a collective consensus.
Your dogs?
If a dog hears and chooses to follow ones command, then that's domestication by faith. The difference...a domesticated dog hearing "wait" gets exited to get relieved from his faith by "go"; while domesticated men exhaust one another by holding onto faith.
The dog knows that everything moves, yet submits to his master temporarily for benefits. The man denies knowledge by holding onto, while allowing to be domesticated into a deficit, hence the continued fall of civilization cycle.
Your word games? What?
What implies an abstract (suggestion) tempting one to ignore actual (perception). Implication solves that issue...if God, then what else?
Asking another "what" implies taking a chance, while ignoring given choice...that's a gamble/game.
Notice that de-struc-tion implies a division of structure within action. You tried to add structure within everything by multiplying nothing. You structure doesn't have a foundation...
Do you think that adding "nothing" to emptiness fills it up?
Now you can no longer analyze words.
Now implies in-between before and after aka as choice within balance. See...using free will of choice to analyze "now" allows one to discern self, which one ignores when trying to curtail others into "no longer" using free will of choice.
And let's also mention norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm aka the tool used by masons to mark angles/angels...fallen angels.
Wrong. The word "No" is already a structure. Thanks for admitting everything you said was false.
no longer using free will of choice
Ohhhh, so you believe you'll become a puppet if you talk like an actual person. Too late, you've already wrote normally before in the past. Also, that's wrong. I have free will, so how do you explain that?
"YOU HAVE TO DO MY SPECIFIC ACTIONS OR ELSE YOURE A PUPPET!!!!" Yeah right. How very convenient.
Singer, who financed the never Trump movement is the CEO of hedge fund Elliott Management and Amber Energy. which bought Citgo Petroleum Corp from Venezuela creditors for way below market value.
The winning bid from the Elliott Management affiliate came in at $5.89 billion, lower than the $7 billion bid from another firm called "Gold Reserve Ltd", but a federal judge in Delaware viewed Elliott’s bid as most likely to close, as it included payments to Venezuela’s creditors.
PS singer did flip to support Trump and contributed to his inauguration fund.
Philo is the real name of "Saint Paul".
The Jew who destroyed civilization by words alone.
Why do you believe Paul destroyed anything? Oh right, you don't know, you just want to be an athiest and never defend your beliefs.
"So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." ~Romans 10:17
God naturalizes instruments within sound...the articulation of words destroys that, while permitting few to civilize aka domesticate many by speaking in the name of God.
In real life or in your word games?
No.
Civilize what? Your dogs? Your word games? What?
a) There's no "or" to reality...fiction simply implies ones ignorance of reality.
b) Ones response (re) to all (al) implies instrument responding to natural sound.
Putting a point behind nothing to indicate an end...that's very destructive to a being within everything moving.
Anyone within civilization aka each ones consent given to a collective consensus.
If a dog hears and chooses to follow ones command, then that's domestication by faith. The difference...a domesticated dog hearing "wait" gets exited to get relieved from his faith by "go"; while domesticated men exhaust one another by holding onto faith.
The dog knows that everything moves, yet submits to his master temporarily for benefits. The man denies knowledge by holding onto, while allowing to be domesticated into a deficit, hence the continued fall of civilization cycle.
What implies an abstract (suggestion) tempting one to ignore actual (perception). Implication solves that issue...if God, then what else?
Asking another "what" implies taking a chance, while ignoring given choice...that's a gamble/game.
No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.
Now I have SUPER-DESTROYED you and your empty word games! Now you can no longer analyze words. Now you'll talk normally.
Notice that de-struc-tion implies a division of structure within action. You tried to add structure within everything by multiplying nothing. You structure doesn't have a foundation...
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Destinys-child-no-no-no-part-1-lyrics
Do you think that adding "nothing" to emptiness fills it up?
Now implies in-between before and after aka as choice within balance. See...using free will of choice to analyze "now" allows one to discern self, which one ignores when trying to curtail others into "no longer" using free will of choice.
Here's the NORM... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV8cI1U43II aka a running joke to domesticate an audience to follow the norm.
And let's also mention norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm aka the tool used by masons to mark angles/angels...fallen angels.
Wrong. The word "No" is already a structure. Thanks for admitting everything you said was false.
Ohhhh, so you believe you'll become a puppet if you talk like an actual person. Too late, you've already wrote normally before in the past. Also, that's wrong. I have free will, so how do you explain that?
"YOU HAVE TO DO MY SPECIFIC ACTIONS OR ELSE YOURE A PUPPET!!!!" Yeah right. How very convenient.
But God exists and we have all sorts of evidence from many avenues to defend the fact He exists.
Saint Paul doesn't exist. He is an OC self insert made by Philo.
Note that Philo is active around the same time as Paul.
Hey. Debunk my ideas.
By his logic a lot of historical figures don't exist. Example, we'd have to deny Napoleon.