same process of thought
Thinking implies differentiation. Many "thinking" alike implies equalization...which benefits few.
real or not
Fiction can only exist within reality...and it's shaped by ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of reality.
Few suggest OR to tempt many to consent to alternatives aka substitutes for perceivable reality...that's fiction.
accident or planned
a) Plane (inception towards death) of existence (life)...
b) Accident implies that which comes by chance...an inversion of coming into being as choice within balance of nature.
There are no accidents in nature...unless one chooses to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
would not have purpose
Purpose aka pur (forth) pose (position) implies being positioned (life) forwards (inception towards death)...one needs to resist purpose.
the reasons as to WHY
Reasoning implies a conflict about suggested artifice, which tempts both sides to ignore perceivable nature/nasci - "to be born"; which implies the why of being...
furthering understanding
The longer one "stands under"...the longer it takes for one to grow.
the whole point
Being implies sentenced (life) towards point of death...as partial (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss).
why events play out the way they do
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...few suggest events and plays to tempt many to ignore that.
I am interested in rationalizing the reasons...as well as the implications and motives
Reason (versus) inverts implication (if/then)...motion (motive) implicates, while reason tempts one to hold onto a side within a conflict against others, while ignoring to be (life) within motion (inception towards death).
In order to substantiate
TO implies towards...natural order (inception towards death) destroys substitutes (life) unless resisted.
Few suggest progressivism to tempt consenting many to think "towards" suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
refute ideas
Before one can refute ideas one has to consent to suggested ideal-ism by either agreeing or disagreeing...no matter the side, both find themselves within a conflict of reason against each other afterwards.
give meaning
Nature impresses (inception towards death) expressions (life)...a moving process of action generating reactions. Few within nature suggest many to hold onto meaning which tempts the ignorance of motion.
Holding onto, while being moved, implies constipation...nature flushes the shit out of any constipation within, and many choose to behave like shit, which permits few to treat them as such.
motivation must be explored
Exploration (life) during motivation (inception towards death) aka status quo of being...unless ignored for finding suggested meaning, evidence, opinion etc.
Motive is equally as important as result.
Motive (inception towards death) generates result/resultare/resilire - "resilience" aka life rebounding during the process of dying.
Equal (inception towards death) generates differentiation (life)...few equalize differences by tempting many to respond alike.
Responding alike lowers resilience, which tremendously benefits a parasitic few feeding upon many hosts.
to zero
All is one. A jew suggests nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to encircle one within nothing aka ayin (ein sof). Here's the symbol... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4N9o4RDQ.jpg aka 1 within 0 aka shutdown symbol aka 1 hidden (kryptos) within 0.
when
Now...one and only moment of existence.
a) Women implies pluralism, hence you ignoring nature setting apart for the artificial temptation of putting together.
b) Feeling rejected by many implies wanting many, while ignoring the need to sustain ONEself by intercourse through another ONE for off-spring of yet other ONEs.
c) Reject/reciere implies ones response (life) to being thrown (inception towards death)...not attraction vs rejection among each other, which implies an artificial conflict called "reason".
d) ME implies one claiming self, which collectivizes other ones into YOU...hence singular feeling rejected by multitude.
How could one get embraced by another if one holds onto self?
Drawings are suggested to tempt consent...ignoring consent (rape) implies falling for a temptation.
Subjecting pure implies impurity. Nature was pure before each impurity comes into being within. Being impure (temporary chaos) subjects one to purification (natural order).
Subjective impurity (life) during objective purification (inception towards death)...
don’t draw children naked? Is that difficult?
To draw from implies accumulation...difficult/differ implies separation. Nature separates; artifice accumulates.
That's also why those who accumulate (wanted temptation) withdraw into nakedness...hence wanting to separate cloth from body aka guilt from innocence aka adult from child.
perhaps
Aka by (per) happenstance (haps) aka by chance (artifical) as oppose to as choice (natural).
drawn pics
If one picks/pics artificially drawn; then one withDRAWs from reality. Few tempt this behavior among many by suggesting escapism...no amount of artifice lets one escape from nature.
now the same as real people
Now implies the momentum of same (motion) for each different (matter) person within.
Few suggest theism (the) and pluralism (people) to equalize differences among consenting many.
you have been warned
Warn/wer - "to cover"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/warn
Nature reveals being (been)...few suggest progressivism (warnings) to tempt many to conceal themselves in fear/hope towards outcomes.
to destroy another comment thread
Do you view me unraveling the threads others bind together as destructive? How is revelation a destruction?
I see. It amazes me...
That which amazes ones mind distracts from what ones eyes see.
The mind/memory tempts one to hold onto suggested, while ignoring that perceivable moves. Amazement implies a stunned perception and "a maze" of suggested information held within ones memory.
I see...thousands of times you have been reported
If one reports aka REsponds to PORT, then one ignores to sail the SEA/SEE by permitting others to dry dock one...
They simply will not ban you.
Making suggestions in the name of others (they) while wanting to ban "free will of choice"... what does that imply for self?
What is more destructive...trying to ban free will of choice or the samson option (being free will of choice)?
Ash White Privilege?
a) Is that suppose to be an ash-ke-nazi pun?
b) White implies pure; privilege implies separation...separation contradicts purity.
A jew suggests "white privilege" to gentiles complaining about "black lives matter"... an impure thought aka a chosen privilege by those ignoring purity.
a) A threat implies a suggestion tempting ones consent...feeling threatened by holding onto the thread of fear permits others to pull it.
b) World/vault implies a repository (momentum) for partials (matter) within entire (motion)...a world can never be entire, only enveloped within entirety.
c) Samson aka sam/shem (semi; half) + Son/suh (to give birth) + Option (choice within action)...action gives birth to reacting choices by setting balance in half.
Being implies choice (life) within balance (inception/death) aka samson option aka nuclear bomb (explosive projection of nucleus).
is the greatest
All perceivable WAS always greater than anything anyone within suggests IS the greatest....suggestion is about fooling the eye of the beholder to ignore WAS for IS.
a) That dudes name is Mutahar/muṭahhar - "purified"...the ongoing process of dying purifies/eradicates anything living within by dissolving impure matter back to pure motion.
Being implies impure aka being within (im) purification (pure)...few call many who willingly ignore this the "unwashed masses".
b) Being implies from beginning (inception) towards end (death) of man (life)...a process of assisted growth during eradication.
Suggested "past; present; future" tempts a perceiving being to ignore ones position at the center of assisted growth during eradication...thinking about past or imagining future distorts ones presence (present).
Preservation
That's a suggested inversion of perpetuation aka inter-course for off-spring...life cannot be preserved; only perpetuated during a moving nature aka during the ongoing process of dying aka during purification of impurities.
A jew suggests preservatives to tempt gentiles to willingly destroy their reproductive system.
pandora tomorrow
As the unwashed masses are fighting each other over wanting to open "pandoras box" again and again, while complaining to loose access to it by few...each one willingly ignores PAN (all) DORA/DO (to give) aka that all perceivable was given to each ones perception.
splinter cell
a) What does it imply to splinter (split) a cell/celare/kel (to conceal; hide; cover)? Revelation!
Nature reveals all perceivable to each ones perception...ones consent to a suggestion by another conceals ones perception from all perceivable.
b) Concealing that which nature reveals...is a stealthy game.
c) What is Splinter Cell famous for? The third echelon googles...the 3 lights shown cover the 2 eyes for seeing. 3 + 2 implies what? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes
veil
Ignoring what WAS perceivable by consenting to what others suggest IS...that's the veil from within self; obscuring ones sight of all reality with fiction by others.
shelter
a) Being implies eye (life) of storm (inception towards death)...
b) Shelter/shield/skel - "divide, split, separate"...coming into being implies by division of all into one aka by splitting whole into partials aka by all separating each one from one another.
Ones struggle to sustain self by resisting, while being tempted by one another out into the storm...that's what sheltering implies. Others tempt one to seek shelter, hence to reach out and hold onto for protection...that only lures one out of ones sheltered position aka ones only position at center (living) of storm (process of dying).
Naturalism Vs. Supernaturalism
a) Any suggested -ism tempts one to ignore perceivable nature.
b) Only within nature can there be an above (super) and below (subpar).
c) Nature turns each one within apart from another...turning against (versus) each other implies ones ignorance of nature.
solutions for problems
Being implies temporary problem (life) during ongoing solution (inception towards death). The process of dying dissolves each thing living within, hence ones problematic struggle to resist temptation.
spiritual causes
There can be only one cause (motion) of spirit (momentum) for each breathing life (matter) within.
Few suggest spiritualism and causation to distract many from discerning this for self.
want to cling to natural
Being alive implies the temptation of wanting to hold onto, while nature implies the solution one needs to resist. Nature cannot be held onto...other life within nature can, which destroys both. Few therefore tempt many together for mutual destruction.
A suggestion tempts ones consent to "cling" to the suggested aka to mentally hold onto suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since inSPIRation implies the natural spirit moving through being.
social of christ
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies a setting apart from one another...few suggest social-ism to tempt many together for mutual destruction of each anointed christ.
What's the "little secret"?
The big secret/seco - "to divide" implies all perceivable dividing into each ones perception aka revelation.
The little secret implies one suggesting another one to conceal self from revelation.
The big divide implies a center growing outwards, while the little divide implies a center tempting inwards.
allow to win
Nature allows choice to be free...winning or losing binds choice to a side within a conflict of reason.
cliffhanger
Wielding choice during knowledge (known edge) implies balancing a thin line....hanging onto either side imbalances choice faster.
will fix it
Fixing free WILL of choice tempts one to ignore choice alternating within balance.
Television and internet ARE weapons of mass destruction
a) Ones tell-a-vision requires another ones consent to look at visuals shown. An internal net requires consent by those allowing themselves to be ensnared within it. A mass requires the consensual participation of each one joining a mass.
b) Ones free will of choice implies the only weapon of offense and defense...and this weapon can only ever be singular. Few suggest multiple choice to distract many from ones singular response-ability (free will of choice).
c) To amass destroys matter. Motion sets matter apart from one another to allow the expression of growth (life) during loss (inception towards death), which requires from each one a struggle for self sustenance by alternation aka balancing as choice aka resisting the temptation to hold onto.
It's few who remain apart, while tempting many together by amassing them, and each one of many choosing willingly to be part of a mass, is sustaining mass destruction for the benefit of few.
change happens so subtly
Subtle implies by penetration, hence change moving through one like perceivable inspiration...suggested information tempts one to hold onto into, while ignoring the subtle penetration of ever changing inspiration.
A suggestion implies a happenstance aka an occurring of agreeing or disagreeing minds coming together...doing so ignores change by inverting alternation with confrontation.
reflection
Aka ones response (re) to being bend (flectere) within action (tion)...a subtle; penetrating impression (inception towards death) bends into shape expressions (life).
an alternate form
Both CNN and podcasts imply many consenting to suggestions by few...that's artificial alternation. Still few shaping the form of many through collectivization into a mass.
From a different angle...jewish pornographers lured gentile "coomers" with the teen category to watch, which then grew into a critical mass, which allowed the production of "teen" by a jew to be replaced by the production of "amateur" by gentiles themselves.
That's the same modus operandi as from CNN to podcasts...it implies a jew fading into the background, while leaving gentiles the center stage of their own destruction. Meanwhile...the distribution of both teen and amateur porn as well as CNN and podcast news is still operated by jewish conglomerates.
concept of self
Self implies through another, hence intercourse for off-spring. Concept/concipere implies "holding together"...which replaces a moving intercourse, with an affixed contract aka a mercantile exchange between a seller letting go and a buyer holding onto.
Concept implies the artificial opposite of natural reality...conception inverts inception.
A jew stages scenes to tempt gentiles to look at aka to focus attention while narrowing sight. Any such stage implies a fiction distracting from reality.
At a small scale such a scene can be a book tempting the reader to focus sight in-between covers. A little bigger scale and it's the screen tempting the viewers sight inside a controlled frame. Bigger and there's an internal net (internet) within a world wide web controlling users through protocols (http).
And simultaneously the largest and the smallest scale...suggested (words) distracting from perceivable (sound).
Nature moves sound...it doesn't shape words. Few shape words within sound to tempt many to ignore sound for words, hence making all the world a stage.
Whatever a gentile looks at...he ignores what nature moves for what a jew suggests it means by thinking in words; languages; definitions; suggested information; labels; brands etc.
Here for example... https://translate.how/en/tree/
An artificial multiple cross-translation dictionary in 134 languages for a nature that doesn't dictate...a nature where no other life form requires the label "tree".
- Human pointing at tree: "We have 134 different names for this"
- Squirrel living in it; running up; down and around it: "That's nuts"
what do you think is going on behind the scenes?
a) Thinking about a suggested SCENE hinders being within perceivable SEEN. In other words...instead of adapting to what is directed towards ones eyes; a staged scene tempts one to roll with imagination behind the seen.
b) Cheap migrants emptying the trashcans; vacuuming the carpets and mopping the floors...because no one else wants to do it.
If you are a musician, then why are you looking to others for the right frequency to tune your instruments? If you can not hear dissonance while making music, then what are you resonating with?
Doesn't the skill of becoming a musician imply frequenting instruments?
Russel came to it from a "completely new" direction...from esoteric teachings
a) ESO (within) implies from EXO (out of), hence esoteric student of exoteric teaching.
b) EXO (all perceivable) exists before ESO (ones perception) comes into being.
c) Exo implies complete; Eso implies a setting apart of exoteric origin into esoteric being.
d) One cannot come from something completely new...one can only come into being from all that was already there before. Others can suggest NEW to distract ones perception from NOW.
period table
Period implies "a cycle of recurrence"...being implies re (responding life) during current (inception towards death).
A jew suggests tables "a synopsis; many particulars brought into one view" to distract each gentile from ones view as particular (perception) within the differentiation of whole (perceivable).
Consenting to a jewish suggestion tempts each gentile into a cycle of recurrence (circular logic) and against each other (conflicts of reason).
element
EL-E-MENT aka ones mind within all...a temporal separation of being, not a recurring synopsis of gentiles to be wiped out by a jew over and over again.
All creation
Creation (out of nothing) contradicts all (everything and each thing within). All cannot create without contradicting itself. If it's ALL, then there could be no more, hence nothing new.
real power... that controls men’s wills
a) Real implies ones RE-sponse to ALL, which implies by free WILL of choice.
b) Con-trol (rolled together) refers to ones choice to ignore self (singular) for others (plural), which is why few apart lure many together with for example "rock and roll" aka rocking ones choice to consent, then rolling many choices together into conflicts of reason aka circular logic.
c) Power/poti - "potential" implies each ones possibility within all perceivable...ones consent to the suggestions of another makes one impotent, while permitting few to control the potential of many.
Most people quote one dead economist or another, and it's not an original thought.
a) Ones perception adapting to all perceivable implies "original thought"...thinking about anything suggested establishes an artificial think tank, which others control from outside.
b) A quote implies a suggestion towards ones consent, while consenting (to buy) to a suggestion (to sell) implies a domestic economy, permitting those who sell to domesticate those who buy with price-fixing, hence affixing artificial currency (information) during natural current (inspiration) by exploiting ones willing consent holding onto it.
This does all boil down to ignorance of our true nature, no?
Yep, and it's using words to describe, which tempts one to ignore that nature doesn't shape words...it moves sound.
You using the words "true" and "no" establishes artificial conflicts of reason aka "true vs false" and "yes vs no" among those who ignore nature. Me writing "yep" establishes "agreement vs disagreement"...
The sorcerors leverage that ignorance by using money as a proxy
a) A sorcerer shapes an ingredient (suggested information) to tempt others to ignore source (perceivable inspiration). Information tempts others to hold onto it, while inspiration moves and cannot be held onto, only drawn from and expressed at the moment(um) of adapting to it, while being within it.
A being implies an apprentice (life) within a moving source (inception towards death)...a sorcerer suggests "The Sorcerer's Apprentice" to become the substitute source directing for those submitting by watching, while laughing at the foolishness of the apprentice making mistakes.
b) Consenting to a suggestion (fiction) implies permitting another the power of attorney for oneself within perceivable (reality).
In other words...consent to suggested implies ones choice selecting a chosen one, by shirking ones response-ability onto another. That's how a proxy is being established.
life force energy, flow state, unity consciousness. (money, currency, banks, etc)
a) All implies energy (internal power); which forces action (inception towards death) through reactions (life).
b) Flow isn't a state...it's the ongoing foundation for temporary form staying within.
Opposite of state implies "terra nullius" (unclaimed land) and refers to the flow which the form within cannot hold onto; claim for self; take possession of.
c) CON (together) SCIOUS (to know; perceive) tempts one to ignore that all perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another, hence giving each one a different perspective.
Unity/unit (one) therefore implies apart from one another, which a sorcerer inverts with for example e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; european union; soviet union; united kingdom etc.
In short...a moving nature generates UNITS by setting itself internally apart, which few within nature invert by tempting many together using suggested UNITY.
a) Nature implies balance (an agent); each one within implies choice (a patient).
b) Few within nature use choice to suggest elections to tempt many into selecting representatives for their own choice. This is how ones choice is being tricked to select a chosen one.
c) Nature implies integer (whole); each one within implies fraction (partial)...voting tempts many together; while setting few apart.
d) Voting implies shirking ones choice onto another, hence making self obsolete.
Either implies "each of two", hence falling for suggested dual-ism, which tempts ONE into a conflict of reason (is vs isn't) of two opposing sides.
Notice that in-DI-cate implies "two", hence two opposing sides; while choice implies "one", hence ones free will of choice in-between two opposing sides.
What generates two opposing sides? ONE motion dividing into two opposing sides (inception/death) for each ones choice in-between (life).
If origin (motion) and outcome (matter) imply ONE, then why call the momentum/balance in-between TWO?
a) Seeking truth to hold onto...destroys matter (life) during motion (inception towards death).
b) Only implies motion (oneness)...thing implies matter (ones). Only within motion can one come into being.
Whatever one wants to hold onto becomes truth...others not wanting to hold onto it becomes lie.
Nature cannot be held onto since it moves. Truth (want) vs lie (not want) tempt one to ignore change (need).
Exchange truth with "motion" and notice that motion cannot be held onto as truth, nor could motion lie.
Decision implies "free from hesitation or wavering"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/decided
Having free will of choice implies ones struggle to hesitate and waver as matter within balance of motion.
Any decision held onto harms ones FREE will of choice through neglect of choosing to adapt to being moved.
Solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life) through differentiation, hence setting each being apart from one another.
Identification and fixation dissolves (inception towards death) problems (life), hence destroying being alive in the process of dying.