Even though all signs point to Trump winning, I have a feeling that they not will ALLOW him the presidency. There is no way in hell that the race is as close as the polls and media are making it out to be and I wonder if this is them gearing up for a steal.
They have come after him from every angle possible from slander to law fare to assassination, and if he becomes the big man in the chair, they could be in trouble. (OR, has this all just been a big publicity stunt? - not sure as they gave him hell even when he was president).
On one side, you have all of the apparent rigging in the swing states in an attempt to get Harris in - more war, more money laundering, higher taxes, higher inflation, communism etc - TPTB want this.
On the other side, Trump seems to have far more popularity than Harris - which means less friction when plans are pushed through, implementation of cashless system, Musk involvement, more bigger israel supporter too, maybe Iran problems - TPTB want this too.
if TPTB wanted Dems to win, why insert such an unlikable person who clearly has no organic support? There has been such exposure of flops too: Dropping out of interviews, doctored interviews, scripted responses, paid for support, obvious hypocrisy - all making her seem even more incompetent and unlikable. This stuff is covered by the likes of CNN who are ardent democrat supporters. It all just seems TOO obvious.
If TPTB wanted Trump to win, why all the shenanigans in the blue states with illegal voting, non registered votes, judges an courts allowing undocumented voting, no voter ID and the apparent delayed results after election night?
Either way TPTB wins, regardless of the election. But I don't know which way they lean as the intent isn't clear (probably by design). Is it all a humiliation ritual? - Massive demoralization tactic?
Who will be the President when this is all over?
Thinking implies differentiation. Many "thinking" alike implies equalization...which benefits few.
Fiction can only exist within reality...and it's shaped by ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of reality.
Few suggest OR to tempt many to consent to alternatives aka substitutes for perceivable reality...that's fiction.
a) Plane (inception towards death) of existence (life)...
b) Accident implies that which comes by chance...an inversion of coming into being as choice within balance of nature.
There are no accidents in nature...unless one chooses to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
Purpose aka pur (forth) pose (position) implies being positioned (life) forwards (inception towards death)...one needs to resist purpose.
Reasoning implies a conflict about suggested artifice, which tempts both sides to ignore perceivable nature/nasci - "to be born"; which implies the why of being...
The longer one "stands under"...the longer it takes for one to grow.
Being implies sentenced (life) towards point of death...as partial (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss).
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...few suggest events and plays to tempt many to ignore that.
Reason (versus) inverts implication (if/then)...motion (motive) implicates, while reason tempts one to hold onto a side within a conflict against others, while ignoring to be (life) within motion (inception towards death).
TO implies towards...natural order (inception towards death) destroys substitutes (life) unless resisted.
Few suggest progressivism to tempt consenting many to think "towards" suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
Before one can refute ideas one has to consent to suggested ideal-ism by either agreeing or disagreeing...no matter the side, both find themselves within a conflict of reason against each other afterwards.
Nature impresses (inception towards death) expressions (life)...a moving process of action generating reactions. Few within nature suggest many to hold onto meaning which tempts the ignorance of motion.
Holding onto, while being moved, implies constipation...nature flushes the shit out of any constipation within, and many choose to behave like shit, which permits few to treat them as such.
Exploration (life) during motivation (inception towards death) aka status quo of being...unless ignored for finding suggested meaning, evidence, opinion etc.
Motive (inception towards death) generates result/resultare/resilire - "resilience" aka life rebounding during the process of dying.
Equal (inception towards death) generates differentiation (life)...few equalize differences by tempting many to respond alike.
Responding alike lowers resilience, which tremendously benefits a parasitic few feeding upon many hosts.