its about survival
a) Survival/supervivere aka super (beyond) vivere (to live). A being cannot be yonder (over there)...only within here.
Few suggest survivalism to tempt many to ignore being here (within origin) for wanting to be over there (beyond outcome).
b) About/butan - "without"...few suggest aboutism to tempt many to ignore being within, hence ignoring to sustain self as effect within cause.
I don't know who runs them
To know implies "to perceive"...ones perception is run within all perceivable. Few suggest "don't" aka doing nothing aka nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to corrupt the perception of many by self imposed de-nial.
they are acting
Only if all acts can each one within react aka enacting cause generating reacting effects.
Few are suggesting pluralism (they) to distract from cause separating effects from one another, and actors under directors to invert reactions (life) within direction (inception towards death).
predictably
Before (pre) shown (dict)...few are enabled (ably) by many coming to the show, hence the show starting once the audience settles.
according to the script
Aka according (consent) to the script (suggested). The opposite of accord and script imply "difference and type" aka different type of form (perception) within same flow (perceivable).
Furthermore...notice that accord is given mentally to one another, while one ignores cordis/cor - "heart", which operates apart from one another, hence the dis-cord.
to look...retarded
Retarded implies "to delay; restrain"...which is what looking/locking implies. Few are showing to trick many to look/lock onto shown, which in return retards/restrains many to the show/skau - "to behold" aka being holding onto.
It doesn't matter what is shown by others; only that ones consent is being tempted to look/lock onto it.
Under that logic, there is no end to the war ever.
a) Circular logic implies the perpetuation of reason aka conflict (war). As long as one puts self under logic; so long does one perpetuate war against others.
b) Ever (always) aka way of all implies ongoing motion from inception towards point of death for each life sentence within.
War aka yes vs no reasoning tempts one to ignore that everything moves "ever" forwards, hence circular logic enclosing ones discernment.
in the future
Suggested future (that is yet to be) contradicts the presence of being. Presence implies being within that which is presented (perceivable) to one (perception), hence being enabled to sense input.
a) Rotation implies an effect within the cause of "straight" motion, hence a differentiation of cause (tion) and effect (rota).
b) The flow of motion implies same cause for each differently shaped effect of form within, hence linear motion, circular motion, oscillatory motion, rotational motion, uniform motion, non-uniform motion, periodic motion etc.
c) A year cannot be "all", since it implies ones measurement of perceived differences among form within the same flow. The opposite of measure (living) implies extreme (dying)...holding onto measurements tempts one to ignore that.
d) Suggested axis (imaginary motionless straight line around which a body rotates) tempts ones consent to annex (connect with; bind to), while ignoring that a body (life) can only exist within a moving straight line (inception towards death).
e) Consenting to another ones choice implies "tilting" aka imbalance of ones position as choice. Few utilize suggestion to topple consenting many over into submission.
f) Equal (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...few suggest an "equator" to equalize differences among consenting many.
random thoughts
RAN'DOM, noun - "motion without direction"...a suggested inversion of being matter (life) directed (inception towards death) within motion.
The opposite of random implies certain, hence inception sentencing life towards a certain point of death....random thoughts are shaped by uncertainty of ones FREE will of choice.
Then why not destroy it, devaluing their symbols?
a) Because one cannot outwardly destroy that which is inherent... https://img.gvid.tv/i/46y6GVVZ.jpg (Notice narcissus/narci/nazi)
b) Value (perceivable) moves evaluation (perception)...holding onto suggested symbols devalues ones evaluation of all moving value.
Same with all that masonic shit
Sonic/sonus/sound (entire) implies all sameness + ma/magh (to be able) implies each different magi within. Ignoring perceivable for suggested disables ones choice, while enabling a chosen ones magic (ma) within all perceivable sound (sonic).
https://genius.com/Bay-city-rollers-you-made-me-believe-in-magic-lyrics
address to congress
Which one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jewish_Congress
Words & Telepathy
Tele (afar; at a distance) + Path (narrow passageway)...sound implies the narrow passageway (inception towards death) for each expansive instrument (life) within.
The separation of sound (whole) and instruments (partials) positioned each instrument a) as a divided stance (di-stance) within all, and b) at a distance from one another.
While the narrow passageway of sound permits each expansive instrument to utilize free will of choice for expanding; the suggestion of words tempts ones free will of choice to bind itself to other instruments, hence narrowing down expansion.
Suggested telepathy (path afar) tempts ones perception to ignore being near the path of all perceivable, hence all sound moving through each instrumental one. It doesn't get nearer than being formed within flow.
Telepathy is not the transfer of words from one mind to another.
a) TELE (afar; at a distance) implies the transfer of words from one mind to another, which in return tempts tele-com-unic-ation aka tele (at a distance) com (together) unic (unique; separated) ation (action)...a contradiction in terms.
Resisting the temptation of "telecom" allows growth of unic (life) within the path of ation (inception towards death).
b) Notice that transferring words tempts the recipient to hold onto a definition (definite; affixed); which contradicts the trans-form-ation of instrumental beings within sound.
the reading of energies to determine
a) There can be only one energy aka all for one and one for all. Plural/plus - "more than one" implies the suggested word used to invert perceivable sound/sanus "entire; all in one".
Consenting to suggested plural (+) negates (-) being singular (one).
b) Determine; verb - "to settle, decide upon; state definitely; fix the bounds of; limit in time or extent"....that contradicts sound setting each instrumental being free from one another.
Terminare (to mark the boundary) tricks free will of choice to hold onto a side within the boundary of balance, which in return imbalances choice.
vibe
Aka each vi-tal; vi-brating; vi-gorous be-ing aka ones expression outwards from within all...not the transfer towards other ones.
A being isn't suppose to categorize the vibes of others...only to sustain ones vitality of being.
Few suggest "vibrant" to collectivize many... https://www.amazon.com/Harmony-Hive-Vibrant-Vision-Freemasonrys/dp/1603020888
can be interpreted
Interpret/interpres - "agent; translator"...only energy translates agent (loss) into patients (growth) aka action into reactions aka sound into instruments.
Interpretation among beings sells many out to few, hence diminishing what each being can do.
Many words mean different things.
Same sound differentiates each instrument from one another...words suggested by few tempt "alike" consent by many.
axe me a question
Axing a quest-ion cuts a suggested outcome (quest) from perceivable origin (action)...if one lets go of possession (me).
bickle
Aka buckle; verb - "distort, warp, bend out of shape; to bend under strong pressure"...
Thanks for the inspiration.
those who beg for power may be chosen at a cost.
a) To beg implies by the power of ones free will of choice. Begging implies towards a chosen one, and for the cost of selling self out by buying into alms.
Alms aka "that which is given to relieve the needy" inverts perceivable need with suggested wants.
b) Beggars can't be choosers because begging contradicts choosing. Begging towards the choice of another binds ones "free" will of choice.
c) Power/potere/poti - "to be able" implies being (choice) enabled (balance), hence nature generating the dominating balance for each ones free will of choice aka FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
They never show themselves.
If many watch suggested shows by few, then many ignore few for what is shown.
operating from the shadows
Shadow (ignorance) implies interception (suggestion) of light (perception)...resisting ignorance grows self discernment aka en-lighten-ment.
Antifa is in no way fit for real fight, they are just irritant.
Fasces/faski/bhasko - "band; bund". A jew suggests both sides (for or against) to tempt consenting gentiles into a conflict of reason (for vs against).
Anti-fasces (antifa) implies each chosen ones resistance to the conflict gentiles willingly bind themselves to.
Suggestion by jew irritates reason among gentiles.
In reality there's no fight against one another, only the struggle of each to remain apart from one another.
neutron
Being implies partial aka in-between (life) mutual (inception towards death)...few suggest neutron/neutral to neutralize partiality among many by tempting mutual consent.
string theory
Consenting to a suggested theory/theōria - "contemplation, speculation" aka theater attaches a string between ones consent and the suggestion of another, hence permitting another to utilize suggestion to pull ones strings aka to puppeteer.
If Trump is sincere
Trump; verb - "deceive, cheat, impose upon"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trump Does that sound sincere?
reindustrialise
The foundation of voting for representatives implies the idleness of the voters. Idleness is the opposite of industry...
retraditionalise
Tradition/traditio - "a delivering up, surrender, a handing down, a giving up"...it's many who are delivering themselves to few; who surrender willingly; who're handing down "understanding", while giving up growing.
tech progress
Technical/tekhnē - "artifice"...nature implies perceivable progress; artifice tempts those within nature to hold onto suggestions.
Did the smartphone made many smarter?
coalition of...
Few coalesce many aka united states; united nations; united kingdom; european union; soviet union etc.
Coalition implies submission of FREE will of choice to another. If many coalesce together, then that establishes a few apart with "rules for thee, but not for me".
Regardless of differences...direction will be more or less common.
Direction (inception towards death) differentiates being (life) by separating each from one another. Few suggest common-ism to tempt many together, thereby artificially equalizing natural differences.
coalition will arise
Coalition (together) contradicts will (apart). Each ones free will of choice can only rise if it resists the temptation of joining coalitions with others.
Joining binds ones FREE will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion. Bondage contradicts freedom.
define game theory
A definition represents a mental scheme aka a suggested theory tempting ones consent to game/gamble on it remaining affixed, while ignoring that nature moves.
when are optics not important
Only nature imports (inception) and exports (death) optical sight (life)...viewing reality through suggested fiction implies a non-visual representation aka a distortion within procession (sound) by holding onto a definition (word).
The artificial labels one mentally applies to reality are not visual, like for example...where is WIND attached to?
Im-port and ex-port implies carrying (portare) suggested words during the pass-over of perceivable sound...that distorts the optics of being.
those they (elites) have in their pocket are possessed
Elite implies "selection, choice"...few shape suggestions to tempt many into giving consent by selecting as choice. Using consent to take hold of suggested implies wanting to possess while getting possessed aka buying into while selling self out.
As for pocket/pokka - "bag/beg"...beggars can't be choosers.
Blackrock isnt exactly a name I'd put my trust into.
Trusting implies ignoring (black) self by swaying (rock) towards another.
The opposite of ignoring implies discerning, and of swaying implies stabilizing. Growing discernment, while stabilizing self requires ones guard upfront aka avant-garde aka vanguard...
produce commission business
Ones consent to a suggestion by another implies a juncture (to join together) and a commission (delegated authority). That's a fictitious transaction.
In reality...nature produces each ones free will of choice through separation from one another, hence not a transaction, but a trans-formation of reactions (life) during action (inception towards death).
interest
Ones consent to a suggestion establishes a commission aka ones shirking of response-ability (choice) onto another, which in return permits a legal claim; right; benefit; advantage in-between (inter) beings (esse).
Nature moves and cannot be claimed, hence few within tricking many to give consent to a suggested transaction, which only then permits artificial interest within natural indifference.
rockefeller
To be implies choice (life) in-between balance (inception/death)...few sway many from center into circumference to destabilize choice aka to ROCK A FELLA.
where the meanings come from
a) That's the issue...nature moves inspiration through you; others suggest you to hold onto information. The latter you call "meaning", which restricts you from utilizing former. As in...you can't hold onto information, while drawing from moving inspiration. Holding onto restricts movement.
Nature doesn't define meaning...nature moves; which permits being to shape.
The trick...nature moves sound; beings trick each other with shaped words to ignore sound. That's spell-craft.
b) Let's look at the etymology: Meaning; noun - "sense, that which is intended to be expressed"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/meaning
Being implies expression (life) within impression (inception towards death) aka expressed growth within impressed loss aka living within the process of dying.
In regard to senses...each ones perception separated from one another within all perceivable. It's the separation from one another which allows suggestion of information, which when consented to distracts one from all perceivable inspiration. Consent representing ones choice to hold onto a shape within a moving process. That's the self inflicted corruption of ones mind, and few trick many to choose that willingly.
trying to figure out
A rhetorical trick tempting you to ignore being a formed figure (life) within flow (inception towards death). Trying to figure out establishes intention towards suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin. This intention permits few to direct many followers.
I think I understand
As long as you "stand-under" you cannot think freely. Understanding is shaped by ones consent to suggested information by another. Thinking implies adaptation to moving inspiration...something one cannot hold onto; only draw from and shape by free will of choice.
you’re showing where...come from
There's only one source (perceivable) for each one (perception) within. I try to break apart the suggested SHOW by few, which many are willingly watching and confining themselves to.
It's the allegory of the cave... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave#/media/File:An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave,_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg
That cave represents the mind/memory of each consenting being. Others cannot enter (suggestion) your mind unless invited (consent).
where the meanings come from of the words they use or the actual message in what they’re saying?
a) Actual sound moves forwards; fictional words tempt ones consenting mind into circular thinking (logic); which outwards turns one against others (reason).
Few are not restricted by words. Few freely shape within sound, while tricking many with shaped words to turn away from sound and against each other. A distortion.
b) Message/mittere - "to release" implies flow (inception towards death) releasing form (life) by separation each one from one another, hence each ones FREE will of choice.
Ones consent to a suggested "message" implies holding onto its meaning, thereby contradicting "release".
Sharing messages with one another represents the game "Chinese Whispers; Telephone; Stille Post"...sharing distorts shapes; few exploit distortions among many sharing information with one another.
Maybe a bit of both?
Both implies "two"...being implies one (partial) within oneness (whole). There can be only one whole, hence the sleight of hand: "hole/whole in one".
Golf btw distorts gulf; noun - "profound depth" as in gulf of the sea/see aka profound depth (all perceivable) of sight (ones perception).
Putting a ball/baal into the hole/whole implies the establishment of circular logic within ones perception.
I just don’t understand how to see
a) Acknowledge for your self that "standing-under" prevents you from growing. You cannot seek understanding without curtailing your growth by intending to "stand-under" someone else.
b) Don't implies "doing nothing". That's a contradiction in itself, since everything perceivable does each ones perception before ones senses can perceive anything.
Nothing implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable. Few invert reality (everything) with fiction (nothing) to tempt many in-vert aka into turning (verto) against (versus) each other within conflicts of reason.
Creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Nature doesn't create out of nothing; nature transform everything into each thing by internal separation of action into reactions aka loss into growth aka flow (inception towards death) into form (life).
Each one can discern self to be within all...utilizing DON'T prevents self discernment.
to directly get at
You try to GET, which represents your choice to want to take into possession and hold onto by means (meaning) through the suggestion of others.
I try to describe all perceivable each ones perception GOT before coming into being.
Suggestion tempts one to GET; while ignoring where one GOT perception from.
All perceivable directs each ones living perception from inception towards death; the suggestions by another misdirect one into a "circle of life; a wheel of fortune; a leap of faith; the band of hope"... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
jews blatantly lying
a) Blatant/blatire - "to babble" aka building the tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder".
b) What about the opposite? Gentiles inconspicuously believing truth...
fact or fiction
Fact/facere/dhe - "to set, put"...it's ones consent setting/putting the suggested fiction of others into perceivable reality.
In short...consenting to facts (truth) establishes fiction (lies), both of which ignore reality (change).
lying about the Holohoax
Holo (whole) caust (corrosive; capable of burning)...being implies corrosive (life) during anodyne (inception towards death).
Being caust within holo implies the status quo of being...the truth vs lie conflict of reason about a suggested "holocaust" tempts one to ignore that.
A jew shapes suggestions to tempt gentile ignorance of perceivable.
What is the default argument. Logical fallacies.
Circular logic turns ones mind into conflicts of reason against others...that's the foundation of an arguing mind (argue-ment).
Not sure if people really understand...still way over people's head
Making sure implies seeking suggested assurances from others by consensual "standing-under"...that puts it way over people's heads.
In reality...over and under are in balance with one another. Artificially choosing to understand establishes a natural over-reaction.
scientific method
- Science/scio - "to know; perceive"
- Ficus/facere - "to make"
- Met/meta/me - "in the middle"
- Hod/hodos - "way"
Ones perception of all perceivable from within the middle (life) of the way (inception towards death). Suggested scientism tempts one to incline towards others aka decentralization.
Notice also metaphysics - "the science of the inward and essential nature of things"...suggestion implies outwards.
be be be
666 aka Carbon (6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, 6 Electrons) aka motion (proton/protos/first) balance (neutron/neutral) choice (electron/elect/to choose)
doctor
A docked oar (doctor) prevents one from steering.
naturopath
One needs to resist (life) the natural path (inception towards death) to sustain dis-ease (physical comfort by separation).
charge them
Consent withdraws suggested...only perceivable charges perception. Ones adaptation to perceivable implies a re-charge.
interaction with God
Inter (life) action (inception towards death) aka each Christ within God.
connection
Connect implies binding together, thereby ignoring that action sets internal reactions free from one another.
Humans were more connected
a) The hue of man implies separation of rays within visible spectrum of light.
b) The suggested word color/colos/kel - "to cover" tempts one to ignore appearance aka each ones perception of all perceivable aka each rays sight within the visible spectrum of light aka ones unique perspective within moving differences.
Consenting to suggested colors...paints others alike.
direct relationship with God
Many ignore being a ship (life) within direction (inception towards death) of God for relating consent to suggestions by few.
To relate implies "to recount, tell" aka fiction shaped within reality aka suggesting other ones what all perceivable is...it's ones consent given to this which affirms fiction within ones mind/memory during an ignored reality.
Faith works both ways
There can be only one...God, hence one way (inception towards death) for each anointed one (life). Faith implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, hence establishing both/bho - "two; one and the other".
Vaccines...
Vacca (cow) implies herd mentality aka many willingly giving consent to suggestions by few. It's irrelevant what others put into vaccines if one already follows herd mentality aka suicidal consent given to genocidal suggestions.
fluoride...
Flouride/flour/fluere - "to flow". Form (life) needs to resist the wanted temptations of flow (inception towards death). Consenting to suggested fluoride is already self destructive...no matter what compounds fluorine is mixed with.
The point was to cut off the direct relationship with God
a) Direction (inception towards death) cuts reactions (life)...separation implies a cut, hence perceivable knowLEDGE; whole cutting into partials; "cut my life into pieces this is my last resort" etc.
b) God sentences life from inception towards point of death. Few suggest many to make rhetorical "points" during circular logic.
Point implies end of sentence...circular logic tempts one to ignore that direction implies beginning (inception) and end (death) for each reaction (life) within.
It's called "point of no return", because ones response (re) turning against another within conflicts of reason puts an end (point) to ones life sentence.
to suppress the soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only", hence whole impressing (inception towards death) partial expressions (life). Consenting to the suggestions of another represses self, while permitting few to suppress many from expressing themselves.
who is heading these agencies
a) Nature implies top (inception) and bottom (death) of each body (life), hence action heading; bottoming and embodying reactions.
b) Few suggest artificial agencies to trick consenting many to follow artificial agendas, while ignoring to be employed (living) within natures agency (dying).
c) An example for artificial agency...if an actor follows directions, then he "reacts".
There are no actors, just influencers (flow) suggesting information (form) to tempt one to ignore being form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Many reasoning against each other about suggested information represents "information warfare"...
a) Voting implies shirking ones FREE will of choice onto a chosen ones suggestion. Choice cannot be shared...only ignored.
b) Words represent spells cast together, which tempts one to ignore that sound casts apart...wo(mb)men; fe(minine)male; s(plit)he.
Be aware when casting votes...