Is telekinesis real?
Tele (operating over a distance) kinēsis (motion)...being implies operating (life) over a distance (inception towards death) within motion.
claiming telekinesis is real and has videos showing
If being implies telekinesis, then choosing to watch what others show tempts one to ignore real (perceivable) for fake (suggested).
That being said...reality cannot be claimed; since it moves.
shared videos of...with no...in sight
Sharing a video implies by suggestion; having sight implies ones perception.
Video/videre - "vision; to see" cannot be shared, hence each ones perception within all perceivable implying a unique perspective.
A suggested video (artificial) tempts one to ignore perceivable vision (natural).
I will only believe
To believe implies ones consent holding onto the suggestion of another, while ignoring that perceivable cannot be held onto, since it moves.
my own eyes
The vision of ones eyes implies adaptation (perception) to a moving origin (perceivable)...a process cannot be taken into possession (own) without ignoring the procession thereof. Ignorance can be easily exploited with suggestions, tho...
I am a Christian
That implies being anointed aka separated from one another. Your consent to believe suggested information binds you to another, hence contradicting separation, hence tempting one to take a contrary stance to being anointed aka anti-christ.
Artificial trust (holding onto another) tempts one to ignore natural thrust (separation from one another), hence being (life) thrust (inception towards death) aka anointed aka being set free from one another when coming into being through the birth-channel.
demonic witchcraft
a) Demon aka dai-mon - "divider, provider" implies all (god) providing the division of each one (christ) within.
b) Witch/wicca/wicker - "soothsayer" implies one who crafts artifice (words) within natural (sound) to distract others from natural (perceivable) with artificial (suggested).
a hindu
Hindu/sindhu - "river" implies channeling (by suggestion) a perceptible current . Ones consent narrows one perceptible sight to the channel of suggested.
A jew does that by banking gentile trust aka utilizing a suggested currency (river) to bank (channel) trust (consent of sight to narrow itself).
to make sure we still hate them
a) Hate vs love implies ones "singular" consent to a suggested side..."we" cannot choose a side, because each one already choose a sovereign "chosen one" over self by submitting to the plural "we".
b) Them or jews (plural) ignores and throws insults at each chosen one (singular).
hot take
Taking during procession burns oneself out. It's called "fast food", because consumption cools off the ignition of life.
the New Zealand massacre
Aka the christCHURCH MOSQUE shooting...
Mosque/moseak - "mosaic" + Church/kyrios/keue - "to swell"...that's how one kindles fire by swelling inlaid patterns.
that song was used in the video
Starting just at the moment when he's done kindling and climbs back into his auto (inception towards death) mobile (life).
Edit: The front window of the car gets shot through right at the line "I TAKE YOU TO LEARN" aka clearing of sight. Afterwards he says "now comes the fuel" followed by the song... https://genius.com/Manuel-eurobeat-gas-gas-gas-lyrics
Why do so few conspiracy theorists see
Sight requires one to be apart from one another...being among many conceals ones sight, until only few can see unobstructed from one another.
you will own nothing
a) Will implies ones struggle to want to hold onto what one needs to let go of.
b) Taking into possession (own) tempts one to ignore being (life) within procession (inception towards death). A process cannot be taken into possession from within, hence a jew externalizing ownership by tempting gentiles to take possession of suggested currency, while ignoring perceivable current.
c) Everything (perceivable) or nothing (suggested)...only one can be taken into possession (ownership) by paying consent, while selling oneself out to another.
Guess what the majority of mankind owns...nothing. But boy oh boy do they hold their mental and physical possessions dear. Simply asking them to GIVE up a belief can tempt them to instead wanting to TAKE your life.
How close are we?
- Christen, verb - "to anoint; to consecrate by unction; separation through oil".
Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt many closer together, which tempts each singular one into close-mindedness...
Pyramid of Giza
Aka the fire (pyr) in the middle (amid) of GIZA (Arabic Er-ges-her) - "besides the high".
Being implies in-between sides, hence as above/so below aka being heightened (living) during lowering (dying).
A jew utilizes spell-craft such as "pyramid of giza" to cast consenting gentiles, as a burned offering, into the fire.
Ones consent to a suggestion makes one "bound by wild desire" to a "burning ring (circular logic) of fire"...following a suggestion establishes a führer/fiur - "fire".
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/The-crazy-world-of-arthur-brown-fire-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLUGsn-NOis
a) The malleability (gold) of the unhatched (egg) referring to suggestion preventing perception from coming forth.
b) Left/right + up/down + front/back implies ones sight within a cube, hence incubation. Consenting to a suggestion keeps one enclosed within circular logic, hence encircling the square by preventing the square root from sprouting.
c) To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring perceivable. To believe implies taking an absence from being alive, hence be-lieve (being on leave) when lieve/leubh (carrying) suggested.
Carry/caru - "to burden; a load, weight, charge, duty; that which is born"...coming into being implies an unburdening, hence nature generating each ones "free" will of choice.
just one language
Only within singular sound can plural languages be shaped. If one discerns this, then the natural sound can't be hidden as easy underneath artificial languages.
why don't you consider
Because siding together (con-sider) contradicts ones free will of choice. A choice can only operate in-between separate sides. Trying to put sides together within conflicts of reason implies imbalance for ones choice.
To consider implies "to fix the mind upon"...being implies within (life) motion (inception towards death).
you can't conclude shit by analyzing it
a) Shutting down together (con-clude) contradicts nature starting up (inception) each being (life) apart from one another before shutting down (death).
b) Ask yourself why you seek synthesis (conclude) over analyses (originate)? It's jewish tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which tempts the synthesis of gentiles amassed together, which equalizes each unique aka analyzed being.
c) Let's go with your example...shit. Concluding food implies constipation within bowel, which the ongoing natural process forces through ones body, just like breathing. A body adapting to the process of hunger "analyzes" food, hence biting off; chewing apart; dissolving within, and shitting out.
english
English/engle - "angle"...before an angle can be shaped, there has to be (life) a straight (inception towards death).
A mason of free (will of choice) can utilize compass (circular logic) and square (angular language) to artificially manipulate natural beings with shapes aka geometry/geomancy.
don't make sense
a) How could one sense "doing nothing"? Which sense does nothing?
b) Make/mag - "to knead; fashion; fit", hence magic/mason/mingle/mongrel/amass/match...
Who makes "don't"?
jews have been into the occult
Nature reveals each being...ignoring nature for each other implies occult/occulere/kel - "to cover, conceal".
A jew suggests artifice to tempt gentiles into the occult aka into concealing self from natural.
secret societies
A contradiction in terms...SEC implies to divide apart; SOC implies to unite together. Same linguistic trick as "sovereign citizen".
Correlation means it describes unknown causation.
A meaning implies a suggestion by another...ones consent to it establishes correlation, for which one ignores known (perceivable) cause.
100% causation
If one measures cause by a hundred (percent), then what about every number above a hundred? Furthermore...if hundred implies one and two zeros, then how many zeros can one cause affect?
Correlation is not causation
a) There can be only one cause for each effect within.
b) Cause differs effects from one another.
c) Not implies the correlation between ones consent and suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing), while denying the only perceivable cause for everything.
highest level
a) Level implies balance, which generates choice in-between high/low aka "as above/so below".
b) A jew suggests artificial levels to distract gentiles from being variable (choice) within level (balance) of nature.
c) How does a level-tool work? By utilizing form (life) within flow (inception towards death) to find balance within foundation.
euronews.
Notice the POINT, which implies a preceding sentence, hence EU R O N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) aka you are a cardinal within ordinal direction aka the cardinal essence of life sentenced by ordinal direction from inception towards point of death.
This is how false dialectics are created.
a) Dialect is shaped by ones consent to another ones suggestion, hence one + one = two (dia). Lect/leg - "to collect" implies the collecting of consent through suggestions made by speech, hence legein - "to speak".
b) True vs false implies dialectical conflict of reason aka one versus a second one over a third ones suggestion..the third one isn't participating in the conflict, but controls both sides (reason) from outside the ring (circular logic).
c) Created implies ones consent to suggested creationism aka creation out of noting (creatio ex nihilo), which tempts one into a conflict of reason...everything vs nothing aka destruction vs creation.
wtf the US or any other country that's not in the region cares
US aka UNITED STATES implies a joining together of remote states...tricked to care/carry the burden of bondage.
to look at the framing
Sight is framed by eye...looking implies locking onto what others are showing, which narrows ones sight to what others are channeling, hence telling a vision channels.
argument in support
Nature withdraws support from arguing minds, while inspiring the need to resist the wanted temptation of arguing. Within a moving nature...resistance is fertile.
Argument implies resistance vs resistance...mutual infertility.
The dance of life
a) Tunes regulates dance...if one tunes in.
b) Sound doesn't tune aka "form one sound to another"...there can be only one sound/sanus - "entire; whole" for each partial instrument within. Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many to tune in and henceforth dance in accord to the tunes of a conductor aka a conduit aka a pied piper.
move schools every year like I did and you avoid the programming/brainwashing a little
Because that forces one to adapt to a changing environment, instead of repeating fixed tasks over and over again. The trick underneath...nature doesn't require one to fit in; it inspires one to stand out from one another.
Public or private
Private (ones perception) within public (all perceivable)...OR implies that there's an alternative to cause, an inversion of effects alternating within the one and only cause.
If perception within perceivable implies private within public, then SUGGESTION shapes it into conflicts among privates...if one consents to it.
What's the lowest rank of soldiers called? Privates...reasoning about suggested implies war, within which privates fight each other for ranks/hring - "circle; ring" aka circular logic.
the definition was broadened.
Definition/definite - "to affix"...how could something affixed be broadened? Could it be that nature cannot be affixed; since it moves, yet beings within can be tricked to mentally hold onto definitions, which in return prevents each from broadening ones horizon?
you don’t notice it happening at all
To notice implies making a mental note when one consents to suggested information, while ignoring all perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't note; it doesn't establish memorandums (random memory), and it it doesn't mark in writing.
NOT-e implies nothing aka suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing), which is why a musical note implies a pitch, just like a merchant makes a pitch to tempt consent.
What if note inverts noscere (to know; to perceive) with suggested nothing; to deny?
cannot be seen directly
Direction (inception towards death) implies separation (life)...only during separation can one have sight among moving differences.
Cannot implies suggested nihil-ism...something tempting ones mind to hold onto, which thereby conceals ones sight.
honorable
Aka being able to hone (sharpen) ones know-LEDGE...not seeking praise/price from others.
defense is justifiable, offense never is.
a) Only nature offers (inception) and takes (death) beings (life).
b) Offering (suggestion) and taking (consent) from one another tempts one to sacrifice self as an offering for the taking by others.
c) Justifiable implies just (all perceivable) enabling partisan (ones perception).
d) Never aka "nothing ever" implies a suggested inversion of the perceivable offer.
the only way...is to stop
Within the only way (inception towards death) one (life) cannot stop...few put stop signs everywhere to tempt many to deny ongoing motion.
The process of dying cannot be stopped...resisting it fertilizes life. Trying to stop anything within motion implies exponential waste of resistance.
stop watching media
Ones sight implies the perceiving mediator within all perceivable...watching implies focusing ones sight (hence narrowing it) by holding onto suggested, which tricks one to believe that one can hold onto it aka stop it moving.
Devil/diaballein aka dia (across) ballein (to throw) aka being thrown (life) across (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand...the devil is in the details. Hence DE (entirety) TAILLIER (to cut into pieces).
Being implies VIL (matter) within DE (momentum) of GOD (motion)...a jew tempts gentiles into a conflict of reason (god vs devil), which represents mutual destruction of gentiles by ignoring to discern self.
animated through a ritual
Ritual/rite - "to move in a straight line", hence animated (life) through a ritual (inception towards death).
involving a magical name of God
If God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all", then ones consent to a suggested word (phonetic verb) makes the magic happen aka involves/envelopes/surrounds ones mind within the suggested word, while ignoring perceivable sound.
golem
a) Aka goyim...the artificial man who ignores natural, hence golem/galam - "wrapped up" in suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration moving through ones mind.
b) Golem aka GOing LEM aka luna (light) excursion (deviation in argument) module (allotted measure)...ignoring perceivable (light) by holding onto suggested (allotted measure) establishes a conflict of reason (deviation in argument).
Luna/leuk - "light" cannot be held onto as a ray (matter) within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion). The dark side of the moon implies ones ignorance of light (discernment).
starlink
- People they come together
- People they fall apart
- No one can stop us now
- Cause we are all made of stars
Being implies falling (inception towards death) apart...a jew inverts this by tempting gentiles together aka establishing a "starlink", which requires ones choice to give consent to a chosen ones suggestion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1rFAaAKpVc ..."You can't ignore what is going 'round"...because going round (circular logic) implies ones ignorance of coming (life) straight (inception towards death).
jews and Jesus
Jesus (French; Je suis) - "i am", hence jew (phonetic, you)...if one within all claims self as "i am", then other ones become "you are".
It's gentiles who select each jew, hence ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion...that's how I AM (jesus) becomes YOU (jew).
jews hate
A jew tempts gentiles with suggestions to love or hate...either choice of side establishes a conflict of reason among gentiles against each other about what a jew suggested.
Once reason is established among gentiles...the suggested became an idol for those consenting to it; the suggesting few gained mass consent to reshape the suggested at will, and also control over both sides of every conflict of reason from the outside, which a jew perpetuates by contradicting both sides aka talmudic reasoning.
jews ordered romans
To rome/roam implies the wandering jew within the natural order...just like egypt implies a gypsy aka vagabond; bohemian; roamer (roma); rootless; vagrant, wanderer.
What if I told you that...is real?
A tale implies a statement aka a fiction shaped within ones mind to tempt others to ignore reality.
Nature doesn't tell/tale/del - "to count", hence setting each one within free from one another instead of holding accountable to one another.
Talmud was given
Talmud (instruction) from lamadh (he learned)...self discernment implies learning to teach self about being a structure (struct) within (in) action (ion).
Consenting to a suggested book called "talmud" (or any other) contradicts self discernment.
talmudic Law was transmitted by God orally
Oral/oris/os - "opening; beginning; origin"...hence transmission implying origin of being aka transfer (inception towards death) of release (life).
In short...each being represents the mitt within trans of natural law, which instructs one to learn (talmud).
Oral Law was implanted in their minds (and not written)
Being implies in-stru-ment (mind structured within) sound aka a formed instrument within flowing sound. Words are shaped within sound and tempt minds to hold onto definitions aka DEAF PHONETICIANS...implying one deaf to sound.
was preserved without being written down
Writing down implies as suggested words held within mind, which in return tempts one to ignore perceivable sound moving through.
Nature cannot be preserved...it falls apart into each being, which allows being to live (growth) within process of dying (loss).
exceeding in length that of the bible
Nature doesn't have a length...it moves each being from inception towards death; which in return gives each being the free will of choice to resist (need) the temptation (want) of dying.
Length implies measurement aka mind taking measure of matter, while ignoring motion.
The length of a book is measured by how long a reader holds onto it...physically and mentally. Hence writers utilizing books to bind the "free" will of choice among readers in-between covers, with spell-craft within.
The Talmud contains...
...each reader if one willingly chooses to let oneself bound to another.
entitled to abrogate the words
Aka shaping fiction (word) within reality (sound) for those who ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).
It is a duty to follow the scholars
A duty implies a suggested call...nature implies the perceivable sound of silence.
One who does not...
...consented to suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing), which tempts one to de-nial perceivable.
voluntarily derive laws
Being implies free will of choice within the balance of natural law aka de-rive...division (life) of stream (inception towards death).
Kill the best of the Christians
Best implies versus worst aka two sides against each other...christian/christ - "anointed one" implies the separation of each being from one another, when coming into being through the birth-channel.
Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies holding onto a side (agree or disagree), which in return establishes a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) aka suicidal logic within self turning into genocidal reason against others.
A Christian who observes the Sabbath
Within nature there's no rest (sabbath) for the wicked (departed) aka no cessation of motion (inception towards death) for the divided matter (life) within.
It's a mishmash parody of stupid things from pop culture
a) Mishmash aka mixing is based on tikkun olam (repairing the world by mixing together) aka an inversion of nature separating each unique being from one another.
b) Culturalism (culture); populism (pop) and trivialism (parody) are all jewish tools of ideological subversion amongst gentiles.
Nature neither cultivates (it moves); populates (it departs); nor trivializes (it imports significance).
c) As for stupid things...those represent the gentiles watching jewish mishmash parodies of pop culture...willingly that is.
Bonus: what's the opposite of sons of simps? Sages... https://h-o-m-e.org/what-is-a-hebrew-sage/
identify as
Identify/identic/idem - "the same"...one cannot be the same as another, since coming into being implies a separation from one another, hence the birth of each off-spring.
ask if
If implies then aka an implication based on a moving origin. Asking implies towards a suggested outcome (answer) by another, while ignoring perceivable origin.
infowars
Information warfare is based on...
a) The transfer-agreement between ones consent and the suggested information by another, hence others asking one to willingly give a consensual answer.
b) Turning consent given to a suggested -ism (identiarianism) into a conflict of reason against others aka into wars like...straight vs gay; trans vs cis; ordinary vs queer; hetero vs homo.
This turning outwards against others (reason) is done by turning inwards against self (logic), which represents an inversion aka being within (in) turning (verto).
gay
Here's something funny... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/gay.html
Why would wordhippo use "a happy or cheerful disposition" as the definition for "gay"? As if... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/gay
Being implies one part (perception) within whole (perceivable)...ones consent to the suggestion of another implies an artificial entanglement of natural particles.
a) Akashic/akasha - "aether"...being implies in-between aether (below aka dying) and aer (above aka living).
b) If one ignores being aer (perception) within aether (perceivable), then one binds self by consent to suggestions of another, hence responding (re) to a string (cord) attached.
c) Others suggest rhetorical "points" for ones life sentence to get attached to, which in your profession is called "putting the needle on the record".
Consenting to rhetorical points establishes a conflict of reason aka war, and the god of war is called... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvYE9tNhPkY As for mars as a planet... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9gOQgfPW4Y
Clair (clear) voyant (to see)...a contradiction in terms. Seeing implies being within the visible spectrum of "clear" light aka being a SPEC (special; unique; partial) also implies being a SPECK (spot; stain), hence lacking self discernment, which one can clear (discern) or obscure (ignore).
In short...one can never see clear, because clear implies without any differentiation, hence without anything to see.