Seriously, why don't you consider that English is just one language and your can't conclude shit by analyzing it. Thats why ur comments don't make sense
Only within singular sound can plural languages be shaped. If one discerns this, then the natural sound can't be hidden as easy underneath artificial languages.
why don't you consider
Because siding together (con-sider) contradicts ones free will of choice. A choice can only operate in-between separate sides. Trying to put sides together within conflicts of reason implies imbalance for ones choice.
To consider implies "to fix the mind upon"...being implies within (life) motion (inception towards death).
you can't conclude shit by analyzing it
a) Shutting down together (con-clude) contradicts nature starting up (inception) each being (life) apart from one another before shutting down (death).
b) Ask yourself why you seek synthesis (conclude) over analyses (originate)? It's jewish tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which tempts the synthesis of gentiles amassed together, which equalizes each unique aka analyzed being.
c) Let's go with your example...shit. Concluding food implies constipation within bowel, which the ongoing natural process forces through ones body, just like breathing. A body adapting to the process of hunger "analyzes" food, hence biting off; chewing apart; dissolving within, and shitting out.
english
English/engle - "angle"...before an angle can be shaped, there has to be (life) a straight (inception towards death).
A mason of free (will of choice) can utilize compass (circular logic) and square (angular language) to artificially manipulate natural beings with shapes aka geometry/geomancy.
don't make sense
a) How could one sense "doing nothing"? Which sense does nothing?
b) Make/mag - "to knead; fashion; fit", hence magic/mason/mingle/mongrel/amass/match...
Nature reveals each being...ignoring nature for each other implies occult/occulere/kel - "to cover, conceal".
A jew suggests artifice to tempt gentiles into the occult aka into concealing self from natural.
A contradiction in terms...SEC implies to divide apart; SOC implies to unite together. Same linguistic trick as "sovereign citizen".
Seriously, why don't you consider that English is just one language and your can't conclude shit by analyzing it. Thats why ur comments don't make sense
Only within singular sound can plural languages be shaped. If one discerns this, then the natural sound can't be hidden as easy underneath artificial languages.
Because siding together (con-sider) contradicts ones free will of choice. A choice can only operate in-between separate sides. Trying to put sides together within conflicts of reason implies imbalance for ones choice.
To consider implies "to fix the mind upon"...being implies within (life) motion (inception towards death).
a) Shutting down together (con-clude) contradicts nature starting up (inception) each being (life) apart from one another before shutting down (death).
b) Ask yourself why you seek synthesis (conclude) over analyses (originate)? It's jewish tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which tempts the synthesis of gentiles amassed together, which equalizes each unique aka analyzed being.
c) Let's go with your example...shit. Concluding food implies constipation within bowel, which the ongoing natural process forces through ones body, just like breathing. A body adapting to the process of hunger "analyzes" food, hence biting off; chewing apart; dissolving within, and shitting out.
English/engle - "angle"...before an angle can be shaped, there has to be (life) a straight (inception towards death).
A mason of free (will of choice) can utilize compass (circular logic) and square (angular language) to artificially manipulate natural beings with shapes aka geometry/geomancy.
a) How could one sense "doing nothing"? Which sense does nothing?
b) Make/mag - "to knead; fashion; fit", hence magic/mason/mingle/mongrel/amass/match...
Who makes "don't"?