The article if you feel like giving them ad revenue: https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-ted-cruzs-claim-that-antifa-burnt-us-cities-year-1754884
J6 was a setup, infiltrated with feds, police opened the gates etc. Trump did tell everyone to go home after telling people if they wanted to protest they should do so peacefully. But the media wouldn't carry his message. Now we've had nearly 2 years of circus show trials. The whole thing including the trials of the people rotting in prison should have been over, over a year ago. It is pretty much your constitional right to have an expedited trial. The constitution is supposed to protect you just being thrown in jail and having to wait years for a trial. These people are essentially political prisoners. This isn't trump's fault, it's Joe Biden's. Trump himself was basically cancelled after j6, removed from all social media platforms etc. He got the Alex Jones treatment. Could trump have done more? Yeah maybe but he had the entire establishment against him.
I do agree with your point about vaccines. Trump has basically refused to admit they have been a spectacular failure.
Maybe. The reflected photo doesn't make much sense either. Why is the landscape so bright on the left side? But dark on the other side. Surely if lit by the sun the landscape would be lit uniformly. The ground looks relatively flat there so I don't think the difference in brightness can be explained by the gradient of the ground.
High resolution image of it -> https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/48/7071.jpg
Pretty much. You only drink a fraction of the tap water anyway. Something like 95% just goes straight down the drain after passing through your shower or toilet etc. The fluoride they add really is unpurified toxic waste and by that I mean a good chunk isn't even fluoride. What they add is frequently contaminated with lead, arsenic and sometimes radio active isotopes. But through the magic of dilution is rendered safe. At least that is the theory.
From the article:
“Recommending a product that has serious safety signals, which is unnecessary because of widespread natural immunity and a generally mild disease, and which possibly has negative efficacy, is an egregious violation of regulatory procedures, and a profound violation of public trust,” she wrote in part.
In its statement, AAPS also pointed out that making the COVID-19 shots a routine childhood vaccination also would “ensure a steady revenue stream for manufacturers.”
This one is really good too in case you missed it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yw7gyWKqmrMj/
I'd sticky both :)
If I recall correctly merck's own studies showed if you had already hpv and you were then vaccinated it increased your risk of cervical cancer. But they are vaccinating girls at 13. They might not even be sexually active for 5 years. Hpv cancer in under 25s is very rare. The medium age is like 52. The point is when they first rolled out the vaccine they really had no idea if it would really offer any benefit for at least a decade. If for the vaccine 'protection' wore off before sexual activity then there would have been no possible benefit. Anyway they fast tracked the vaccine then cancelled all the long term trials. Well the vaccine turned out to be extremely dangerous to a minority of girls (and boys). Now it turns out it didn't really protect against cervical cancer either.