Interesting link, thank you. At least dude have some links to exact code articles and stuff. But still too many narrow places, so it is more the question of luck, than something solid.

One thing I didn't get really, is why a book named "Black's Law Dictionary" used as an argument for bureaucrats? As far as I found, this is just a dictionary of juridical terms, without any signs of official acceptance. It is not some legislated, voted, signed official dictionary, just some lawyer or juridical scholar tried to systematize words often used in laws and other judridical stuff. Or I missing something and this book is recognized by courts as official document, so definitions in it have power of law and have to be accepted by courts undoubtfully?

Really humans must take rainbow back from faggots.

Flag LGBTXYZ+ really deserve in the best case is brown with some pink spots on perimeter.

Not being a US citizen by birth or naturalization makes a big difference

I meant I have Russian citizenship, not US one. :) I just trying that concepts on my reality. Things are pretty same really, just with some local specific.

F.e. there was no any procedure of dismissing USSR citizenship for citizens. Formally, I'm a dual citizen of USSR and Russian Federation. So, theoretically I could just use my USSR citizenship to get out RF one. And since USSR is formally exist in form of Transnistria (the only region that never declared exit or whatever from USSR, so become an only and single USSR member and formally represent USSR today), my USSR citizenship is still valid and should be formally accepted by all other states. And since RF declared itself a successor on USSR obligations, includng before USSR citizens, this effectively force it to admit my USSR citizenship and rights. So I don't even need to somehow declare myself sovereign or whatever to do same juridical mumbo-jumbo. :)

sovereign citizens are not similarly incentivized to publish but are in fact incentivized to be cautious in speech, the documentation you seek is hard to come by

I think there is a reason for that. Person who dug so deep in jurisprudence have to understand, that if everybody began use their concepts, then authorities inevitably will change the laws to close all that holes. So it is in his interest to not share that information. :)

What you describe demand a very high level of knowing laws. If you are into all that pile of papers and learned juridical argo, you have very good chances to become a lawyer and just compensate all possible taxes with money you coud earn for a lawyer services.

If your unwillingness to pay taxes is not based on money, but you just don't want to pay anything to the state for ideological reasons, then things will eat all your time. Say, you buy a car, and as a sovereign citizen don't need license plates and driver license. Each meeting with road police will cost you months of your life to dismiss all charges. So, you need some source of money for living, buying car and all that stuff. But if you have such endless source of free money, then you are definitely not an ordinary person with a job and all that stuff. Probably, you could exist in such state, but does such existence in permanent juridical battles really worth it? Your activity will produce salaries for many people who will pay additional taxes. And it is qestionable, if that amount of additional tax will be lower than the tax you had to pay. Eventually state could receive even more taxes than if you just paid yours, which is obviously contradicts your goal. You will create jobs and so taxes instead of minimizing them.

Really, I don't see any point to prefer such weird way of living over, say, going guerilla capitalism with just hiding your income from any possible surveillance. Yes, you will not be able to buy, say, latest car from dealer, but do you really need it?

And last but not least thing, that rises moral question - there is some services that even worst state provide for citizens, like roads, water, rescue in disaster and so on. Not most expensive things, of course, but they are not free, and people, who keep them, deserve salary for their job. Basically all that things are paid with taxes. And there is no way (AFAIK) to pay for that things directly. Just no any mechanism exist for that. Will it be honest thing for sovereign citizen to use all that things for free?

So you send a form that states your believed "income" is 0.

Then, some people appear on your porch with some ridiculous demands, stating they are from IRS.

What's next? Shoot them? Tell them GTFO? Show them some paper? Explain that all that money you get is not an "income", but what exactly?

If I understand correctly eventually you will be forced to appear in court with tax evasion charge. Then what? You show judge this screenshot, and charge is dropped?

To explain much further would be giving you specific tax advice, which people don't generally give for free.

So here we go. You have to pay somebody to get answers that will allow you to not pay tax. Then what the fucking difference if you have to pay in any case? Why not just pay fucking tax and avoid all that haemorrhoids?

Holy shit, that's just fucking ridiculous.

Many have gone off Not Guilty per Jury Trials by using this as evidence and other things too that we don't have to pay taxes.

OK, then there should be detailed step-by-step 100% working howtos around. What exact preconditions necessary, what exact documents, witnesses, arguments, code articles numbers you need, how exactly properly apply all that in the court so judge could not arbitrary dismiss your stuff, how to answer to any questions prosecutor and judge could ask and so on.

Not fucking youtube videos, not fucking forum posts about somebody somwhere once upon a time, but straight detailed step-by-step instructions written in human language without juridical yddish.

I'm not an US citizen, but it will be very interesting for me to study basic principles and strategy of fast and guaranteed winning such cases in courts with judges and prosecutors whose salary depends on taxes I don't want to pay.

Taxation is theft. Is theft legal?

Anything that was legislated by legal authorities is legal. Theft, eating babies, fucking frogs, not fulfilling pre-election promises, usury, whatever shit those who write and pass the laws want to be legal.

You should never mix justice with enfocement of honest and morally apropriate ways of doing things and resolving disputes accepted by your people. Former is based only on what some not close to you people in power made in laws for people like you, latter is based on moral principles shared by people you live among. In courts you meet with justice, unfortunately.

It does not matter. From millions of names and so acronyms they choose one that identical to the name of Jewest town of Russia/USSR.

Probability of occasional coincidence is 1 to millions. It is purely intentional.

Do you really understand how funny your post is?

Do you really believe that abbreviation ODESSA occasionally identical to the only thing on the Earth - Russian town of Odessa, which was behind Pale of settlement in Russian Empire and was accounted as unofficial capital of jewish population in late Russian Empire and USSR? Odessa is jewest town in all exUSSR. Most Jews in USA and EU ruling class have at least one relative from Odessa.

Odessa TX named after Odessa in Russia by Jews who emigrated in USA.

So, why ODESSA organization that helped ex-SS named exactly like Jewest town of Russia?

Nothing suspicious at all. :)

It is interesting phenomena, really. All that unratified laws, sovereign citizens, maritime laws and so on. Being pretty interesting all this things are absolutely impractical.

OK, taking OP as example in the best case you would spent your life in courts proving each time you don't have to pay taxes. And may be you even win all cases, but what's the point if your life will be ruined?

Also, studing all that stuff, I never found any simple and straightforward howtos. In the best case it is a number of questionable juridical conclusions useless for any regular human being. No any clear recipes. Only some rumors that somewhere, somebody, using, say, sovereign citizen arguing, after few years in courts won the case against speed fine.

And even with such howto - I'm not interested in possibility to spent a huge amount of time and win some case against cops stopped me on highway. I'm interested in a way when cops do not stop me at all.

Also, I don't see any problems for state to close any juridical hole if many people began to exploit it. In OP case, I don't think US gov will not be able to quickly find 14 states to properly ratify that 16 amendment if they will feel some danger from that juridical hole. Or just order to ignore it in courts.

Weird thing, really. Practically useless, but kind of creates illusion that TPTB could be defeated in their own cours. WTF?

What are your opinions on the patents that are classified by the government?

It's still patents, not blueprints of real things.

A lot of conspiracy minded people think our energy problems have already been solved but since it would collapse an entire part of the economy by providing low cost energy to the masses it's been hidden.

Tons of patents with such claims are in database. None of them ever was proved replicateable.

All that bullshit about some astonishing invention that was banned by government are bullshit. Unlike some celebrity rumors, inventions could not be "closed" or "banned" once they were proven replicateable. Even if invention completely erased along with inventor, somebody else will inevitably reinvent it soon. Hiding patents could not prevent it.

Meaning you can take the payoff or disappear.

Science and engineering does not work like that. Every inventor use existing knowledge as a foundation. It is inevitable that someone else will reinvent same thing if foundation is ready for such invention.

Every single story about "free energy" and bought/deceased inventor I know shows obvious signs of scam. Every single dude who claimed something like, never even thought about publishing full and exact instructions on how to replicate his "great invention". Smart enough to make "great invention", but complete idiot to not release invention to wide public to prevent problems from those who obviously will lose billions. It is impossible.

The only proof that invention is real is independent succesfull replications. Not some "demonstrations", not some patents, not some stories. Only successful independent replications.

When inventor of such thing began to mumble something about commercial secret or secret ingridient, do not allow unlimited studying his prototype or doing other shit that prevents straightforward replication by others - it is 100% scam.

And that stupid mumble s about "business interest" is complete bullshit fundamentally if we talk about free energy. With free energy money completely lose any sense. Money itself become obsolete, not some industries or corporations. It is just insane to think about money and profits when you invented free energy, because free energy is the end of money.

Go try some on.

Best way to get the full understanding of the problem.

An average person today would have trouble getting up out of a chair.

Not like that really. Problems will began around 10 minutes of wearing chainmail. At the beginning it is just heavy, but more than acceptable. Humans have relatively high limit of load. Problem is that this can't last long. Most people will have no problems lifting 50kg weight, but carrying that load for some time is completely another thing. I estimate average person will be unable to scratch a nose after an hour or two in chainmail.

You need months of training to adapt and be able to wear armor without exhausting. And still it will noticeably make you slower.

It is not surprising that you could shoot a video of how you can move in heavy armour for few minutes, but imagine you have to wear it all day long. :)

Mostly they used either for patent trolling when some corporation patent something obvious nobody even account as an invention, either for pleasing self-importance, either to allow corporations to harvest any useful inventions for cheap.

Old idea of protecting rights and business interests of some engineer who invented something useful for humanity is not there for a long time.

May be some of patents could be registered to deceit adversary or competitior, but hardly without real implementation this goal could be achieved. Nobody will spent money, time and efforts without solid information about implementation of invention in real life.

I highly recommend to exclude patents from the points, really.

To get a patent you need only pay patent fee and prepare papers according to standard. That's all. You don't need your "invention" be real at all. If you have few thousand dollars you could trash, you could easily get a patent on magic wand made from polypropilene or voulcano creating apparatus based on cordless drill. Just pay fee and fill papers.

Patent absolutely does not mean that device described working as described, could be built or even implementable at all. Nobody in patent office cares if it exist or could be built. Only thing they care about is thar there is no such thing in previous patents and fee you paid and that's all.

I don't know where from that stupid belief that if something is patented it was for sure somehow implemented and working. Times when that was the case ended in the very beginning of patent system. Patent office needs money, not proofs of concept or real things. You have to be completly ignorant about how patent system really works and what it is, to use a patent as a proof of anything.

Russkie narratives.

Yea, be strong and consistent and fight that pesky Russian narratives. All of them. Don't miss any. You could start from that insane false Ekaterine II narrative that British North American colonies will become independent, because British empire is in decline and failed. You know, British fuckcheckers at the time spent a lot of time to debunk that narrative and brought a very reasonable and obvious explanations why it is a Russian lie and will never happen.

So let's see, are you solid and genune in your beliefs, or just yet another unprincipled Jewish shill who will do anything in attempt to save yet another chutzpa.

That US foundation fathers was definitely Russkie shills spreading Russkie narratives, aren't they?

The fine needs to be greater than the profit. That's the only way to stop it from happening again.

This will perfectly work with some regular business, but here we have kind of state-private corporation. Even if fine will be larger than profit, then losses will be covered from state budget. Look what's happening with large banks and other crappy institutions. And even Pfizer, IIRC was already fined around $3B before coronahoax. And then become creator and beneficiar of it.

When dealing with people who print money, fines are senseless.

Pfizer calculated how much they would gain versus how much they would lose if caught

That is why only personal prosecution will work, but I don't see how they could be done legally in modern clown world.

$75B vs $20k per violation. Hardly Pfizer owners will think - "Hmm, it's painful, we will never do it again".

IDK, but hardly anything but criminal lawsuits with jail time against all physical persons who directly or indirectly benefited from coronahoax will be effective. From Pfizer investors to nurses who did the jab.

Fines for Pfizer even noticeable will be just another stimulus for them to unwind some other shit to compensate losses with taxpayer money and another scams. It is not a punishment, it is invitation for other crimes.

Just historic artifact. Boring, really. Few interesting observations about Jews behaviour does not help this book become something outstanding. Even Ford's "The International Jew" is much more useful and interesting if you are interested in Jewish shit around the world.

Nowdays "Mein Kampf" just used mostly as a false flag prop by Jews and their shills. Hardly those who do that really know how uninteresting and out of time it is. It just can't inspire anybody today. It is just sad to read it today, you clearly see where Hitler was hugely mistaken due to his ignorance and followed false narratives due to his credulity.

Strange, that Hitler's paintings are not used for the same shit. They are exactly like "Mein Kampf" - uninteresting.

If you are much into all that history things - read it, it is full of that small historic details. If you are not - you will not find anything you didn't already know.

Yep. But still such persons appear in 20th century too, despite much harder pressure.

When was the last time you heard a mainstream "artist" exposing anything of relevance?

Bobby Fischer? Kind of "artist" too. Him being jew himself adds courage.

Yet Satan was competent enough to deceive man to fall and bring about death and suffering to the world.

And still 8bn of us here and only tiny satanic elite more or less possessed by daemons. Is that a result of competent evil? I don't think so. I think Satan dreams about much more, then he ever will be able to get.

There could be simple explanation, really, To be competent, you have to get a lot of knowledge on the way of uncovering God's design of real world. So, knowledge itself carry a bit of God in it. When you full with something that carry a bit of God, there is little place for Satan left. Really, I never met someone really professional and competent who was a bad person. I don't know a single smart person who is fat. In the worst case, people with knowledge could be a bit weird, but not in evil sense. Seriously, there have to be some connection between knowledge and ability to think and resistibility (does such word exist in English? :) ) to the evil.

First off, we don't know what the actual plan was to judge if it were successful.

We do. Event201.

Even when the Antichrist's rule comes there will be people who will oppose it and live to see the coming of Christ.

That mean Antichrist is incompetent. I think no one could be competent being on the devil's side. Kind of safety mechanism built in our world by God.

"Expert" is a weird term describing some person, others, who are incompetent in one or another area think understand something in that area.

Person who have real knowledge and experience in some field named "professional", not "expert".

"Expert" is one of that garbage words intended to sound cool for public, but in no way it say something about knowledge and experience of person. You could assume "expert" is a person who identify himself having knowlege in something, while "professional" is a person who prove be competent for real.

Incompetent idiots have a huge problem with hiring professionals for the job. Because they know nothing about anything, they just have no any way to determine, if ones who they hiring are professionals or "experts" who just identify themselves having knowledge in area.

Nearly every TPTB shit we familiar with, from coronahoax to climate change bullshit obviously have tons of experts, but no single professional. On the opposite, it is professionals, who actively object TPTB narratives. Also, none of TPTB shit was done professionaly, and everything is a failure with a fingerprints of incompetence of every person who participated in creation and support of that shit.

So why do you think that next TPTB shit will be something different?

More than 80% of the "free people of the west" got an experimental gene therapy - is that not effective in your book?

And only, say 10% of that 80% got some serious issues. I do not account 10% of "success" as "efficient".

Also, there is unknown how many of that 80% just bribed nurses or faked vaccine paper other way.

TPTB crime is not in amount of injured. TPTB crime is in intention to harm people. If a serial killer who plan to kill thousands could kill only one victim, it does not make any excuse for him. He is still serial killer with all consequences.

still deny tptb are effective and their social engineering, cultural and economical plans work out

If they was really effective and completent, you would have assume things happening as normal and sincerely want them this way. If you are able to see all that insanity you talk about - this is the best proof TPTB are incompetent idiots.

The people I'm talking about are experts in the fields needed to create a digital currency.

"expert" today is a synonym to "incompetent clown". It was not Fauci clown who worked on gain-of-function and it was not Bourla who created not-a-vaccine. It was another clowns who studied in woke universities and failed with making something really dangerous.

West is totally bankrupt. They have no any unique, critical and necessary commodities to offer to the world majority in exchange to their Western currencies. And most weird thing is that it is the West did this to itself.

If you could name anything real, unique, clitical and necessary for others that West have for sale, please name it.