Many have gone off Not Guilty per Jury Trials by using this as evidence and other things too that we don't have to pay taxes.
OK, then there should be detailed step-by-step 100% working howtos around. What exact preconditions necessary, what exact documents, witnesses, arguments, code articles numbers you need, how exactly properly apply all that in the court so judge could not arbitrary dismiss your stuff, how to answer to any questions prosecutor and judge could ask and so on.
Not fucking youtube videos, not fucking forum posts about somebody somwhere once upon a time, but straight detailed step-by-step instructions written in human language without juridical yddish.
I'm not an US citizen, but it will be very interesting for me to study basic principles and strategy of fast and guaranteed winning such cases in courts with judges and prosecutors whose salary depends on taxes I don't want to pay.
Taxation is theft. Is theft legal?
Anything that was legislated by legal authorities is legal. Theft, eating babies, fucking frogs, not fulfilling pre-election promises, usury, whatever shit those who write and pass the laws want to be legal.
You should never mix justice with enfocement of honest and morally apropriate ways of doing things and resolving disputes accepted by your people. Former is based only on what some not close to you people in power made in laws for people like you, latter is based on moral principles shared by people you live among. In courts you meet with justice, unfortunately.
Not being a US citizen by birth or naturalization makes a big difference, as you don't have automatic access to the sovereignty rights under the law for those who continue the population that created the governments by their sovereign citizenships.
Citizens have the right to pursue happiness (to work for pay) without interference. Noncitizens have their entry and stay regulated by the government already, so there is an immediate nexus to all money transferred that doesn't apply to the citizen. I haven't been asked recently to look into the laws for noncitizens to review arguments that noncitizens do not earn income, so I apologize for not having any quick takes for you there.
You are right that there should be step-by-step instructions, but since the ones who write (mammoth) step-by-step instructions are the IRS itself, which benefits from obfuscation, and the sovereign citizens are not similarly incentivized to publish but are in fact incentivized to be cautious in speech, the documentation you seek is hard to come by. There exist books that come close, but I'm not prepared to recommend one that applies to your case, and of course there are many more books that mislead or that are controlled oppo. But if you're interested in learning more about the tax fraud in this country, ask away. There would not be any fast or guaranteed path now because it would become commonplace if confirmed by courts; but recent years have allowed other surprising fast or near-guaranteed paths to materialize on other important fronts of sovereign expression, so there's always hope. Rather, we sovereign citizens have the responsibility to blaze our own pioneer paths, and those who succeed will be followed, even by noncitizens who take the additional steps of naturalization so as to share equally and responsibly in our sovereign status. Patient sovereigns decide justice ultimately.
Not being a US citizen by birth or naturalization makes a big difference
I meant I have Russian citizenship, not US one. :) I just trying that concepts on my reality. Things are pretty same really, just with some local specific.
F.e. there was no any procedure of dismissing USSR citizenship for citizens. Formally, I'm a dual citizen of USSR and Russian Federation. So, theoretically I could just use my USSR citizenship to get out RF one. And since USSR is formally exist in form of Transnistria (the only region that never declared exit or whatever from USSR, so become an only and single USSR member and formally represent USSR today), my USSR citizenship is still valid and should be formally accepted by all other states. And since RF declared itself a successor on USSR obligations, includng before USSR citizens, this effectively force it to admit my USSR citizenship and rights. So I don't even need to somehow declare myself sovereign or whatever to do same juridical mumbo-jumbo. :)
sovereign citizens are not similarly incentivized to publish but are in fact incentivized to be cautious in speech, the documentation you seek is hard to come by
I think there is a reason for that. Person who dug so deep in jurisprudence have to understand, that if everybody began use their concepts, then authorities inevitably will change the laws to close all that holes. So it is in his interest to not share that information. :)
The issue about widespread knowledge leading to changed laws is better appreciated in the money issue. When people realize federal reserve notes are fiat there is a very hard landing to return to some kind of gold standard. The means of resolving such a landing are negotiated by power brokers who then propose a transition they can all accept, each for self-interest reasons for different spheres of power. We see this negotiation happening, with many dirty tricks included, in the news daily. It's my belief the tax issue will be resolved similarly as part of the money issue. Either the voluntary tax will remain and knowledge will become wider spread about evitability, or something else will be proposed and possibly mandated, in which case sovereigns will individually need to determine whether to accept it or whether to practice peaceful civil disobedience. But evidence currently favors the first option.
Sadly, most who claim to have the silver bullet, and then publish it step-by-step and make more money selling a system than otherwise, get prosecuted and debunked because they didn't have it. I said there were exceptions. If you have what appears to be the whole truth because all mysteries about the law are explained without equivocation, it is definitely in your interest to share because your conscience is clear. The Swamp Rangers have not currently found it to be in our interests to share details of these laws as an org because the org's goals are different; but as an individual my conscience directs me to answer most specifics when I can give credible, competent info that doesn't interfere with the org. IRL I am much more free about it.
I can't verify fact or fiction on this, but this guy claims to have an exact list and detailed instructions of which forms to file and how to deal with local authorities after your license is de-registered and your only ID is your passport. The detailed info and step-by-step process is not divulged on the site though - one apparently signs up for the free course through email.
Interesting link, thank you. At least dude have some links to exact code articles and stuff. But still too many narrow places, so it is more the question of luck, than something solid.
One thing I didn't get really, is why a book named "Black's Law Dictionary" used as an argument for bureaucrats? As far as I found, this is just a dictionary of juridical terms, without any signs of official acceptance. It is not some legislated, voted, signed official dictionary, just some lawyer or juridical scholar tried to systematize words often used in laws and other judridical stuff. Or I missing something and this book is recognized by courts as official document, so definitions in it have power of law and have to be accepted by courts undoubtfully?
The tax scheme is not based on uniform commercial code as your link suggests; it has operated independently and defeated all UCC arguments, as Becraft noted long ago IIRC.
Filing a bunch of UCC papers merely mucks up a record but doesn't accomplish the testimony necessary to overcome mistaken presumptions of income. The site's going two years is no indicator of eventual success in actual goals. Find people who have been doing it for a lifetime. Herein I answered all the essential tax-related questions in one sentence, and this can be backed up with specifics from IRS instructions as I said. There are thousands hacking at the branches of evil without any effect.
Herein I answered all the essential tax-related questions in one sentence
I read through your response quite intently and I'm unable to identify which sentence was supposed to achieve this. Are you by any chance a person that has been doing this a lifetime? And you mentioned IRS instructions, but I don't see those either. I'll be honest. I'm very confused about all this, and it seems fishy.
I've been "doing it" (analyzing the law) for over 20 years, but that's obviously not part of the Swamp Rangers.
IRS instructions are on their website. Anyone analytical will note that the IRS instructions and website and the associated regs and laws are themselves very fishy. The fact that there's a constant unrestrained movement deriding the IRS as fishy, for a thousand invalid reasons and maybe a couple legit ones, indicates that the law is sufficiently vague to merit judicial notice. I realized this fishiness, without any help from any false argument, when I was still a minor; so you could say I've been doing it for a lifetime; but my primary questions were answered only after sufficient research.
If confused, step one is always to know and ask the Lord. Based on how he guides, ask away. Consider whether Americans legally ceded their sovereignty or whether they didn't and must act on the sovereignty bequeathed to them by taking responsibility. If Americans never made themselves slaves of the state, they must do due diligence to reclaim their heritage. It's not easy, and it takes a lifetime of small victories to get where you desire to go in your sovereignty, but it's much easier than at most any other time or place in history, as long as you don't fall for the state's lies that it "entitles" you rather than you controlling it.
I came here to spread truth, and so this truth is one that I direct people to among many. Due to prior agreements, I'm not at liberty to set up a teaching seminar here. Yet. But if you want a homework assignment, find a form from a third party that you may have received in a January (that's an "information return") and find the box(es) that indicate that an amount of money was paid in a certain category (that's testimony). Then begin your research into whether that third party had its testimony accurate, and means of correcting inaccuracies. I believe that one can relentlessly pursue truth until any question is answered, so the submission of honest confusion will always reward the patient.
OK, then there should be detailed step-by-step 100% working howtos around. What exact preconditions necessary, what exact documents, witnesses, arguments, code articles numbers you need, how exactly properly apply all that in the court so judge could not arbitrary dismiss your stuff, how to answer to any questions prosecutor and judge could ask and so on.
Not fucking youtube videos, not fucking forum posts about somebody somwhere once upon a time, but straight detailed step-by-step instructions written in human language without juridical yddish.
I'm not an US citizen, but it will be very interesting for me to study basic principles and strategy of fast and guaranteed winning such cases in courts with judges and prosecutors whose salary depends on taxes I don't want to pay.
Anything that was legislated by legal authorities is legal. Theft, eating babies, fucking frogs, not fulfilling pre-election promises, usury, whatever shit those who write and pass the laws want to be legal.
You should never mix justice with enfocement of honest and morally apropriate ways of doing things and resolving disputes accepted by your people. Former is based only on what some not close to you people in power made in laws for people like you, latter is based on moral principles shared by people you live among. In courts you meet with justice, unfortunately.
frog fucking you say? sign me up.
Not being a US citizen by birth or naturalization makes a big difference, as you don't have automatic access to the sovereignty rights under the law for those who continue the population that created the governments by their sovereign citizenships.
Citizens have the right to pursue happiness (to work for pay) without interference. Noncitizens have their entry and stay regulated by the government already, so there is an immediate nexus to all money transferred that doesn't apply to the citizen. I haven't been asked recently to look into the laws for noncitizens to review arguments that noncitizens do not earn income, so I apologize for not having any quick takes for you there.
You are right that there should be step-by-step instructions, but since the ones who write (mammoth) step-by-step instructions are the IRS itself, which benefits from obfuscation, and the sovereign citizens are not similarly incentivized to publish but are in fact incentivized to be cautious in speech, the documentation you seek is hard to come by. There exist books that come close, but I'm not prepared to recommend one that applies to your case, and of course there are many more books that mislead or that are controlled oppo. But if you're interested in learning more about the tax fraud in this country, ask away. There would not be any fast or guaranteed path now because it would become commonplace if confirmed by courts; but recent years have allowed other surprising fast or near-guaranteed paths to materialize on other important fronts of sovereign expression, so there's always hope. Rather, we sovereign citizens have the responsibility to blaze our own pioneer paths, and those who succeed will be followed, even by noncitizens who take the additional steps of naturalization so as to share equally and responsibly in our sovereign status. Patient sovereigns decide justice ultimately.
I meant I have Russian citizenship, not US one. :) I just trying that concepts on my reality. Things are pretty same really, just with some local specific.
F.e. there was no any procedure of dismissing USSR citizenship for citizens. Formally, I'm a dual citizen of USSR and Russian Federation. So, theoretically I could just use my USSR citizenship to get out RF one. And since USSR is formally exist in form of Transnistria (the only region that never declared exit or whatever from USSR, so become an only and single USSR member and formally represent USSR today), my USSR citizenship is still valid and should be formally accepted by all other states. And since RF declared itself a successor on USSR obligations, includng before USSR citizens, this effectively force it to admit my USSR citizenship and rights. So I don't even need to somehow declare myself sovereign or whatever to do same juridical mumbo-jumbo. :)
I think there is a reason for that. Person who dug so deep in jurisprudence have to understand, that if everybody began use their concepts, then authorities inevitably will change the laws to close all that holes. So it is in his interest to not share that information. :)
Thank you so much for the Transnistria data!
The issue about widespread knowledge leading to changed laws is better appreciated in the money issue. When people realize federal reserve notes are fiat there is a very hard landing to return to some kind of gold standard. The means of resolving such a landing are negotiated by power brokers who then propose a transition they can all accept, each for self-interest reasons for different spheres of power. We see this negotiation happening, with many dirty tricks included, in the news daily. It's my belief the tax issue will be resolved similarly as part of the money issue. Either the voluntary tax will remain and knowledge will become wider spread about evitability, or something else will be proposed and possibly mandated, in which case sovereigns will individually need to determine whether to accept it or whether to practice peaceful civil disobedience. But evidence currently favors the first option.
Sadly, most who claim to have the silver bullet, and then publish it step-by-step and make more money selling a system than otherwise, get prosecuted and debunked because they didn't have it. I said there were exceptions. If you have what appears to be the whole truth because all mysteries about the law are explained without equivocation, it is definitely in your interest to share because your conscience is clear. The Swamp Rangers have not currently found it to be in our interests to share details of these laws as an org because the org's goals are different; but as an individual my conscience directs me to answer most specifics when I can give credible, competent info that doesn't interfere with the org. IRL I am much more free about it.
https://www.onestupidfuck.com
I can't verify fact or fiction on this, but this guy claims to have an exact list and detailed instructions of which forms to file and how to deal with local authorities after your license is de-registered and your only ID is your passport. The detailed info and step-by-step process is not divulged on the site though - one apparently signs up for the free course through email.
Again, I cannot verify this isn't bonkers.
Interesting link, thank you. At least dude have some links to exact code articles and stuff. But still too many narrow places, so it is more the question of luck, than something solid.
One thing I didn't get really, is why a book named "Black's Law Dictionary" used as an argument for bureaucrats? As far as I found, this is just a dictionary of juridical terms, without any signs of official acceptance. It is not some legislated, voted, signed official dictionary, just some lawyer or juridical scholar tried to systematize words often used in laws and other judridical stuff. Or I missing something and this book is recognized by courts as official document, so definitions in it have power of law and have to be accepted by courts undoubtfully?
The tax scheme is not based on uniform commercial code as your link suggests; it has operated independently and defeated all UCC arguments, as Becraft noted long ago IIRC.
Filing a bunch of UCC papers merely mucks up a record but doesn't accomplish the testimony necessary to overcome mistaken presumptions of income. The site's going two years is no indicator of eventual success in actual goals. Find people who have been doing it for a lifetime. Herein I answered all the essential tax-related questions in one sentence, and this can be backed up with specifics from IRS instructions as I said. There are thousands hacking at the branches of evil without any effect.
I read through your response quite intently and I'm unable to identify which sentence was supposed to achieve this. Are you by any chance a person that has been doing this a lifetime? And you mentioned IRS instructions, but I don't see those either. I'll be honest. I'm very confused about all this, and it seems fishy.
Sorry, here it is.
I've been "doing it" (analyzing the law) for over 20 years, but that's obviously not part of the Swamp Rangers.
IRS instructions are on their website. Anyone analytical will note that the IRS instructions and website and the associated regs and laws are themselves very fishy. The fact that there's a constant unrestrained movement deriding the IRS as fishy, for a thousand invalid reasons and maybe a couple legit ones, indicates that the law is sufficiently vague to merit judicial notice. I realized this fishiness, without any help from any false argument, when I was still a minor; so you could say I've been doing it for a lifetime; but my primary questions were answered only after sufficient research.
If confused, step one is always to know and ask the Lord. Based on how he guides, ask away. Consider whether Americans legally ceded their sovereignty or whether they didn't and must act on the sovereignty bequeathed to them by taking responsibility. If Americans never made themselves slaves of the state, they must do due diligence to reclaim their heritage. It's not easy, and it takes a lifetime of small victories to get where you desire to go in your sovereignty, but it's much easier than at most any other time or place in history, as long as you don't fall for the state's lies that it "entitles" you rather than you controlling it.
I came here to spread truth, and so this truth is one that I direct people to among many. Due to prior agreements, I'm not at liberty to set up a teaching seminar here. Yet. But if you want a homework assignment, find a form from a third party that you may have received in a January (that's an "information return") and find the box(es) that indicate that an amount of money was paid in a certain category (that's testimony). Then begin your research into whether that third party had its testimony accurate, and means of correcting inaccuracies. I believe that one can relentlessly pursue truth until any question is answered, so the submission of honest confusion will always reward the patient.