3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

The deep state once thought they could imprison our soul directly but were severely disappointed when they saw they couldn’t

What if they couldn't because CO2 levels are already too high, so this process is just physically impossible. So Musk with his pushing EVs and other green crap is trying to resolve that issue for them, along with other corporate businesses and state. And his tweets are just a distractions. Don't look at man's tweets, look what man really do.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

As for drone/not drone,what I digged for now:

Toropets weapon storage is an old place. Today it consists of two parts - old USSR surface storage (hangars in the forest) and new one, underground facility. From the latest Maxxar images you could clearly see that only old, forested area was seriously damaged, and new one, with separate underground chambers didn't. There is no problem to blow up surface hangar in a forest with a drone. Looks like that bureaucrat who supervised building a new underground storage and was jailed months before hit, delayed moving stuff from old hangars to underground chambers or just didn't bother about that old stuff. So, something was left in old surface hangars and detonated after a drone strike.

Probably as one of immediate consequences of that hit all other such storages that had to be modernised will be inspected, so may be more trials coming and more bureaucrats will be jailed. :)

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no much sense to run OS in VMs under Xen for security purposes on the modern x86 machines with AMD PSP / Intel ME. You have to completely get rid of PSP/IntelME in the first place, to make this configuration as secure as promised, but if you got rid of PSP/IntelME (say, on old motherboard with coreboot flashed instead of BIOS/UEFI), then Xen VM will add nothing to the security in comparison of typical Linux with "unsafe" apps like browser running in regular Linux containers where they don't see your real filesystem with your private data.

Unfortunately, there are no x86 hardware that will allow to comfortably browse modern Web and at the same time could be completely cleaned from PSP/IntelME. Only dozen years old hardware could function more or less normally without that crap, but you will get laggy modern browser.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was something markedly different about this one.

Well, the only difference I see is that bueaucrat who was responsible for building Toropets storage was arrested and jailed long before the strike for stealing taxpayer money and receiving bribes.

Hardly this could mark the start of WWIII.

At the same time I could imagine that Western elites who live in their own world truly secretly believe that WWIII already started and they head their imaginery battles. But that doesn't mean it really so. Most dangerous part of this delusion is that they could do some shit for real.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hardly this could be a start of WWIII. There was similar attacks on other arsenals earlier, f.e. in Voronezh oblast or Rostov-on-Don, but just like in previous cases this one does not have any significant influence on the battlefield. Also, only part of arsenal was destroyed, yesterday Maxxar published satellite images, most part of it survived - https://t.me/intelslava/66746. Even if all that storage was destroyed, that will not change anything. It is reserves, not source of battlefield supply.

This mosquito bites are overhyped in Western MSM to the level of WWIII start events is more wishful thinking than something real. At the same time, destruction of western arsenals in "ukraine" that happens nearly every day, routenely, somehow stays completely out of their scope. Just yesterday at least two storage facilities was blown up in Kharkov and Sumy, along with destruction of communications headquaters of AFU. But Western MSM don't bother to even mention that.

If you need WWIII start events, better take a look at attempts to hit Russian NPPs in Kursk and Zaporozhye. Or that attempt to damage ICBM radar station or nuclear bombers airfields. This what could theoretically cause WWIII if succeed, but not neccesarily.

That "red lines" narrative is totally Western construct. We don't have that "red line" thing at all. "Red line" thing, in its core comes from overpopulated Europe, where feudals teared each other throats for additional field or village and thoroughly watch for their feuds borders.

Russians don't have that habit, we operate in completely another mode. There is even proverb - "Russian will not cross itself until thunder crush". It's not in our habit to draw lines for others and closely watch for them constantly if anybody cross them. We do something only if something happen, and only then assess reaction. But this does not mean we don't have multiple plans for possible problems and this does not mean we don't care. "Lay straw beforehand", "Prepare sleigh in summer and cart in winter", something like that. We don't have any "red lines" all of them are invented by Western politicians and MSM, we just react on the go if something happen.

I think this "red line" shit is used to create an illusion that Russia is inept, like "look we crossed their red line and they did not immidiately nuke us!". There are no red lines. There is actions and retaliation. And retaliation does not necessary exactly what West made up in their delusions.

Add to this that Russia is very bureaucratic state. For each action, somewhere some bureaucrat write a paper, where everything is documented - locations, perpetuator names, financial figures, etc., and put in corresponding file. Then, after some time, this page from file will be opened by some other bureaucrat who will have to do something about it. Many years could pass and nobody knows how exactly this action will be retaliated. But there is a paper in a file waiting for its time. From the outside it could look completely insane, but that's work in the long term. Say, decade later, say Finland will have to restore normal relations with Russia to fix their economy. And suddenly that file with that paper about launch of "ukrainian" drone from Finland will pop up. And Finland will have to do whatever we say to resolve that old issue - from extradition of all who participated in that shit for trial in Russia to some unpleasant concessions in future relations.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

The israelis want people to think of them as gods, capable of getting you anywhere, anytime, with any means imaginable. But really they’re just scum setting off bombs among the civilian populations of the world.

Exactly. Meanwhile, it was kikes who "invent" what today is named "terrorism". That Irgun random mass murdering of natives of Palestine and all other stuff up to plane hijacks and bombs amid mass events. All that was invented and first perpetuated by kikes. Before their invention, terrorism was defined as "killing top persons of political opponent". Say, JFK asassination was pure terrorism. Today, the meaning is completely perverted. What they name "terrorism" is just killing random people for some benefits of ruling elites.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't care what deluded West think about their own LARP.

Creating artificial Klingon language and declaring Klingon etnicity in papers does not create real Klingons and Klingon state. Etnicity, nationality, statehood and all that stuff is not like your 150 genders when you could just declare that things is how you want them to be. All that things are physical, and as noone opinion could make π equal to something different from 3.14.15926.... you can't create state and nation out of nothing just by publishing some papers in MSM. It will always be only your own delusion, and nothing else.

Really it is very benefitial for us that West are so deep in their own delusions, that it is unable to make any reasonable decision somehow connected with reality.

Do you understand that "ukraine" literally mean "outskirts" in any slavic language?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then how about you stay in Russia and stop trying to make your neighbours Russian?

We are staying in Russia. For now. And what we are doing on our own territory is not your, or your bosses fucking business.

There's a reason why they all hate you.

We don't give a fuck what inbreed perverts from Western elites and aristocracies think about us and so western sheeple forced to think too. Why should we? Name me a single fucking reason. All that "king charlies", potuses, whatever swedish/danish/dutch "kings", eu bureaucrats and oligarchs are noone and nobody for us. And all their delusions just could not have any sense at all.

We tried to play nice with that arrogant and ignorant filth just a decade ago, but looks like they just can't drop their aristocratic delusions. So fuck them. We don't need them to exist, they can't offer anything we need.

Meanwhile, do you understand that "ukraine" literally mean "outskirts" in any slavic language?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Russians really live in an alternative reality.

Yes, we do. And we will never agree to live in your freakish reality you building for yourselves and will do everything necessary to avoid that. Deal with that.

What about that question you run from every single time?

Do you understand that "ukraine" literally means "outskirts" in every slavic language?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean much less than 0.01% of Russian weaponry? OK, celebrate that "peremoga", losers. 99.99% to go. Funny how your kind celebrated every rare stupid mosquito bite that was instantly made into some outstanding PR event, completely ignoring Western meat and hardware grinding going every day in so called "ukraine". Seems like you have no any clue that there is dozens of such hits happens in so called "ukraine" every single day. I think it is very good. Uninformed enemy sunk in its own delusions is a good thing.

And what about simple question you don't want to answer - Do you understand that "ukraine" literally means "outskirts" in any slavic language?

7
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

This could have interesting consequences on the gadgets market.

I think there will be many who will think trice before buying any gadget of a brand from any Israel-supporting country.

Not that idiots who buy every new iPhone regulary, of course will think, but government and corporate customers who buy gadgets for employees and account this thing seriously, will definitely will take that case into account. Who knows if they someday could experience Jewish anger for something? IDK, not hiring some woke thing, issuing some "antisemitic" regulation or crossing the road of jewish owned corporation...

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hi! This time looks like it is the West who build this new iron curtain. However, that wouldn't work, just like 1.0. More you try to ban some info, more attractive it become to the people.

I don't think there will be internet separation. In the worst case USA/UK/EU will build something like China Great Firewall with mandatory internet IDs, But that will not work too.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hardly this is about real military secrets, more probably it is about reselling sanctioned multipurpose ICs like sensors, FPGAs or MCUs of US/EU brands. Jews just can't resist profits of reselling, because if not them, others will get what kikes think is only theirs rightfully.

As for real military secrets, looks like West have nothing to offer. Nearly every crucial solution of military problems that was found in western weapons obtained on battlefield was overcomplicated and overengineered, like those who designed them care more about price than about soving real problem in most simple and so much reliable way. Where we use simple mechanical link in western weapons complicated electromechanical servo system found.

It is not only about military, really, just take a look at such simple thing as trunk lock. In a modern car it is a button with wires going through all car to comfort unit under the dash and then back to the servo in trunk lid that unlock the lock. Instead of direct mechanical link from the button to the lock.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

So that "unmerged with foundation" thing is state/land dependent?

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

So cheap houses are limited more by regulations, than the technology.

IIRC in US you don't need to register or get approval for the house that is not permanently connected to its foundation. Doesn't that allow to build that prefab houses on any private land? Just build them with detacheable connections to foundation so they accounted not as real houses that fall under all that regulations. I also saw multiple "build house by yourself" videos where that point about connection with foundation was specifically mentioned. People built houses from sea containers or as log house avoiding approvals and other stuff on their land.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, with 13000 dead fighters for LGBT freedoms and a lot of western junk burned. Idiors bring their manpower and weapons to single point of destruction.

You still didn't answer the question - Do you understand that "ukraine" literally means "outskirts" in any slavic language?

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chicks reflect a lot of photons, if you consume some watching, nothing will happen with chicks. :) Chicks like to reflect photons, But reflected photons that will hit your eyes will be absorbed and turned into signals to your brain pleasure centers (if chicks are nice, straight, slim and so on, of course, otherwise your disgust centers will be stimulated).

But if you watching on single photon, there is no way to watch it other than consume it. And if you consume it watching, it would not hit the place it have been flying to.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

When you want to measure/observe/watch single photon or some other elementary particle, in the middle of experiment with it, you inevitably change or destroy this particle, so experiment is flawed or ruined with watching.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Half of house cost is that unfolding mechanisms. Why not just produce same standard panels of different types separate and just asemble house from them on site? It could be even faster than to unfold this thing.

And that walls thickness.... IDK, looks like walls could be occasionally punched through with a mop handle. Houses with planned obsolence? That's the business plan?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Lone Gunmen" series, episode 1. Aired March 2001.

With exactly same plot and location, with explanations who, how and with what purpose wanted it, orders of magnitude more valid than anything official, but with happy end.

Even Hollywood make this idea in a movie and air it to US (and may be other countries) viewers half-year before, but somehow US government "had no idea".

It is very hard to understand how anybody, even completely dumb idiots, could believe official version when it happened.

Sometimes I think that all that modern 5G chip-mind-control crap often pushed here and there is a quarter century late.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems like even if the effect is small, as you allege, they are still using the Lorentz equations.

They do that "just in case", because "scientists insisted" or for whatever other reason, but definitely not because it is really necessary for positioning.

They use Lorenz equations on GPS satellites, but Lorenz equations are not used for GPS positioning, because their effect is unnoticeable.

Also, in any case once a day staellite clocks synced with Earth UTC time from ground stations.

So, statement that existence of GPS impossible without relativivty and GPS is a proof of relativity is a bullshit. Not because GPS disprove relativity or prove something different, but because whole system designed to minimize or completely exclude influence of clock instability or drift of whatever reason on positioning.

During finding position following happens in receiver: To determine position on one coordinate receiver need 2 satellites. Receiver measure static delay (phase shift) between signals from satellites. This way receiver find out by what distance it is closer to one of satellites. Pay attention to that - receiver does not measure absolute distance to satellite by comparing local time and received satellite time where Lorenz transforms matter, but local phase shift between signals from two satellites. What matters here is syncronicity between satellites which is not subject to Lorenz, not their absolute times or frequency drifts. Knowing absolute positions of both satellites from ephemeris (almanac) data and how it is closer to one or another, receiver calculate its absolute position. To calculate 3D position receiver need 4 satellites in view. With 3 satellites in view you will see empty field for altitude (height) value in NMEA sentence from GPS receiver and only longitude and latitude will be shown.

Say, receiver get 3.333 mS shift between signals from two satellites. This means receiver is 1000km closer to one of satellites. 38 μS/day is 38e-6 / 86400 = ~4.4e-10 adjustment to clock and so to position measurement, because receiver clock synced with received satellite frequency signal and is used to measure phase shift. On the distance of 1000km it is 0.44 millimeter difference. Could you tell that 0.44 millimeter on 1000km is anywhere practical or significant? Was it really necessary to make this Lorenz adjustment to the staellite clock, especially taking into account that other things add meter order errors?

Point of GPS and relativists who lie about it is very simple - Why relativists need this lies if their theory so cool and correct? Why do they need to pose GPS positioning example as a proof of relativity theories, when principle of GPS positioning made in the way it just cancels relativity effects if any? They slowed clocks on GPS satellites to some value, yes, but this value could be arbitrary, not -38μS/day, but, say -70 or +10 or 0 μS/day and this still will have no any noticeable effect on precision of GPS positioning.

Meanwhile, time shift is not the only possible relativistic effect. F.e. engineers examined other cases where relativistic effects could have some influence on positioning - https://archive.org/download/DTIC_ADA516975/DTIC_ADA516975.pdf about using GPS from high-speed plane or another satellite, i.e. when receiver moves too and this probably could add some relativistic effects.

Conclusion was: (see p197)

Eq. (17) "is just what one would expect by a Lorentz transformation from the center of rotation to the instantaneous rest frame of the accelerated origin" ([6], p. 23). Except for the leading γ factor, it is the same as the formula derived in classical physics for the signal travel time from the GPS satellite to the ground station. As we have shown, introducing the γ factor makes a change of only 2 or 3 millimeters to the classical result. In short, there are no "missing relativity terms." They cancel out.

It is really amasing that GPS engineers created a system that cancels out all possible uncertainites and minimize possible errors as much as possible fundamentally, by design. But still some use GPS that is designed to cancel out errors of different kind including relativity as a proof of relativity. It's just plain dishonesty in a nutshell. Why relativists ever have to use such dishonesty in attempts to support and propagandise their theory?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, they don't.

GPS, just like any known GNSS system is differential, not absolute.

Receiver doesn't use absolute time data from satellites, it measure differences of time in signals received from different satellites (phase) and use only that differences to find out position.

GPS clocks on satellites do slowed slightly IIRC not 1.024 MHz clock signal, but 1.02399...whatever MHz to satisfy special and general relativistic time distortion prediction (-7μS/day special, +45μS/day general, total +38μS/day) to make satellite clocks appear running at same pace as clocks on Earth, but this does not make any real sense, since any absolute error is cancelled by differential nature of measurement (not a frequency or time on satellite matters, but phase offset between different satellites, that is measured ), so any relativity corrections will give position error in order of millimeters. This shift was done purely to satisfy relativists marketing demand, not for solving any real problems. Also, in any case satellite clocks are forcefully synchronised with Earth UTC every 24 hours .

Take a look at GPS position calculation math, it is pretty clear that relativistic effects if any, could not give any noticeable error.

For GPS positioning syncronicity between satellites is orders of magnutude more important than any possible relativity effects.

Major GPS error comes from atmospheric interference, ephemeris precision and so on, potential relativistic effect errors are at the very bottom of the list, even lower than short-term instability of atomic clocks.

PS: that often pushed statement that unaccounting for relativistic effects in GPS will give 11km/day error is a pure lie. Idiots who made this statement (300000km/S * 38μS) to show importance of Einshtein just have no any clue about how GPS really works. In reality such error will be absolutely negligeable (millimeters in a worst case), much lower than other ineradicable errors and it will not accumulate at all.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

IDK what exactly sect he belongs to, but in that sect they believe that Jesus is not our only God and have no clue about Holy Trinity concept in whole.

I know that there are "christian-like" sects that push narrative that Jesus is just a kind of prophet of Old Testament God, but never dig into sorts of that shit.

If you care about him to the level of making personalised posts, then pray for his enlightement and so abandoning his heresy/sect. I don't think he is inherently bad person, really.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›