▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

How is vaxine shit in russia?

Failed. Most people don't give a shit about vaxx and highly suspicious, especially with different Jewish Ginzburgs on top of all that vaxx hoax. There was initially some weak enthusiasm about vaccines among the most convinceable, but since the people figured out that vaxx will not allow them to not wear the masks in public places or travel abroad and after first severe side effects among vaccinated relatives or friends most denied vaxx at all.

Western media says russia is making laws to vaxx people, is this true?

Nobody cares about laws in Russia. Especially stupid ones.

There was attempts to push the federal QR-codes/vaxx passports laws, but that shit was quickly retracted as the authorities ratings fall below the floor.

Interesting that QR-codes (in whole) are highly anticipated by the main Putin electorate (pensionaries, state bureaucrats, military, etc.), most account them as mark of the beast. So Putin seriously afraid that his electorate will never forgive and forget that thing, so he ordered parliament to push the brakes on that law. Parliament hearings on that dumb shit was delayed to Feb 2022 and hardly that law would ever pass.

Finally all that coronahoax crap is still completely illegal. Federal authorities leave all decisions to the regional authorities to keep hands clear, but regional authorites could not issue any local orders that contradict to federal laws. So all regional orders about masks, vaxx or any other crap are illegal.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hardware backdoor is a thing. Both AMD & Intel have it.

Only if some malicious third-party have a direct access to your local network and your device with AMD/Intel have ME with AMT. Even in that case it could be very tricky to do something meaningful if you don't use Windows.

In any case I just don't allow third-party in my local network.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

If so, why are you here?

Living in Russia I don't care about US three-letter agencies and corporations. That is why I spend time here, talking with fellows about conspiracies, and that is why I don't spend time talking on any Russian conspiracy sites.

No privacy in the internet. If you want perfect privacy, go offline, don't use computers & live in the cottage.

When I need perfect privacy, I just use i2p, tox and other technologies. And living in cottage in no case mean being offline and living without computers.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is a part of my job, dealing with DDoS and knowing how this things works.

Cloudflare is nothing more than man-in-the-middle surveillance company. It does not protect a service from DDoS at all. Even their public DNS service (1.1.1.1 f.e.) is nothing more than collecting information about what sites users visit and other tracking info about users. CDN is the same surveillance shit too.

Best DDoS protection is BGP blackholing. Cloudflare don't use it. Best DNS service is your own bind with list of root servers. Best CDN is your own servers. In no case Cloudflare services is necessary or even slightly better. In every case Cloudflare services is worse and insecure. It is also unreliable, just recall July 2019. And do censorship, recall the story with 8chan. Cloudflare is a cancer of internet and should be avoided at any cost.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

DDoS attack primary goal is to make the target server unreacheable for users. It is in the name - Distributed Denial of Service attack. If user can't access the service, i.e. denied of service, the goal of DDoS is reached. Cloudflare prevents only the flooding of server with a storm of requests. And it prevents it by not forwarding them to the server. Yes, target server continue to work, but nobody could access it, because Cloudflare drop requests. In any case user denied from service.

So, such DDoS "prevention" have no sense at all, since users still denied from service. In the best case, only thing server owner get is lower incoming traffic during DDoS, and that's all.

Marketing lies of cloudflare does not make the whole thing work. Just swindle server owners into selling all their users to the hands of that shitty BigBrother company that will mitm even into SSL connections (yes, in any mode Cloudflare decrypt trafic from target server and encrypt trafic for users with their own certificate - check lock icon in your URL bar for conspiracies.win - it will be Cloudflare certificate).

I would not be surprised if it will be revealed that cloudflare organize and do all that DDoS attacks on the sites that will never really could become a target of real DDoS just to convince site owners to buy into cloudflare man-in-the-middle crap.

▲ 9 ▼
CrazyRussian 9 points ago +9 / -0

Cloudflare DDoS service act like man-in-the-middle between user and "protected" site. So, all data you exchnage with the site behind cloudflare is tracked, stored, studied and sold.

conspiracies.win is behind cloudflare too. It is insane, but most site owners are obsessed with that crap. In any case, cloudflare DDoS "protection" does not work at all. Site became inaccessible for user, just like without that crap. The only difference is that user see a nifty page with error instead of timeout.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

:) :) :)

That covid hoax is as contagious as paederasty. And by the same reasons. Countries with less coronahoax propaganda have much less "cases". There are no exclusions. Just like with paederasty.

So, there are no any difference at all.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. I even thought for a moment that this site is some kind of trolling against the vaccinazis.

And they all died in so-called "hospitals" under control of so-called "doctors" who getting a lot of money for every dead patient they label with COVID-19.

Nice link, very convincing. Saved in bookmarks.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Again that bullshit? You choose wrong forum.

SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated here, here, here, and here.

In no way this is "isolation". Isolation means to separate object of interest from any other substances.

If you want a description of virus isolation you could easily read it here Here it goes:

ChAdOx1-containing medium was clarified by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min in a benchtop centrifuge. Supernatant was then loaded into 38-ml ultraclear tubes compatible with the SW28 rotor (Beckman Coulter) and centrifuged at 100,000g for 1 hour in a Beckman Coulter Optima XPN-100 ultracentrifuge. Supernatant was discarded, and the pellet, which was slightly yellow and sticky, was resuspended in 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4, Gibco). This 5 ml of PBS containing the ChAdOx1 from the supernatant was used to resuspend the infected HEK-293 T-REx pellet. This solution was then mixed in a 1:1 ratio with tetrachloroethylene (TCE; Sigma-Aldrich) and shaken violently to ensure thorough mixing. The virus, PBS, and TCE mixture was then centrifuged at 2000 rpm in a benchtop centrifuge for 20 min. The top aqueous layer of the solution was removed by pipetting and placed into a new tube. A second TCE extraction was then performed by adding a further 5 ml of TCE to the aqueous layer, shaking, and centrifuging, as before. This is performed to ensure maximum removal cell debris. Previous purifications that excluded this second extraction showed fatty deposits when analyzed by negative stain transmission electron microscopy and resulted in viral aggregation. Next, the top aqueous layer was extracted again, and the remainder of the purification was performed using the two-step CsCl gradient method, as previous described (42), except for the following modification: During the final extraction of the virus containing band, which should have a crisp white appearance, the band was not removed using a needle through the side of the tube but by pipetting. A P1000 pipette was used to slowly withdraw fluid from the tube, taking from the meniscus, careful not to disrupt the band. As much fluid was removed above the band as possible, then a new pipette tip was used to withdraw the band from the meniscus in as little volume as possible.

See the difference? They finally got a perfectly isolated ChAdOx1 adenovirus supposedly used in AstraZeneca vaccine for further study, including EM and other things. You could also see a EM of isolated virus with identical particles without any garbage in Supplementary Materials Fig.S1

That is isolation. Virus isolation is routine well-known procedure, that used in that paper just as a obvious intermediate step in reserach. Real scientists do it every time when they want to really study some virus. Routinely and without any problems. And that simple and obvious procedure was never done for SARS-CoV-2.

What you falsely throw here as examples of isolation of SARS-CoV-2 is not even near isolation at all. It is just a description of getting some dirty soup of parts of dead monkey cells, antibiotics, antifungicides, and God know what else, where that frauds declare presence of SARS-CoV-2 using PCR tests that can't be used to detect viruses by definition.

All EM's that provided by so-called "scientists" who declare SARS-CoV-2 "isolation" is an image of unidentifiable garbage with inclusion of few particles that posed as a virus. But they are not. Some kidney specialists do that whole fraud procedure of SARS-CoV-2 "isolation" on clean monkey cell, just for lulz, because what they saw on so-called EMs of SARS-CoV-2 they saw constantly studing kidney cells long before coronahoax. They made EM images, specially for dumb idiots, who pose usual kidney cells remnants as SARS-CoV-2. On images you could easily found exactly the same particles that was posed as SARS-CoV-2 virus. Hopefully, this scientific journal is out of propaganda control due to be very specific on kidneys, so, here you still could read that paper and fuck out with your lies.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is nothing new in that vulnerability. May be it was 0-day in distant past, but definitely not now.

And here is how to exploit it, for free:

How JNDI injection works - https://www.veracode.com/blog/research/exploiting-jndi-injections-java

The core of that hack is a few year (or may be even decade) old hole in all that EnTeRpRi$E java crap. As real EnTeRpRi$Es, no one really do something with it, as usual they make meeting, teambuildings, wrote reports and allocate funds, with millions of presentations and bullshit talk.

They just dig out this old thing to cover all that money laundering and privatisation of company money "cyberattacks" scheme that become very popular in last year.

MSM lies. Even if they are "IT" MSM's. The reality always differ from what they tell you.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Simple explanation about speed of light in one direction - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTn6Ewhb27k

And that dude is definitely not in any meaning an opponent of official narrative, nor scientists he interviewed.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't measure speed of light in one direction according to special relativity. You could measure only average of forth and back speeds of light returned by distant mirror. It is unknown, if that speeds are equal.

There are a lot of logical loops in relativity theories.

Do you have any examples of a prediction being proven false?

Gunter Nimtz. In first experiments got 4.7c speed of signal transmission. Later replications, including made by other groups showed that tunneling time seems to be zero ("Our experimental results give a strong indication that there is no real tunneling delay time"), even through 1 meter gap as in Nimtz experiments. Speed of light is not the highest possible speed. There are no any predicted casuality violations observed during transmission of a signal with a speed much higher than speed of light.

If Harold White et.al. finaly create a warp bubble (see Alcubierre drive) in their experiments, that will finally bury relativity theory.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't see any problem in pushing their own sacred things they prayed not long ago into their own throats now.

Also I see nothing wrong in idea of unconditional prohibition of any medical invasion without consent or any compulsion to that consent by any means, including indirect ones. In no case this could be a communist value, because every single communist regime always violate that rule.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Being in margins of Einstein-like logic, you absolutely have no way even to really measure speed of light in one direction. And speed of light is assumed basic constant in the whole theory of special relativity. And it is not the only one suspicious and strained thing there.

Just an example.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

And name it NIGGERO or KIKECOIN. :) May be think out some intolerant logo too.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

facepalm.jpg

They even don't shy to dig out the corpse of their old failed hoax and put it on their banner.

More I read that, more I think that they are in big troubles.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

False. It's not old. It's used very much today. It's a critical part of cryptography.

IDK, but it seems that 30 years is rather old for IT.

I first meet it in mid-90s. It was used in code and comments to name random sequence in MD5 hashed password exchange. I think that it is older, since that algorithm of protected password exchange (with simplier hash) was known since 1970s

When user tried to log in to some server, server sends a nonce - random number. Client added that sequence of digits to password, calculated MD5 hash and send that hash to server. Since server knows nonce and password, it also calculated a MD5 hash from combination of nonce and password and compared this hash with hash from client. If hashes was equal, user was allowed to log in. That algorithm make the password exchange encrypted, clear password never was send over the net. Nonce was necessary to modify hash for every new login, so even if third-party sniffed hash sent to server, it will be useless, since on next login it would be different because of new nonce.

Note SuiticeTruthbomber's link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_nonce

So what should I see there?

Or spew smears like 'you sound like a leftist whining about master/slave'

But it is the same thing. I used different obscene and slur words in my programs, and still sometime use them. I really don't care if anyone will try to somehow attach some shit to that usage, just will be disappointed about the IQ of that person.

I'm trying to figure out WHY this word was used; because nonce as a slur predated nonce as a cryptographic tool

There are a lot of slur in code. You will even find few "fuck"s in linux kernel sources. A lot of tools named with obscene words. If somebody wanted to mention pedo in code for some reason, he could easily and openly use something like "fucking_pedofile" or "pedo" as variable/function name without any problems. It was completely OK at the time. There was no any need to use some barely known slur for whatever reason.

And all in all, nonce is not something specific for cryptocurrency/blockchain. So the title at least incorrect. Like "Critical part of login process is "Nonce" ... Login requires pedofiles ... ", Even just viewing conspiracies.win require use of nonces. Does conspiracies.win requires pedofiles?

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is an opensource program and opensource board allowing you do the same things BigBrother do, but for your own profit without any connection to all that BigBrother crap.

You could make your own security system, outdoor drone detector, birds finder, whatever you want with it.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

How much of the "accepted" knowledge in mathematics and physics fields do we know to be true?

Everything that you could check. I.e. set up real experiment that will prove or disprove them.

How much of them are reasonably doubtful?

Everything that you could not check. I.e. everything that could not be proven or disproven by real experiment.

That is why every real scientist do everything to think out how to experimentally prove his theory.

Especially as it pertains to what may be taught in universities nowadays.

IDK how they teach youth in universities now, but I was teached mostly to think, not just learn by rote some formulas or laws. I was teached of how all that things works and tied together, how to find relations and connections and it was much better than learning by rote, because if you get an ability to think that way, you could anytime derive any law or formula form the very basic knowledge. Also you could find new laws and formulas if you found a new relation or connection.

Looking at complete disability to make their own conclusions from some related facts in most young people I think that situation in education changed heavily and not to the best.

Do you think one field is worth studying more than the other?

It depends on your own interest and curiosity, not on some fashion, profit, whatever. In any case it is better to choose field you really interested in, even there could be much more popular or profitable fields. Science is about curiosity and attempt to uncover the secrets of Universe or God's plan if you wish, not about doing some boring uninteresting job for money. If you are not interested, Universe/God will not share its secrets with you. :)

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is the same "logic" SJW's use to trash IT and broke working software with all their "cancelling" of "master/slave", "whitelist/blacklist" and other settled long ago terminology. "nonce" is old cryptographic term that have nothing common with blockchain. It is blockchain uses crypto algorithms with nonces that existed long before all that blockchain hype.

It is even not a word. It is a name of variable. Most programmers don't like to type long variable names and shorten them with some kind of keepeng meaning (except Java programmers, I think, but they are weird people :) ). Instead of writing something like number_to_be_used_only_once = random();, somebody once wrote n_once = random(); or just nonce = random();. This name was short and even had some decent meaning. That variable name become a term. And that's all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any search engine crawls all internet. Any search engine has database of all keyphrases and keyword with apropriate links to sites containing them.

Everything with censorship is going later. Obviously censorship of keywords highly depends on censor. Those who do censorhip in Yandex don't care about somethign in English, they are too dumb to know another language. The same is with Google, their censors don't know Russian and do not censor stuff in Russian.

So, you will not find anything reasonable about "voting falsification" in Google and you will not find anything about "фальсификация выборов" in Yandex. However, you will find a lot of stuff if you keep requests the same but change search engines.

It is so obvious, that I'm amased that there is some questions and false assumptions here.

Yandex and Goolge are completely same in censorship. Each company heavily censor absolutely same information for their target audience that differ in language. Since amount of Russian-speaking users of Google is tiny, and same with English-speaking users of Yandex, corporations don't bother a lot to censor search results for that users.

There is no any difference between Yndex and Google at all. Both censor absolutely same things for their target audiences. Just the languages of audiences are different.

If you are Russian, use Google to find something interesting. You will not find that things in Ynadex. And vice versa, if you are American, use Yandex for your searches.

That is vulnerability of global censorship system, not a feature of some search engine. You could use it, while it works. But don't even try to supose that Yandex is somehow different from Google in the question of censorship. But remember, if the amount of Russian queries to Google or English queries to Yandex become significant, they will immidiately began to censor search results for foreing users.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do you think Yandex should be something different from Google or other NWO stuff? Russia government is a complete and truly NWO shill since the beginnig. If yo think that Russian authorities masters is somehow different fron US or European authorities masters, you are just dumb idiot falling to all that MSM propaganda crap.

And the study is completely flawed. They should make search requests to Yandex in Russian, according to the language of target auditory., then they will get the same results as with Google and other crap.

If you will make Google queries in Russian, you will find a lot of conspiracy. The same with Yandex, but with different language.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Confirm that. I also checked original image (huge JPEG2000 25 cm/px 25928x44039 px 658Mb), that thing is there. Definitely looks like disk object plow up ground while falling. There even visible traces of soil that was collected on the top of disk and flown further along the trajectory when disk stopped. And AFAIK, there was no human Mars missions with probes of that size.

Definitely worth attention

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›