See the video here: https://www.ntd.com/upcoming-global-covid-summit-nashville_715751.html
Skip to 1:10:15
Apparently, the new omicron variant changes where the virus is infecting, and it seems to be good news.
I thought it was a bit radical to say there is no virus. I trust terrain theory instead of germ theory. There still are artificial biological organisms/viruses that can be created (bio-warfare, population control).
There is propaganda designed to have us look in other directions, and I think that negating many doctor's experience and observations is not wise. That the problem is a virus (artificial or natural), or another type of organism, doesn't really matter to me.
My belief at this time is that the original chimeric virus is real, and I am not surprised if it evolves/changes or a modified version is released.
Again that bullshit? You choose wrong forum.
In no way this is "isolation". Isolation means to separate object of interest from any other substances.
If you want a description of virus isolation you could easily read it here Here it goes:
See the difference? They finally got a perfectly isolated ChAdOx1 adenovirus supposedly used in AstraZeneca vaccine for further study, including EM and other things. You could also see a EM of isolated virus with identical particles without any garbage in Supplementary Materials Fig.S1
That is isolation. Virus isolation is routine well-known procedure, that used in that paper just as a obvious intermediate step in reserach. Real scientists do it every time when they want to really study some virus. Routinely and without any problems. And that simple and obvious procedure was never done for SARS-CoV-2.
What you falsely throw here as examples of isolation of SARS-CoV-2 is not even near isolation at all. It is just a description of getting some dirty soup of parts of dead monkey cells, antibiotics, antifungicides, and God know what else, where that frauds declare presence of SARS-CoV-2 using PCR tests that can't be used to detect viruses by definition.
All EM's that provided by so-called "scientists" who declare SARS-CoV-2 "isolation" is an image of unidentifiable garbage with inclusion of few particles that posed as a virus. But they are not. Some kidney specialists do that whole fraud procedure of SARS-CoV-2 "isolation" on clean monkey cell, just for lulz, because what they saw on so-called EMs of SARS-CoV-2 they saw constantly studing kidney cells long before coronahoax. They made EM images, specially for dumb idiots, who pose usual kidney cells remnants as SARS-CoV-2. On images you could easily found exactly the same particles that was posed as SARS-CoV-2 virus. Hopefully, this scientific journal is out of propaganda control due to be very specific on kidneys, so, here you still could read that paper and fuck out with your lies.
Please see the following
https://ibb.co/2twDqfN
The below is from Dr Cowan's book Chapter 2. The picture above shows the findings described below.
Here is the essence of Lanka’s experiment, done by an independent professional laboratory that specializes in cell culturing. As seen in this series of photographs, each of the four vertical columns is a separate experiment. The top photo in each column was taken on day one, and the bottom photo was taken on day five.
In vertical column one, normal cells were cultured with normal nu- trient medium and only a small amount of antibiotics. As you can see, on neither day one nor day five was any CPE found; the cells continued their normal, healthy growth.
In vertical column two, normal cells were again grown on normal nutrient medium and a small amount of antibiotics, but this time, 10% fetal calf serum was added to enrich the medium. Still, the cells in the culture grew normally, both on day one and day five.
The third vertical column shows what happened when Dr. Lanka’s group used the same procedures that have been used in every modern isolation experiment of every pathogenic virus that I have seen. This included changing the nutrient medium to “minimal nutrient medi- um”—meaning lowering the percentage of fetal calf serum from the usual 10% to 1%, which lowers the nutrients available for the cells to grow, thereby stressing them—and tripling the antibiotic concentration. As you can see, on day five of the experiment, the characteristic CPE occurred, “proving” the existence and pathogenicity of the virus—ex- cept, at no point was a pathogenic virus added to the culture. This outcome can only mean that the CPE was a result of the way the culture experiment was done and not from any virus.
The fourth and final vertical column is the same as vertical column three, except that to this culture, a solution of pure RNA from yeast was added. This produced the same result as column three, again proving that it is the culture technique—and not a virus—that is causing the CPE.