▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like seeing cloud iridescence in person.

Knowing exactly what is happening when you see cloud iridescence in person does not make it less fascinating and marvellous. Even more - when you know how it works, you are much more amased, because you not only observing an enchanting show, but also understand the beauty of the universe design that make that wonderful things possible. You lose absolutely nothing when it is not a "magic" anymore for you, on the contrary, it becomes much more interesting.

If their "magic" was so real and strong, they wouldn't need to hide behind lies..

Lies could be part of "magic". To get your satanic goal you need to seed a lie that will be believed by many souls. That lie in billions of souls will f.e. somehow feed the entity that will in exchange provide them power or know-how to get the goal or help with the goal itself.

Or it could be like with a role of acid in shugar hydrolysis. You have to add a tiny amount of acid, may be in form of fruit juice of whatever to begin process of separation sucrose into fructose and glucose. That acid is even not consumed during process, it just create a conditions where this process become possible. So with lies - if they will not add them, they will not be able to start the real process.

I prefer to leave the "magic" for them, not buy it for myself. If they do some rithuals just because they stupidly believe in them, or because somebody told them to practice them, that does not mean I have to leave attempts to try to understand the technology they actually using. Even if I could build some very approximate, but working model of process they do, I could be able to find a way to stop it or resist it, f.e..

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has any magic been shown to be actually functional?

Anything that look like magic for some person is just a technology that this person don't understand. Take any average smartphone user - smartphone is a literally magic box for them. They just used to it. So, magic don't really exist at all. It is just a technology we don't understand.

I've seen real magic in the workings of synchronicities.

In no case it is a magic. Just some unknown, hidden, unexplained process.

Can things be encoded in crystals (I know they can be used for encryption)?

You have such crystals in your USB flash memory sticks, SSD's and other *ROM's everywhere around. So, yes they could.

what ACTUALLY happened there?

Nobody knows for shure. Even if you somehow find out exact actions of all participants, this will tell nothing about the actual purpose. Even known results could say a little, since you could miss the real result, just because you don't know what to look at.

So, there could be only theories, one that will best fit for all known facts could be taken as a decent model.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too. Any autologin crap in browsers is a bottomless security hole.

There exists secure methods to authenticate without entering password (like ssh public key auth, f.e.), but I never saw this thing used for the web.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

USA does not restrict the trade of USD.

Do you understand, that "trade of USD" is just a tool for obtaining and selling USD (USD is just a tool too), and not a self sufficient goal? If you don't need USD, there are no any reason to trade them. Is that some revelation for "economists"? Nobody needs to keep "trading USD" just to "trade USD".

It's like VHS tapes. Some time ago many people need them, so there was a market for VHS tapes. People buy and sell them. When VHS tapes become obsolete, nobody needed them anymore, so VHS tapes market disappeared.

USD become obsolete, useless tool. Why should anybody trade them?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look up trade volume for Rubles right now. You will be in for a very nasty surprise.

Do you understand that all that stupid western money theories don't work anymore? Because western sanctions broke nearly all conditions that forced that stupid theories to look like they work.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, my crazy theory was not so crazy. :)

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Russia pretends it has a value against the dollar but does not allow trade against the dollar.

Bullshit. You could easily pay from your rouble account in USD everywhere, where payments from Russia in USD will be accepted. Obviously it done by automatic exchange of your RUB to USD by bank. To have USD for that exchange, bank buy them on the stock for you. I did it just few hours ago on Aliexpress who still want payments in USD (however, they working on switching to direct rouble and yuan international payments now).

Yes, there is some kind of deficit of physical USD banknotes, since they does not delivered to Russia by US now. But you could get your bucks if you need them, just need to order them before visiting bank. Just like with big sum of roubles. Many people who kept their savings in USD/EUR in the past, now move to precious metals, realty, means of production, investing, whatever, to get rid of useless USD/EUR that lose all trust they had here just in a month, so there will be no any real problem with USD banknotes, just longer logistic, if you need them for whatever reason.

It is not Russia who does not allow USD trade, it is West who don't want to accept USD payments from Russia. I personally gladly will pay for few pairs of Mexico made Wrangler jeans from US sellers on eBay right now, as I did it in the past often, so I will need to buy USD for that, but eBay/Paypal don't want to accept my USD. So no any reason for me to buy USD at all. That is why USD weakening here, nobody need a currency that is not unconditionally accepted as a payment.

Also, you already could open an account in yuans in many Russian banks. Unlike with USD, you could buy the same things for yuans, avoiding Western brands resellers who pose obvious "Made in China" stuff as Western one.

So, there is absolutely no miracle or need for government interference to weaken USD in Russia.

Unfortunately, our NWO shilling government officials still cowardly follow many IMF orders that prohibit backing of our currency with real things, making international transfers with rouble and other shitty stuff, lowering key rate to sufficient level and other stuff. So, things are not as good as they could really be for Russia now. And it is not because some "sanctions", but purely because of Putin & Co treason and open IMF shilling.

So,

why are not all Russians buying dollars? Easy answer: because they can not.

Is wrong answer. Easy, but correct answer: Russians don't buy dollars just because they don't need that useless for them currency.

Even if dollars become dirt cheap, Russians will not buy them. Russians rarely buy useless things, even if they are very cheap. May be some will, but just for fun or as a souvenir. West, by its own hands, just destroyed any trust to its own currencies in Russia.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we could ask our asian friend u/Mrexreturns . At least he is closer to China and may be will be able and willing to confirm or disprove our statements and observations.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is partially true. It is some kind of average among all cases where there is 3 base stations "see" one phone. But it is heavily depends on the used cellular network generation, distance to base stations, landscape, buildings around and the hell ton of other stiuff. In towns where base stations are on every block corner precision is much higher, up to hundreds of square meters, if the network is less dense, reflections from buildings and interference lower the precision. In the rural area when there is only one base station see mobile device it is a 90-120 degrees arc with the width of few hundred meters and length depending on the distance from base station, i.e. from that ¾ square mile close to the tower to dozens of square miles far away from it.

Really, triangulation is not the main source of phone position. GPS receiver in phone often permanently on and it's data constantly shared with multiple parties, from all that shitty social networks to the "innocent" app of some cafes of gas stations installed because of that annoying "do you have our app to get discount and collect bonuses?" each fucking time you visit that place. And of course most people just have navigation app turned on permanently.

That shit share your position with precision of few meters.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree to a certain extent, the Chinese will produce shit if you don't provide verification.

They perfectly know how to bypass your verification. F.e. they will make gears from cheaper, harder, but brittle plastic. Device will perfectly pass postmanufacturing verification, but gears will fall to pieces very quickly. If you want to "save money".

Chineese relatively honest with customer who do the business honestly. But somehow have very good sense of greedy customer. If they feel that greed, they will never be honest with such person.

If you hand them a lot of money, and don't verify, they will keep the money and turn out shit.

Of course there could be swindlers among them. But most will look at you first, and then decide, will they swindle you or not. I have some business with them, and rarely meet open swindlers, and when I do, it was always clearly visible from the beginning. IDK, may be they treat Russians somehow different, but I doubt they see any difference among Europeans, just like we barely could distinguish them.

If you hand them money AND send western quality managers to run the plantation, then you get what you want.

Never did that, but never had problems with quality. However, I never ask them to do something for the limited price or tried to lower price. I asked for quality, and then they named price I usually agreed with. May be that could be the secret, IDK. Also, interesting fact - when I start some project with Chineese, they usually ask, if I want my own brandname and all that "Made in Russia" stuff on the product. I always told them that I do not see any reason to do that, and I don't want to disguise their devices as my own. May be that could be the key of honest business with Chineese.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chineese really simple people. You got what you pay for. Just that simple. If you pay Chineese good money they make a good product. If you pay a little you get garbage. They are not like Europeans who will still try to do the job right even if paid less. Chineese will just make worse product if you pay less. Without any thoughts. You need a hand drill - OK. If you pay reasonable money they will make a perfect drill, with good copper-coiled brushless motor, steel gears, quality plastic body and precision chuck. It will be really good tool, may be even better than Western brand one. If you tell that there will be slightly less money - they without problems and questions will make you a drill with working brushed motor, plastic gears and still decent body. If you will pay them little, they again, without any thoughts, questions and single warning will make you drill too. It will still look like you want, but will be made from complete garbage - weak plastic, shitty chuck, aluminium coiled brushed motors (with short and unchangeable brushes) and gears from the unknown substance resembling dried snot. And it will be assembled using worst possible wires and screws. And they will do it with same smile, just like in first case. You could name any price and they will say - OK, we will do it.

IDK, Chineese have completely different attitude to the creating things for money. They assume that customer better know what he want and that is why he pay that price. They don't care about quality of product at all, they care only about providing the product to the customer for his price.

You could observe that thing on the example of formerly good Western brands. When they moved production to China, initially things had decent quality. But the "effective managers" began to "save money". They come to Chineese and ask - "could you make that same thing but for lower money?". Cheneese answer - "Of course we can, no problem, where is your money". "Effective managers" got their bonuses for "saving money" and end consumers got thing that looks exactly like older ones, but with lower quality. "Effective managers" of the brand did that trick multiple times, and "suddenly", we now have brand things made from garbage and like garbage.

So, really, playing that game with Chineese, Musk will just get complete garbage instead of same thing for lower price. AFAIK, the quality of latest Tesla models already worsening. So, Musk will just get what he paid for. No less, no more.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

No physicist would use a database with a disclaimer

LOL. since when "disclaimer" become something scientific? If I measure voltage across the resistor with different currents, store that data into database and write a "disclaimer" that "it can't be used" will it make Ohm's law non-existent or will it make that data unuseable to check that law? No. Science don't give a fuck to any "disclaimers". You have no any idea, what science is.

cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association

Where is the evidence of casual association between result of PCR test and cause of disease? Where is the evidence of casual association between the jab and occasional immunity? Where is at least the evidence of casual association between presumed virus and disease?

To prove casual association scientist throughly isolate the potential cause from all other potential causes of effect. To be shure, that the cause he study and only the cause he study is the real cause of observed result. This is what real scientist do. Real scientists spend years and a lot of money to isolate the object of study from anything else. Buld filters, shields, even whole underground facilities to get that probable cause as pure as possible. This was never done in any paper you praise and in none of other papers your praised papers link to. Your medical cheaters even never get a presumed virus particles in pure form, without any contaminants to study them. Only as a soup of dead cells, medications, solvents and hell knows what else. And used only PCR tech, absolutely not suitable for that, to "prove" that there is some "virus" in that dirty soup. They did not bother to do even the most basic part of any scientific research. :) Swindlers.

You could get all your coronahoax shit and try to sell it to instagram dumbfucks. You have absolutely zero chances to do it here.

PS: You also gave a perfect proof that you absolutely can't do your own research, even simpliest possible one, and using stupid assumtions backed with literally nothing. I never mentioned VAERS data for anything. In Russia there are no VAERS or anything comparable at all, so I just don't care.

In Russia, if you are interested, here exists one interesting official paper, that was and is actual even right now - "Methodics of determining epidemic thresholds for virus respiratory diseases". It is officially signed and accepted paper with epidemic thresholds (number of cases per 10000 above which authorities could declare epidemic) calculated for every single region and each week of year. None of that thresolds was ever exceeded during all that coronahoax in any region at any week. There was no any epidemic in Russia at all. None of all that shitty illegal orders and laws, federal and local issued during coronahoax have any mention of epidemic. They all use only WHO orders as reason. None of local health entities give positive official answer to the requests like "do we have epidemic now?". There are tons of that official papers where clearly stated by official entities, that there are no any exceed of thresholds, so no any epidemic of virus respiratory disease observed. Link to the official "Methodics" - https://docs.cntd.ru/document/555652160 You will not find any proof that there was any real epidemic, even with all that fake PCR "tests". So there was no any need for any immediate vaccine at all. Case closed. Take your coronahoax to the instagrammers.

You are the most miserable propagandist I ever saw here. :)

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

OK, no problem, I'll send them to some neutral country so you could recieve them from good guys and avoid any problems you could have due to direct contacts with bad Russian. :)

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

I could provide some cheap gas and oil. :)

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

The same terms is completely applicable to the using of PCR technology that can't be used for testing due to its working principle. But I don't see you insisting on rejecting all PCR "tests" results. Or rejecting all papers about not-a-vaccine "efficiency". They should be rejected for the exactly same reason you reject VAERS data - there is no any solid scientific proof of the link between the cause and result.

Either you completely throw out all PCR "tests" data along with all VAERS data and not-a-vaccine "efficiency" data according to your "logic", either you are just cheap low IQ hypocrite propagandist. :)

VAERS data is exactly same kind of data you suddenly praise for promoting coronahoax and not-a-vaccine "efficiency". If you accept latter, you shoud accept former. If you deny former, you should deny latter. Only if you are honest man, of course.

Sorry, but you fucked yourself up. Again.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

In Russia you more likely will find something like t-shirts or stickers "Za НаVального". It is "For Navalny" (jailed by Putin pro-west opposition leader) with Z and V letters used by Russian military units in Ukraine. US equivalent could be something like "Biden is Qool!". Advertising sarcastic absurdism and political nihilism in full scale.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What were the funding sources of each study?

You didn't read your own "arguments"?

Replications aren't necessarily published

Of course. :) Who need independent replications? Only insane conspiracy theorists need them. Every good science believer will be satisfied with study about BigPharma shit done for BigPharma money by BigPharma "scientists".

Yes, I do. I have experienced peer review. Have you?

Multiple times. But for real science, not for pseudosciences like medicine or sociology. Had successful replications too.

It's an important check on validating a study.

It have absolutely nothing to do with validation of a study. For obvious reasons. Validation of the study could be only in a form of independently replicated experiment.

You don't understand science.

I don't even want to understand all that garbage you name "science".

Physics scientists would say they aren't qualified to peer review a paper on epidemiology or virology.

You have no idea what real peer review is, how it is done and why it does not matter what speciality reviewer have. The purpose of peer review is to check for obvious errors and for compiance to scientific method. There can't be any difference in medicine math and physics math. So with scientific methods. If you insist that physicist can't peer review medical studies it just mean that your medical studies is not scientific.

But you don't believe any scientists are actually independent because they might be financed by the state. I'll let the "non-scientist" thing slide, but what you said was non-scientists.

There are no any World Physics Organisation whose authoritarian orders are absolutely obligatory to all states. Suddenly.

It's pretty clear that you are not an engineer and you are not a scientist.

Of course, you have no any sane counter-arguments, only can go personal. :) Perfect. :)

You don't understand even the difference between hypothesis and theory.

LOL. If a thought about looking for differences between hypothesis and theory come to your interear ganglion, you are as retarded, as a person who decided to find differences between engines and cars. :)

You find a wrong forum for your meaningless propaganda. Try some mainstream social networks and similar shit.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something to reduce western dependence on Russian-enriched nuclear isotopes (which is rarely if ever mentioned alongside gas concerns, for some reason).

That is a strangest thing too.

AFAIK, in Europe, only France is relatively independent on nuclear fuel, waste and have its own nuclear technologies. Britain seem to abandon most of their nuclear tech and had abroad fuel processing. Most other European nuclear plants depends on Russian tech or processing in one way or another, even USA made ones. Interesting, that Germany still want to close last 3 working nuclear reactors to the end of 2022. For the sake of ecology, of course. Theoretically, Europe could switch to French nuclear fuel, but France, being one of the largest nuclear fuel supplier have large internal consumption and low reserves for additional fuel production. As for tech, all Eastern Europe nusclear plants use Russian tech. USA buying Russian fuel. So, France and Canada could become alternatives for Eastern Europe, but hardly they could quickly enhance supply for all Eastern Europe plants. And there is silence in MSM about all that.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hardly. Coal mines are very old and mostly empty, It is same coal layers as in Rostov-Don region of Russia. That mines are done long ago. Gas/oil fields are weak and tricky. That resources are negligible comparing to known Russian resources. It is much cheaper and easier just to drill one well in any rich place to get the output more than all potential wells in Black Sea region could ever produce. People live in that place many thousand years, so everything that was accessible now is mostly extracted. That could not be a real reson for the war.

Of course all other shitty officially declared reasons, like all that crap about "denazification" or "forcing neutrality" also not real.

The real reason for that war is still unknown. I bet it is just a way to make an excuse for artificial faminehoax elites try to establish on the West on their way to NWO.

There are also some other theories circulating, f.e. war started for whatever is under Azovstal factory in Mariupol. Nobody knows what it is, but there a lot of theories, including interesting ones. F.e. there is cyborgs created by NATO scientists from Ukrainians in Azovstal underground, that is why those encircled at the plant cant't put weapons down and surrender, weapons are part of their bodies, they can't put them down just physically. :)

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've cited dozens of papers in this thread. Why don't you go through and list the funding sources for each of them.

I checked. Found none independent researches. At all.

bla-bla-bla

And no any replications. Zero. Nobody checked researches published by BigPharma/state researchers.

Papers published in prestigious research journals undergo peer review.

Do you know what is "peer review"? Peer review does not mean that research is valid. It does not even mean that it is really done. It just a check that there is no any obvious mistakes, and that's all. Peer rewievers do not replicate experiments, so they just can't confirm paper at all.

Moreover, none of that paper will pass a peer review of, say, physics scientists. The first their question to the paper will be - "how did you isolate effect of vaccine from other effects like natural immunity, medication, other substances in the vaccine and other stuff? You did not demonstrate that declared effect if exactly from vaccine active component only and not from other possible variables". Next will be - "how do you infect your test subjects with virus to enshure that it is really declared disease vaccine have to prevent". And so on.

Theories are not "declared" correct. That's not how science works.

Exactly. If a theory have no repeateable experimental confirmation, it is probably bad, wrong theory thinked out by some swindlers.

How do you know that? Do you think all replicative studies are also published?

If you don't have any clue about the deep black ass medicine drowned to, try to read something about replication crisis in medicine. Medicine is the worst among all other sciences. Somwhere near sociology and psychology.

So you only accept replication of studies done by independent groups of non-scientists?

Of course. That is the point. If you declare in your research that some treatment works, then this should be checked by an independent researches, that in no way have any connections to those who connected with you and those who interested in confirmation.

Not true. You have made this up. But papers do have to be replicable.

Person who create sentences where every part contradicts all other either insane, either propagandist.

I'll take his word over the word of dozens of scientists publishing in the most prestigious medical journals in the world.

I don't care what is your religious beliefs at all.

No independent replication of experiments - nothing to discuss.

Why don't you start a "science-y" journal and publish your debunks of all these, hundreds and thousands of papers published in prestigious medical journals?

"Why don't you create your own Twitter (i.e. state, banks, money, networks, powerplants, etc.)?" :)

You see, people? That's all you need to know about propagandists. Final argument always fall to some kind of monopoly or "consensus". :)

You clearly know more about science than all of these scientists who actually have science jobs.

Yes. Because I'm a scientist and engineer and doing science and engineering job nearly everyday. That thing, that is happening in medicine is not a science at all. "We made some device, we absolutely have no clue how it really works, but we give 100 devices to 100 people and ask them to shake device. Then we found that women have 20% more green LED activated than men. Few people died for unknown reasons. So this device could be used to safely and effectively detect women.". Every single paper you posted looks like that. That is how medical science look like today. That is why medical science is complete bullshit and garbage. That is why it should be deeply reformed and forcefully returned to the strict scientific methods.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Show me a single paper that is done by an entlty that is not financed, connected, or dependend on BigPharma or state Health institutions. Show me a replication of a single paper that is done by an entlty that is not financed, connected, or dependend on BigPharma or state Health institutions

You don't understand, that everything you linked here is a solid proof that all that vaccinehoax is not a science at all.

Scientific papers are published to present some research to other scientists. Presenting your research to other scientists is necessary for independent replication of researsch. If you have no independent replication of your research, publication of your research says absolutely nothing about validity of your research. Only when other scientists repeat your experiments and get exactly same results, your research could be named valid and your theory could be accounted as correct.

Science is not about publishing papers. It is about repeateability of experiment that prove or disprove some theory. Repeateability of experiment is the only proof that your research is valid. If nobody independently replicated your research and get the same results - it is unscientific to declare that your theory is correct.

There are no any single independent replication of any paper somehow connected with coronahoax at all. Medical "science" have lowest replication rate of published papers among all other areas. Moreover, even if rare medical papers replicated even by not-so-independent, but just another group of scientists, their results in most cases contradictes with initial paper. That is named "replication crisis", many sane people tried to point on this greatest problem in medicine, but was shut down by medical establishment. But with coronahoax we see a total zero of independent replications.

So, if you want to talk about science, you choose completely wrong area. Medicine is not a science for a long time already. There is only theories that is not supported by independent replication of experiments.

Published papers prove absolutely nothing if described experiments was not replicated by independent researchers with same result.

There is nothing to discuss at all. You have no any clue what science is and how it works. It is funny to see how you try to replace science with some kind of stupid religion with "published papers" as sacred writings and people financed by BigPharma and state health institutions as "priests", having no any idea what is all that really about.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alexei Navalny is the Russian version of Hillary Clinton, another liar trying to slander the peoples choice.....

So then why the elites didn't help him with most popular among Russians sanctions, but instead used them to help Putin?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lukashenko denied coronahoax openly. IMF even tried to bribe him with $1.5b to implement lockdowns and mask mandates, but he refused. Belarus was completely free from all that shit just because its leader just said no.

Yes, there was consequences in the form of protests, but I think the absurdity of the opposition demands who literally do rallies for Lukashenko resign and implementing immediate lockdowns including prohibition of rallies turned away a lot of people from opposition. People could want Lukashenko go away, but no sane human will support that if lockdowns and other crap also comes in that package.

So, it was completely possible to not shill for NWO with coronahoax even for small Belarus. For the Putin that was much simplier to do, but....

Putin was the last hope of someone to avert the coming future of the worlds people.

It is not Putin who is the hope. It is Russians who are able to not give a fuck to the NWO authorities could be a hope.

The only way to have a hope, is do not comply. That is not rallies and protests that could change something. It is "not giving a fuck" to authorities pushing NWO agenda that everybody could effictevily use against NWO.

The whole NWO thing is based on the compliance of people to the NWO agenda. That thing will not work at all if even part of people will silently sabotage it.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Navalny was a western plant

Of course. But he selected a very good main topic of his political program. Most Russians support that.

It is highly suspect to claim he was poisoned by fsb

FSB(former KGB) did and do a lot of disgusting things in Russia, it is very probable scenario.

I am also not clear on what powers to manage oligarchs the west gave to Putin that you are eluding to.

West finally arrested/confiscated western assets of "Russian" oligarchs. It is West who did the only thing, that every Russian approve. And it was Putin whose actions was used as a reason for that.

Putin has been hard at work on the opfor oligarchs since he took his seat.

If he did, nobody will rememnber now about different Usmanovs, Abramoviches and other greedy criminal bastads. But Putin did absolutely nothing. He only geting rid of his political rivals, and don't care about thieves that aligned with his politics. So, Putin did nothing to get rid of oligarchs for being thieves.

The amount of cleanup required in Russia after the corrupt leaders of the past was non trivial.

Putin itself is a completely corrupt leader, since the story with "Oil for food" hoax in early 1990s where Klaus Schwab was his curator. Putin was presented to Yeltsin by Berezovsky, another jewish thief who stole all his wealth from Russian people. Putin get rid of Berezovsky and Khodorkovsky not because they stole from Russians, but because they have different political views. All other oligarchs who do not have political contradictions with Putin still robbing and stealing from Russians without any problems.

Putin is totally corrupted and is devoted NWO shill, his full support of coronahoax is more than enough to have undeniable proof of that.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stalin, born Besarionis dze Jughashvili... was a jew.

Completely possible. I don't have a clue if his mother was jewish. Among jews etnicity is accounted by female line, unlike among europeans or others. "Jugashvili" is from the father, it means "son of Juga" in Georgian language. However, in Georgian jew will be "Hebraeli".

Hitler also could had some jewish ancestors.

But this does not matter. That all story is about declining jewish mainstream agenda. It means that Jewish cabal goals are much more important than even jews who could go against agenda. Agenda uber alles.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›