after waiting 5 hours for a part
Yes, it is much less than a week waiting of dealer delivery of the part with the price of printer with year supply of plastic.
that wouldn't take five minutes to make machine in an actual factory
Factories that make plastic parts made them in baches. And if you need a part that's not in stock and not in current batch, you could wait mohths, when batch with your part will be started.
and likely using more expensive materials,
Making plastic parts is not about using expensive materials. It is about making cheaper parts.
And if you are not satisfied with durability or strength of printed part, you always could turn it into aluminium one. All you need - aluminium junk, fire, crucible, sand and bentonite kitty litter.
3d printing isn't viable for anything except small home projects you cant get parts for any other way or that have insane mark up.
It is perfectly viable for anything you can't just go and buy in closest shop.
But that's not about tips and tricks of making parts on 3D printer. It is about a vector of technology. More and more things people could make by themselves with the help of tech. From plastic parts to baking bread. Including devices for making other things. With minimum possible efforts. Eventually, you will be able to make any object you need.
You would because the machinery used to make farming so efficient is unaffordable for the average man.
Why do you think so? Of course, if you are talking about new John Deer, it is unaffordable, and mostly not because of price, but because of ownership cost. But there is a huge market of used tractors, thanks to technology developments. Technology not only make new things, it also creates a market of previously unaffordable things.
Again, no. if the specifications call for artificial flavoring or plastic instead of metal then that's what will be used
And that is the problem. That is why we have a lot of shitty short-living things around now.
You just imagine a world where one machine can do everything without need for retooling and with no question of how the raw materials will be obtained if not with costly machinery.
It is only question of energy. With enough energy and technology advanced enough, you could just create anything from any matter you have around. That is the course of whole history of means of production development. Technology makes means of production smaller, more effective and cheaper. Of course, we are far from "replicators", yet, but you already could have nearly any plastic part made at home on $100 device.
The only way to do so is through theft, tax evasion and illegal homesteading, or under the table bartering, all of which are already illegal.
Fuck their laws. Right to create anything you want is natural. As a right to exchange goods with others. If some law restrict it, this law is void.
They'd be working their asses off for as long as the sun is up and then be unable to get a reasonable price for their harvest because local distribution is the only option and everyone else around you is growing the same crops.
That does not work like that. It is not XIV century now. You don't need work your ass off all daytime.
Funny, in a modern farm there's a specialized position for all that sort of stuff
Positions. Highly expensive ones. And that people create absolutely nothing. So, those who do real things have to work much more to make some additional money to pay them.
That creates the motivation, without a need to work to survive most people would just be chasing pleasure all their lives.
Most, but not all. Many people will spend free time for doing something useful.
quality is entirely dependent on those who write up and sign off on the specifications.
That is complete bullshit. Quality have nothing to do with specs at all. There is no any quality in things that perfectly fit to specs at sale time but most will inevitably break later. Quality depends on manufacturing culture, not on specs. Manufacturing culture will not allow you put a plastic part instead of metal one on car engine, or use some "flavoring identical to natural" instead of real berries. Both products will perfectly fit specs, but one is a garbage and other is a decent thing.
And how would you expect that to work in industries where even one plant is an endeavor costing hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars to build and equip?
I expect that such giant enterprises will eventually become obsolete, because of technological development.
Do the workers just pool their money together to buy a factory and then fight over who actually gets to run things?
It does not matter who owns a factory. Important thing how many effort of people who run and//or own that factory is dumped into different state and "business" stuff that is not essential for real production.
Those would all still exist though.
But they should not be so expensive.
What is impossible about that goal?
There always will be people who will find a way to get everything they need without begging from authorities.
A bit of a stretch that people being worked to their fullest means everyone starves(and then nobody to work the factories and farms?)
Could you imagine that people could work on farm for fun? Just because they like that way of living. And they don't need to work hard to cover their needs and have some excess for trade. But when a state force them to work hard for food by all that stupid legislations, taxes, licenses and other shit, they have no reason to continue. It is no more fun in that thing, when you have to spent days talking with unpleasant and useless people just to buy some nitrate fertilizer.
The same is with factory and any other business.
So, the attempts of state to force people work for food killing any motivation. Work without motivation is a direct way to fall of productivity, quality and all that things not very important for state. Eventually there will be no decent food or goods to work for. And that's the end.
Russia in my mind "Crime and Punishment", probably has pretty strong concepts of these things, which is what it looks like your laying out. Interesting stuff.
Meanwhile, I find interesting, that West find something exceptional in Dostoyevsky. He is, say, noir novelist, good one, but working in specific genre. Another widely known Russian author - Leo Tolstoy with his "War and peace", it is also kind of very specific, heavy historic-philosophy genre. May be that specificity make them interesting for foreigners. :)
In China, it's like, it's smart to take any advantage you can, as long as it's not written out by the law.
And that is China law. Fact that some law is not written on paper, does not make it void in many cultures. And in many cultures could be opposite thing - it could be inapropriate to do things that is not prohibited by written law. And that is a law too.
I mean it works in the framework of China, because everyone assumes everyone else is going to cheat.
I know that this thing exists in China, but really it is not absolute. Not all chineese abide that law and cheat. But you are right, it will be reasonable take that law into account making deals with chineese.
It depends on meaning you attach to the term "law" - "system of society rules" or "some juridical texts". If you limit the "law" to the latter, you could easily fall into troubles in many places.
Funny, it shows me
Sorry, this content is not available in your region.
:) Not a problem, VPN is easy thing, but interesting, what is in the heads of such site owners? :)
If most people didn't need to work to survive society would grind to a halt and everyone would starve.
Who told you that?
With current level of technologies average man don't need to work more than 2-3 days a week to get everything necessary for a more than a decent level of living. If they stop "work for food" and will work only for themselves and their families, only parasites who do not (and can not) create any goods would starve, not everyone.
I see nothing bad if all that useless lawyers, state officials, stock traders, marketers, elites and other crap would starve and beg ones who could create things for food.
There happening completely opposite process, NWO build a system when people who create goods have to beg for food those bastards who create absolutely nothing. And NWO would not stop by itself if it will not achieve that impossible goal. So, it is stupid idea that "people should work hard to survive" will eventually end with everyone starving, unless NWO will be completely destroyed along with every and each of their agendas and narratives.
BRICs always have been a place for western corps to work around laws they didn't like on their home turf...
Western laws. But in BRICS they obey BRICS laws. I think the western law "you have to hire niggers and gays for sensitive positions" is way worse for corps than "don't criticise Putin" in Russia or "you have to avoid pork and alcohol" in some muslim country.
I've see Chinese "Law".... Fuuuuuck that noise.
Laws and laws system don't have to be a copy of western laws and law system at all. F.e. US law system with so called "case law" looks insane for me, with that stupid approach that if some judge in distant past make some decision on similar case, it is somehow could be an argument in another case, but I don't state that there is no law in US just because I don't like that system or do not understand it.
If you do not understand Chineese law and law system, that does not mean there are no law. There still shit, but it is different from western shit.
Despite all differences between law systems in West and World, there is one thing pretty common. Laws everywhere purposedly made overcomplicated and stated in special insane language, so regular citizen could not use or understand them without expensive assistance of layers, attorneys and other parasites. Everywhere courts always put that laws above common sense, science, truth and other things. With all differences the kernel of all existing law systems are the same.
Also, there is interesting linguistic thing in the English language (and other western languages too). There is no literal transaltion for the term "справедливость" (in Russian, but there is words for similar concept in other non-western languages), that means something like "fair, honest and truthful resolution of some controversy among people". Dictionaries will propose "justice" as a translation, but that is completely wrong, term "справедливость" have nothing common with term "justice", courts, laws or juridical system at all. It is also not an "equity", "fairness", whatever. We have another, different word for "justice" - "правосудие", that is literal translation of term "justice", derived from Rome godness of law Justitia Augusta, some authority of law. West literally lacking one of the basic concepts of social life. There is no word in western languages for that concept, that is above and in no way connected with any justice, laws, courts and other authority stuff. Western understanding of right and good things tied to justice system, and there is just no western word for concept that is above that justice. "Справедливость" could be completely unjust, unlawful, unjuridical and still be the only right and fair resolution. IDK if I can find any understandable example to illustrate that concept, but imagine that Marvin Himeyer didn't kill himself in the end, but kill all that bastards who tried to take his land, all judges, state officials and police who pursue him instead of taking his side. And finally he is alive, good, wealthy landowner and everybody think he did right thing. And all that without any interference of justice system or any athorities at all.
So, it is a big question, if "the law" as something good and fair you talking about, ever existed on the West, since the concept of "справедливость" does not exist in western languages. Real laws have to be build on that concept, not on some "justice" that inevitably implies some special authorities.
Why give a click to the media?
You don't need to. Just copy an article text. Is it some rocket science now? Also, that unauthorised copying ignoring copyright laws will be perfect "They can suck my toe jam, the pencil necked, prawn backed, imbeciles." towards that imbeciles.
Be at least consistent in your declarations and actions. People here love that.
Why not provide a link to the article? Or at least describe details in text? May be his sexual assaul was naming some woke person with incorrect pronouns. You know, that modern times when people can't copy links or consider anything as sexual harrasment or racism.
There's no rule of law in those countries.
That does not mean that there can't be created laws between that countries.
And why do you think that there are no laws or rules in that countries. They exist, but they are different from what you imagine for yourself. And the whole law system is different from what you think. Western juridical system does not mean "law", just like USD does not mean "money" or just like fictional "gender" does not mean that man could become woman.
I'm very skeptical of these narratives.
BRICS could be a plan B for elites. BRICS did not do anything that directly harm elites or their narrative. F.e. IMF and WHO was not declared terrorist organizations, members of WEF is not under investigation, no any tribunals on the local WHO proxies and so on.
So, BRICS could be a failover replacement for West centered NWO if stupid western elite pawns fuck up everything.
American DIY enthusiasts are already biodieseling or producing alcohol fuels, all 100 of them.
Biodiesel - yes, a lot, but you have to seed fields of plants to get necessary oil. Methanol - yes, you could make it from nearly any organic waste, but it is hard to convert methanol into hydrocarbons mix and as a direct fuel it is twice worse in MPG than gasoline and highly corrosive. Ethanol - all mentions I found - in US people buy it for their experiments, not make. From the side of independece it is senseless.
Of course you could run your car nearly on anything that burn, even directly on wood gas, but speaking about free energy I pay more attention on independence, not on the possibility.
Most DIYers I've seen don't zeolite, they just adjust the fuel/air mix, and change any older hoses that aren't ethanol safe.
Burning alcohol is less effective than burning carbonhydrates mix. You already have that pesky oxygen atom in alcohol, it is already partially oxidized (say burned), so you have to burn more to get same energy output.
I don't think legality has much to do with this one.
That's what american alternative fuel enthusiasts told me, when I asked them about using moonshine. I was asking about it, because unlike other stuff, like vegetable oil, methane, hydrogen it does not need expensive equipment and have better output. I tried to get a picture of modern alternative fuel scene and found that strange, west-specific thing.
Most people don't even cook dinner, so why expect them to do something that requires some planning, attention, ventilated space, etc?
That people are not in target audience of free energy thing. As they are not in target audience of alternative DIY fuels. But they could have friends who are into that things.
Also, most people don't know that you can pretty easily tune/modify gasoline engines to run on ethanol.
You don't need to modify a car, you need to modify ethanol (C2H5OH) using zeolite catalist to convert it to a mix of hydrocarbons similar to high-octane gas composition. It is just passing ethanol wapours through heated tube filled with zeolite. It is dehydratation and alkylation combined in one simple process.
Are they all gov controlled op?
Not necessary. Conspiracy is a perfectly valid theory to explain some strange things that happens. If you have a little data on subject, conspiracy can't be thrown out, since non of theories to explain stuff is significantly better. So, if you have only low quality video of strange phenomena, it is absolutely normal to see conspiracy theories around it. As soon, as better data will be available, some theories would be disproved, others will stay valid. If conspiracy will be disproven, then phemomena is out f scope of conspiracy theorists. If conspiracy will be proven, it is not a theory anymore, so that phenomena will be out of scope of conspiracy theorists too.
That is why a lot of low quality materials circulating in conspiracy theorists circles. Because they are essential material conspiracy theorists have to work with.
Let's say, bigfoot theory. All we have is low quality photos and videos. If eventually, bigfoot will be captured and studied, there will be a lot of high quality photos and videos. Biology will get yet another species to put into atlasses and study them. But there will be no any conspiracy theory anymore.
Apart from all that amasing, but never-mass-replicated devices that promises free energy and other stuff, I still don't get why in US people don't make and process moonshine for using as fuel? I know, I know. It is "unlawful" in US. So, if people are so law-abinding, that can't even don't give a fuck to a completely stupid law, how is it supposed that people will be able to use some wonderful free-energy invention?
That's basic thing - if such device will be really invented, and if impossible will finally happen and inventor immidiately publish everything necessary for mass-replication, then, obviously, making and using such devices will be prohibited by authorities. So, how do you suppose to overthrow NWO with mass use free energy devices if even most devoted fans of alternate fuel literally afraid to make moonshine in US?
All that propaganda of hillarious inventions are completely senseless if target audience is not ready to break the laws and don't give a fuck to authorities.
PS: And, as usual, last thing I checked from the pool of wonderful free energy inventions is not working. Again. No way for self-sustaining mode and it eats more than giving out.
I'm really amased why that fires and other suspiciously multiplied accidents was not linked to russian spies or something like that? That could have been fit to whole narrative perfectly and build more sheeple anger towards us to show "population" support for US authorities external politics against russians.
Looks like NWO even out of mental ability to use pretty obvious things as reasons in their propaganda now. Elites degradation skyrocketed. Isn't that connected with re-activation of coal power stations forced by their own stupidest sanctions? Am I occasionaly hit something in my crazy theory?
Thanks for your perspective.
It could be that people are afraid of generating hard feelings if they are being overpaid compared to their friend or coworker. So fear of conflict. And fear of finding out that they are being underpaid.
So, for the unknown reason, there are no capitalism and free open market (labor is commodity too) in corporations?
And here comes very interesting question - if capitalism and free open market is superior over any other system of economic relations organisation, why corporations don't want to use it for labour market inside them?
Still don't get the point of such strange corporations approach with salary secrecy. Even in terms of corporation profits. In Russia, on many HR/job sites and in job sections of professional forums even prohibited to place vacancies without exact minimum and maximum wage. There exist well known average salaries for most jobs, so as employers could plan and estimate expenses and potential employees have full picture of existing opportunities. Employees with better skills nearly always get salary above average, ones with lower skills have a good motivation to gain more expirience and so on. Everything open and predictable. With salary secrecy even simple things looks obscure - how employer could estimate his expenses for new jobs? How to plan expansion of business if you have no idea what salaries new employees will agree for? With random salaries you could easily run out of funds looking for necessary competence, or vice versa, get worst possible employees if you cap the salary. Or it will get completely random result with incompetent dumbfucks with high salary and professionals working for food.
Isn't that approach destroy labour market and cause employees quality falling? Or it is an intentional attempt to force that new "post-whatever" negative selection where higher quality of life received by ones who are not better professionals, but ones who are better in lies, cheek, narcissism and all that stuff?
In latter case I see how modern west could had been degenerated to all that wokeism, ESG and other stuff.
I think they actually do know but they don't want to admit they fucked up.
Those, who got that they was fooled, are in sutuation like they was tricked into publicly eating shit under guise of chocolate. They just can't admit that they ate shit.
I think if we could create a narrative that let them keep their sense of superiority, they would come around.
I don't think that there exist any sane way to find out any superiority in eating shit. Normalizing coprophagy is the only way.
Hardly. Too exact and too specific descriptions. Nostradamus never fall to that plebeian exact and unambiguous details.
May be time traveller?
It is nearly impossible. Even if they will understand that they was fooled, they will never openly admit that they was fooled.
It's like in Chapter 23 of Mark Twain's "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn", when citizens had been fooled with shitty theater play.
“Hold on! Just a word, gentlemen.” They stopped to listen. “We are sold – mighty badly sold. But we don’t want to be the laughing stock of this whole town, I reckon, and never hear the last of this thing as long as we live. NO. What we want is to go out of here quiet, and talk this show up, and sell the REST of the town! Then we’ll all be in the same boat. Ain’t that sensible?” (“You bet it is! – the jedge is right!” everybody sings out.) “All right, then – not a word about any sell. Go along home, and advise everybody to come and see the tragedy.”
PS: Also, do you recall that "great tragedy" action? -
he rolled up the curtain, and the next minute the king come a-prancing out on all fours, naked; and he was painted all over, ringstreaked-and-striped, all sorts of colors, as splendid as a rainbow.
Mark Twain definitely knew something very specific about all that "pride parades" and other modern shit. But how?
JFYI: There exists USSR "Smerch" MLRS with characteristics similar to HIMARS. Smerch allow striking targets "deep" (in quotes, because 100miles is nothing for Russia) into Russian territory in the same way as HIMARS. Ukraine have 80 of them (at least had at 24Feb2022) on duty and each with at least one ammunition pack (to be on duty). Smerch could use a lot of different types of missiles, including guided ones, just like HIMARS. Apart from Smerch, Ukrainians always had a lot of ways to strike (or try to strike) targets "deep" into Russia territory, but did not want, or was not able to do it, you know, that strange staged war and all that stuff. How few HIMARS could change anything now?
I meet that strage obsession with HIMARS everywhere, like it is some marketing campaign for that things that pop up as soon as it was announced. HIMARS never popped up before, since the beginning of war in 2014 until US $40B "assistance".
Special relativity is a psyop too. But definitely not because Einstein was a jew and nazis wanted something.
And I'm not shure about "jewish psyop". It is a psyop of a much higher level, unachievable for jews, jews just not smart enough to do such things. Jews maximum is things like holohoax, whining about antisemitism and robbing people with usury and fiat money system. Fraud, cheating, chutzpa - that's jewish things. Science is not their strong point. And you have to be very good in science to create, push and sustain psyops like special and general relativity. Einshtein was just a dumb pawn of real perpetuators of that psyop.
Who the fuck that "US Treasury" to regulate things they don't have any connection to, any understanding of and any jurisdiction on?
However, really, I don't care about that "stablecoins". They are just stupid and failed attempt to somehow tie independent crypto to silly fiat currencies.
Pelevin wrote only "A naked to the waist man in camouflage pants rushed along the mountains on a fierce white bear." about bear in fresco description. :) All other stuff is up to artist who make that illustration.
This is an illustration to the Victor Pelevin's book "iPhuck".
Specifically for the chunk about "Feat number 12. Putin stealing rainbow from faggots" - an unknown piece of art, fresco, found by robot-author in distant future.
IDK if there exists English translation of that book, but if it is, I highly recommend it to read, as all V. Pelevin books. He is a real genius of modern Russian literature.
Awful (as usual) google translation of that text chunk with my small fixes to preserve sense and meaning:
"Rainbow is one of the highest sacred symbols created by nature itself, from the same category as the sun and the moon ... What is a rainbow? Clear white light, decaying into its components. The genome of the day. An extremely wide and universal code, a whole aircraft carrier of meanings, simultaneously accommodating a huge number of such one-color references as communism, islam, orange revolution, and so on. The question is, by what right is the entire existing color library usurped - and put in accordance with such a narrow and specific field of human experience as deviant recreational sex and identity built on its basis? Is something in homosexual or transgender practices (of course, free from narcotic influences) leads to the experience of the rainbow colors? For the exhaustive color representation of the LGBT experience, the brown area of the spectrum with interspersed pink and red would be enough. Maybe we are talking about two or three shades, but hands away from green and purple! We see that the question of revising the results of symbolic privatization was posed by an unknown artist extremely timely and acutely ... " - the museum caretaker fell silent.
"Why does it stealing, but not robbing?" - asked Mara.
"This is just very accurate. Say “robbing” - and the connotations of violence and enmity will immediately appear. But in this act of cultural redistribution there is no hatred of the LGBT community, here we are only talking about the restoration of symbolic justice. Therefore, “stealing” is more appropriate. Hercules, after all, could also first break the skull of Diomede. But no, he went to hardships, refused himself in a sleep - and steal his horses. And only then, when Diomede, to his misfortune, chased him ..." - the caretaker looked at the fresco again.
“The stealing is more plastic", she said. - "It is ancient, more authentic. There is no bloodthirstiness in it ... it's like Soft Power "
What do you mean in "both their competitors"? You have only 3 providers in Canada? How is that? Does Canada internet providing business so tightly licensed and supervised that only few large companies could do it? Or what's the problem to have a large number of small and medium providers with mutual piring, independent IXs and mutiple private abroad channels?