A Celtic language, Welsh, is the most straightforward language to use to translate Egyptian hieroglyphics:
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=298&part=1&gen=99
This is probably due to the Welsh's relative unchanged ancient nature, preserving much of it's original Aramaic influence. It's a surprisingly controversial topic in academic history circles.
GDL = "Goyim Defense League"
There are authentic and resilient people working at these major banks, everything is going to be fine.
Real science is dead.
Researchers are no longer trying to seek and speak the truth. Scientists no longer believe in the truth. They no longer believe that there is an eternal unchanging reality beyond our human organisation which they have a duty to discover and disseminate. Hence, the vast structures of personnel and resources that constitute modern science are not real science but merely a professional research bureaucracy.
The consequences? Research literature must be assumed to be worthless or misleading and should almost always be ignored.
In practice, this means that nearly all science needs to be demolished (or allowed to collapse) and real science rebuilt outside the professional research structure, from the ground up, by real scientists who regard truth-seeking as an imperative and truthfulness as an iron law.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Not-Even-Trying-Corruption-Science/dp/1908684186
It's a book by Bruce Charleton I highly recommend. He ran one of the last scientific journals (the last?) to have only an editorial board, without an anonymous peer review process. He thought peer review was a farce. In the end, he was pushed out of the journal by the publishers after he published an article that argued AIDS was a false construct, that it's multiple illnesses not caused by a single (HIV) virus. The journal was then over-hauled to include a peer-review process.
You could always go direct to the local farmer and buy some food with cash. Or buy from your neighbor who keeps chickens or a stock, or from some cash only simple market with no phone or wifi - I did it out of disgust when businesses would not take cash. Such markets became more popular during recent times just for such reasons.
To lock you into one area, they had deploy police and barriers - it was expensive, messy, unreliable. I was able to be nice with police to go where I wanted to go, or take a smaller road they had no resources to police. With CBDC it's a mouse click, and done - no way around it unless you bring a picnic and tent. But then CBDC is not the only front of attack - think of the English 15 minute city that tracks your car reg if you leave your area.
not juridical, legislative
but those are the problems. Technically it's a similar system to digital representation of cash now, but all the barriers to info flow to central banks will be removed - a free flow of transaction information. The real goal is to prevent people from possessing physical cash, from their account or from elsewhere, and paying it to someone for something without a record of that transaction - and now VAT paid on that specific transaction - no record of who paid and who received, where, when what etc. Right now, the cash disappears from some account and there is not trace of what happened to it. Smart phone would eliminate that.
For example - I have a certain amount of cash in my possession, obtained from various sources for various reasons - none of it was withdrawn from my own account, all was physically given to me. If they wanted to control how or where or on what I spent it, they couldn't - at least not until they cancel paper money as currency. But they can't cancel it until they introduce it's replacement - which is what they are doing with CBDC.
There are many problems for them with the current system. CBDC will make it easier and more immediate for them. They wont have to request info from any 3rd party about transactions. The real problem in their eyes is they don't know how every cent is spent, by who and on what. They want that info to be automatically a central property. Cash/debit cards (to a lesser extent credit cards) makes that difficult and cumbersome etc.. Before they eliminate cash entirely, they introduce it's replacement, CBDC, let it gain a solid footing over some years, get people to use it more and more often often, and then remove the smelly old cash and debit/credit cards no one uses anymore. CBDC will be smart phone only. CBDC wont be allowed to be exchanged to cash like debit card/credit card is. It's not a representation of cash, it's a new currency entirely.
This Richard Hall video IMO provided some probably accurate examples of how CBDCs will be used to control people:
A couple of good books on this:
The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels by Thomas Gold
Hydrocarbon edited by Vladimir Kutcherov
I found both on Libgen
The take-away here is real men aren't afraid to cry.
Sorry, the "global filter" removed a bunch of your comments and I just noticed it now. Some domains are added to spam filter by website owners, beyond the control of conspiracies mods. They are approved now.
There is an older version of similar database still online but not updated for a long time:
https://deletionpedia.org/en/Special:AllPages?
Most deletions not interesting, just people making a page about themselves for self advertising.
many such cases
It could well be, they removed Jim Fetzer's website. However I don't trust Malone, and the wayback is only part of Archive.org, and that hosts a lot of very controversial stuff - and though they label it "fringe" and "deemphasized" they don't delete it or prevent it from being found in searches. It may be that they remove data or websites under pressure from alphabet agencies, legal threats etc. But then every single website does that these days. I recommend browsing those 2 collections and downloading anything of interest. Good to bookmark good uploaders too.
This guy is a legend
OP is a flat-earther, that's all the reason he needs to believe the Mars rover missions are fake.
Having said that, there have been various, seeming "goofs" down through the years of Rover missions that lead even non-flattie NASA skeptics to think the Mars missions are being faked. If you also believe the Gemini and Apollo missions of the 60's and 70's were largely faked, as was the behemoth "SkyLab", then you have good reason to also be skeptical of NASA's Mars mission claims.
I found this article by Mullins while backing up and organizing downloaded files - it was in a folder of Colemans writings, not Eustice Mullins', ironically enough - I must have downloaded that folder in complete form from somewhere, I really don't remember where from, but I know I didn't compile it.
Really excellent article, thanks.
THEY
Russia?
It would be pretty funny if she convinced everyone she was Madeline, and Kate and Gerry had to play along since they can't say they know Madeline's dead and that they know because they were there when she died and got rid of her body.
Sub? What is this, reddit? Yes, I believe the last election was fraudulent, and it wasn't the only obviously fraudulent POTUS election either. The 2000 Bush win was exactly the same. Are you equally outraged by my "pushing" that narrative? BTW, since when did expressing a opinion become "pushing" or "peddling"? Such hysterical language, lol.