Yep, that was the one.
I feel like going back and looking for all of the old actual libertarian / conservative creators that got deleted during "Covid". They were obviously real enough to be deleted, whereas all of the people that remained (Mark Shouldice, Steven Crowder, etc.) are part of the Daily Wire cabal.
Thanks. Somebody posted a video from him earlier and I was like, "holy crap I haven't seen Harry Vox since his last banning from YouTube", so I went and looked him up and stumbled across this.
Speaking of people that have been banned, have you (or anybody else here) send anything from Vincent James or Richie from Boston lately?
I always remember this interview segment from Fahrenheit 9/11. That was back when Michael Moore produced something of value. 9/11, itself, is what first got me into conspiracy research (aside from the silly stuff I listened to on the art bell coast to coast a.m. radio show as a teenager), but I think we, at least my generation, have to give some credit to Michael Moore, because that documentary got a lot of normies interested in 9/11 conspiracies, since most normies would have never stumbled upon Loose Change or any of the other stuff we all watched.
Yeah I gotcha; I tend to take the absolutist libertarian side of most debates, but then when somebody says "OK, what are you gonna do when they show up with machine guns to capture your town, call the police, which don't exist?", I don't really have a good answer - I feel like my only purpose in such cases to at least provide pushback, in order to pry out the best justification possible. I do agree that the Q posts were getting to the point of spam even if you took individual spammers out of the equation, so I guess this would be the machine gunners capturing my town scenario that I don't have the answer to.
BTW, what is "doom slaying"? I couldn't find anything doing a quick search, aside from references to the old video game.
Unpopular Opinion:
I know I mentioned I like reading/watching some of the FE stuff, but if I was one of the people posting FE stuff, I would have stopped also, because there was so much hate against them during the polling period. That's exactly why I argue against censorship; even the suggestion of censorship has a censoring/chilling effect. Hardly anyone wants to be the asshole posting about shit that's considered verboten.
I also disagreed with censoring all of the Q stuff back in the day even though I was one of the very first people I ever knew who was calling that shit fake (in Nov 2016).
I definitely thought Voat and places like this were flooded with spam from idiots in the Q world, but I thought the idea of censoring the topic was really bad. As what seems like a result of that censorship, we don't hear anybody talking about the fact that there are definitely videos of Biden and Harris that appear to be deep fakes or at least have some CGI component to them, as well as the definite CGI video of Trump after his "Covid" days where he was missing (e.g., I have a screen recording from one such video where I slowed it down and scrubbed back-and-forth to show that Trump's collar was going into his neck, and this was not some kind of video compression anomaly). Anyway, a lot of this stuff was tied in with the "devolution" and Q theories, and, as such, dried up when everybody started calling those people shills and censoring them by topic (vs by behavior). The unexplainable CGI/deep fake videos of Biden, et al, are some of the most disturbing phenomena in modern times. I've wondered, "have the Chinese already taken over the US and are using CGI and collaborators within the government to keep us calm", etc.
OK, now this is a counter argument to the thesis I've been reading about/commenting on over the past day (re: u/GynaNumbaZero). Anytime you see an exercise going on that matches in event that takes place in the same area, that's got FF written all over it, IMHO; Especially if it fits within a larger framework like that of the great reset. And it's not like East Palestine is a big city or something (where this kind of dystopian nonsense would be expected to go on on a regular basis).
I feel like this should be the term, since it basically describes exactly what I'm talking about, but when I looked this up all I found was all kinds of stuff about visual forced perspective, like in movies and photography. For some reason I couldn't find anything related to intel, etc. do you have any links specifically?
Thanks. Even though I haven't come across any responses that immediately ring a bell as to the original phrase/term that I was trying to remember, I've learned quite a bit just from looking up some of these responses.
Actually, I did not even know there was such a term as "malicious compliance", but I did this exact thing back in the day. I worked for a bank call center when I was younger, and we had these really strict guidelines for reversing fees. I hated the bank and thought they were pure evil, so I would always try to find a way to reverse as many fees as I could. anyway, I found this loophole in our very long and very specific/descriptive computerized manual. I started using the loophole exactly to the letter, and I had this manager spying on me who came over to ask me what I was doing, so I showed him in the manual where it said exactly what to do, and the look on his face was priceless. He said something along the lines of "you know exactly what you're doing".
Could be the case. In searching for "reverse honeypot", I just ended up on some Game of Thrones forum, reading this hilarious post about how Bronn from Game of Thrones is secretly, and perhaps unknowingly, bisexual. Apparently "reverse honeypot" is also a literary/cinematic term, meaning something to the effect of "unintentional stories that exist within other stories".
Unrelated, but landing on that forum reminded me of how awesome the Internet used to be when a lot of browsing time was spent on basic, old fashioned style forums. I think old fashioned forums sharpen your mind. You are forced to read a lot more instead of having everything neatly aggregated, which forces you to filter out information and increases reading comprehension. I have definitely become less intelligent in some ways as a result of the decrease in difficulty of acquiring information. We just don't have to do the work anymore, so it's kind of like using a calculator to do every math problem; you're gonna lose your math skills.
Vincent James ran a brand called the red elephants, and he named every unnameable group, and was real AF. He was removed shortly after the fake election of our Chinese CGI president. Richie from Boston was exactly the same kind of call-anyone-out player. I think both of them were 100% real and independent, at least back then.