I know I mentioned I like reading/watching some of the FE stuff, but if I was one of the people posting FE stuff, I would have stopped also, because there was so much hate against them during the polling period. That's exactly why I argue against censorship; even the suggestion of censorship has a censoring/chilling effect. Hardly anyone wants to be the asshole posting about shit that's considered verboten.
I also disagreed with censoring all of the Q stuff back in the day even though I was one of the very first people I ever knew who was calling that shit fake (in Nov 2016).
I definitely thought Voat and places like this were flooded with spam from idiots in the Q world, but I thought the idea of censoring the topic was really bad. As what seems like a result of that censorship, we don't hear anybody talking about the fact that there are definitely videos of Biden and Harris that appear to be deep fakes or at least have some CGI component to them, as well as the definite CGI video of Trump after his "Covid" days where he was missing (e.g., I have a screen recording from one such video where I slowed it down and scrubbed back-and-forth to show that Trump's collar was going into his neck, and this was not some kind of video compression anomaly). Anyway, a lot of this stuff was tied in with the "devolution" and Q theories, and, as such, dried up when everybody started calling those people shills and censoring them by topic (vs by behavior). The unexplainable CGI/deep fake videos of Biden, et al, are some of the most disturbing phenomena in modern times. I've wondered, "have the Chinese already taken over the US and are using CGI and collaborators within the government to keep us calm", etc.
Yeah I gotcha; I tend to take the absolutist libertarian side of most debates, but then when somebody says "OK, what are you gonna do when they show up with machine guns to capture your town, call the police, which don't exist?", I don't really have a good answer - I feel like my only purpose in such cases to at least provide pushback, in order to pry out the best justification possible. I do agree that the Q posts were getting to the point of spam even if you took individual spammers out of the equation, so I guess this would be the machine gunners capturing my town scenario that I don't have the answer to.
BTW, what is "doom slaying"? I couldn't find anything doing a quick search, aside from references to the old video game.
Whatever the case, they seem to have changed tactics.
Which means they weren't committed to the idea of FE and our suspicions that they are merely Detractors intending to Weaken the board with Nonsense are correct.
Unpopular Opinion:
I know I mentioned I like reading/watching some of the FE stuff, but if I was one of the people posting FE stuff, I would have stopped also, because there was so much hate against them during the polling period. That's exactly why I argue against censorship; even the suggestion of censorship has a censoring/chilling effect. Hardly anyone wants to be the asshole posting about shit that's considered verboten.
I also disagreed with censoring all of the Q stuff back in the day even though I was one of the very first people I ever knew who was calling that shit fake (in Nov 2016).
I definitely thought Voat and places like this were flooded with spam from idiots in the Q world, but I thought the idea of censoring the topic was really bad. As what seems like a result of that censorship, we don't hear anybody talking about the fact that there are definitely videos of Biden and Harris that appear to be deep fakes or at least have some CGI component to them, as well as the definite CGI video of Trump after his "Covid" days where he was missing (e.g., I have a screen recording from one such video where I slowed it down and scrubbed back-and-forth to show that Trump's collar was going into his neck, and this was not some kind of video compression anomaly). Anyway, a lot of this stuff was tied in with the "devolution" and Q theories, and, as such, dried up when everybody started calling those people shills and censoring them by topic (vs by behavior). The unexplainable CGI/deep fake videos of Biden, et al, are some of the most disturbing phenomena in modern times. I've wondered, "have the Chinese already taken over the US and are using CGI and collaborators within the government to keep us calm", etc.
Yeah I gotcha; I tend to take the absolutist libertarian side of most debates, but then when somebody says "OK, what are you gonna do when they show up with machine guns to capture your town, call the police, which don't exist?", I don't really have a good answer - I feel like my only purpose in such cases to at least provide pushback, in order to pry out the best justification possible. I do agree that the Q posts were getting to the point of spam even if you took individual spammers out of the equation, so I guess this would be the machine gunners capturing my town scenario that I don't have the answer to.
BTW, what is "doom slaying"? I couldn't find anything doing a quick search, aside from references to the old video game.
Oh, lmfao.
Which means they weren't committed to the idea of FE and our suspicions that they are merely Detractors intending to Weaken the board with Nonsense are correct.
Didn't you quote Pol Pot to defend censorship? Good times!