During the recording of the movie Er ist wieder da, the actor playing Hitler where taken out in a convertible car around Berlin waiving at people, thousands of reactions where secretly recorded and almost everyone smiled, people waved back, many did the Nazi salute, both Germans and foreigners.
Only 3 people where cucked enough to REEEE and give "Hitler" the finger. One of them told him to fuck off. The rest where all happy.
This was 7 years ago, I wonder how many more Germans today are unhappy with the degeneracy and destruction of their country. During Wiemar the Germans where extremely angry at their oppressors. The Kristallnacht was entirely on the German people's own initiative. Hitler and the Gestapo actually went out to save the jews from the people.
When shit hits the fan this time there will be no Führer to calm down the German people.
Search for anything in Europe using your favorite search engine and you'll find most local businesses selling that specific product. The only retarded thing about it is that they haven't stocked up on firewood earlier, they're out in the last minute.
*Had, back in 2008 hard drives where common and kept growing. Had we'd followed that path instead of moving over to SSD's and cloud storage, we'd have 32 or 64TB hard drives as standard today in most devices. Which means the BCH path would have made perfect sense, and the whole chain could have easily been stored on home PC's.
Now SSD's is getting cheaper too and local device storage keeps growing again. Soon on chain storage might and unlimited block size might be feasible again. But I bet before that we'll see way better scaling solutions. Lot's of coins already have better properties then both BTC and BCH.
BTC's only advantage is it's insanely high hash rate making it the most secure coin.
(((Cash))): BAM, your face plastered on camera when withdrawing from ATM and a machine will register it's serial number soon as you buy something in a big box store. You're busted.
(((Bank currency))): BAM, it's a centralized system, they see everything, you even got a GPS tracker in your phone and RFID chips allover the place that register all your movements.
Monero: Nope, no tracking. A view key is required just to view your wallets transaction logs, so unless you're retarded enough to specifically tell the government about what you're up to there's no way they can track you.
Bitcoin: public ledger, same there, transaction history will be public but only hurt you if you're retarded enough to reuse your keys and tell the government about what you're up to. In the opposite case this is a great way to keep track of government spending. Taxes should be paid in Bitcoin for maximum transparency.
Peer-to-peer is the opposite to cloud infrastructure. There's no cloud service in where you have control over your own date, they always control it. With peer-to-peer and end-to-end encryption on the other hand you are in full control, even tho data is stored and processed on others computers too, and on your own.
If you where local only, then who's gonna control so that you don't cheat. Local only means that you're the cloud service if someone actually use and trust your computer.
Fiat currency is the scam of the jews, gold and crypto are real assets, fully transparent, anyone with a functional brain can learn how it works and understand it. Not so much with fiat where (((they))) hide stuff and claim you're too dumb to understand as reason to why they need secrets.
It's not an if, it's a fact, both BTC and BCH are using SHA256 as mining algorithm and the majority of miners abandoned BCH for BTC. Neither is very good when it comes to scaling for their own reasons.
BCH needs to change mining algorithm to become secure and the lightning network needs to go mainstream for BTC to succeed. Until then you might as well avoid them both and use alt coins instead with better solutions to the scaling problem already from the beginning.
The scaling debate is all about block size and if all transactions has to be on chain. BTC vs BCH is the perfect example here, the 1mb block size which is the cause for the high fees (market value by supply vs demand) is not there to say fuck you, it exist in order to keep the size of the blockchain reasonably large.
Originally there was no plan to have a block size limit because back in 2008 most people used desktop PC's with ~1TB hard drives. SSD's was still new and expensive for large size but became preferred because they where faster, this wasn't taken into consideration into the original design of Bitcoin.
First now almost 15 years later, SSD's is finally catching up and Moores law is back for SSD's storage size vs price. Now if you're gonna remove the block size or let it increase gradually you'll have two major problems, low transaction fees makes it cheap to spam the chain and lot's of crap will be stored on chain because there's no mechanism to prevent that.
The second problem is the actual storage space, if nodes are not run by regular people on their home PC's then you'll lose the decentralization. Most people today can store 200GB of data, but if you use BCH's approach and apply the same amount of transactions as processed by Visa or Mastercard we're talking 200TB of data, that means only big cloud providers will have enough storage to keep the whole chain, unless sharding or other technologies is implemented.
Many alt coins have chosen other solutions to keep things decentralized while also having all transactions on chain. BTC and ETH is now switching to parallel chains and off chain transactions which is both cheaper and faster. Because BTC have higher transaction fees, miners choose to mine it, which is a major threat to BCH which is still using the same algorithm.
Any big BTC miner could at any time launch a 51% attack against BCH, Ethereum classic got attacked this way. You'll just have to avoid on chain transactions, but also avoid vulnerable forks. They're dangerous even if they're cheaper to transact. Instead of BCH try Litecoin which uses scrypt, or Monero which offers privacy and a ASIC resistant algorithm, it also uses dynamic block size which is a nice balanced solution.
By now everyone should have figured how (((they))) stole your gold, pay attention folks, don't let them steal your crypto too.
Europe already has bicycles that doesn't suck, no need for fake cars that's essentially just bicycles but with extra steps. 🤡
You sound sarcastic, it's thepiratebay.org. 20 years and the only blockage they managed to instruct their minions in the Swedish government to do is to force Telia, the government owned isp to block the original .se domain. Every other isp still supports it and many refuse to rat you out for downloading torrents.
And yet, where do you get cash without going to an ATM or a bank office, where digital dollars is processed before you get your cash, or your credit card which literally checks towards a centralized server your digital balance and credit score before you're allowed to spend your own money.
Cryptocurrencies may be digital, but still grants you better privacy, better uptime and better transparency. Not to mention the capitalist valuation where supply vs demand sets the value instead of the (((groomer))) tax known as inflation, because the (((groomers))) takes a cut out of your fiat stash, no matter if it's bank money or cash, every time it goes up in value. Then you lose big soon as it drops in value.
Oh you mean like when they took down thepiratebay and all the torrents hosted there? Oh wait, despite the police seizing a whole data center, the centralized website (the most vulnerable part) was back up again in just a few hours, while the torrents where never down at all.
Blockchains are a very simple data structure, few people could get it wrong, even if they tried hard. The dollar and most other western fiat currencies has been digital for decades too, just just haven't realized because the user interface has been slips of paper, checks or plastic cards which to you looks physical, while in the back end everything happens digitally.
Might be escalated to a cold war again, lot's of military activity and constant fearmongering about nukes. Every now and then fake news media will report about deaths, muh foreign army got there and killed this guy and that guy, while in reality they all died from the jab.
CBDC has already been implemented in a bank near you. Agenda 2023 involves a cash ban in order to force everyone into digital.
I am not saying you can’t make money on it, I made 30k, of course the feds taxed the fuck out of it, I took home 15k.
It's about privacy and control over your own assets, even in the digital space, not a get rich quick scheme. And the government will always fuck you over if you have capital gains from any "investment".
I’m saying they (cia) started it to usher in digital currency, no more hard copy cash, means your bank account and assets can be “more easily” frozen (because all your assets are now “online”) cash will be no longer be “good for trade”.
Cash is vulnerable to inflation, they can drain the value out of it, leaving you with nothing but the worthless slips of paper. If you're really into physical assets then it's gold and silver you want.
As for "digital" currency, banks have keep digital logs since the 70's. Doesn't matter if you use a card, your phone, a chip in your hand or even mail or checks, the transaction still happens digitally in the back end. So quit that bullshit, the only thing that's "physical" about fiat currency is the user legacy interface to the end user, such as cash or checks, otherwise it's already digital and outside of your control.
Look at china, they are BURNING cash because muh “covid” (sure okay) and have a social credit system in place TODAY. So for example when you are no longer “allowed” to be “anon” online (not that we REALLY are), and you spread “misinformation”, the US “ministry of truth” can seize your funds, you can’t travel, buy or sell, etc. That’s straight out of “1984” and Revelations lol.
China's "social credit system" is just more honest than what we have here in the west, ever wanted to buy a house? notice how you probably need a loan for that, but you can't get a loan with a bad credit score, and what gives you a bad credit score, that's right, criticizing the government or being a "bad citizen".
When Elon talked about solving the “bot” problem on twitler, he’s talking about YOU, you (we) are the BOT. Everyone will likely have to be verified (eventually). It’s a slow process but it will happen.
It's their goal to end anonymity online, but it can't be done as long as there are alternative software, which there always will be. Problem is, a large portion of normies are gonna stick to the mainstream platforms and let themselves get fucked over into compliance.
If this doesn’t at least cause some “suspicion”, then carry on sir.
Not only is it suspicious, it's a fact that the globalist elite hates us. Now don't pretend that they won't keep fucking up the mainstream platforms, because they will. And we're building alternatives in order to take back control. Internet is a too powerful tool to let it slip straight into the hands of the globalist elite.
Seems like a far fetched theory tho letting people call them out that easily, why? what's their gain from it?
If they have anything to do with it, and I'm not saying that may not be the case. It's morel likely to be similar to the TOR project. TOR was created by the NSA in order to let CIA agents fuck around anonymously on the internet.
Problem is, if only CIA uses TOR anyone who see's a TOR visitor would know it's a CIA agent which ruins the whole point of anonymity. That's why they made TOR open source, and allowed everyone perfect anonymity, because it was the only way for CIA themselves to hide in plain sight.
Pay attention to the open source part, if that wasn't the case then literally nobody would use TOR to get anonymity from the government.
After all, the government needs privacy and digital gold just as much as you do. The government doesn't control the banks and especially not the federal reserve. There's a conflict of interest there.
Because it's stupid, open source code is just as easy to verify as if CIA gave you a recepie for pancakes which literally only contain the four ingredients eggs, milk, flour and salt. While if you make those pancakes it'll be CIA pancakes, that doesn't mean those pancakes will be toxic or fuck you over in anyway.
This is because you made them out of a recepie you could verify. If the CIA however gave you proprietary pancakes, then you could obviously expect some fuckery. Not because it says ICA (acronym of CIA) on the recepie.
In my experience, people who only speak English are among the crappiest at translation from foreign languages to English, no offense, it's just how it is.
This is because you can't just take words out of context from any language and translate them into English and expect a correct translation. Other languages use a completely different set of grammatical rules, words are usually put in a different order and similar.
I've seen Goolag translate many times twist the meaning of a sentence into the complete opposite of what it really means.
Luna is a classic example of get rich quick mentality where someone without knowledge copies a very simple open source software, adds new features then release it before all of the issues are fixed. Which is exactly how it failed.
Seems like they already fixed the problem, all they have to do now is to burn a large portion of the tokes to reduce supply and the exchange rate can recover. The stupid thing to do is if you went into Luna with the expectation to get rich quick, then panic sold for a fraction of a cent.
Seriously, what do you think would happen to the gold exchange rate if someone successfully managed to wrap bricks into gold foil and successfully convince the market that those worthless bricks where high quality solid gold bars. The gold exchange rate would crash just as bad as Luna and someone would have to buy all those bricks and destroy them for the exchange rate to ever have a chance to recover.
20 years of SQL has proven that it sucks for managing digital currency. You're worried about the wrong thing, blockchains are a very simple data structure. Simplicity is the best way to prevent issues and vulnerabilities. They would have easily made their own transaction optimized database solution to take control over your life, if blockchains never existed.
CBDC itself is not gonna give them more control over you than they already have. The biggest threat with CBDC is it's security and distribution which makes it a legit excuse for a cashless society in contrast to the current flawed system which is too vulnerable to be used in cashless hell. CBDC will be released next year, at which point the world goes cashless. That's the real threat.
Market price is always better in theory. You can't blame the medium of exchange asset for (((their))) market manipulation. The alternative is to have (((them))) take all the profit away from you through inflation, soon as the market price goes up. Then you go headfirst into the toilet once the market price goes down, crashes and never recovers. Which will happen to the dollar.
Fiat currency has been digital since the early 70's, and central banks has always had a finger (((and a nose))) in that game. CBDC built on blockchain technology is not the threat you think it is. They will continue to fuck you over just like they did every day for decades. It doesn't give them more control than they already have.
The problem is you still holding fiat currency in the first place, you already gave up control and now you're upset because they upgrade the back end technology, which they will use as an excuse to make countries cashless, because with blockchains that would be slightly less risky in case something happens to the power grid or internet connectivity. You already accepted being a slave to them.
There was no way for him to win, the deep state was already too strong back then. He did give them a massive kick in their balls tho with a spiked set of boots which bought us all many additional decades of freedom before the new world order eventually kicks in. After all, it took (((them))) 100 years to bring Germany back to Wiemar levels.