Bitcoin whatever coin, usher in digital currency, the “mark”, How is this still a “theory”? LOL
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
It's about privacy and control over your own assets, even in the digital space, not a get rich quick scheme. And the government will always fuck you over if you have capital gains from any "investment".
Cash is vulnerable to inflation, they can drain the value out of it, leaving you with nothing but the worthless slips of paper. If you're really into physical assets then it's gold and silver you want.
As for "digital" currency, banks have keep digital logs since the 70's. Doesn't matter if you use a card, your phone, a chip in your hand or even mail or checks, the transaction still happens digitally in the back end. So quit that bullshit, the only thing that's "physical" about fiat currency is the user legacy interface to the end user, such as cash or checks, otherwise it's already digital and outside of your control.
China's "social credit system" is just more honest than what we have here in the west, ever wanted to buy a house? notice how you probably need a loan for that, but you can't get a loan with a bad credit score, and what gives you a bad credit score, that's right, criticizing the government or being a "bad citizen".
It's their goal to end anonymity online, but it can't be done as long as there are alternative software, which there always will be. Problem is, a large portion of normies are gonna stick to the mainstream platforms and let themselves get fucked over into compliance.
Not only is it suspicious, it's a fact that the globalist elite hates us. Now don't pretend that they won't keep fucking up the mainstream platforms, because they will. And we're building alternatives in order to take back control. Internet is a too powerful tool to let it slip straight into the hands of the globalist elite.
eggscellent points, I learn a helluvalot more here than twitler. Thanks!