Bitcoin whatever coin, usher in digital currency, the “mark”, How is this still a “theory”? LOL
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
In my experience, people who only speak English are among the crappiest at translation from foreign languages to English, no offense, it's just how it is.
This is because you can't just take words out of context from any language and translate them into English and expect a correct translation. Other languages use a completely different set of grammatical rules, words are usually put in a different order and similar.
I've seen Goolag translate many times twist the meaning of a sentence into the complete opposite of what it really means.
yeah I get what you’re saying but that’s still what it means, source: japanese dude. lol.
side note english is a horribly watered down language, like the word “believe” doesn’t mean “to think”, it means “to be doing, taking action, action mirroring what you think”.
Seems like a far fetched theory tho letting people call them out that easily, why? what's their gain from it?
If they have anything to do with it, and I'm not saying that may not be the case. It's morel likely to be similar to the TOR project. TOR was created by the NSA in order to let CIA agents fuck around anonymously on the internet.
Problem is, if only CIA uses TOR anyone who see's a TOR visitor would know it's a CIA agent which ruins the whole point of anonymity. That's why they made TOR open source, and allowed everyone perfect anonymity, because it was the only way for CIA themselves to hide in plain sight.
Pay attention to the open source part, if that wasn't the case then literally nobody would use TOR to get anonymity from the government.
After all, the government needs privacy and digital gold just as much as you do. The government doesn't control the banks and especially not the federal reserve. There's a conflict of interest there.