just to explain this to you in simpler terms...
Encryption schemes basically depend on using very large numbers with only 2 prime factors. With classical computers, it's almost impossible to get the 2 prime factors of a very large number (it would take decades/centuries) -- but it's really easy to give you two prime factors and the get the large number. Mathematically:
L= p * q (L = large number; p&q are it's only prime factors)
If I give you L you basically cannot find p&q. If I give you p & q, you can easily find L
BUT... with quantum mechanics, you can very easily find p & q -- that is, you can easily find the prime factors of a large number... IF you can build a quantum computer. The idea behind this is quite simple, but a bit beyond a 'win'-type discussion. 'Verisatium' (youtube) has done a good explanation of "Shor's Algorithm" that explains all of this.
So, basically, if quantum computers are big enough to factor large numbers, then all of encryption is, as said, 'f**ked"
As for P=NP... P=Polynomial; NP=non-Polynomial (polynomial is like 1 +x + x^2 +x^3... etc). P=NP means that Polynomial functions are just as easy to solve as non-polynomial functions. You need to think about this a little bit -- it's not intuitive!!! But, effectively, it means that... as said... factoring a big number into its prime factors (an NP problem) is as simple as factoring a polynomial problem (a P problem). That's exactly what quantum computers can potentially do.
We're a long way from there, though. Personally -- it's a pipe dream.
I think religion has caused far more harm than it has caused good
...this isn't true, though. Rational religions (meaning Christianity, Islam, Hinduism etc -- the religions that name themselves) cause far far far more good than harm. Irrational religions (our current scientism/individualism that doesn't call itself religion) cause far far far more harm than good. This is a really hard point to communicate to westerners, though, because we've lost the sense of what it means to be human. One way to understand this is to consider that places like Cambodia are exceptionally happy (ie: no depression; forget those stupid 'happiness indicies') despite being dirt-poor; the US has massive depression problems, despite being rich.
the left can't insult and hate their way into convincing you to join them
...this is exactly what the left has done -- they invented the term 'racism', which doesn't exist at all, and used it as a bludgeon to destroy western society.
Freedom causes problems because not everyone thinks the same way
...this is also not true. What you're calling 'freedom' leads to problems because the young can be manipulated into being slaves of their base desires, and thus not maturing. Without that media manipulation, everybody really does, largely, think the same way. And the differences can be resolved rationally.
transgender people have a right to dress and act the way they want
...they always did. They were just subject to (a) ridicule; and (b) standard rules of propriety. When I used to work, I could neither wear Speedos... or a skirt (as a man). In a rational society, shemales were free to do whatever they wanted. We just mocked them.
As for the Jews [...] most of them are great people and some are dicks
Here you're just missing the point. Consider, instead, the British, who quite admittedly colonized India. You could imagine an Indian (say, Shashi Tharoor) hating "The British" for colonization, without hating even one single, solitary British citizen. For example, I also hate "the jews", but I know plenty of jews, and I'd even venture to say that not a single one is a 'dick' -- they're all wonderful, and some have even helped me in times of need.
The key power of the jews is that they've got you to reject 'generalities' as a method of think when, in fact, generalization is the only way of thinking. The issue with the jews is what they do, not who they are individually.
As for what they do... well, you're only ready for that when you're ready for that.
When someone is sick, specimens show high concentrations of viral load.
Unfortunately, this isn't true. They've never done the experiments to verify this. They might occasionally lie about having done said experiments. The experiments would be cheap and easy to do... they just don't do them.
However, there is more evidence of contagiousness through person to person contact.
Unfortunately, there is no evidence of person to person contagion, at least not scientifically speaking. Anecdotally... sure. But no experiments have ever established contagion. Again... they'll lie about this, but when you go through the papers, you'll see the lie.
Since you've seen through the holofrost, understanding that viruses are a hoax should be fairly easy. Remember, when you try to talk to a normie about the holofrost, their initial impression is that 'the amazing jewish historians must have an answer to all of your objections...' ... but they don't.
Apropos your 'noteworthy'... I'm not really sure that that's true for (white) men. I think that almost all white men, if they're not (((influenced))) by (((society))) have an incredible combination of creativity/autism. A lot of 'dumb' white men make excellent mechanics or carpenters, because their creativity/autism is turned almost completely away from math/literature which are (((our))) standard measures of intelligence.
I don't think that the blonde girl who ranked #2 would have a chance in hell at being a good mechanic, just as I would have similarly low chances of applying make-up as well as she does.
Yeah, one thing they don't mention is that Lombardy, the place in Italy where the Coronavirus hit first outside China, is the most polluted region of Europe.
Also, when you hear about Swine Flu (2009) or Bird Flu (2023) -- look into the conditions that the animals are kept in. No wonder they're getting sick! They only call them 'flus' because it's a convenient way to keep people frightened of 'viruses'.
I think you need to undergo a 'paradigm shift' before any of this makes sense. Your first paragraph is really the key point -- transmission from sick to healthy individuals has never been proven, despite many attempts. Therefore the 'virus' model is clearly, unambiguously false. And vaccines are simply a religious tool.
Ah -- but your wife got sick! True! That's happened to me, too, and to everybody. So (a) scientific experiment shows no transmission; (b) your lived experience 'indicates' transmission.
Consider: I've found the bodies of two suicides in my life. One was a friend of a friend, she shot herself in her car. I shook my head, called the police and went on with my life. The other was one of my best friend -- I screamed uncontrollably for 6 hours. My voice gave out, but I kept screaming. But, you see, both situations are physically the same -- a dead body. So why the wildly disparate responses? Well -- the emotional connection.
So why did your wife get sick -- because she saw you sick, and her body decided that it was time to get sick. Why didn't she get sick the other times? Better genetics/diet/health/lifestyle (etc) than you. So the idea here is that (a) people get sick because sometimes the body needs to expel something; (b) if your wife sees you, her body might decide that she should do that too. What things need to be expelled... well, toxins, okay, but also -- you're constantly breathing in dust and sand and smoke. It builds up, and needs to be flushed out from time to time.
This explanation isn't really satisfying to modern 'scientific' people. But remember, 'science' is only lauded because physics and chemistry are so very successful. But the scientific model is really only applicable to those and a handful of other disciplines.
The difference between physics and virology is that the physical models by-and-large work for practical purposes (nobody uses 'relativity' to design an airplane, for example). Virology seems to be complete garbage.
I'm starting to suspect that Kuhn is no longer valid! Old-school science could be investigated with two hands an a dream. You or I could do old-school spectroscopy or aerodynamics. Modern science is so entangled with totalitarianism that I don't think it can advance 'one funeral at a time...'
Dark matter/energy don't 'come out of' Einstein's equations. Dark matter is based on observations of how galaxies rotate. Dark energy is based on the red-shift of light from distant galaxies. If you use a 'tired light' hypothesis, then dark energy disappears (although other problems pop up!).
Okay, that makes much more sense. There are tons of other 'good jews', but they all give off a jewish vibe. Sepehr doesn't give off any such vibe. If anything, he seems like an Aryan God, especially if you've seen the pictures of him when he was young.
Thanks for the info.
Einstein was clearly a fraud, but the phenomenology of 'his' equations are okay. The real issue is that he did nothing for Special Relativity (remember, they're the 'Lorenzt' equations), and his General Relativity was basically sketched out by David Hilbert.
Phenomenologically, things are basically okay. Ontologically...well, that's a different question.
Diabetes... okay, we can control it via daily insulin. We could also eliminate it via daily not-drinking Mountain Dew.
Western surgery is a massive win.
Western 'medicine' is an abject failure.
(I suspect you know this)
Keep in mind, though, that the power of the illuminati lies in engineering, not science. An example: I'm fairly certain that a normal aviation company could create a 'stealth bomber', but they would have no reason/financial incentive to do so.
With quantum computing -- people at the universities are struggling to assemble a few dozen qbits, so it would be mind-boggling to think that a few Darpa scientists were 'light years' ahead of them.
More and more I think that the power of the illuminati is simply psychological. They're basically tricking us into killing ourselves.