Einstein was clearly a fraud, but the phenomenology of 'his' equations are okay. The real issue is that he did nothing for Special Relativity (remember, they're the 'Lorenzt' equations), and his General Relativity was basically sketched out by David Hilbert.
Phenomenologically, things are basically okay. Ontologically...well, that's a different question.
They had to invent dark matter to account for 96% of the known universe (all fiction) to keep their retarded THEORY alive. As far as objects falling on earth, out dated Newtonian physics does an OK job at approximating what we observe, though no one claims its accurate.
Eh, relativity is pretty sound
nope. einstain was an inbred jew pedo fraud.
Einstein was clearly a fraud, but the phenomenology of 'his' equations are okay. The real issue is that he did nothing for Special Relativity (remember, they're the 'Lorenzt' equations), and his General Relativity was basically sketched out by David Hilbert.
Phenomenologically, things are basically okay. Ontologically...well, that's a different question.
I debunked relativity myself.
They had to invent dark matter to account for 96% of the known universe (all fiction) to keep their retarded THEORY alive. As far as objects falling on earth, out dated Newtonian physics does an OK job at approximating what we observe, though no one claims its accurate.