How many jews were there before the holofrost?
Anyway, these sort of oblique arguments aren't necessary. All you need to do is look at the engineering of Auschwitz. That should be enough to tell you that the holofrost is laughably absurd. Unless you're not good at thinking about engineering -- not many people are, to be honest.
Brother, why are you like this?
Terrain means -- eating well, avoiding stress and loving the people around you such as, for example, accepting that your grandparents are going to die, as is my father, who's on his deathbed. don't 'do exercise', walk in nature with your friends. Breathe fresh air. Feel the sun on your body. don't use sunscreen, but don't try to get a three month tan in one day. Shake your body, smile at people, play with their children.
What's the actual problem. Your grandparents are old. You're stressed. This too will pass.
Aerotrain
Sir, I would be 100% fine injecting HIV blood at any concentration. I'll also make out with a dying covid granny if she's not too disgusting.
See the problem with that is that we can isolate variables...
Sigh... look, you seem like a clever guy, probably 20-ish? Probably much smarter than your peer group? To be honest, I quite like you, or at least your internet persona.
But you really do need to research a bit more because when you say that "we've isolated the variables...' No, we absolutely have not. It's absolutely shocking how intellectually lazy HIV research is. In fact, Montagnier, who won the Nobel for HIV, basically rejected the theory at the end of his life.
When you say that Transfusion patients caught 'HIV'... uh, true... but they didn't get AIds!!! Ever!!! (well,, except from the AZT treatment)
I know that you previously complained about someone suggesting that you read a 50-page paper. Imma suggest a 500 page book -- Inventing Aids by Peter duesberg (who discovered retro-viruses).
If you read it, you'll realize that all (and I mean ALL) of your assumptions about Aids are completely wrong.
Now -- this doesn't mean that HIV doesn't cause Aids... but it will give you some insight to why people like me, who have more scientific publications than your gramma has years on this earth... reject the HIV hypothesis AFTER looking at the data. Not before... after.
Aerotrain
Sir... you're right. You're being a bit thick here, but your basic assertion, that if one injects HIV-infected blood without being at starvation-level food consumption (or at Amyl Nitrate levels of anal sex)... then one will be perfectly fine. Same thing with 'covid'.
I realize that you're slightly emotional because of the situation with your grandparents, but the issue here isn't that they're sick, but the provenance of their sickness.
You've mentioned in a previous message that if you sent me proof of 'viral transmission', I'd probably just move the goal-posts, so to speak. But no! The problem is that you'll likely (sorry) do a quick google search and come up with, say, Marek's disease... you know, the illness that factory-farmed chickens get, where they're in cages, being shit/pissed on by all of the other chickens.
Or you'll mention aids... you know, the illness where gays take massive amounts of respiratory drugs to relax their anal sphincters so that they can have unlimited anal sex... and then develop respiratory diseases....
You tell me: if you were in a 5ft2 cage, being shit/pissed on by other human beings... do you think you would get sick?
Aerotrain
Sir: The issue here is that a mutation brings in new genetic information. A mutation within a gene will lead to a completely new protein being expressed.
With down syndrome, the extra chromosome doesn't have any new genetic information -- as far as I know... it's just an extra copy of the same information that then impedes gene expression.
It's an interesting topic, though. In French it's usually called Trisomie-21, because it appears on the 21st site. There are also things like Klinefelter's syndrome where there are three copies of the sex-chromosomes -- so chromosomal aberrations are rare but relatively common in large populations.
As far as I know, there are no advantageous extra-chromosome syndromes, unless you really torture the definition of 'advantageous'. (Castor Semenya, for example, wins gold medals in women's running, despite having the testosterone of a boy; and downies almost always seem happy).
Aerotrain
Nice response. Thanks. A few observations:
Genetic mutations are, by and large point mutations, which is why I 'assumed' that. Your example of down syndrome is a bit off the mark -- it's not a mutation of the genome, but a sort of egg-sperm error. The extra chromosome is, I believe, not a new chromosome, but an extra copy of one. I guess this leads to errors in gene expression.
Children aren't copies of their parents because they're getting disparate information from each parent - remember, it's sexual reproduction, not asexual. This is why brothers are often wildly dissimilar.
Your example with the dogs is the standard lore of adaption, and I completely agree with what you said. The point I was making, though, was a bit different, and probably not amenable to an internet post.
Bro, Sometimes common sense absolutely trumps "studies".
Well, at this point I suspect that common sense always trumps studies! But remember that 'common sense' was always -- wear a scarf dear, because you don't want to catch cold.
The idea of contagion is a top-down construct promoted by doctors with no evidence. I know you think that there are tons of papers proving infection.... but there are none. It's astonishing. There are many doctors doing massive literature searches looking for these 'infection studies' -- and they welcome contributions from virus-believers.
Sadly, there are two classes of studies:
-
Clean experiments, like the Rosenau study during the Spanish Flu, that show no sign of infection.
-
Standard virology experiments where they inject 'viruses' into the brains or spines or lungs of monkeys and say -- look, they got sick!
As for your Grandparents -- I hope they're doing well. A discussion of your illness, though, requires you to understand the points above about 'infection'. It's up to you to decide if you want to look into it or not. But if you do, you'll figure out pretty quickly why you're getting sick.
Aerotrain
Jack, I guess rather than gyroscope I should have said accelerometer -- so a device, such as a fiber-optic ring that will tell you your acceleration, both magnitude and direction.
In an airplane that's coasting, there is no acceleration, because gravity is balanced by lift. This is why you can walk in an airplane at cruising altitude. But once you hit turbulence -- well, fasten your seatbelt!
Now, if you're flying east-west on a 'Gleason map' flat-earth, then you have to constantly veer to the left to maintain the circle. You won't notice this effect physically, because it's small. But a sensitive accelerometer will detect it. This is the infamous 'centripetal acceleration' that people struggle with in uni!
Conversely, if you're on a Globe earth, you'll have to constantly veer downwards, otherwise you'd fly off into space. Again, you don't notice this effect, but an accelerometer would detect it.
I hope this clears up what I mean?
Aerotrain
Sir,
Evolution: There are three issues.
- consider a protein of 1000 base-pairs. The sample space of this protein is 4^1000 = 2^2000 = 10^500 (my six-key isn't working, so some of these numbers are slightly off).
Compare this to the number of seconds in the universe -- about 13 billion billion, or 10^19, and then factor in the number of life-forms on the earth -- say 10e30 (there's an upper bound of 10e81, because that's the number of protons in the observable universe).
So, if every life form on the planet mutated every second for the entire age of the universe, you would only have a total of 10e50 mutations -- compare that to the 10e500 possibilities of even a small gene, and you'll see that the probability of evolution happening is... zero.
-
A lot of evolutionary mechanisms really don't make sense. Consider: a dog will flop on the floor if you drop it, whereas a cat will land on its feet. But how do you go from flopping to a graceful landing? Small changes, such as a slightly more dexterous dog, won't change the death rate, which is what evolution is predicated upon.
-
Outside of very vague evidence based on bacteria experiments (at Michigan State U) there is nothing that indicates speciation -- unless one just reads an abstract of a paper without reading the methodology.
(etc -- this sort of discussion is better face-to-face).
Microscopes: We can capture bacteria on a light-microscope, which has a resolving power of about 500nm. Viruses require electron microscopes which (I think) can resolve into angstroms (so 0.1nm).
BUT: no one has ever (EVER) seen a virus in a sample of a sick human. EVER. What they do is mix the sample in with monkey kidney cells and anti-biotics etc, and then they observe cell-break-down, and some of the break-down products look like viruses.
Caveat: The 'tobacco mosaic virus' and 'bacteriophages' are slightly odd. The tobacco virus can be seen but not transmitted via experiment. Bacteriophages can be seen -- and they're awesome -- but they're not really viruses, as such -- ie, they're not transmitted from person to person.
Also, there are no studies that demonstrate the transmissibility of respiratory viruses/hiv/measles/polio etc. None. Again, you have to read the methodology, not the abstract/conclusions.
Aerotrain
Here: Why can I go either East or West from Toronto, and end up in Rome?
On a spherical earth, a gyroscope would detect a semi-constant acceleration towards the ground.
On a flat earth, a gyroscope would detect a semi-constant acceleration to the right or left, but none towards the ground.
What are the results of this experiment -- which is done every day via air-flight? I don't know, but I suspect that it's the former.
It's even worse than that! Some people key in on the wooden doors... but the real point is that there was only one door, so if one person falls down from anxiety or stress... well there's a huge bottleneck -- German engineering!
Michalus: You can see bacteria under a normal (light-based) microscope, but not viruses (except the 'mega-viruses' alluded to in your article). Light has a wavelength of about 500nm, so it can't resolve the (alleged) 200nm corona viruses.
The electron microscope can resolve things on an Angstrom level, so, of course, you would think that people would have observed 'viruses' -- but no! If you have a person dying of HIV or Corona... you cannot see any viruses in their cells -- you need to process their effluvia via monkey kidney cells etc in order to see anything. Odd, huh? The virus is killing things left-right-and -centre... but it can't be seen!
If you want a real trip, read Peter duesberg's book 'Inventing HIV' (or something like that). It reads like a thriller, and I really don't think that a rational person can read it and still think HIV exists.
To spoil the ending: Gays in the 80s took massive amounts of Amyl Nitrates (poppers) in order to relax their anal muscles to facilitate sex. These 'poppers' destroyed their lungs -- this is why 'AIdS' patients died of fungal pneumonia or Kaposi's Sarcoma... two diseases that nobody dies of. Then the 'doctors' introduced AZT, an old chemo drug, that killed a whole bunch more Gays.
It's... insane...
Aerotrain
Michalus: The issue here is that they have never been able to demonstrate transmission of respiratory viruses (I'll remain mute on other types for now). They literally did experiments in the 1920s/30s where they got sick people to talk/cough extensively with healthy people and... none (or few) of the healthy people got sick.
Now, if (respiratory) viruses can't be transmitted, then they don't exist. Period.
But what about those pictures you see??? Well, they have a procedure to observe 'viruses' -- take a sample, put it in with monkey kidney cells and anti-biotics, and then starve this mix of nutrients... and then you observe 'viruses' under an electron microscope.
Okay, fine, so there are repeatable experimental observations... but of what? If transmission can't be observed then... who cares.
And, hey, there's always the strange case of Masha and dasha -- Siamese twins who shared their circulatory system... and one of them got the measles, but the other didn't. But they literally shared an "immune system"!!!
Aerotrain
Oh... sorry, I guess you're very young. Your name is 'Bayesian', so I thought you were familiar with Bayes' Theorem. The explicit statement of Bayes Theorem emerges from considering two statements of 'conditional probability', and then manipulating them -- mathematically -- to generate the explicit statement. I thought that you would know that, given your name.
Your second paragraph: lol!
Your third: Nah, of course I get all of that. And I do eat lots of meat and eggs. I admit that I don't eat viscera because I'm still western!
Fourth: Ah... no vaccine was ever effective at anything useful. You just have to look at the actual numbers. This sounds crazy, but it is, in fact, true. Look what happened, in real time, with Covid. There was no attenuation of death with any vaccine. The best source for this is "dissolving illusions" by Humphries and Bystrianik...
But you'll have to decide whether you trust data or "Vaccines Save Lives" propaganda.
Aerotrain
Bayesian: We admit that bacteria exists -- after all, you can culture them and observe them under light microscopes etc. The real question is whether they are what's making you sick or not.
Consider cholera -- there are many people that have drunk vials of cholera and they... do not get sick. On the other hand, there are African refugees in Burundi, for example, living with dirty water who get sick... and then we find cholera.
Now, assuming that I've not been mislead, this suggests to me that the problem is that the dirty water is making the cholera proliferate. But if the water is clean, then the cholera can't proliferate, so we're unaffected by it.
As an analogy, imagine that I have an open wound on my leg. That's going to attract flies, and if the flies swarm the wound, then it will never heal. So if I can get rid of the flies, I'll see my wound heal much more quickly. This is effectively how we think of antibiotics.
Aerotrain
Sir, jewish expulsions were from Europe to Europe, so they don't really affect the number of jews in the continent.
Yes... but this is misleading, because their processing is distributed among every single city in Germany. The 'bodies piling up' is also misleading. There are two major things in WWII:
1 - the allies bombed civilians/civilian infrastructure in Germany, leading to mass death and all of the bodies that you've seen on film -- their deaths, be they jewish or German, were caused by the allies. This is completely undisputed, but not talked about.
2 - the Germans allegedly had 'death camps'... but none in Germany (this is undisputed, but you have to wade through tons of propaganda to get there). The 'death camps' were largely Auschwitz on the one hand and Treblinka (+Belzec etc) on the other. These were all in Polish territories, and we have no evidence of them, because the Russians who liberated them decided to not take any pictures. They did confiscate the legitimate death records of Auschwitz, and hide them for about 50 years, though.
As for engineering... We have a very clear picture of how the jews say that the holocaust happened. Auschwitz is particularly clear, because we also have the floor plans, and the ruins of the buildings.
One tenet of engineering is to avoid 'bottlenecks'. For example, you don't want a busy six-lane highway to collapse into a one-lane tunnel, right?
Well, Auschwitz is bottleneck after bottleneck! It would be impossible to get through one batch of jews (remember, they 'killed' 2000 at a time) let alone the 500 batches that would get to the 1M number of alleged deaths.
To give you one example... imagine that you fill a 2L coke bottle with 2000 hazelnuts... how would you get them out?!? Okay, you would eventually, but wouldn't it be more efficient to cut the top off of the bottle and pour them out. Right... well the Germans -- the best engineers in the world -- apparently didn't think about that.
If you're interested, I can go through it for you. It's astonishing that such a bald-faced lie is believed. But then, I never questioned it back in the day.
Aerotrain